@Anthony74247166 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preve
@calvinrobinson He says there’s no evidence because, well, there is no evidence: https://t.co/zWjg3OpNuh https://t.co/6xvlQTOIou In some circumstances, HCQ is associated with increased mortality. Use the above info as “the science” rather than anecdote
RT @Sefap_FAP: (Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP htt…
(Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP https://t.co/mJC8JrJXAx
It's easy to detect. Masks are not there to keep us afraid. And if someone is advocating for ivermectin, Vitamin D or hydroxychloroquine they're a crank. Simple. https://t.co/zC22Z49VwX
Here's the thing. It would be great if it worked but it doesn't. If the producers say IVM doesn't work, then guess what? It doesn't work. Here's the report from Cochrane, based on multiple studies. https://t.co/V8apzPsn1M
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @styh131582: 既存の研究を網羅的に確認する事は重要ですが、こちらのサイトは質の高いレビューをするための標準的な手法を用いておらず、misleadingであると指摘されています。 https://t.co/HyTfGPKxQp https://t.co/SYkj…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podcast from authors explaining the evidence: https://t.co/9mPJwQI49S https://t.co/FZWcPNMDL2
@calvinrobinson Here’s the Cochrane Review into Ivermectin. “Unsure whether it reduces or increases mortality”: https://t.co/qBNxHsmiLL
RT @CochraneJapan: 多くの方にご興味を持っていただいておりますが、エビデンスの確実性が非常に低いというのは、「効果が無い」ということではありません。「効果があるかどうか確実なことは言えない」という解釈が正しいです。効果があるかないかをはっきりさせるために、より…
@BogeyUrsule @fquedeville https://t.co/SPDrZUoGhu l'ivermectine n'a jamais fait ces preuves, 278 études qui n'ont rien prouvées
RT @CochraneJapan: 多くの方にご興味を持っていただいておりますが、エビデンスの確実性が非常に低いというのは、「効果が無い」ということではありません。「効果があるかどうか確実なことは言えない」という解釈が正しいです。効果があるかないかをはっきりさせるために、より…
@Kelbawhom @drizzleanddip @miss_moss @RachAlberts Of far more concern is the false sense of security it creates. Colleagues in private telling me their ICU's are full of ivermectin users... and the science shows it doesn't work: https://t.co/4YOkK3JZcV
@DanielJBienlien @kidsneedheroes2 @WesElyMD @DrEricDing https://t.co/oDUQGUFxPx - what this tells me is that you are referring to a medicine that is NOT OK for treating Covid. This states there is a “high risk of bias” etc. https://t.co/zstGglw3LH
RT @CochraneJapan: 新型コロナウイルス感染症 (COVID-19) の予防および治療に対するイベルメクチン https://t.co/wlUlwKl3dV
@KristeKline @KimDoss71 @Yogi_4_Life @AutumnDamnIt @justinl040 “Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent used to treat parasitic infestations, inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro.” Literally the first sentence of the first Google result…ffs https://t.
@bymyelf @JordanChariton This is stupid beyond comprehension. Ivermectin is used for parasites, not for viruses. It targets a completely different thing. The preponderance of scientific data shows Ivermectin to not be useful in treating COVID. https://t.co
@pharmersOnly_ I wish ivermectin was showing benefit too. A real therapeutic agent would be such a game changer. Doctors profiting on this have no ethics and need to stop misleading the public that IVM is somehow comparable or superior to a vaccine. It’s
@Fiorella_im https://t.co/AWhhijqE9o Here's some actual research on these "amazing studies" on the efficacy of ivermectin. It concludes ivermectin should not be used. The studies included in the meta-analysis and review are the ones with low (or no) bias.
RT @EricTopol: New and rigorous review of Ivermectin by @CochraneLibrary @cochranecollab underscores the lack of evidence that it works htt…
RT @GidMK: Cochrane review on ivermectin just dropped. This is the current gold-standard summary: "the reliable evidence available does no…
@CryptoG320 @BradGeyer It absolutely has not - check out the gold standard Cochrane review meta-analysis - https://t.co/sMMFaVpWCf The trials that showed a large positive effect were fraudulent as per this honourable chap: https://t.co/rXcLXwQRu0
@bitcorn_farmer @BradGeyer How about a gold standard Cochrane methodology review which is a process specifically designed to correct and balance out biases and distortions? https://t.co/sMMFaVpWCf
@jimmy_dore The evidence does not support Ivermectin use, you conspiracy nut. https://t.co/lh4Oj8wqnH
@progressnerdgo @ksipp911 @DrSuperSalty Doing research in medicine involves looking at the sources of studies, their size, strengths and weakness, etc. Here is a great review of ivermectin (Spoiler 1: it doesn’t work, Spoiler 2: one of the papers cited has
@heathermcnarf @HadenWare @BenjaminPDixon Exactly, it says more large scale studies are need and has flaws as to why conclusions couldn’t be drawn. Once the large scale studies came in (which Dore failed to give) it concluded that ivermectin is no better t
@BenjaminPDixon The NIH has overwhelming states the ivermectin has no more effect than a placebo in large scale studies. It has been used in cocktails and people believe it was potential on of the active parts early on but no. WHO is still going with trial
@PierreKory Can you explain this study on Ivermectin? It shows no positve affect on Covid-19 https://t.co/a4rGnn1zIx
