@DoctorGeorge15 @RWMaloneMD An analysis of 20+ IVM studies concluded it to be effective with "moderate certainty." https://t.co/mEgd5MAKaA
Published July 2021. Ivermectin for preventing & treating COVID‐19. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID‐19 infection. Evaluation of ivermectin is continuing in 31 ongoing studies..will update this rev
RT @DoctorMcCoy2021: @electrikmonk @AviFlyGirl @AsbRider_10 This is not disinformation. I posted the information as it is. Ivermectin for h…
@hectic_energy @LeafLee6 Social distance to protect yourself. More data is needed b4 relying on an unproven drug. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐desig
RT @rochampbeaux: @iambackagain21 @GazziMacedo @AubrielleJoynes @medicalaxioms It doesn't treat or prevent covid. It's for worms. https://t…
@2D_Gama @RheaCrossy8 @KalmenBarkin3 @Abhishe32708703 @medicalaxioms And in humans, you know where it matters, there is no clinical effect. https://t.co/tsxyIWdRDf
@iambackagain21 @GazziMacedo @AubrielleJoynes @medicalaxioms It doesn't treat or prevent covid. It's for worms. https://t.co/tsxyIWdRDf
@TommiSpark @DrAndrewHill @PierreKory @BIRDGroupUK That's nice, troll. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https:
RT @DavidEpsteinMD: Misleading information…please use scientific evidence correctly. The @CochraneLibrary reviewed the current pertinent li…
RT @drkomanduri: H/T @teamoncology for finding this Cochrane review of #ivermectin data for #COVID19. “Overall the reliable evidence av…
@marybethpf @maddow "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/e6fLpmXLoc
For all you stalwarts out there claiming ivermectin is a wonder drug. NO sound properly designed study to date has shown benefit. Cochrane data analysis is considered a gold standard. https://t.co/yvPNbxC7dq
Nema razlike nažalost izmedju therapije Ivermectinom i placebom. Naučni podaci, ništa yotube ili noviski članci.
@LibertyUSA47 @trl80 @CarmenStuder https://t.co/CwnzOofhcH Main results: We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standard of care. No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with prove
RT @OPalanca: @mariana057 Here is an article from a reliable scientific publication regarding the effectiveness of Ivermectin in preventing…
@g_taylor82 @Rorrimmirror12 @DougMathewson @Strandjunker Oh, but if happen to want about best evidence you can show to other mindless freaks that ivermectin has no place in convo about covid, his scientific paper is one of easiest you can find to disprove
@Tejaslonewolf21 @westgate63 @ChrisCillizza https://t.co/8qlwT4QMpU Literally an article from the NIH you moronic piece of trash.
@JakesnewT @flygten @llLadyLikell @RightWingCope No. Just no. https://t.co/drPoPmvfeD
Ivermectin, for when you run out of placebos. https://t.co/tMmG193bm8 #Ivermectin #COVID19 #GetVaccinated https://t.co/1IOfHCbtoP
RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト()伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…
@benotti69 @piquet_h @TheTweetOfGod ...also effective against other worm-related infections and diseases, plus several parasite-induced epidermal parasitic skin diseases, as well as insect infestations." Covid is not a parasetic infection. There is no proo
@JekaSolo1 @OriGross2 @pro_activist @GONENB1 סקירת מאמרים https://t.co/DO0nU1pjTp
@RCAIEVS @Dan_passover @GiovaQuez Ivermictina... gli studi, leggili 30 anni che si usa sull'uomo, in tele dicono che è per cavalli https://t.co/Wg3jFtezvH https://t.co/kL6ZpT9uDe https://t.co/xj6QRp5NUP https://t.co/5ykSTnJXGf
@th3hypn0tist @Pionit2 @heliramax @OKuokka Jep. kuten voit lukea, ei toimi, ollenkaan. https://t.co/afvKbd8BpY
@AnttiMkel18 @heliramax @NikoHmlinen10 Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/rhcf5BU5Vu
@Pionit2 @heliramax @OKuokka Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/rhcf5BU5Vu
@jyrkikononen @heliramax Jyrki, sivista itseasi. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@heliramax Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@alfaserv Мне русскоязычные эту дрянь уже впаривали в коментах! 😂 https://t.co/vFJK3iuZCl
