@MollySam1986 @cbouzy Ivermectin is an anti parasitic with some examples of efficacy in vitro. But limited and highly questionable studies have been fine with regard to it's efficacy against covid. Perhaps this will help you understand the problems. https:
@BoomSardonic @GarbageApe @armando_rojas @ggreenwald here is a rigorous meta analysis of the trials: https://t.co/ojGSxKLXXK
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @GabinJean3: 5/n La méta-analyse de Popp et son équipe est publiée par Cochrane: " Sa conclusion: "Sur la base des preuves actuelles de…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
@humanidee @4est2sea @ggreenwald @maddow @TwitterSafety A couple things concern me about this https://t.co/fQuCTPnHBG site. It doesn't identify who is behind it - no names or institutions, and it was first published online in November 26, 2020, 6 months BE
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @GabinJean3: 5/n La méta-analyse de Popp et son équipe est publiée par Cochrane: " Sa conclusion: "Sur la base des preuves actuelles de…
RT @BreezerGalway: @DavidStevenson1 @DrNicoleC Hey, Dave, stop pushing a drug that has not been proven to be either safe or efficacious. It…
@DavidStevenson1 @ktibus @J_EmpyreanGoals @DrNicoleC Hush fool, stop putting others in harms way. https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
@DavidStevenson1 @DrNicoleC Hey, Dave, stop pushing a drug that has not been proven to be either safe or efficacious. It endangers those who choose to believe this nonsense #BloodOnTheirHands https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
@GidMK @cliftonaduncan and @GidMK: Guys, we are not going to change minds without listening to them! We have to step back, look at the evidence presented, and help folks interpret the data from an overall picture pov. Recent interaction I had on the IVM to
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
@kacybrn @Strikenstein Don't work https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
@Jimmy_Jeans @TheEconomist What a bunch of crap! 🙄"Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/IACuBXuLs2
@waynemystir @ashleymayer I did zero of those things. The Ivermectin studies are clear and the consensus is exactly as I described it: https://t.co/ZKQxSrZDZ5
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't co…
Received dozens of (hate-mail-ish) notes from #ivermectin fans. ALL say same stuff. Reality: - NO, FLCCCA spin isn't convincing (anecdotes & cherry picking) - NO, we are not paid off to ignore "real science" - YES, we consider all the science (like h
@cupcakeslammer @SGalvin2 @Stevens18Clint @JewhadiTM You didn't even addressed this twiitt So yeah you are protecting now https://t.co/45W7VicDxa
@HarridanLib @PierreKory @joerogan @ggreenwald https://t.co/4X5vPLyhz4 https://t.co/EelGedeB8L https://t.co/BL6MiBnl6b Last a collection of 113 studies linked together. Btw I’m happy you have some scientific literacy but you fallacy was assuming I did
@Cflmarth @coffeehack2 @kayleighmcenany @RollingStone Oh look: another one... https://t.co/6CEpRNMPrC
@cupcakeslammer @SGalvin2 @Stevens18Clint @JewhadiTM This systematic review says otherwise https://t.co/oWJqUPfYSK And this metanalisis says otherwise too https://t.co/bL8Yc114UK
@4Eddy @Stevens18Clint @JewhadiTM 35 years of safety record, at the dose it works against parasites, not at the dose that it works as antiviral. No there is no corporate resistance, it's medical resistance to use a drug that has been proven not to work at
@Jackson93111675 @maddow Not sure your reference on those infographics but here is the link to the meta analysis. https://t.co/aW5jzPCnNd
RT @TicTocOmmm: @dusty_dweller @RebellionBear @craigschinck @ByronYork I wonder if there are any actual studies with ivermectin and COVID s…
@Marta70928744 entwickelt werden sollten. Zu Ivermectin: https://t.co/8ytAroRhNI Das Medikament wurde in keiner Studie mit klinisch erprobten Behandlungsformen verglichen.
