RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AndrewGillies9 @BreezerGalway @k_b_lvi @thismorning Ivermectin produces results consistent with an intervention that d…
@AndrewGillies9 @BreezerGalway @k_b_lvi @thismorning Ivermectin produces results consistent with an intervention that does not work, unlike SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK h
@roropapa4 @picco_s_ @PlasrR @Nain_Portekoi @ChrisCottonStat Nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes soutenant l'utilisation de l'ivermectine dans le traitement ou la prévention de la COVID-19, mais la base de données probantes est limitée. https://
@Jo_Milne @JujuliaGrace Found your misleading tweet. So your answer to proving remdesivir is lethal is again an unsubstantiated case. A claim that doctors youd never heard of before 2020 are being silenced. And a claim ivermectin is effective. https://t.
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Instead of the garbage-in, garbage-out list of studies conspiracy theorists are passing around claiming that ivermecti…
@MrDiefenbach @sudokuvariante @AviBittMD @JAMANetwork They didn't actually read the paper, since ivermectin working on strongyloides is not the same thing as it working on SARS-CoV-2. These non-expert ivermectin fans can't be trusted to competenty evaluat
@PLarroque Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@dlc_products @deankingman @elonmusk @Independent @rustyrockets Since it seems I have to "spoon feed" the proper documentation to you, here you go. https://t.co/KDhjG4i6j1
@PascalFrog1 @COURTOI96984743 @Emmanuel_microb @PYJeholet Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Allan43310392 @IvermectinSheep @CraigKellyMP Well then there's no point speculating. Fact is, it was retracted (usually that's because of bad data or flaws in the study). Try something reliable maybe? https://t.co/QOljmOiNrS
@alain_berre @Spinnaker13007 @Gioladouille1 “Le dossier” est clos depuis et sans appel: l’IV et l’HQ ne fonctionnent pas et n’ont jamais fonctionné. https://t.co/5SgfnMApZS https://t.co/L6G2zbCKz4
@liza8491 @salspua @elliehoneybeez @DevlinCrose @katzycc @MISSION_is_life here's a Cochrane meta-analysis, which pools results from multiple trials in the literature. authors were a lot gentler in wording than I'd have been. the data is overwhelming. it sh
RT @CochraneLibrary: @Breanna34652334 @CochraneUK It's important to not only know what is effective but also to know what is ineffective.…
@Breanna34652334 @CochraneUK It's important to not only know what is effective but also to know what is ineffective. ➡️#Chloroquine or #hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of #COVID‐19 https://t.co/WKd9XZZGlz ➡️ #Ivermectin for preventing and
@Sabelot06414304 @CochraneUK Agreed! Our Ivermectin review (https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J) is a #LivingSystematicReview - as are many of our #COVID reviews. A updated version is currently being worked on. 🤓 https://t.co/ODzDDCMv9r
@YukikoPool 匿名グループが作ったメタ解析っぽく見えるウェブサイトですね。メタ解析の標準から完全に逸脱しているため、研究者、専門家からはまったく評価されていませんね。 メタ解析ではコクランが評価が高く、ゴールドスタンダードとみなされています ご参考になさってください https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl
RT @tomo_hiko: @YukikoPool @hanakihideaki 匿名グループが作ったメタ解析っぽく見えるウェブサイトですね。メタ解析の標準から完全に逸脱しているため、研究者、専門家からはまったく評価されていませんね。 メタ解析ではコクランが評価が高く、ゴー…
@YukikoPool @hanakihideaki 匿名グループが作ったメタ解析っぽく見えるウェブサイトですね。メタ解析の標準から完全に逸脱しているため、研究者、専門家からはまったく評価されていませんね。 メタ解析ではコクランが評価が高く、ゴールドスタンダードとみなされています ご参考になさってください https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl
@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO You're still not addressing the published evidence that was cited to you. https://t.co/0gRWR0xil8
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO You're dodging, as expected. Again: Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use iv
@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Re: "by one sponsored study" You're still fabricating. Like Luca, you have no integrity. https://t.co/0gRWR0xil8
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO And you still refuse to admit to what the evidence-based consensus shows. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use
@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Re: "You pick one published document" Nope. You really are pathologically dishonest. 5 > 1 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.
