@DaniVal15447371 @JoseMJG Eso podría ser como complemento, no lo veo como alternativa. Tampoco hay muchas evidencias científicas sobre el uso de IVM, de momento. https://t.co/DCIfpuAybu
@JeanNey98266675 @BarouniaA @NPolony @JeanYvesCAPO Les études chez l’homme existent. Elles ne montrent rien à ce jour 👇. Et comme l’a dit @BarouniaA le Japon suit les recommandations de l’OMS : pas d’ivermectine en traitement https://t.co/EiwbD7qMmW
@rekatz Here’s a systematic review of 14 randomized controlled trials proving it doesn’t work https://t.co/IvbzLKNp1h I’m sure @mpanhwar92 can provide much more evidence
@RinnosukeETQW @Harden_TF_Up @oufenix @kfor It's true that there are plenty of studies. They just happen to not be very good. https://t.co/ccDPmJcjv3
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/NwJn2KWSn5
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/3QWI1Z3iFI
@fueksy @RollingStone “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials” https://t.co/kKG3XHTuAC
@CancerIntegral @Shine_McShine @cochranecollab https://t.co/dmhIetKMtj Y antes que este señor @CancerIntegral charlatán.. empiece con que si esbirros de las farmacéuticas... @cochranecollab sobra decir de ellos.. el criticismo médico ante mamografias y
@TomeZen @ag_trader @biancoresearch Cochrane produce gold-standard medical research overviews. They note that many studies in Ivermectin are low quality. https://t.co/kxBYTT8A70
@antonio_vgc Entonces no es evidencia. Muchos negacionistas argumentan que las vacunas no son necesarias porque existe "cura" para el covid, con la ivermectina. Sin embargo un análisis de todos los estudios dicen que no hay evidencias para afirmar que pre
RT @Caethan13: P.s. Die Inszenierung als „Pferde-Medikament“ ist zugegebenermaßen lustig aber medizinisch nicht korrekt, da es sehr wohl in…
@Cami_GP0 Si pretendes que comparemos seguridad, primero tendrías que demostrar que la ivermectina es eficaz ante el covid19, cosa que a día de hoy... https://t.co/wClbJ30nqq
RT @Caethan13: P.s. Die Inszenierung als „Pferde-Medikament“ ist zugegebenermaßen lustig aber medizinisch nicht korrekt, da es sehr wohl in…
@RayMoore_3 @anbol @Gear68116422 @IMAO_ How do you know, scientists who know a lot more about this than any of us don’t even fuckin know if it’s worth taking or not. https://t.co/fptm15JoCl
@prasadhemant @twoyboy @MichelleGHunder @DoctorKarl I think you might be missing the more recent Cochrane review also on Pubmed. All that it appearing on Pubmed means that the Journal is listed, not that NIH agrees with the findings. https://t.co/wtq5HG8k4
RT @Caethan13: P.s. Die Inszenierung als „Pferde-Medikament“ ist zugegebenermaßen lustig aber medizinisch nicht korrekt, da es sehr wohl in…
RT @Caethan13: P.s. Die Inszenierung als „Pferde-Medikament“ ist zugegebenermaßen lustig aber medizinisch nicht korrekt, da es sehr wohl in…
RT @scherpstvdsnede: @sabreur @Gert_van_Dijk Nee echt niet. Maar wordt wel onderzoek naar gedaan bij mensen. Maar vooralsnog in de laatste…
RT @scherpstvdsnede: @sabreur @Gert_van_Dijk Nee echt niet. Maar wordt wel onderzoek naar gedaan bij mensen. Maar vooralsnog in de laatste…
RT @Caethan13: P.s. Die Inszenierung als „Pferde-Medikament“ ist zugegebenermaßen lustig aber medizinisch nicht korrekt, da es sehr wohl in…
P.s. Die Inszenierung als „Pferde-Medikament“ ist zugegebenermaßen lustig aber medizinisch nicht korrekt, da es sehr wohl in der Humanmedizin angewendet und eben auch für COVID erprobt wurde. Bislang aber eben ohne Benefit. https://t.co/lRmqnbCHxR https:
RT @NESARA__GESARA: Ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of new coronavirus infections (COVID-19) --Popp, M --2021 | Cochrane Librar…
@Gert_van_Dijk Dit polariseren helpt niet echt denk ik. Het gewoon een geneesmiddel dat ook bij mensen gebruikt wordt. En er wordt veel onderzoek naar gedaan, vaak heel slecht en dat wordt dan weer teruggetrokken. Maar bottom line, tot nu toe geen bewijs d
@sabreur @Gert_van_Dijk Nee echt niet. Maar wordt wel onderzoek naar gedaan bij mensen. Maar vooralsnog in de laatste Cohrane review (hoogste niveau van bewijs in de medische wetenschap): GEEN EFFECT. https://t.co/O8mcsKEmvQ
RT @elprocermorazan: Ese de @HoyMismoTSI que promueve el uso de la Ivermectina, debe de leer esto. https://t.co/EBYgwSGG2M
Ese de @HoyMismoTSI que promueve el uso de la Ivermectina, debe de leer esto.
