@surinobaasan 東京都医師会長がイベルメクチンを使えと言いました。科学的根拠も推奨もないのに、なぜでしょうね?私も不思議です。 様々な仮説や期待があることは承知していますが、現時点でベストの科学的根拠に照らしイベルメクチンはCovid-19の予防と治療の両方で有効とはいえません。 https://t.co/E7AZQDKw0F
@psonners @cleotibbitts @publicaddress Re: "How about 61 peer-reviewed studies...? This page contains links to each original study, plus a summary and discussion of each one" How many people have you tried to deceive using the disinformation site ivmmeta?
@cleotibbitts @psonners @publicaddress They're trying to deceive you by citing a long-debunked article that contains fraudulent + retracted research, was authored by members of an ivermectin advocacy group, has an "expression of concern" on it, etc. https
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @psonners @GidMK @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 🙄 "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support t…
@psonners @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 Read. The. Published. Literature. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK http
@psonners @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 @GidMK You said ivmmeta does not include retracted it work. Well, it does, so you were wrong. Just admit it, instead of trying to change the topic to save face. Try being honest, instead of a non-expert id
@psonners @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Completely wrong, like Dr. Zamora" Sorry, but you don't merit being taken seriously if you're still citing long-debunked nonsense like ivmmeta as if it's a credible source. https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 htt
@psonners @GidMK @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 🙄 "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKU
@BradCohn @r_y_a_n__t @ilyakayli If you're credulous enough to rely on a disingenuous non-expert like Alexandros, then you're beyond help. And you were wrong when you said ivmmeta does not peddle retracted research. What Lawrie says is irrelevant now. ht
Re: "Campbell approvingly cites a meta-analysis containing fraudulent + retracted research (ex: Elgazzar). https://t.co/VrfPY0N56L Then ignores a collaborator when they point it out." Getting worse + worse for Campbell's source. https://t.co/IvYMmTlFHu
@psonners @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 This **non-peer-reviewed** meta-analysis has been shown to be problematic, to say the least, by @GidMK . Never mind the retracted & fraudulent studies. Also see Cochrane Library systematic review of RCTs. https://
@thereal_truther @Juicifer19 @jason_willz1 @AmerAcadPeds @FloridaAAP @DuckDuckGo Re: "It's over dude. It's failed. Move on. I won't debate things that aren't subjective." Yup. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https
@iguy_f @DurhamRich @KimIversenShow That said, I'm certainly open to further studies if people desire. The scan of available studies I was able to find so far did not look promising, but I'd take any tool in the toolkit if it can be shown to work. https:/
@KimIversenShow @L0_0ney I am very interested in every possible option for combating COVID 19; unfortunately, Ivermectin has been studied rather extensively at this point and been shown to have little to no impact as either preventative or treatment. http
@LogicalKnot @AesBrah @GidMK @drpablocorral @AOlavarria @PierreKory Re: "I want to point folks to the RCT trials, can you provide me some links?" https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k
@1kick1hat1snare @AesBrah @AdamALang @PierreKory Re: "Would you say experience in clinical practice is also a good guide for clinical practice?" "Experience in clinical practice" does not trump RCTs. That's not how medical research works. https://t.co/sZ
@Elduper1 @CharlesPoiret @FLAHAULT Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Tim_Hayward_ @AesBrah @GidMK Re: "is there any risk of the general public seriously misunderstanding" Many members of the public grasp that correlation =/= causation, and to defer to experts on scientific topics they lack expertise in. You should try th
RT @AtomsksSanakan: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 o…
@ai_clayton @Jccalmond2 @rw_christian @jason_willz1 @NoVaxPassInUk That's not how medicine works. Practitioners don't just do whatever a patient requests, when the request contradicts evidence on what treatments work. Medicine is guided by evidence. Iver
@PeterKonings7 @Ar_Chroi @CHRISTO92770326 @ClimateAudit @soncharm People lie, though, or else make mistakes, such as claiming that Cochrane views ivermectin as proven, when the truth is the exact opposite: https://t.co/r3iuCFxuyX
@Paul__Fritz @jappert_chris @CPC_HQ His PhD is in nursing education - a Doctor but not in the field of infectious diseases or epidemiology. Also - nothing credible there. Here is something from a credible source stating there are no studies proving effica
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
@AlbertUgh @AtomsksSanakan @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Read & consider: - Critically appraise the SRMA on IVM - What tool will you
@AlbertUgh @TheSGEM @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Why are you still peddling a long-debunked article that contains fraudulent + retracted
