@CybereVitas A more rigorous analysis shows no discernable effect https://t.co/v8OdniPrKt
A Cochrane review here which is a reliable and transparent system for review concluded too few decent studies to be clear whether there was benefit. https://t.co/0u3ppf0w5h
@daryl888 @LittleX82324682 @Revolte_Fiscale L'ivermectine est un médicament utilisé pour traiter les parasites tels que les parasites intestinaux chez les animaux et la gale chez l'homme. https://t.co/oDUKQkmJt3
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/tIePbaF7zP
@DocMCohen The @cochranecollab tends to do high-quality SRMAs. My interpretation of the primary literature is similar to theirs. https://t.co/pE0cIyGcWS
@IAmCixc @VennyVedivici And here’s a Cochran review: https://t.co/TAVhBYDErT upshot -we don’t know, can’t be determined from available info.
RT @comradeharps: @SCOTTYSIMM @DoodleCanyon The science is uncertain: https://t.co/nBebMjGdMq
@Th3CV @AeroPorn @Bentokey @ggreenwald That article is a mess. A lot of it is some rando’s twitter. You’ll have to be more specific about this Mexican “economical” journal. I’m not wading through that pile of turds to find the kernel of corn you claim
RT @ramosdelamedina: Cochrane (quien de verdad es médico sabe lo que significa), publicó hoy su evaluación de la evidencia sobre ivermectin…
@jyanguas @Dr_Pilgrim @EugeniodOrs_ Falso. Las revisiones serias e independientes concluyen que no hay pruebas de que sirva para nada. https://t.co/mEj38A5cSw Y posiblemente los ensayos que sus defensores enarbolan sean un fiasco o fraudulentos https://t.c
@les_vaxxeuses Nous n'en savons strictement rien, on ne sait pas si ça marche ou si ça ne marche pas. On a le droit de dire je ne sais pas. Comme pour l'homéopathie (je suis personnellement contre remboursement SS), on ne peut négliger l'effet placebo des
@The_Jester_Fr @idrissaberkane @DeBunKerEtoiles @OSS117_Helsinki Et que disent les études ? Oh, ben que ça sert à rien. https://t.co/5wxQ7xdodM
@NinerMBA_00 @bat92799926 @Bohemians19 @9NewsAUS 3/3 This one discusses the quality of research into Invermictin. The conclusion that there's not enough evidence to support the efficacy of Invermictin doesn't diminish the fact research was done. Ivermecti
RT @loudquack: @stkirsch @DrAndrewHill A negative systematic review by the folks with highest reputation. https://t.co/ezScpw6hj1
@Mark72781 @teknnnnnn @brenontheroad This is crucial as it weeds out results that are likely to be biased due to some factor of the work. Without that, the whole analysis is unreliable as you can’t make a good meta-analysis from poor quality results. GIGO
@AngryCardio None of these. 112 studies would be more convincing if the quality of evidence were better. https://t.co/hvYEEEQUSF
@goodtoknowmag @ChuckGafvert @amylestoye @jentaub @maddow https://t.co/nAzccNMwo0 Try a respected source for reviews.
@KateKel01474544 @RickWatt9 @Peter_Fitz @the_wolfman_man If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of iverm
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@chanceitup @MinervaDiPas @ggreenwald https://t.co/3MvxWz5kqX https://t.co/LBglZcT5T3 https://t.co/e5uNnZbPSM Just a few.. there are around 60-ish relevant studies, the vast majority of them point in the same direction.
@SCOTTYSIMM @DoodleCanyon The science is uncertain: https://t.co/nBebMjGdMq
@terriscofield @EdoajoEric @Covid19Critical Cute graphic, but results reported on a random website are maybe not the best thing to count on? I seem to remember there was some serious criticism of this particular metastudy, I'll see if I can find it again.