@HasReber @accnetwork @HokiesFB In fact, here is one study which looked at ALL of the other studies, posted in July 2021. https://t.co/kOYMTe1Lji
Ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of new coronavirus infections (COVID-19) --Popp, M --2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/HWmTmxYT0l
@OtherBecky @arthur_affect @LemieuxLGM What's with all these medical journals saying otherwise then? https://t.co/LqMHjD9BNX
RT @CassandraHeale1: @SenMikeShirkey There are multiple ongoing studies. None so far have shown ivermectin decreases covid symptoms. https:…
@ksummers7 @DarwynsTheory @meg_anders That’s over a year old. Here’s one from July 28, 2021. Read the author’s conclusion. https://t.co/bWG2Q0WNaO
RT @jgann111: @brandondarby “Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of iv…
@PhilMuka @californiabarby @TravisRSprings @THR this is really the only relevant data right now. kory is a well known hack and the FLCCC meta analysis hilariously left out research painting ivermectin in a bad light. this is the only legitimate meta analys
@DrLeanaWen Omg there are literally over a dozen studies showing that it works for covid. https://t.co/vt82dwBryk
以前論文を引用した時に字数不足だったけれど、お守り代わりとしても家畜用なので量には注意と <米でイベルメクチンの売り上げ24倍 救急治療室が満杯に 家畜用の寄生虫駆除薬であるイベルメクチンをコロナ治療薬として勝手に服用し、具合が悪くなって救急車搬送される患者急増https://t.co/LKu6HEAbTf
RT @DrSteveFeldman: Is ivermectin the answer to COVID-19. I doubt it: https://t.co/4gtpyighJ3. Learn the basics at https://t.co/mOqQ0yKG0M
@PunishedSean Here's a literature review written by a real scientist on the efficacy of ivermectin re: covid (conclusion: no evidence it does anything). Meanwhile there's a vaccine that reduces mortality by 99%. I know which one I'd pick! https://t.co/8Kz
Is ivermectin the answer to COVID-19. I doubt it: https://t.co/4gtpyighJ3. Learn the basics at https://t.co/mOqQ0yKG0M
Consider reading and then checking each study cited , very interesting stuff!
@paulsounds @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @BEEMcme Most of my academic activity is structured critical appraisal of the medical literature. My position al
@chuckmaddenpics @CitizenCharles9 @ggreenwald https://t.co/M0gee72ulE Sure. Its a cochrane systematic review and meta analysis of the available literature in RCTs. Two of the authors received funding from the German ministry of education and research, per
@paulsounds @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino It is not my definition but those used by people like me to assess the quality of the literature. Check out page
@AmericanEpilog What prompted the CDC to come out and say do not ingest horse paste was because of social media suggestions to go to a vet or feed store and score it there. In any case there are still no studies indicating that it works against covid. htt
@HoyMismoTSI Ya han evaluado evidencia en más de 14 estudios de ivermectina para manejar y prevenir el covid. La evidencia ha sido de pobre calidad y no demuestra que sea beneficioso contra el covid. https://t.co/rz5hOSSjmu
RT @tadesouaiaia: @KalYippie @wil_da_beast630 Tbh, Im very skeptical. There are a bunch of pro-mask studies & even a recent RCT that “ju…
@KenHaughian @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino Systematic Review Meta-Analysis from @cochranecollab on IVM and #COVID19. https://t.co/iqtYX47tCY - I agree wit
RT @tadesouaiaia: @KalYippie @wil_da_beast630 Tbh, Im very skeptical. There are a bunch of pro-mask studies & even a recent RCT that “ju…
@FmMosca @barbarab1974 Questi sono i lavori ad oggi in merito all’utilizzo di IVERMECTINA per il trattamento dei pazienti affetti da COVID 19. https://t.co/eadaB1T2g3
@JoanieOC @petenator39 @jo_friar @BeWarnedImIrish @oneunderscore__ https://t.co/450MqzqRYV Claims most stufies have high risk of bias, didnt compare to vaccines, data containing ages of participants absent (if control is 70+ and ppl using ivermectin are n
@KikilLove365 @stefmega74 @Le___Doc @cochranecollab je rajoute ceci juste pour sourcer le propos de @Le___Doc https://t.co/Pkar6KkOLl
@WhisperSquare @PhillyD I have links too! 😂 These trials are so small & are not of a high success. The fact that people are more eager to go for drugs with so little trials with no solid positive evidence but then ignore a vax that has had HUGE trials
RT @CatattackE: @MarthaBueno18 @joerogan Ivermectin is just as efficient as taking a sugar pill for covid. See proof of stupidity here: htt…
