@Bender_riss https://t.co/VhsY6KmOEu Enabled Auswertung von 14 Studien und dies sieht nicht wirklich gut aus. Bei hoher Dosierung zeigt es allerdings Wirkung, aber diese Dosierung ist noch unerprobt
@islandteslafan @MephistoTabern1 @Covid19Critical @CovidAnalysis Unfortunately, most of those IVM studies are apparently small and of poor quality which is why more large, high quality studies are needed, and top science and medical entities advise against
@Terpenes11 @HeyAmandaR @KatiePavlich @joerogan You realise someone saying something is true does not make it so right? Scientific peer review does. I would take the below study any day over 'some bloke from India what said it's gud' and the below study su
@ErcolePorrot @GidMK @clairlemon Other systematic reviews of relevance are Hill et al (retracted because a big dodgy study skewed the analysis) and the Cochrane one, which is updated as new results come in. Hill is being re-done with recent large RCTs to b
@alexandrosM The following is from a Cochrane Review, a study that looks at all the available evidence. “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19…” https://t.co/VnQ2eaRa1t
@Sunny_1961_ @CalFreiburger @barnes_law Here's a later metadata study that reviewed more studies.. https://t.co/MUwpGF3Y1T
RT @PerpetualWinger: @MrKRudd The amount of people out there who think they are a horse is staggering! The Cochrane Collaboration undertoo…
RT @jgann111: @brandondarby “Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of iv…
@OAndrePa @williamcacusso @cryptolobopt Esta meta análise (Popp et al)? https://t.co/uSTUus3Vcr Sofre do seguinte problema: https://t.co/hbWOAJZckc
@Chicago4L @thekatnicholas @bly_nell Pretty self descriptive of you. Following the latest trend with no verification it works. Here I'll post it again so maybe you will read it and question people when they tell you something will cure you when there's no
@williamcacusso @cryptolobopt Nível máximo da evidência científica: https://t.co/GPq6OcGaMk
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
@ErcolePorrot @GidMK @clairlemon You realize that analysis relies on the fake trials to make it's claim. See this review instead https://t.co/i1BVDRa3mg
RT @PerpetualWinger: @MrKRudd The amount of people out there who think they are a horse is staggering! The Cochrane Collaboration undertoo…
RT @JeremyAnso: Relire la méta-analyse Cochrane sur ce sujet (https://t.co/nOTE1z8aN2) https://t.co/MMmTopKBHL
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
@walterpeters @AdvancedForged @ScottAdamsSays @AJA_Cortes Garbage in garbage out. The only reputable metanalysis shows no benefit to Ivermectin https://t.co/sp1RVBanBs
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/wDMJBo5i0F
@DarwynsTheory @QCurio @VAButlerwrites @meg_anders Or like this? https://t.co/yHC55Ohmzy
@Fuzzballdonut1 "The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates." https://t.co/O7Qeoiw78X
@brandondarby “Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality.” https://t.co/ea
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @PerpetualWinger: @MrKRudd The amount of people out there who think they are a horse is staggering! The Cochrane Collaboration undertoo…
@jimigrev @clairlemon @navillus126 Mebbe this? https://t.co/bspSWoljb3
@Bigscouser @clairlemon @navillus126 How about https://t.co/bspSWoljb3 ?
@alecialynn @KidThorazine @valerieflames The answer is just no. Doctors shouldn’t be doing this: https://t.co/kK1NkKjOIh
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@ItsTheAnd @MrKRudd If you want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐1
@BradGeyer @miketatarski And for the data geeks - https://t.co/Kxz0F8FCHY
@yodelodwho Hey boo I’ve shared this with you at least 3x if not more. Here’s another: https://t.co/kK1NkKjOIh
@yodelodwho @interrolang @Bertie_222 @grahamwalker It. Doesn’t. Work. For. COVID. https://t.co/ab0I24v0xa
RT @RyanMarino: @yodelodwho When you’re done ad hominem attacking me please dispute this ☺️ https://t.co/kK1NkKjOIh
@yodelodwho @interrolang @Bertie_222 @grahamwalker It doesn’t work for COVID so stop advocating for it? Your only argument with me is that you think it doesn’t poison people and I am literally poison control so https://t.co/ab0I24v0xa
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@AbdenurFlavio @yodelodwho Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID though 😊 https://t.co/kK1NkKjOIh
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@yodelodwho When you’re done ad hominem attacking me please dispute this ☺️ https://t.co/kK1NkKjOIh
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@DarwynsTheory @meg_anders Dosing is, as far as I’ve been able to discern from reputable studies, the key problem at this point. Can ivermectin be effective against the virus? Yes, on lab slides. But in concentrations that are too dangerous to prescribe in
@gunawardena_s @ndyagif It is here in this quoted tweet - https://t.co/aSaXr27DDK
@GenderVe @insanocate @PhillyD Not effective enough to be approved 🤷🏻♂️ and where are you pulling these numbers from? Try reading this: https://t.co/YNiPXpeIzD
@stone_hopper @alexsalvinews The evidence isn’t there https://t.co/kK0Ae19Fst
Relire la méta-analyse Cochrane sur ce sujet (https://t.co/nOTE1z8aN2) https://t.co/MMmTopKBHL
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@LTDANSLEGSII A Blog?🙄 You should go back to school, do more science, math & analytical thinking, so you can identify double blind scientific, independent studies, from … bullshit https://t.co/YBpt6FrOwN https://t.co/fVRmyQkSvV https://t.co/dzITL0A
@SingnRing @1stAallTheway It does not effectively treat Covid. Trump did not use this to get well… he used monoclonal antibodies. https://t.co/riMFSOzGln
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@gunawardena_s @ndyagif wow, a bot has replied to your tweet with the link - https://t.co/sotbHMOYlX :)
@tonyrohne @dianaberrent @greta @Survivor_Corps “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.” https://t.co/ODUtzI0iZj
@florianaigner Ihr Tweet beginnt m d „Fehler“ Iv als Tier-Wurmmittel falsch zu charakterisieren. Die verlinkte Cochr Studie ist eher offen, allerdings in d Anspielung auf Sicherheitsbedenken auch irreführend: Iv ist eines d meisterprobten, unbedenklichsten
@nwbvt @georganneb @TrumpJew2 @narrtrek Furthermore, this study is even more recent, being dated in July. https://t.co/Y6r6k8el31
simple solution...try a 90-day EUA use against the virus of an already FDA-approved drug #Ivermectin, the Nobel Prize-winning human version. Prove this to be a farce and move on. Unless you are too scared to discover the truth #IvermectinWarriors
Read this before talking about #Ivermectin to better inform your opinion https://t.co/2FlPZdEtZD
@WhyWherever @anm8tr09 @HHIbill https://t.co/2FlPZdEtZD. Literally no evidence to support Ivermectin being used to treat covid?