@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Again, none of your deluded ranting addresses the published evidence. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co
@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO None of your paranoid ranting addresses the published evidence cited to you. https://t.co/3gWCiztlw8
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Your denialism is noted, pseudoskeptic. https://t.co/d4FGyKoq7k https://t.co/ZX0ASnNO2V https://t.co/zxKHO8xbqI
@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO And it's one of @Luca_Napoletano's fellow non-expert ivermectin conspiracy theorists. 🙄 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8dj
@Artemizia_123 @EMWResearch @PierreKory @jpkiekens @P_McCulloughMD @richardursomd @Covid19Critical @treatearly @GeorgeFareed2 @ChildrensHD @AAPSonline @drbeen_medical @dockaurG @JamesTodaroMD @joerogan Here you go, the comprehensive analysis that proves I
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Not my fault you're still willfully ignoring what better-designed studies show, since you want to troll with a worse study. Like I said, you're a pseudoskeptic troll committed to pretending ivermectin works. 🤷♂️ htt
@Luca_Napoletano @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle "Until evidence that is more robust is available, the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 cannot be justified." https://t.co/2vnDJym4ka ""Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in ot
@Luca_Napoletano @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "I don't think I'm more astute" No, you do. The consensus is clear. You dodge it. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outsi
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Stop being lazy, and go bother to learn the basics of evaluating medical studies, including better + worse study designs. It's not my fault if you lack the integrity to do that: https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/
@Luca_Napoletano @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "I never said ivm worked", No, you did. Re: "I just said It's quite strange this association pops up continuously." It actually doesn't in the higher-quality studies you willfully ignore. Now, s
@Filosofiot Tja ... de conclusies die niet met de werkelijkheid overeen komen... erg goeie! https://t.co/0XJOo4nsLq
@r_y_a_n__t @jere7my @sailorrooscout @TerraChained Re: "What would you call one who is wrong about ivermectin, was embarrassingly wrong about the lab leak and wont update their beliefs, perhaps ever, no matter what the evidence?" @r_y_a_n__t https://t.co
@yvon_l @SeamanMuller @ElizabethDocc Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
イベルメクチンによるCOVID-19の予防および治療効果に関する、Cochrane Reviews. #イベルメクチン #COVID19 #CochraneReviews Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/8iuMbQrC3P
@EdoajoEric Re: "Below from Juan Chamie. This is Belize. [...] Take a wild guess what Belize did mid-Dember." For posterity's sake: You should have never trusted Chamie, nor been in a disinformation group FLCCC for that long. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k htt
@Vivi8317 @RolandLescure @dupontaignan Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@maeleamanche @Robertlagriffo2 @Letoulouzingue Prends la peine de chercher… Traduction : je n’ai rien. J’ai trouvé ça ? J’ai bon ? https://t.co/hHJ0222PKR
@CachePast @c22784753 @GidMK It's an irrelevant conspiracy theory, since other researchers independently reached the same conclusion as well. This is just the same tedious paranoia that many science denialists often resort to, like HIV/AIDS deniers. http
@EdoajoEric @GidMK Re: "he re-analyzed data excluding 2 studies, one fraudulent the other with.... major concerns, and found NO benefit." Something other competent people independently did as well. Better the conspiracy theorists will make stuff up about
@Jm_Porticcio66 @whitedolphin289 @zoomabus Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@maximum_nice @wello_yello @beverleyturner @RobertKennedyJr I said robust studies. https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO
@RickCaughell @PierreKory @healthnerd You're gullible and a lost cause. https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 https://t.co/odlhb0PuFX https://t.co/GgsieZDdK4
@Gilbertow20 @oatila Estes ECRs ser compilados em Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-Analíses, Nível 1 de evidência. (Nível de evidência não quer dizer qualidade do paper e sim do tipo do estudo) Exemplo https://t.co/lfolvmspHO
@LoveroNicolas @Real_Ane_Onyme @dupontmarieest1 Il est établi que l’HCQ est totalement inefficace. En ce qui concerne l’ivermectine, pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne démontre son efficacité. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @josenalencar: Triste tempo em que pesquisadores sérios têm que fazer meta-análises bem feitas de estudos negativos (cujo resultado será…
@JoanieOC @PierreKory @healthnerd 1) It's not my fault non-expert conspiracists don't realize studies often have more than 1 author. 2) An edited video given to you by your fellow paranoid conspiracy theorists does not rebut published evidence. https://t
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Re: "What's wrong with these?" You're trolling in bad faith. No amount of evidence-based explanation will persuade ideologically-motivated denialists like you. You'll simply peddle trash source after trash source.
