Revision de la @cochranecollab sobre los estudios de la #Ivermectina Ivermectina para la prevención y el tratamiento de la covid‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/0ZddWWOmS6
@besten_richard @HaHaGentherapie @Hankie30530822 @IGJnl @JonaWalk @CWZNijmegen @hbj0168 @cwitteveen1 hoi @Hankie30530822 ("Wie bepaalt of Ivermectine en HCQ desinformatie is. Jij? (...). De aarde is plat. Niet waar."), wetenschappers bepalen de vorm van de
@ErikGeenen Hier een studie: https://t.co/2nwDZqZiQd
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/hDsyJI54g8
I know I said this recently, but I want to reiterate the point that 2 meta-analyses (including a Cochrane review) have stated that Ivermectin is not effective for COVID. Still, it should be researched, discussed & openly debated. https://t.co/OkhkNTZ
Ah se me olvido una cosa https://t.co/YH0miIxel6 "Los tratamientos tempranos eficaces" Cuales? La hydroxicloroquina? https://t.co/BAGleEUgCk; La ivermectina? https://t.co/cOzHQSkJMM https://t.co/tZET3eT0Xs
@MGoedblick @cwitteveen1 @AnneliesdeZeeuw @hbj0168 @IGJnl @JonaWalk @CWZNijmegen @HaHaGentherapie @BorgerPieter Zie https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6 voor een wetenschappelijke publicatie. Je bent een wappie weigert daardoor de conclusie van deze publicatie te acce
新型コロナウイルス感染症 (COVID-19) の予防および治療に対するイベルメクチン https://t.co/ixFTudrJ5u
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SHurrell1 @garrr_scallywag @jcsutton69 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK ivmmeta is a disinformation site. It is to the…
@MGoedblick @cwitteveen1 @AnneliesdeZeeuw @hbj0168 @IGJnl @JonaWalk @CWZNijmegen @HaHaGentherapie @BorgerPieter Hoi @MGoedblick, ik ben bang dat ik helaas tot de conclusie moet komen dat jij inderdaad een blok voor je kop hebt van hier tot aan Tokio en ter
@MGoedblick @cwitteveen1 @AnneliesdeZeeuw @hbj0168 @IGJnl @JonaWalk @CWZNijmegen @HaHaGentherapie @BorgerPieter "Inmiddels zijn wij 1,5 jaar verder". Nogmaals, eerst lezen en dan pas gaan typen. Bron: https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6 Wappies kun je identificeren d
@MGoedblick @cwitteveen1 @AnneliesdeZeeuw @hbj0168 @IGJnl @JonaWalk @CWZNijmegen @HaHaGentherapie @BorgerPieter Hoi @MGoedblick, in het vervolg eerst lezen en dan pas gaan typen. OK? Of ben je al in MAVO1 gestrand op vakken als biologie en wiskunde? Zi
@ScarletOh @NaheedD Evidence based medicine encourages us to use the “best” evidence. This is a well done SRMA that aligns with my position. https://t.co/qdD08Cfdnf https://t.co/wlacb1HXQv
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SHurrell1 @garrr_scallywag @jcsutton69 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK ivmmeta is a disinformation site. It is to the…
@garrr_scallywag @jcsutton69 @SHurrell1 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK Not a lie at all. ivmmeta is a non-peer-reviewed disinformation site that does not competently assess study quality / risk of bias, and is thus rejected by experts for numerous well-su
@jcsutton69 @garrr_scallywag @SHurrell1 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK Your disingenuous misrepresentations + red herrings are rejected. 🙂 "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside
@jcsutton69 @garrr_scallywag @SHurrell1 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK Your usual paranoid gibbering is noted + rejected. 🥱 https://t.co/Fi0Prf0prC
@garrr_scallywag @jcsutton69 @SHurrell1 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK Not impressed by garbage from ivmmeta, where they're clueless on how to competently assess studies for quality / risk of bias. Let me know when you finally value quality over quantity.