@m_soond The best review of completed and ongoing ivermectin studies is the recent review by the independent and non-profit scientists of the Conchrane Collaboration. (Include that analysis) https://t.co/CzQlcgMmks https://t.co/cXUN1AJzx8
@White_Hole_Sun @mesonparticle @CoD4Easy Re: "And here you go, here's a tonne of IVM studies." No, @White_Hole_Sun, you linked to an advocacy known for peddling nonsense. Do the reading: https://t.co/k3pXiFYzXH https://t.co/QJCO1tcCvG
Assumptions, dialectical traps, and moving of goalposts all in a single tweet. Btw, there's been no double-blind peer-reviewed studies showing the effectiveness of the COVID jabs against COVID. None.
Read this - then give an opinion on the value of Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/wh9gya4jlp
Anyway, here's the Cochrane review and the NIH table of studies I relied on for this thread: https://t.co/tloNBxu2vi https://t.co/Az1t8VzPZ0
@Masiosaurio @drmistercody Now abre el Link pero lo único que pienso es que se necesitan las estudios: The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. htt
No evidence to support use of ivermectin in treating or preventing Covid-19 — Cochrane verdict
@White_Hole_Sun @CoD4Easy @AtomsksSanakan Let’s watch you “do your conspiracy theorist thing” and dance around this like you did the vaccine efficacy studies linked by a literal professional immunologist. I predict more conspiracy theorist nonsense and smo
@sept4M4A @drmistercody Hay muchísimos estudios que no muestran que hace más diferencia que un placebo. No hay ninguno que haya utilizado controles apropiados y éticos, ni uno suficientemente amplio o riguroso para concluir que sirve para algo que no sea d
All it seems to be doing is giving a lot of people the shits. Nice singing, BTW Julie.
@CommunicatorPro @AmerMedicalAssn Don’t pretend that there is no data, because there is. You may not find it thorough enough, but it certainly warrants further investigation. https://t.co/iyvvMSBzbh
No a la Ivermectina para tratar pacientes con #COVID19 en ninguna de sus formas clínicas. #LessIsMore®
RT @CochraneLibrary: Main @Cochrane_IDG authors, Maria Popp & Stephanie Weibel said: “Current evidence does not support using #ivermectin…
@thesourwarhead @crypt0lad @wmdochterman @JamieLiz17 @NYDailyNews Oh, and then there's this: https://t.co/GycBsS0jXM
@Adam_Puzio @NPR You’ve proven that you trust NPR over the actual.. what word is it I’m looking for here.. 🤔 oh yeah, “science”.
@tfrilot @NPR https://t.co/RqKjPldTFa https://t.co/Gk9YHFxJdr https://t.co/mvUPmC6aJb https://t.co/8bVeB2Z3Jn …but yeah, “believe science” until it conflicts with your political agenda. https://t.co/1FPIToUIQe
RT @CochraneLibrary: Main @Cochrane_IDG authors, Maria Popp & Stephanie Weibel said: “Current evidence does not support using #ivermectin…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Main @Cochrane_IDG authors, Maria Popp & Stephanie Weibel said: “Current evidence does not support using #ivermectin…
It not one study. It's a bunch of smaller selected studies that appear to have not been chosen at random. Also, it is not Ivermectin alone that works. It is the MATH+ protocol where Ivermectin is one drug of a set of drugs that should be used together. htt
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
@transfix @wildemajination @TalionisLaw @KXAN_News Ahh! So all of the sudden your “trusting” sources now? Well, here’s another one much more recent. Ooh! Look! It’s from the exact same place where you got yours! https://t.co/6YO9uol2eQ
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @CochraneLibrary: Main @Cochrane_IDG authors, Maria Popp & Stephanie Weibel said: “Current evidence does not support using #ivermectin…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Main @Cochrane_IDG authors, Maria Popp & Stephanie Weibel said: “Current evidence does not support using #ivermectin…
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
Given all the disinformation and people spouting misinformed opinions and sharing dated in vitro studies, here’s a comprehensive look at Ivermectin’s known effectiveness in treating Covid: https://t.co/K9hftJ5qbC
@Alexdavismma Definitely effective against parasitic worms and infections caused by parasites but there's no empirical proof it works against COVID-19. 14 studies, over 1,600 people tested, no proof it does anything for COVID-19. https://t.co/wOrHy7DLZg
@nickrg452csh @BenWhite1007 14 studies, more than 1,600 people tested and there was zero proof ivermectin had any effect whatsoever on COVID-19. https://t.co/wOrHy7DLZg