2020年に始めた北里大 @KitasatoUniv のイベルメクチン治験。遅延を重ねて2021年の10月にようやくデータ収集を終えたものの、解析でさらに遅延。「貧乏所帯」を言い訳にズルズル遅れて2021年度も終わりそう ウイルスも変異で特性がすっかり変わってしまい、もはやそのデータにどんな価値があるのか…
@richardemoe @AesBrah @loofymectin @drbeen_medical Your gibberish orders are noted. All you're doing is willfully ignore meta-analyses of RCTs because the larger pool of data makes your claims on sample size fail. You do this because you have a pre-deter
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "It’s still evidence." Already debunked. Re: "As far as I know" Then you're…
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle @drbeen_medical @_s1q3t3_ Re: "I’m starting to wonder if you have autism." Thanks for confirming your bad faith, @pondera_fm. 🙂 Despite your trolling, your attempted deception failed. You're going to need to find some
@VirginNostrils @CDisco5 @CachePast @GidMK Science isn't decided in a court of law. And personal anecdotes are not evidence a treatment works; published research is. No amount of evidence anyone cites will ever persuade you, given your conspiracist views.
@VirginNostrils @CDisco5 @CachePast @GidMK Your unevidenced anecdotes do not rebut published evidence + don't justify your conspiracy theories about the pharmaceutical industry https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https
@saskiaveluwe @CollakuGentian @muumi_tweets @mholkers @waukema @WHO @TwitterSafety Hoi @CollakuGentian, ken je https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6? Deze link werkt wel en je kunt het artikel ook als PDF downloaden.
@jengleruk @GidMK What makes this even sillier is that other researchers independently researched the same conclusion as Hill, + even the journal that published Lawrie's meta-analysis noted much the same thing. The paranoia about Hill is pathetic. https:
@Bartes73193791 @DoorbraakBe In de database van de Cochrane Library, dé medische referentie voor de betrouwbaarheid van de bestaande onderzoeken op statistische gebied en dus of ze voldoen aan de eisen gesteld in de Evidence Based Medicine: https://t.co/08
@CChaffoy @nicolasberrod Un couple d’amis de 80 ans également mais sans Ivermectine. Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@JohnyMcLane @Zeemeermin6 Je weet dat als iets op Google staat dit niet persé de waarheid is, hè. Ik zou deze even lezen als ik jou was https://t.co/B7NSzjZ36u
@markfmccarty @jason_willz1 @Integritys1 @PierreKory Re: "The authors redid the data with the questionable study removed - their conclusions still stand." No, they don't. https://t.co/sQNCRK7M8i https://t.co/t0M0VknI4n [https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC] https://
@lordbulb001 @PearMad @nickmmark What signal? Do you mean the signal of fraud and debunked publications at high risk of bias? https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https:
@ManuelaEberle1 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP Das weiß ich nicht, aber alle Reviews der vorhandenen Studien kommen zu dem Schluss, dass eine Aussage auf den bestehenden DaZen nicht gemacht werden kann. Vgl z.B. Cochrane: https://t.co/h7i1TgXYXy
@insins31544458 @dulac_dulac2 @michellecureur Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. Factuel. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Saint_William_ @Draakje58 @Brambothefirst @veen_els @hapelensrob @HuisartsWet @aliettejonkers @IGJnl Hoi @Draakje58, wappies leren op de wappieschool dat het verboden is om te accepteren dat Ivermectine niet werkt tegen corona. Ivermectine werkt dus niet
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "What are your thoughts on https://t.co/Y3HO5iIt8O?" At this point, I've stopped taking seriously anyone who cites that trash website as if it's a credible source. It's been debunked so many times that there's no
@CharlieZxi1 I'll take that as your tacit admitting you can't meet the challenge. Campbell is a grifter who misrepresents evidence. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "It’s still evidence." Already debunked. Re: "As far as I know" Then you're incorrect. Meta-analyses of RCTs failed to show causation. So mentioning a poorly-done retrospective cohort study is irrelevant. https
@factode305 @msabouri @Alex_on_A14 @appyman @stephan19573 @BreesAnna @thesassymicrobe @Lizzy_Lang7 @SwaledaleMutton It goes on and on and on and... "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐1
@Alex_on_A14 @msabouri @factode305 @appyman @stephan19573 @BreesAnna @thesassymicrobe @Lizzy_Lang7 @SwaledaleMutton Re: "You have picked a fight you cant handle and you are retreating ..." Yup. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.c