@Transigence @CarolynRodham @JewhadiTM No it does not work https://t.co/bL8Yc114UK
@MrQuantity @AThankless @jml3439 Not for C19 though Benji https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
RT @GabinJean3: 5/n La méta-analyse de Popp et son équipe est publiée par Cochrane: " Sa conclusion: "Sur la base des preuves actuelles de…
@Blondin93454703 @vacceen Bien sûr, mais des études ont été menées et d’autres sont en cours. Leur conclusion à ce jour c’est qu’il n’y a pas de preuves que ça marche. https://t.co/vZpW6Aekqh
@OLight78 @Drmartyufml @philippeherlin Eh oui : peut être ou peut être pas💁🏻♂️. C’est pourquoi on décide pas d’un traitement « à propos d’un cas ». On regroupe plein de gens, on tire au sort pour éviter les biais (genre guérison spontanée). Et on regarde
@galesuos أدوية اثبت فعاليتها : favipiravir dexamethasone remdesivir دواء IVR ليس الأول التي يوجد عليه خلاف ، تسويق أي الدواء كعلاج فعال و أمن للجميع يحتاج دراسات مكثفة و دقيقة. https://t.co/NdeICChLs2
5/n La méta-analyse de Popp et son équipe est publiée par Cochrane: " Sa conclusion: "Sur la base des preuves actuelles de certitude très faible à faible, nous sommes incertains quant à l'efficacité et la sécurité de l'ivermectine" https://t.co/AK3iCWsWdO
@DaveMcguire007 @BorisJohnson Now thats off point. Perhaps because there isnt significant evidence to support its use? And several trials being investigated for fraud. https://t.co/EVLZ1lqbul
@Lecatalan08_2 @DIVIZIO1 C'est suffisant pour impressionner les gogos. Les autres vont regarder autre chose que des fausses méta-analyses. https://t.co/ELuQBGuniW https://t.co/y09v9wVljo
@DaveMcguire007 @BorisJohnson 1. https://t.co/EVLZ1lqbul 2. What do you know about midazolam? That its used in palliative care? And as a sedative on ICU? You realise lots of people were dying and needing to be ventilated right? 3. https://t.co/IqgSjgSHpJ e
@GeneviveCaron18 Sur la base des preuves actuelles de très faible à faible certitude, nous ne sommes pas certains de l'efficacité et de l'innocuité de l'ivermectine utilisée pour traiter ou prévenir le COVID-19. Les études terminées sont de petite taille
@WhoIsSabala @adamoverberg No it doesn’t the literature is littered with rubbish studies and fraud. The two latest meta-analyses, including a chochrane review, show no discernible effect of ivermectin on covid-19. https://t.co/DhkM06sX8u https://t.co/i1B
@darin54182428 @sally_ann_cole @JanNWolfe Because the studies into it have either been inconclusive or biased. A drug that is not thoroughly tested can cause harm. https://t.co/G7571dn16u
@pp2019XYZ @VF25F4 コクランレビューのメタアナが参考になります。https://t.co/hk1PVcgd7J
@Christi66838162 @80Jeepcj5 @PeterHotez Next time? I don’t plan on their being a first time and no one should want that. Also I did prove it doesn’t work but you ignored it
@RealSalvakasi @losmarble @CaraSantaMaria @nytimes Hello, here is a Cochrane review of 14 of the highest quality studies into Ivermectin for use with Covid 19. You've got to remember that just because a study looks good initially doesn't mean it is :-) sta
RT @drkomanduri: H/T @teamoncology for finding this Cochrane review of #ivermectin data for #COVID19. “Overall the reliable evidence av…
RT @LeslawDietrich: @RWMaloneMD The reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19…
No it is big pharma wanting the docs to use.
@dusty_dweller @RebellionBear @craigschinck @ByronYork I wonder if there are any actual studies with ivermectin and COVID specifically??? Hmmm.... https://t.co/MG4lR1vdBR
@afifthofaugust If the above link isn't working for anyone else try this one: https://t.co/um2xPOHGp3
@DavidBCollum @joerogan @johntg83 Meta study disagrees, as of now. Find it here, with plain language explanation towards the bottom of the article: https://t.co/PjAPm6LxRY
@DrewHolden360 @DrEricDing Looks like fake news from the CCP. Ivermectin: https://t.co/0JjPpLAHjv
@FoxyTower @helmedon @maddow " Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/IjLXiYOMYa
@Dark_Matters_11 @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @DeNovo_Fatima @shazmamithani @StanKutcher @GidMK @cochranecollab Are you asserting that the authors of the @cochranecollab SRMA were scammed by the peer review process and if so what is your evidence? Do you
@halfcaperfarm @Jco971 @DanRather https://t.co/dBi1ztOgoi Ultimately, inconclusive….