@MarthaBueno18 @joerogan Ivermectin is just as efficient as taking a sugar pill for covid. See proof of stupidity here: https://t.co/dUn8BO4Ji5
@_Kodos_ @TYQ @mtaibbi Oh yeah? Are you an expert on meta analyses now? Well I do clinical research for a living and have co-authored two of them, and I’m sure you know that cochrane is the authority on meta-analysis. https://t.co/M0gee72ulE https://t.co/q
So, I said right now there is no data to suggest ivermectin is useful in treating covid, you said I was wrong, and sent that link. Well, here's the conclusion at the bottom of that link you sent. https://t.co/XQUz7evCDA
@SenMikeShirkey “Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent Covid-19.” https://t.co/peM3FbvCbD
@SenMikeShirkey There are multiple ongoing studies. None so far have shown ivermectin decreases covid symptoms. https://t.co/urynLtfLSx
@spartankdub @TrumpZombieCult @SenMikeShirkey Because there hasn’t been an actual quality study that shows it reduces symptoms or mortality in covid patients. https://t.co/urynLtfLSx
@spartankdub @SenMikeShirkey You could simply google it. There’ve been no quality study done that demonstrates ivermectin reduces symptoms or mortality in covid patients. “We identified 31 ongoing & 18 studies awaiting classification until publication
@yuvharpaz @IsraelMOH יש מטא-אנליזה של קוקריין מיולי האחרון: אין מספיק ראיות שתומכות ביעילות של התרופה במניעת וטיפול בקורונה. רוב המחקרים בתרופה הם באיכות מתודולוגית לא טובה דיה. https://t.co/0SKMSy9z0c
What is your opinion on the study?
@loveyourearth2 Another meta-analysis. But it supports people's desire to use ivermectin, so it's all good. And I'm sure "moderate-certainty evidence" is what we're looking for here. Meanwhile, I too can find a meta- that supports my opinion on the use of
@verdadesportiva @ItIsMashAgain @NoLieWithBTC @briantylercohen What's interesting to me is that there's this conspiracy about Big Pharma like Ivermectin grows on trees! And this adds more context https://t.co/tzCGj9n9y9 to another NHI study Ivermectin def
RT @RyanMarino: @yodelodwho Hey boo I’ve shared this with you at least 3x if not more. Here’s another: https://t.co/kK1NkKjOIh
@tennesseemiles Citation needed Here's mine: https://t.co/fByh6IfZJV https://t.co/ROIywANPsS
@lcarb_4u @skodasays @Jeffrey43345014 @BeauTFC @ajividen73 @ZaidJilani Likewise. https://t.co/KbxvJJqwFh https://t.co/5s38hdxXE8 Also, in case I wasn’t clear: IVERMECTIN IS AN ANTI-PARASITIC. COVID IS A VIRUS. IVERMECTIN HAS NO EFFECT ON VIRUSES INCLUDIN
@evasmagacz @SaratogaGregg @NintendoSoiBoi @JoeyDevlin_ "Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19." https://t.co/VWISOQUo9A
@JvanderAa3 @Ronscher1 @wierdduk @telegraaf Hou op man. Net weer een Cohrane dat het niets doet. En het is juist andersom, de artikelen die voordeel tonen zijn superslecht of worden ingetrokken. https://t.co/O8mcsKEmvQ
@burnrevolt @DamonFillman "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials."1/ https://t.co/04qcPOMLdY
@JohnCon49ers @49erCarlos Was just showing you tests were being done. My tweet was about something bigger than ivermectin and was not an endorsement of it https://t.co/Ltrze9glau
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@toni_zoya @realCCrump https://t.co/Hcow8lAfUq. Here is a comprehensive discussion of the comparisons of the studies!
@GabinJean3 @nntaleb Yeah. Literature says ivermectin probably doesn't work and best case its benefit is marginal and not recommended for use outside of clinical trials. Why the fuck are people so religious about an antiparasitic agent. People are dumb man
simple solution...try a 90-day EUA use against the virus of an already FDA-approved drug #Ivermectin, the Nobel Prize-winning human version. Prove this to be a farce and move on. Unless you are too scared to discover the truth #IvermectinWarriors
@AnthonyGuihur "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are UNCERTAIN about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19." Rien de concluant dans 1 sens ou 1 autre selon les experts Cochrane, c'est tout. À
@avogadr0avocado @carnivalist2 @HeldinEU #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 -Full open-access systematic review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J Commentary and podcast: https://t.co/8VPlqiljrj https://t.co/QUgbKwCJFg
RT @jgann111: @brandondarby “Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of iv…