@garrr_scallywag @jcsutton69 @SHurrell1 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK Re: "doesn’t change the conclusion" Conclusion is: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designe
@dnunan79 @KDNyhan @instagram Hi Kate & David, The post that was taken down by Instagram was about #Ivermectin and #COVID19 - you can learn more about this review here: https://t.co/y95c3oFwNR and it is open-access here: https://t.co/jdRm2rt5Zz
@vitolaRadioacti @Deloquenohay Pero sin cherrypicking: https://t.co/4AWJMCn7Fu https://t.co/MYplMma3fI
@jcsutton69 @SHurrell1 @garrr_scallywag @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK Stop trolling using ivmmeta's debunked garbage work "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designe
@SHurrell1 @garrr_scallywag @jcsutton69 @sean_purdy @PierreKory @GidMK ivmmeta is a disinformation site. It is to the COVID-19 pandemic what HIV/AIDS denialist blogs were to the HIV/AIDS pandemic, when they ran around pretending vitamins cured AIDS. http
@connor757 @TheoVon But it's not just the CDC that has reviewed the ivermectin data and found it lacking in efficacy. So if not an intnl govt conspiracy, then what? https://t.co/N4sLKqJNIo https://t.co/T8J4pZJHnd
@Brian39407423 @VolatilityVIX @joerogan See above. Couldn't care less about anyone's opinions on Covid treatments, only the facts. Ivermectin has no evidence, the vaccines have loads. https://t.co/DpY7ss8162
@attitude_stupid @WappieWerpen @MijnMening020 @Maurice90353748 @JonaWalk @MonaKeijzer @AdVerbrugge @De_NieuweWereld @ArtsenC @HaHaGentherapie @GVDBossche hoi @attitude_stupid, Domme typjes (= 'attitude stupid') komen met oud nieuws aan. Slimme typjes ke
@MijnMening020 @WappieWerpen @Maurice90353748 @JonaWalk @MonaKeijzer @AdVerbrugge @De_NieuweWereld @ArtsenC @HaHaGentherapie @GVDBossche @Marc_Veld "Ik weet helemaal niet of het wel of niet werkt en daar houd ik mij ook helemaal niet (meer) mee bezig, want
@MijnMening020 @WappieWerpen @Maurice90353748 @JonaWalk @MonaKeijzer @AdVerbrugge @De_NieuweWereld @ArtsenC @HaHaGentherapie @GVDBossche hoi @MijnMening020 ("Ik geef aan dat ze dit vanaf dag één openlijk hadden moeten doen."), Vanaf dag 1 is er een openli
@WappieWerpen @MijnMening020 @Maurice90353748 @JonaWalk @MonaKeijzer @AdVerbrugge @De_NieuweWereld @ArtsenC @HaHaGentherapie @GVDBossche hoi @MijnMening020, We leven in de EU en je mag van de daken schreeuwen dat Ivermectine werkt tegen corona. Flat-ear
RT @cochranecollab: @godsaveES @instagram A post about the Cochrane Review on #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 was removed…
@FFLPatriot @J_Hurstman @5EANKING @warrenleightTV How about something a little more recent. https://t.co/CehgqanayZ
Ivermectin สำหรับป้องกันและรักษา COVID-19 https://t.co/hNIXRQnczp
@zrgcsl @Dany_Ortizzz @InsNacOtrosDato @DrMauricioGon " Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19" https://t.co/IRjqUStw4C
@TeaTownCowboy @PierreKory Hi Bobby Cowboy! Let me explain one thing. This is just an article from a website. Where is your miraculous double-blind study? Just to help you out, please see these studies with good quality: https://t.co/YaTLRam2Ul https://t.c
RT @Sydney1998N: @Saint__Michel 關於伊維菌素(Ivermectin)防治Covid-19的信息🔗https://t.co/zvMBsaaIu0
@germanhorus @GoldsteinBlum Den Ansatz generell zu verfolgen ist erlaubt, aber es ist halt erwiesenermaßen unwirksam: Quelle 1: https://t.co/bF6Me07B93 Quelle 2: https://t.co/LcGAnsaRD3 Quelle 4: https://t.co/fRqouRvzKY Quelle 5: https://t.co/q1cdmgmGYI Qu
イベルメクチンレポートがあった https://t.co/aROGpE94iS
RT @cochranecollab: @godsaveES @instagram A post about the Cochrane Review on #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 was removed…
@TheRealMatt22 @MattH_4America Here's your fake cure... seriously https://t.co/yOHaZcogU0
@AndrewGilmour11 @SParnis @PettersMichelle The good quality evidence available doesn't show any benefit from ivermectin. https://t.co/fggLkgcm4m https://t.co/Gz2nsJDUCc
RT @cochranecollab: @godsaveES @instagram A post about the Cochrane Review on #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 was removed…
@cochranecollab -post on Ivermectin-review removed by @instagram for "harmfull false information". 🤦♀️ You clearly cannot trust any @Meta analysis.