Here is the (July 2021-upated) @CochraneLibrary systematic review of #Ivermectin studies/meta-analyses. This review is widely-cited by #NATO-sphere health authorities, re: the unproven efficacy of Ivermectin for #SARSCoV2 infection & COVID19 treatment
@Highway_30 @oneunderscore__ I can cite a source that says that you are likely to be wrong: https://t.co/MeJ4UkLqy4
@chuisti @Jaime_Culebras @iglesiasivann @sinuhe1983 @DrRubenMejia @Dr_Pilgrim @EugeniodOrs_ Quieres metanalisis?, te lo tengo https://t.co/bL8Yc114UK No sirve
@PoisonAlice @PierreKory @US_FDA I notice you provide no evidence of this. :) Here: https://t.co/JEZsYISGNg
@GregKni96248504 @Michael37823933 @Covid19Critical @PierreKory Against parasites, yeah. Against COVID, not so much. https://t.co/JEZsYISGNg
@hrford Here’s a good scientific article on it🙂 https://t.co/rGieXdD1yp
RT @DashboardCovid: 🐎Still lots of hay being made over #ivermectin!🐎 ...but major medical authorities like @NIHCOVIDTxGuide, @WHO, @harvar…
🐎Still lots of hay being made over #ivermectin!🐎 ...but major medical authorities like @NIHCOVIDTxGuide, @WHO, @harvardmed, @UCSFMedicine *don't* recommend ivermectin to prevent or treat #COVID19 -- best available data shows that it won't help. Details: h
@LakdarSpeaks @wholelife180 @MollyJongFast Betcha did! /s https://t.co/7A0jSuThNw
@yenyadpt @DrJohnWagner @KristyInBlue @DrTomFrieden It's an internet fad, a trend. It does not work reliably against COVID-19. The end. If you cannot get this, then I repeat, take it. But stay home when you get sick - it will hopefully be a lesson in humi
@RoadWarriorsUSA the treatment doesn’t work https://t.co/NOZ7vxygHr
@JJJLacey @stiggy754 @pinciukas1 @BallouxFrancois @CatherineS73 All of the above. The best accurate summary of the evidence is probably in the Cochrane review on the subject. https://t.co/dXj95Jor52
@guka4 Genau das hat man bei Hydrochloroquin erzählt, bis in großen Studien klar wurde, dass in den Gruppen mit HC mehr Menschen sterben als in den Kontrollgruppen ohne! Die Cochrane kommt zum Ergebnis dass heute nicht klar ist, ob Ivermectin hilft oder sc
@MHarijk @Marc_Veld @muumi_tweets answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/yOJzN0Zfwf En lee
@DefenseMichel @tiborverduna Revisione Cochrane (Cochrane, non Pfizer... Non Moderna...) aggiornata al giugno 2021: https://t.co/thNh5W3wNR
@gummibear737 This "meta-analysi" is hopelessly flawed. Here's a short thread pointing out some of the issues that render the website useless: https://t.co/2ivbO3rQfa Here's the recent Cochrane review: https://t.co/iCmjv46Z5o https://t.co/IrU4qWVdYW
@LindaLa34268275 @WLWT They're not, but here's a study by several who are: https://t.co/C5nTO8OFcD https://t.co/6X3ABpaHMB
@Dr_Pilgrim @jyanguas @EugeniodOrs_ si te interesa aqui tienes una revisión de estos https://t.co/cOzHQSkbXe es la mejor de todas que hace mucho hincapié en la calidad de la investigación
@lapoisse10 @GeneralJConnor @tristanmf bon, c'est du Cochrane, pas du Tuning Magazine, j'espère que vous allez comprendre https://t.co/PJluWnnS77
@Imustnotf3ar @JenLucPiquant @SwaledaleMutton "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/IQDtXcxuLH 🤷🏻
Fiction trumps reality. (pun intended) https://t.co/nBlGywsTgK
@NunoPaulaRocha @al_antdp “Diz-me que não percebes nada de farmacoterapia sem me dizeres que não percebes nada de farmacoterapia” https://t.co/QtMV6r7X2R
Here's the most up to date review of the all the evidence (or lack thereof) for the use of ivermectin in COVID-19. https://t.co/g0WV8UZBAp
@KANUTATOR @DrEricDing Lots of studies underway trying to answer this question. Don’t have the data yet on efficacy according to Cochrane https://t.co/TvgPcZ8wr5
@yamax6 @OlivierPicot2 @AndrePitre_LUX @saraart4 200 études de faible qualité ne démontre rien. https://t.co/kWJaGOPUFu
@brenontheroad @markoftec Doesn't work- https://t.co/yjQUsRGFXw
@PierreKory @Covid19Critical Any thoughts https://t.co/PONJ7aRltE
@SimonRMerton @BeauTFC It doesn't help to provide links to studies from last year when there are newer ones available. The question has been answered, you just don't want to listen. https://t.co/1jECxRJoil https://t.co/gFT6WFI171 https://t.co/rO31ghG3DP ht
@AblemanAdam @MurphyYuiko @Kaleidoscape2 Science continues to research BUT doesn't say "believe this works UNTIL we prove it doesn't" FFS Here, some science "I'm ignoring" https://t.co/4Ea29zkjID
@jacuziel67 @brenontheroad Źródla: https://t.co/KdBSgN5dof Tutaj bardzo wazne badanie. Meta-analiza kilkunastu innych badań. Wnioski są jasne. Ivermectin nie powinien byc stosowany jako lek. Poza tym lepiej zapobiegać niż leczyć, dlatego mamy szczepionki
@esnet120 זה אתר מצוין תראי מה כתוב https://t.co/8NUI9nKyOa
@frifa968 @PippoVignola @valy_s L’efficacia dell’ivermectina contro il Covid è molto incerta https://t.co/8oOBQHv7Iw In compenso la gente ha iniziato ad avvelenarsi con i sicuri effetti collaterali “curandosi” con questo farmaco veterinario.