@ItaloScott1 This is proper analysis https://t.co/Xu254IWQ63
😂😂😂
@pepereboily J'aimerais bien qu'un de ces produits fonctionne. Voici pour l'ivermectine, la plus récente (fin juillet) méta-analyse de Cochrane. https://t.co/2aPr4Nxy5L
@Dlassche1 @aveldjesgraaf @Hilde_Morre @HettyRommers @PietLekkerkerk @Food4ears @Marc_Veld @FHeijblom dan zijn de allerberoerdste studies nog niet eens meegenomen in de review... https://t.co/ERwPAq2uy6 3/3
@jimmy_dore Yes, the reviews of the studies show that the human dosages (not the livestock medicine people have been rushing out to buy which they are poisoning themselves with) works no more than a placebo in large scale studies. https://t.co/OHnARPCv1m
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @asyrafsaharudin: Kalau rajin boleh baca di : https://t.co/kNdDKgcG4A
@IsaacFriel3 @naomiCrussell @keysers09242929 Here’s some bedtime reading for you! https://t.co/gjidOCgOT7
@SherryC64686266 @Omega_Word @FoxNews There is no study or evidence that suggest it helps at all https://t.co/AkfB0ypE6E
@MsKawaiiSammy @GrimoireRosa Here's some articles - sorry there is some evidence of it having anti-viral effects, but... https://t.co/4Ea29zkjID
RT @CochraneLibrary: @WesElyMD @US_FDA @cochranecollab Full @Cochrane_IDG systematic review is open-access and available at https://t.co/FR…
@ThinkingAtheist Medical science should and does routinely explore all possible treatments / solutions in peer-reviewed studies. Also, labeling Ivermectin a "de-wormer" is for headline shock but does not contribute to thoughtful discussion. https://t.co/7
Share about ivermectin: https://t.co/uoQetzwufa https://t.co/8jfh5s9Z9M https://t.co/WraF495AWm And there's more if you bother to look.
@KennethWPratt @alisonfletch1 @DesertReview But you’re not. You’re attributing to ivermectin the drop in infections that would logically be expected from the vaccine rollout and other public health measures in India. You might be keen on it, Cochrane shows
@AblemanAdam Or maybe it’s this one? https://t.co/9rkMtl0XFC
RT @Katsumata_Nori: コクランとは、民間でシステマティックレビューを行う非営利団体です。政治や製薬企業からも完全に独立していて信頼できるエビデンスを作っている団体です。政府や厚労省を信頼できない人、医療不信を持つ人でも、このエビデンスは一度覗いてほしい。 ht…
RT @CochraneJapan: こちらにサマリの翻訳を載せておりますので、あわせてご確認ください。
RT @CochraneJapan: イベルメクチンの効果を見たコクランレビューが出版されました。現段階のエビデンスからは、COVID-19患者の入院・外来治療、およびハイリスク曝露後の感染予防に使用されるイベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実と結論付けられました。…
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @WesElyMD @US_FDA @cochranecollab Full @Cochrane_IDG systematic review is open-access and available at https://t.co/FR…
@WesElyMD @US_FDA @cochranecollab Full @Cochrane_IDG systematic review is open-access and available at https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J https://t.co/XW0TgCmAY0
Cochrane, das Bollwerk der evidenzbasierten Medizin hat 14 Studien mit rund 1600 Teilnehmern analysiert, die herausfinden wollen, ob Ivermectin eine Behandlungsoption für Covid-19 ist. Resultat: Leider wenig Evidenz, keine ausreichend gut designten Studien
Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/JbOa9
@Jeffrey43345014 @BeauTFC “Zero studies”: https://t.co/KbxvJJqwFh. Also, it’s not approved by the FDA for treating COVID-19. So if you want experimental, there you go.
@IggAnicic Evo, veruj: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/pAlUNjQUZ1
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
@straightShorts @Ironcobracomic @KrutchEddy @WTAE Here’s a meta analysis of 14 studies with 1678 participants. Ivermectin does not help. Source: https://t.co/ysN2rJh15o
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
@SamLowryEsq @dr_simon @GBNEWS “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.” https://t.co/wWRNdlbhs6
@gira_michel @rene_chiche Au risque de vous décevoir, l'ivermectine est totalement inefficace contre le covid. https://t.co/5wxQ7xuZCm
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
@larschristens @ThomasBruun14 @pederhvelplund "We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standard of care. No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy." https://t.co/V
Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Yale public health prof saying HCQ worked in Nov 2020 as "the evidence". https://t.co/fyRcM9cg8f https://t.co/SfCtUHya1k ht
here’s a doi from Wuerzburg, Berlin, Düsseldorf study. please STOP going to your tractor supply and using this stuff on yourselves. https://t.co/6TVGxOnwBU
RT @asyrafsaharudin: Kalau rajin boleh baca di : https://t.co/kNdDKgcG4A
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
RT @Le___Doc: "Il y a des traitements efficaces" selon @f_philippot Lesquels ? "l'ivermectine". Ah ?? Bah NON, non et non. https://t.…
@Justinm0502 @LadyClin @nytimes 72 patients in that study... Latest from https://t.co/zCngYOb9u8 Oxford study will answer the question. It will or it won't..
@SagacityCm @LadyClin @nytimes https://t.co/zCngYOb9u8 no evidence to it works no evidence to say it does.. big oxford study in UK looking at it.. end of until study released.