RT @cochranecollab: @godsaveES @instagram A post about the Cochrane Review on #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 was removed…
@insins31544458 @Christo64260474 Donc Goa et Bénarès. Ou peut on consulter ces études ? J’en suis resté à ça. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @cochranecollab: @godsaveES @instagram A post about the Cochrane Review on #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 was removed…
Then the predictable dabble into EaRlY tReAtMeNtS. Don't expect a nuanced debate on appropriate populations for molnupiravir, its the usual two. Chloroquine (doesn't work) and ivermectin (not yet sufficient evidence of efficacy) https://t.co/oDUgBoElRz htt
RT @PresqueRire: @Pyostacine Si jamais https://t.co/9ZBGlmSXJd
@Brianir64009092 @Sharky_vs_Evil @badboyntx @Sleepnomore5 @MaureenStroud @robjohn133 @laffaminit @freggy_kruger @Michael35885896 @mattletiss7 @GaryLineker No, here is the gold standard Cochrane review showing no efficacy. That is why no=one uses it. https
@godsaveES @instagram A post about the Cochrane Review on #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 was removed by Instagram. You can read the review in full at https://t.co/jdRm2rbv81 and the author interview at https://t.co/y95c3oX8cr https://t.co
@jeremyfolco @FloWer21450796 @nathanpsmad La littérature scientifique. https://t.co/9ACHcn2b0o
Ivermectin as COVID-19 treatment/prevention is uncertain at best. https://t.co/kpLcnC74T9 #Covid_19 #Ivermectin
@Pyostacine Si jamais https://t.co/9ZBGlmSXJd
@FloWer21450796 Ça démontre que ces sites sont sans intérêt et que ce n'est pas comme ça que la recherche fonctionne. Lisez ceux qui savent en faire : https://t.co/9ACHcn2b0o
@FloWer21450796 @ivanrioufol @dupontaignan On ne met pas en évidence l'efficacité d'un traitement avec des témoignages. https://t.co/9ACHcn2b0o
@EKorteweg @Marc_Veld De onderzoeken die aantonen dat ivermectine zou werken zijn of gefraudeert (Elgazar et al. als prominent voorbeeld) of van dusdanig lage kwaliteit dat ze nietszeggend zijn. https://t.co/HZxXNVDxUp Cochrane review heeft dat ook al la
@11GinaMarie11 @jonstewart Okay. "...Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-desi
@ChrisLiMRX3 @Crypteslagram @WR4NYGov Cochrane review is the gold standard. Read for yourself: https://t.co/kKPlNXl4Zi
@Pajaropolitico @GobCDMX Nota tendenciosa Deberían esperar resultado de estudios en Reino Unido, Japón y otros más, antes de cuestionar su uso en la CDMX en momentos críticos durante la pandemia Pasó algo parecido con vacunas Cansino y Sputnik 🤷 Ataques s
@JohnGPettus @AztecCelt @jordanbpeterson "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library" https://t.co/trMZ2L59RR
@pjhlaw Evidence is that it doesn't work https://t.co/T3GhYfHHb3
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy @GidMK When experts do competent risk-of-bias…
@johnjoh27881978 @username05050 @8_27J @DouglasGauger “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19”…https://t.co/WYM1Y33FSR
نقش ایورمکتین در پیشگیری و درمان COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/3AXBkc0Kjz