@GaIadhrim Sono scettico anche nei confronti di un sito che raccoglie risultati di studi mai pubblicati e che non include trial clinici che si trovano con Pubmed. https://t.co/UVHOHEQvHR https://t.co/6SeoDZFcKq
RT @SGriffin_Lab: Big shock horror surprise type thing...😱 Cochrane review finds Ivermectin not recommended for use outside of RCTs. Plea…
@KarineRobitail1 Je ne vous mens pas et je ne mens pas à moi-même. Je me garde au courant. Je ne vois rien de ce côté, malheureusement. Pour l'instant. https://t.co/2aPr4Nxy5L
@BudimicMirela @koronavirus_hr Cochrane o (ne)efikasnosti ivermektina: https://t.co/ZgJgGFlRGY
@BandofHopeASX @TFR94504381 @brenontheroad No, that one was written by lawrie (who is making money from this), and is very, very badly done. They included retracted studies, ignored studies that showed no effect and did not use best practice. This is a go
RT @sangeng02: @Maggie12409794 根据目前可见的极低至低质量证据,不确定伊维菌素用于治疗或预防 COVID-19 的有效性和安全性。业已完成的研究都较小,且没有多少高质量证据。总体而言,现有的可靠证据不支持在精心设计的随机临床试验之外使用伊维菌素治疗…
@BandofHopeASX @brenontheroad No, that is anecdotal. It does not work: https://t.co/E2DVmpbcYR
@Fifi_Borgia @veryvirology It's for parasitic infections hun.. Its not shown to be effective with covid-19 either. Here's a metastudy analysis of research results. https://t.co/a7Ra6TBu4L
@RJGarnerAuthor @TheAllstar504 @talkRADIO and for your personal use https://t.co/Dm270JGX4I https://t.co/QfyVnfZn7s
@LankyCarGuy @ArtisanLoaf Cochrane Library is independent medical research/review body. They found no safe reason to use it, no reason to support use & insufficient evidence that it works against Covid 19. It will give you the shits but get rid of head
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@schille_arne @DanielO88917837 @eivind1984 Vi kan ta det enkle først: I motsetning til vaksinen er ivermectin ikke godkjent for bruk mot covid. Hvis ikke kan kanskje en cochrane-studie hjelpe? De seier at de ikke fant nok studier som kan si at det virker .
ちなみにコクランレビューでは、外来患者の調査についても触れられています。これが指摘の初期に該当するのかは分かりませんが。 https://t.co/izt8ZQQcA7 https://t.co/KZWlrLu9PP
@DRochambeau @neo_30 @MadmoizelOceane pendant ce temps là, partout dans le monde : https://t.co/RyPTEfRG7Y
@fuckcubicles @Joseph_Joe_M @VennyVedivici “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials.” https://t.co/ea7saCcheS
@Maggie12409794 根据目前可见的极低至低质量证据,不确定伊维菌素用于治疗或预防 COVID-19 的有效性和安全性。业已完成的研究都较小,且没有多少高质量证据。总体而言,现有的可靠证据不支持在精心设计的随机临床试验之外使用伊维菌素治疗或预防 COVID-19。https://t.co/AlxsBVEKa0
RT @styh131582: コクランのイベルメクチンレビュー論文をざっと見ましたが、discussionに他のレビューとの比較がとてもよくまとまっています。このDiscussionでも述べられてますがレビューによって併用薬を含む研究、対照群が無治療・プラセボではなく、 ht…
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
RT @EdwinRankin: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/F8R4Q6sxgA
@denise_dewald @maria_zw @HoustonChron @JulianGi11 Yes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized t
RT @styh131582: 既存の研究を網羅的に確認する事は重要ですが、こちらのサイトは質の高いレビューをするための標準的な手法を用いておらず、misleadingであると指摘されています。 https://t.co/HyTfGPKxQp https://t.co/SYkj…
Ivermetin efficacy on Covid-19.
RT @styh131582: コクランのイベルメクチンレビュー論文をざっと見ましたが、discussionに他のレビューとの比較がとてもよくまとまっています。このDiscussionでも述べられてますがレビューによって併用薬を含む研究、対照群が無治療・プラセボではなく、 ht…
@DavidGreenslit @Covid19Critical Go read the actual Cochrane review. Question: are you using ivm to dodge vaccination https://t.co/rzZlCGsFeT
RT @EdwinRankin: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/F8R4Q6sxgA
RT @styh131582: 既存の研究を網羅的に確認する事は重要ですが、こちらのサイトは質の高いレビューをするための標準的な手法を用いておらず、misleadingであると指摘されています。 https://t.co/HyTfGPKxQp https://t.co/SYkj…
RT @DTB_BMJ: RT @juan_francomd: Caught in a Twitter argument over ivermectin? Trust the evidence. Here are three #FreeAccess articles you m…
RT @EdwinRankin: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/F8R4Q6sxgA
RT @EdwinRankin: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/F8R4Q6sxgA
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/F8R4Q6sxgA
RT @TheSGEM: @MDaware @JaimeAPRN No high-quality evidence to support its use. https://t.co/odXIDS5FaL