|Neuer Beitrag von deare| Solidaritätsaufruf eines Geimpften (Antwort) Ivermectin für die Prävention und Behandlung von COVID‐19 https://t.co/UJXBz6A0LJ https://t.co/Y8xR3BBwl7
@FinalHour @corybernardi Please don’t start rabbiting on about Ivermectin. The evidence isn’t there right now for it making any difference over placebo or nothing… https://t.co/Cmd8wlnvdP
@Dalluin_Von_G @Esban_ C'est faux. https://t.co/RLw6J8o60g
@Charlescapsicum @andrewjgiles Sure, but realistically, the extreme position here would be 'Ivermectin is effective at curbing COVID-19'. Seems like all the evidence used to push is it either pre-prints or low-reliability studies while emerging evidence po
@jason57417428 @clairem80500720 @joe_seeman @WhiteHouse I don't think that's true at all, though. This systematic review seems to suggest that most of the evidence for ivermectin comes in the form of pre-prints (not peer reviewed) or really poor quality st
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/1DmQovZ0Jj
“Texas Abortion Bounty Holder” is a whole lot of things, dumb shit being #1
For anyone wanting to do their own research on ivermectin, systematic reviews are always the best place to start l, and @cochranecollab is one of the most trusted and reliable sources for health research written in both technical and simple terms https://t
@whosyourdandy22 @Maddog4Biden Gemma are you capable of reading? The nih is currently doing trials to use this against covid it clearly states that in the link I provided I can’t make it any easier for you https://t.co/IfSzGbud2q
@Maddog4Biden Since you’re clearly uneducated and spreading misinformation here are the facts: the “horse paste” you refer to is a legitimate human medication actively being tested by the government for treatment https://t.co/IfSzGbud2q
Olha aí @Sen_Alessandro @randolfeap monstrem ai para os colegas...tá difícil.
@Patagonico777 @RealCandaceO SMH. People will buy into anything to suit their political ideas, even if it kills them. However, the NIH did a study of these studies on ivermectin: https://t.co/IZH3qBEogi After tossing the biased studies and those that did n
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology @Covid19Crusher Re: "I do not recall claiming that either" https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69 https://t.co/dcdITWPWG5 https://t.co/RY1MwGOzBN https://t.co/eB6eJ1daGa
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology Re: "Preliminary update with exclusion." Amazing how you keep spamming an article you clearly didn't read, just because you think it says what you want to hear to suit your ideology.
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology Re: "Here is the preliminary update. I should have included this link: " https://t.co/QsmZKRJXS4
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology Stop being credulous. https://t.co/QsmZKRJXS4
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology And you'll still credulously fall for their same garbage analysis. https://t.co/QsmZKRJXS4
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology @Covid19Crusher Like when you cite their first analysis because it said what you wanted to hear, even though you neither read nor understood it. https://t.co/QsmZKRJXS4
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology @Covid19Crusher Already knew about it; you didn't read + understand it. Rejected since the authors were too incompetent to do a good risk of bias assessment to begin with, + *still* h
RT @alimkakeng: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/tj6UENp5Ti
@WamsuttaLives @DrTomFrieden Both the "gold standard" meta-analysis via the Cochrane Library & a large RCT ("Together Clinical Trials") showed Ivermectin to be ineffective for COVID. https://t.co/zBODOie526 https://t.co/8INxTxBzDN
@FurcoatPJs @WakesurfMum @HaroldJ_NEPA @MaxCRoser @TheEconomist Ivermectin looks like fool’s gold. https://t.co/DtdFmT4Y9g https://t.co/dguJvCOAyr And removing a patient from a ventilator who needs one to stay alive is tantamount to murder.