@AlbertUgh @GidMK @TheSGEM @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Re: "Conclusion Ivermectin use was associated with decreased mortality in patients with
@NeiuCHDepWsD59t 唔使驚,藥房有冇伊維菌素買?最有效的藥。 https://t.co/UNc4RlB4Ms
@Jccalmond2 @jason_willz1 @NoVaxPassInUk @ai_clayton Re: "And I suppose that you know more about meta analysis than Dr Tess Lawrie" The one containing fraudulent research, with an "expression of concern" attached to it, debunked in the journal it was publ
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Stop trolling. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k
RT @AlastairMcA30: @ai_clayton There is no compelling evidence that ivermectin treats Covid-19. That is the state of the science. It is the…
@ai_clayton There is no compelling evidence that ivermectin treats Covid-19. That is the state of the science. It is the truth. If you don’t like it, that’s your business, I’m afraid. (Since this review, 2 more large RCTs showing no benefit. See above). h
@JLesgards J’attends vos études. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@jjchamie Don't you ever get tired of trying to deceive people, Chamie? https://t.co/NAkx7DGkrv https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/ykwWY1k3ma
@RMConservative You're a disinformer. https://t.co/NAkx7DGkrv https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/kbGOFhDFEn
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
@PretresseAlexia @Xof3 @2022_alf @lereveildatlas Plutôt qu’1 article, je vs joints l’étude sur les 31 études sur l’ivermectine, vs remarquerez qu’il n’y a aucune conclusion affirmant ou infirmant son efficacité. Tout est à l’arrêt depuis mars 2021. Cocasse
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
@greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell me the name of the author of) the randomized clinical trials?" https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK
@RomainNotRemain @WilliamROsler1 @veski777 @Tom60Chat @EncoreZino @Mediavenir Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne soutient l’utilisation de l’ivermectine dans le traitement ou la prévention de la COVID-19. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@lauri_paavola @n1kul1 @milladeema Ivermektiinistä ei vain ole mitään hyötyä Koronan hoidossa. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@Primal_Wound @mizdefiant Y’all realize you can’t just stop at one study because you like it, right? “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomize
@FFeys @instagram The @CochraneLibrary systematic review on #Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of #COVID19 https://t.co/jdRm2rbv81 More about it here: https://t.co/VmyYFY5GTM
@PekkaPaananen4 @OttoPoikolainen @HuuhtanenPanu Anna kun mä arvaan, "lääkekuuria"? Ivermektiiniä? 😀 Ei ole mitään näyttöä että siitä on mitään hyötyä, Lue nuo tutkimukset. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
RT @boticariors: 💥Riguroso (as usual) análisis de la evidencia disponible sobre #Ivermectin en #Covid_19 por @cochranecollab Resumen: nad…
RT @boticariors: 💥Riguroso (as usual) análisis de la evidencia disponible sobre #Ivermectin en #Covid_19 por @cochranecollab Resumen: nad…
@BorgerPieter @lapisexcoelis @veen_els @pjvanerp @ReusVisser @bpoc2020 @HaHaGentherapie De stand van zaken in eind juli 2021 staat op https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6. Ivermectine werkt niet tegen corona. Pieter Borger kraamt onzin uit.
RT @boticariors: 💥Riguroso (as usual) análisis de la evidencia disponible sobre #Ivermectin en #Covid_19 por @cochranecollab Resumen: nad…
@lauri_paavola @kohudonitsi @TiinaKeskimki @SampoLms Mene nyt helvettiin pelle, Ivermektiinistä ei ole mitään hyötyä Koronan hoidossa, typerys. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
New Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Ivermectin ‘Significantly’ Reduces COVID Infections, Hospitalization, and Mortality Rates https://t.co/1bllXdq3xG January 18, 2022
@GrumpyOldDoc The Bryant et al. ivermectin meta-analysis is basically dead at this point, especially since it's known to contain fraudulent + retracted research. https://t.co/sQNCRK7M8i https://t.co/t0M0VknI4n [https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69] https://t.co/CviHu
@slotball @DafiCrypt @InesvanBokhoven @cwitteveen1 @Alicia1984N @veen_els @ElvisMemphis70 @Meggy_Mae @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep @BagginsMolly @wimaalten Bewijs #2 is van eind juli 2021 en staat op https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Your trick is pretty obvious: You got caught lying on whether the results are still significant. Since you can't admit your fabrication, you move the goalposts to a red herring on whether studies are
RT @VikCBC: @bethanylindsay Dr. Charles Hoffe told patients to buy veterinary ivermectin, college says. READ: @cochranecollab review of #i…
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK @scienceaccount You Googled the term "immunologist" because you didn't know what it means, right? And you still don't know what it means, just like you don't know on herd immunity, ivermectin, infect
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Re: "you cite a failed pandemic curve prediction" Is that your way of finally admitting you were wrong on that (to go along with the myriad of other nonsense you were wrong on)? Re: "potential benef
