@LevodopaSound @QReprobate @masforshort @ScottAdamsSays @joerogan Almost as if there are more than one study: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed ran
@MinorMarsh @laninoel @hasanthehun Your stupid, and I shave my head. One of these is easier to change than the other. https://t.co/cBM4zW0fAq
@AmandasTwt @Kairos_Creative @pramitheus @THR Thank you for posting a screenshot I am entirely familiar with and doesn't impact on anything I said. AT BEST it minorly reduces risk of death given the correct dosage, but not as effectively or as safely as o
@CetiCov19 @trolleurdetroll @FrWeasel @BrigitteTee89 @T_2B4v facile de répondre et de bloquer par la suite... Par exemple cochrane le site de référence de raoult. https://t.co/wWdZfHqNLf Ou alors Hill l'auteur de la plus grosse meta "consacrant" l'iverme
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@HandOfTheDark @Dcwash1 @TPCarney Thankfully we have data on that as well: https://t.co/bTIJCPFYA9
@cliftonaduncan I mean, he's taking a medicine that didn't pan out in multiple studies, but the people memeing about it hate their Conservative neighbors and genuinely want them exterminated. So... yeah. https://t.co/VgvXW7JORF
@HenkJZoer @c_breul 😂😂🤣🤣 The Hart group ... ja lekker unbiased! https://t.co/DTf3vc2zwq
https://t.co/R27jllD0Rh https://t.co/bnITxQhlOh I mean if you want to Darwin yourself who am I to stop you? Go for it.
@Noah_Klug The difference is that ivermectin is horse medicine and has little to no evidence suggesting it is effective against covid. The vaccine was thoroughly tested and proven effective on humans before it was available to the general public. Ivermecti
@kevvwill @makumee There is a human version but I haven't seen any good data to support its use for COVID. https://t.co/sRr8xtXZbD
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@AldousLeary @bryan_neel @Kevin_McKernan @stackinsatz Not more than for 5-HTTLPR - which isnt enough for me to abandon skepticism. Its cheap/safe - I support you or Joe Rogan adding it to a recovery cocktail. I also support you wearing a mask. I don't t
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@vivelafat @TooMuchKarate @PoisonedStews @xmarx360 @VillanovistPal @ericmcclung @ZaidJilani Thats really helpful. Thank you. I found a better analysis from Cochrane Library. Their main conclusion is that "We don't know whether ivermectin leads to more or
@HEvans84 @Jerny16 @GregBewick @thehill https://t.co/iI3diRHJyz "the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19"
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@Timcast "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality." https://t.co/5tHK8PDBp
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
If you have a brain, you'll realize in the first 30 seconds this is a study of other studies focused on passing judgement on Ivermectin instead of breaking any new ground itself. It's very concerned with BIAS in the other studies though it turns a blind
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@Watchmiker @sic_hed Because there are no reliable studies. Here's a rundown of the studies so far,not including the VA trials that were stopped due to increased morbidity in severe cases. https://t.co/qPAy6qv9AC https://t.co/Ae3gxUqHDJ
@KalYippie @wil_da_beast630 Tbh, Im very skeptical. There are a bunch of pro-mask studies & even a recent RCT that “justifies” mask mandates (It doesn’t). The year of “the science” has unfortunately exposed “scientific research” as a field w a mass
@NPR This is just misinformed fake news. 1. Joe never dismissed the vaccine. He’s against mandates only but recommended his own parents get it. 2. #Ivermectin has been used on humans for decades (fact, look it up) & is being tested for COVID in humans:
@JordanSchachtel Or you are full of crap. Taking the free vaccine is "evil big pharma" to you people. But paying for a drug that isn't known to work is sticking it to big pharma??? https://t.co/at683cwGjv
Yes, perfect example how $$ made/spent/wasted doing worthless studies. Layman’s terms. Ivermectin is mechanism to get zinc into cells. Robust cells block viruses from replicating. Immune system not overrun and can fight viruses. Simple. Robust immunity. Be
@amadaris78 @deliciousmalk Because there’s no clinical evidence it works in humans even when doctors experiment on their patients with the human stuff. https://t.co/7uYbJnfSVw
RT @gruler: @JordanSchachtel Cochrane is delighted to announce that we have received a grant of USD $1.15 million from the Bill & Melinda G…
@Curious6263 @a_mum_lol The science is weak. Meta-analysis is hard to do right. Sadly, GPs aren’t scientists. https://t.co/Isi672clqJ
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@JordanSchachtel Cochrane is delighted to announce that we have received a grant of USD $1.15 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Not surprising that Cochrane found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin. RIGGED https://t.co/kTIe
@ScottAdamsSays @joerogan https://t.co/2FlPZdEtZD. We’re unsure whether Ivermectin leads to fewer or more deaths than no drug to treat rona. People are taking the animal version, and those people usually are shitting out their intestinal walls.