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology @Covid19Crusher Re: "Long after? That paper was published in the July / August issue." A month and half later, you were still relying on that fraudulent + retracted work that Cochran
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology The Cochrane review was sensible enough to exclude Elgazzar, unlike the analysis you credulously peddled. It's almost like the competent experts know how to evaluate evidence better t
@Victim1003 @FredWil32806656 @LetUsUniteHere Don't be so rude. It's an antiparasitic & treats head lice, scabies, river blindness, strongyloidiasis, trichuriasis, ascariasis, and lymphatic filariasis in humans (not viruses). Also used by vets. No ade
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/tj6UENp5Ti
@lanoprimeradama @gracie_ss @santiagobaeza Este es un análisis de los estudios publicados hasta mayo de 2021. Las conclusiones del autor en la imagen. Si lo quieren leer completo, ahí están las ligas https://t.co/yFIv1BkeRP https://t.co/1ZO63lZAlC
@RilesZrk @scrowder The NIH has had to issue retractions on their meta analyses because they were inaccurate and the evidence was weak to begin with. Here's actual scientific research. https://t.co/FqQG0wSzM8
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology Re: "Come on, we have the FDA calling Ivermectin horse medicine." People were taking ivermectin formulations meant for animals like horses. Telling how you liars conveniently leave th
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK @aetiology I don't care what some rando says in the press. I care what the published evidence shows. Address the published evidence (no, falling for the garbage "Covid Crusher" tells you is not
@Rikk_Show @richeggleston @PierreKory Because they are lying for money. https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
@deNutrients @Fynnderella1 @LetUsUniteHere @FredWil32806656 @veryvirology Please provide more information because all I have is a peer-reviewed systematic review of all the studies that have been done on it. https://t.co/YxnTuNBpo6
@AtomsksSanakan @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK I agree with the criticism.
@BIRDGroupUK It does nothing of the sort you lying grifting bunch of abhorrent muppets, yes, that includes you @DrAndrewHill #BloodOnTheirHands https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK Re: "I can call you a defamer just as easily because I don’t see a peer reviewed study and I got an insult when I honestly asked for one." Your deceit is noted. https://t.co/PNvjDgC7MY
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK Cochrane already did a risk of bias assessment, as per Cochrane's own guidelines for their peer-reviewed work (consistent with PRISMA recommendations). It's not my fault you're still a denialist
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill @GidMK Re: "It’s nice that we don’t have to cite studies anymore." Good to know you're also a liar, in addition to being a conspiracist and paranoid pseudoskeptic. https://t.co/BlaXLUVp3l
@DanOfAmerica @EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill You have no clue how to do a risk of bias assessment. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized tr
@LetUsUniteHere @FredWil32806656 @Fynnderella1 @deNutrients @veryvirology Currently, inadequate data for using an antiparasitic https://t.co/YxnTuNBpo6
@DrAndrewHill Hence: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69 https://t.co/t9XZgGxBwl https://t.co/JIRZH2d9i
@FredWil32806656 @LetUsUniteHere So, I looked further & found a systematic review https://t.co/YxnTuNBpo6 Based on this, I'd choose a vax. I had Oxford/AstraZenica.
@dylan50042981 @CNNPolitics Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials. https://t.co/ufd0HWFpZX
@Sarah_Alice_X @jewlry4justice On the other hand, Cochran collaboration is unconvinced https://t.co/ffe1S5TPTX
@NJDetox @therecount I’m all for continued research. There have been more studies on this. The ones using placebos show there is no real difference with patients that take Ivermectin and those that don’t. Best option now, vaccines. https://t.co/OtBsWh2lRT
@Cryptoking172 @chelshillier @NursesCanadian Nope, ivermectin doesn't work for Covid. https://t.co/SCoBZRLK6T
RT @CochraneJapan: イベルメクチンの効果を見たコクランレビューが出版されました。現段階のエビデンスからは、COVID-19患者の入院・外来治療、およびハイリスク曝露後の感染予防に使用されるイベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実と結論付けられました。…
@EdwardRocket1 @LGradaigh @DrAndrewHill Not any more:
@allseeingelbow @SullyBobbi Unfortunately IVM hasn’t been shown to have an effect on SARS-2/Covid …. https://t.co/VwicKvn6jo
@Amabiel1 @se745146534 @SasoDolenc Tukaj mas sistematični pregled od Cohrene Library in trenutni dokazi ne govorijo v prid IVM. https://t.co/kAJxTPZJov
@KatherineLutz18 @scrowder That link was deleted because it was outdated. Here's an updated version. The findings are the same Ivermectin is NOT an effective treatment against COVID-19. This is actual scientific research. https://t.co/FqQG0wSzM8
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…