@PartiesWithTea @dfishcake @RMarsh991 @xmasboyvt @barrymanilow https://t.co/PtfWzHckcd the use of Ivermectin is not recommended by WHO, FDA, Cochrane library. Feel free to take it. For your health I recommend you get vaccinated. Stay safe
@CryptoBadger17 @dotave @IcemanBreaking @sportyschrades @RobbieVanGogh @michaelshermer @HueMatters @joerogan No you don't. Something from https://t.co/IvtRgJdE35 is not equivalent to this https://t.co/cjbc0zdoj8
@HomeroNegro @Agenzia_Ansa Io non so, magari questa tattica di postare link nella speranza che la gente non li sappia leggere funziona con qualcuno...nel dubbio, preferirei analisi più serie del tipo https://t.co/TXSvIUhAhT De gustibus, comunque. Saluti
@hansjepansje Ja, zie oa https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6
@slamgot @AtheeIV @Fraslin Cadeau pour les scientifiques incapables (vous, semble t'il). https://t.co/McXSzK53Tr https://t.co/fw1sTcg5r5
@AxDevelopment @lolilapopa @nadine__morano Non, parce que depuis 18 mois aucune étude fiable ne le confirme. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy @GidMK When experts do competent risk-of-bias assessments for ivermectin studies (unlike ivmmeta), they justifiably reach different conclusions than ivmmeta. https://t.co/tbH2ECBNzE
@SMC_London As over 6 months have passed, is your team surprised there still seems uncertainty about the efficacy of ivermectin? https://t.co/8xw6EFw8vs https://t.co/KED2qykBms
@MiekMiauw @aredhaired @robbynho_golf Ik lees liever wetenschappelijke, peer reviewed, artikelen zoals deze: https://t.co/9C9EqT1Xii Als je het kunt lezen en begrijpen😁
@tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy @GidMK 3. I'm not trying to convince you. Some people are unpersuadable. I'm pointing out your claim of personal bias makes no sense when *experts in the field across the world say th
@pierropipi @TonioDaoust @libe @CheckNewsfr @Bruce_Toussaint @lemondefr @RTLFrance @LEXPRESS @Mediapart @BFMTV Cochrane recommandé par Raoult comme fiable https://t.co/Qapg14smFm
@mike_hunt716912 @thehill Rogan drank his own urine for unknown reasons to me. John McAfee eats feces- for enjoyment not Covid. https://t.co/ywBntQityb
14 studies, 1678 participants. "evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin". Well designed and powered RCTs are needed. #Ivermectin #COVID19 https://t.co/oPr2aloo8p
RT @CochraneLibrary: #Ivermectin: @cochranecollab's most talked about review. ➡️Read the review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J ➡️Interview with…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #Ivermectin: @cochranecollab's most talked about review. ➡️Read the review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J ➡️Interview with…
@bundee77 @Thinkingpowers @GaborKemenesi @speedbumpcomic @jonathanstea @MadScientistPod @CaulfieldTim @skepticalraptor @psychunseen @RuthAnnHarpur @DrLindaMD @DrvanTilburg @CritclThnkr I’ve reviewed the literature on IVM for the prevention and treatment of
@CastorSenior @FCOUILBAULT1 Des études il y en a eu des dizaines. Les études qui étaient le plus favorable se sont révélées frauduleuses.. Les molécules fétiches des complotistes n'ont été adoptées par aucun pays industrialisées. Pour de très bonne raisons
Amigo eres ingeniero… deja esas opiniones a gente de su campo 😉