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 Published: 28 July 2021 https://t.co/xVhMB7g7Dz
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@stevendimattei @DrEricDing Cochrane checked the IVM studies evidence! 61 mostly retrospective! studies(?) with differing settings without proven evidence vs. 1 sound, prospective, randomised Phase 3 with sufficient patients to judge efficacy and safety! C
@wneilq @vgttrom @ScottAdamsSays Did you read their website about IVM? It didn't say all the studies were biased. Their latest data is from May 26TH! Where did you get your info from? ivmmeta is a compilation of studies. https://t.co/98YVQbwgCQ I gues
@simon67322372 @bobscartoons Its not the same formulation. No significant evidence of benefit: https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i And midazolam was used entirely appropriately as a sedative on ICU and as symptom control during palliative care.
I lean right and I don’t self medicate. If my doctor prescribed or advised it, I would probably take it. Just like the vaccine.
@YUNG_BHRISTO @DrutangAtHome You mean like this? https://t.co/zlfwIOMaKW Just understand that they had conducted research for the use of ivermectin against SARS-CoV back in 2005 and found it worked as a prophylactic as well as curative treatment. They ni
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@ASPphysician ...and here is a meta-analysis on that! https://t.co/KRVicxIX3y
@DerrickJosi A new study - using the human stuff. https://t.co/Cj0J15mgSS
@Arta77639046 @Ayjchan And again expecially Ivermectin: I wouldn't rely on anecdotal evidence alone, not given the side effects. Relevant: https://t.co/Dq2lvVNvnZ Latest Cochrane review: https://t.co/I9ILc7b2zW https://t.co/Vq5zxAv8yk
@SuperHerbalist @The_Reality_1 @a_mum_lol More: https://t.co/RfKjajy8Sb Its only hope for salvation is high-quality studies because anyone screening out low-quality studies is left with next to nothing. But if it really was a miracle cure, the evidence w
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@AdeleKinvesting @TheFreds @DJ_Barc No, as my it would do nothing for my horse you ignorant muppet. https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
@Flufferduck747 @a_mum_lol It’s not only a matter of searching. You need to know how to test research for validity – is every cause of bias adequately addressed, for example? In my view not and this is supported by people who know how to do meta-analysis
@AdeleKinvesting @TheFreds @DJ_Barc Hello Muppet - there are NO DBRTC studies showing it either works or is effective 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻 https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@TheWay25740196 @PhotographixByJ Really- what’s incorrect? Please go back to school, study science, maths & analytical thinking at at least high school if not tertiary level These might help you start… https://t.co/YBpt6FrOwN https://t.co/fVRmyQkSvV
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@ScottAdamsSays The scientific studies say it doesn’t work. Guess we found out who is brainwashed. https://t.co/d2BK80w6mT
@MaajidNawaz @WSJopinion Do you understand what in vitro means? Here is a meta-analysis from Cochrane library : https://t.co/IDzgjQL9uy
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
to summarize, uncertain results
@Ancientwealth @dreatx @fightlurker @TheZaneSimon Here’s a study from the NIH… That literally disagrees with your study from the NIH https://t.co/BPDwsXQtWi
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
Has anyone else seen this study? https://t.co/BOUC56rtjg
@JurdziakPawel @PolskaKobieta Iwermektyna⤵️
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@chinglishchoppa @Jodilizzie @TheFreds It. Does. Nothing. Good. https://t.co/Wj1GpvoOvv
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @wesleywood73: @AndySwan So many people call it horse medicine and say it is not approved, yet the NIH thinks it is a good treatment. F…
RT @medpedshosp: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library - Please stop using this medication fo…
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
I don’t think “leans right” is a single or even useful indicator of ones views on vaccination and experimental treatments for COVID.
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @Taxpayers1234: If you lean left, I'll bet you've never seen all these Ivermectin studies. https://t.co/AZBGPjmUK7 https://t.co/F5HxNyy…
RT @Taxpayers1234: If you lean left, I'll bet you've never seen all these Ivermectin studies. https://t.co/AZBGPjmUK7 https://t.co/F5HxNyy…
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@ScottAdamsSays The study is also here: https://t.co/d794YMGeeM Did you notice the part where they say they excluded all studies that they felt were "biased"... this study is junk Scott.
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
If you lean left, I'll bet you've never seen all these Ivermectin studies. https://t.co/AZBGPjmUK7 https://t.co/F5HxNyyVwu
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3