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Your denialism is noted. 🙂 "the findings still meet statistical significance" https://t.co/TQvUVAspAp https://t.co/MoLGLLIJbc https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD
@dietcheese @PierreKory Haha @dietcheese I remember you. We did this dance twice before, so I only need to repost that thread that rebuts/debunks those IVM hit pieces: https://t.co/UIgtX1yojW
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Re: "I wouldn’t waste your time with Atomsks, he’s a siloed partisan and is unable to view science objectively/admit wrong" ...says the non-expert ivermectin fan. You're so bad at evaluating scienc
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Re: "It’s common sense." Like your "common sense" on ivermectin (which turned out to be wrong)? https://t.co/SODuV7m5Ft Science isn't about the "common sense" views of ideologically-motivated non-ex
@originalfarmski @thisisnothappen @markdodds11 @IainMulady @BreezerGalway @AlBowers1 @factode305 @SarahPi37977904 @DavittJustin @1ohreally @GBNEWS @GVDBossche Not statistically significant; i.e. consistent with a drug that does not work. Stop trolling. h
RT @VikCBC: @bethanylindsay Dr. Charles Hoffe told patients to buy veterinary ivermectin, college says. READ: @cochranecollab review of #i…
@bethanylindsay Dr. Charles Hoffe told patients to buy veterinary ivermectin, college says. READ: @cochranecollab review of #ivermectin They are the gold standard for review of best evidence. https://t.co/qnCwGxLw0c #cdnhealth
@paps_zen @SkunkWorks___ @DocCacahuete @LCP @MartineWonner @olivierveran Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne soutient l’utilisation de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@ScienceAccount1 @pafournier @MartyBritts @dmatic_33 @MartyMakary Using your nonsense for entertainment, + as an object lesson to others later. Nothing I say is for your benefit, given your dishonesty. It's not my fault you're wrong on topic after topic,
@ScienceAccount1 @JHowardBrainMD @DrJBhattacharya @Michigan_Noah Re: "Yet your track-record of predictions is... not great, @ScienceAccount1. 😑" Speaking of which... https://t.co/udijhWtz3f https://t.co/zoPTJ8Wr0q https://t.co/gSXq85eEgR
@ScienceAccount1 @luckyfrak @rial0325 @AdorableDashie @jondutoit Re: "the Ivermectin studies look promising. That’s my next pandemic prediction, that Ivermectin will be the next lab leak theory exposed." 🤣 Your predictions are so bad. https://t.co/N7iZn
@ScienceAccount1 @stephaniemlee @kenbensinger Re: "the findings still meet statistical significance" So you screwed up on ivermectin as well. How telling https://t.co/MoLGLLIJbc https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69 https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD ht
@ioainpc11 Ironically, the article in question debunks the source used for the 70+ studies claim. So you didn't read the source you quote-mined, @ioainpc11, despite acting like you did. https://t.co/lWRdR5Ey4p https://t.co/rcZKlz9rBW
@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers Re: "read every article and study you've sent along" No. For example, when you gave your usual "inconclusive" distortion, you missed the part where it said the source you + FLCCC use for your '70+ studi
@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers Some of your other tricks: 1) Go on about "inconclusive" because you refuse to learn about rejecting the null hypothesis: https://t.co/TcW7kf5GTv 2) Continually evading the fact that experts showed you w
@ioainpc11 Again: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC Contrast with what a dishonest denialist said: https://t.co
@ioainpc11 Re: "maybe doesn't help much or it definitely helps a lot" 🤦♂️ "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC h
@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers I've dealt with denialists long enough to know when they're deflecting to tone trolling to avoid acknowledging their position was wrong. 🙂 You were wrong, @ioainpc11. Whining about people being "unhealthy
@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/QVSic
@ioainpc11 @Davidfa35698009 @ariehkovler Amazing how the non-expert ivermectin conspiracists are still citing long-debunked tripe from FLCCC and ivmmeta, as if that nonsense is credible. https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 https://t.co/odlhb0PuFX https://t.co/sLyR0q
@trozzman79 @yungfraggle @starsleandown @APFactCheck 3/ Recommendations from relevant organizations can be summarized as: Evidence of efficacy for ivermectin is inconclusive. It should not be used outside of clinical trials. https://t.co/QNEv4JmwYZ http
@yoshkapundrick @Sharky_vs_Evil @GidMK Interesting. Still seems like the evidence is against it working. Given the high quality research showing it not working and all. https://t.co/YTWfVt4gPU That said, less inflammation is always good.
@villemin_thomas @canbetheonlyone @UPR_Asselineau @raoult_didier Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@BiliSeijo3 @CongasMaracas @dvdgchrd @azertyijkl123 Non c'est un site créé par des personnes qui ont des intérêts dans l'ivermectine (FLCCC etc) Si vous voulez une liste, utilisez pubmed https://t.co/PUlNr6BGbW Et sinon lisez des bonnes meta https://t.co/