@JoanieOC @bruce_y_lee @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @DeNovo_Fatima @shazmamithani @StanKutcher @GidMK @cochranecollab Here are the fCOI reported by the authors of the @cochranecollab SRMA on IVM https://t.co/iqtYX47tCY https://t.co/c9rti2UkG9
@ckorolov @ggreenwald @stevanzetti Ivermectin does not have clinical benefit for covid. It is for worms. Here is the cochrane review. If there is any effect it is marginal and has not been detected in reliable peer reviewed randomized studies. https://t.co
Knuckleheads who go around saying the word "science" can't be bothered to do research. Very sad. https://t.co/0JjPpLAHjv
@IkNet Ook hier is gewoon een Cohrane over. Het werkt niet. https://t.co/O8mcsKEmvQ
@MartinTruther @carolinecstark Here is one article. Note that they state that there were no studies comparing ivm v. [something that works]. Only v. nothing/standard of care. They were unable to determine efficacy. https://t.co/14N6qC76I6
@danny086756661 @BiotechObserver @PeterHotez @ScottGottliebMD @AmaraCNN And ivermectin does not work https://t.co/Vt7hmxezde
RT @drkomanduri: H/T @teamoncology for finding this Cochrane review of #ivermectin data for #COVID19. “Overall the reliable evidence av…
RT @LeslawDietrich: @RWMaloneMD The reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19…
@atensnut Maybe ivermectin helps a very small number of people at a very specific stage of the disease. If it had a big effect on lots of people, those overworked ICU docs would jump on it so they could get a day off. The iverm studies just don't show much
@FaithandGlory11 @Connectwith @dallasnews Ivermectin is useful at treating parasitic infection in humans and in animals. Got scabies, head lice, or tapeworms? Ivermectin may be just the thing. Against Covid, it’s use still needs more study, but doesn’t loo
@PqGregor @tagesschau https://t.co/Tp0k0HTLvL Sie sind echt nicht der Schnellste oder?
@saffronasha @ggreenwald @stevanzetti A responsible person would share the latest cochrane systematic review (highest quality analysis of medical literature) analyzing the available evidence of ivermectin on covid19 instead of pretending that medical effic
@ckorolov @ggreenwald @stevanzetti There is no reliable evidence that ivermectin has any effect on covid. There MAY be a MARGINAL effect shown in the 30-some odd studies that are still being conducted, but the available evidence does not show that ivermect
@netpoette @DelthiaRicks Scientists are working on it, but physicians shouldn't be prescribing it (except in clinical trials). "…evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed ran
RT @LeslawDietrich: @RWMaloneMD The reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19…
I’ll just leave this here. https://t.co/3YBlPHCsiI
get vaccinated, keep your distance, wash your hands, and use sanitizer. https://t.co/dKWvJTYTkV https://t.co/tb2KO8DiAi https://t.co/ZWWxkFt37t https://t.co/MA9eXL959e https://t.co/qYYD1Fjmez
@ggreenwald @stevanzetti Why are you using "politifact" to try to understand medicine? It's a very strange method. https://t.co/M0gee72ulE
@Dark_Matters_11 @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @DeNovo_Fatima @shazmamithani @StanKutcher @GidMK Have you performed systematic review and meta-analysis (SMRA) following the PRISMA guidelines and published this is a peer reviewed journal to support your claim
@lance2290 @PierreKory Here is the latest Cochrane review on efficacy: https://t.co/cFBQroISOL Here is the reasoning behind the increase in variants: https://t.co/RC5aVDPpUh
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
I got it: Called "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19" - not particularly clear or accessibly written. This is what we are up against according to John Hopkins sources right now: https://t.co/Hgzu58ZuOt https://t.co/kUpWYk6WKB