@SuperLazy6 @RogueElf70 @UniqueSAProblem @Richard_Spoor Trying again. Sources for your claim? https://t.co/KWedwC0BHa
@Dahuuu @epelboin Non le gold standard c'est la cochrane https://t.co/hzEsl740bZ @XavierHugonet qui avait fait cette découverte
@kristy_clueless But see this summary & review of such studies https://t.co/vpkPX7XphK
@RedaBendisari @UPR_Asselineau @ordre_medecins Voilà. Bonne journée. https://t.co/5wxQ7xuZCm
@WigoBEAR @maddow @MSNBC @FDA_Drug_Info @US_FDA 'Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of #ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.' https://t.co/jWKpwVEmyB
@Dennistalksfact @niebangweesnie @A_C_D_P @MarietjieLuyt @DianeM79 @SahariIvsa @RightsSA2020 @Tsholedi_01 @fiebiePup @PierreKory @SABC_2 @SABCNews At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigor
@OutOfTheDarkAge @amareshskumar @ICMRDELHI @MoHFW_INDIA @PMOIndia At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bry
@PatrolPointer @shalinivbhagat @MujMash At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC a
@farm_ape @fantasyfbdriven @VolumePrintcess At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLC
@DianeM79 @niebangweesnie @A_C_D_P @Dennistalksfact @MarietjieLuyt @SahariIvsa @RightsSA2020 @Tsholedi_01 @fiebiePup @PierreKory @SABC_2 @SABCNews At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigor
@RobinWhittle3 At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and explains the different
@niebangweesnie @ktmdirtbarbie @Speedy_RS @calvis_p @trixasis2 @NickHudsonCT At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the H
@OutOfTheDarkAge @amareshskumar @ICMRDELHI @MoHFW_INDIA @PMOIndia At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bry
@niebangweesnie @BraBobM @i_batibat Cochrane review on ivermectin! Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and explains the different conclusions. https://t.co/4r4kiNw3CN
@lilRIPplexrp @tepperleen @fantasyfbdriven @llthesechickens @VolumePrintcess At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the H
@niebangweesnie @Dennistalksfact @A_C_D_P @MarietjieLuyt @DianeM79 @SahariIvsa @RightsSA2020 @Tsholedi_01 @fiebiePup @PierreKory @SABC_2 @SABCNews @DrAndrewHill At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a discipl
@niebangweesnie @A_C_D_P @Dennistalksfact @MarietjieLuyt @DianeM79 @SahariIvsa @RightsSA2020 @Tsholedi_01 @fiebiePup @PierreKory @SABC_2 @SABCNews Cochrane review - all good studies! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous
@Dennistalksfact @niebangweesnie @A_C_D_P @MarietjieLuyt @DianeM79 @SahariIvsa @RightsSA2020 @Tsholedi_01 @fiebiePup @PierreKory @SABC_2 @SABCNews At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigor
@prasadhemant @jjchamie @HermanGel79 @marybethpf At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis
@louisaclary @Krishna54158015 @TFR94504381 @richardemoe @chasbarter @SeivwrightTrudy @baggers951 At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one al
@BharatiyaNagr1k @JangoBunBun @TFR94504381 @FreedomIsrael_ At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant met
@adisin At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and explains the different conclu
@niebangweesnie @Dennistalksfact @A_C_D_P @MarietjieLuyt @DianeM79 @SahariIvsa @RightsSA2020 @Tsholedi_01 @fiebiePup @PierreKory @SABC_2 @SABCNews At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigor
@TheTravelDoc2 @Forbes At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and explains the d
@PatrolPointer @shalinivbhagat @MujMash At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin: "Cochrane reviews" are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC
@oliverwabwire @oneunderscore__ At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! "Cochrane reviews" are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and ex
@Semmelweis7 @RWMaloneMD one or the other, and also for breastfeeding women At last: living Cochrane review on ivermectin! https://t.co/4r4kiNw3CN
@drakchaurasia At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and BIRD and explains the different conclusions. https://t.co/4r4kiNw3CN
@StLuttikhuis @chrismartenson At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': a disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and explai
@DrOakley1689 It is highly questionable that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for C19. In fact, the reverse appears to be true. According to the Cochrane Library - the premier worldwide medical database - Ivermectin hardly functions better than a plac
@PierreKory Cochrane review on ivermectin! Cochrane reviews are the 'platinum standard': disciplined and rigorous test of other research. Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and explains the different conclusions
TREATING C19 "Based on the current very low to low certainty evidence we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small, few are considered high quality. Several studies ..." htt
At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! PREVENTING COVID‐19: "We don't know whether ivermectin leads to more or fewer deaths compared with no drug" https://t.co/4r4kiNw3CN
At last: Cochrane review on ivermectin! Helpfully, this one also comments on the Hill and Bryant meta-analysis, FLCCC and BIRD and explains the different conclusions. https://t.co/4r4kiNw3CN
@K2theChad @DrOakley1689 Gish gallops aren’t evidence. Proper meta-analyses (Cochrane) show no benefit. Remdesivir not part of our protocol. https://t.co/WPxaC39Ka4
@Bertie_222 @yodelodwho @Amy_Siskind Not according to the FDA, and Cochrane finds no basis in research. https://t.co/6XFireCtQN
RT @vsbuffalo: Other meta-analyses have been published (Bryant et al. 2021) and are again touted as proof IVM works (below), though a recen…
RT @vsbuffalo: The main issues with this MA I see are (1) very weak selection criteria and lots of low-quality studies, (2) huge amounts of…
RT @EricCrampton: Cochrane reviewed the evidence on Ivermectin in July. https://t.co/qhVL2mQ2Ib Please do not decide to forgo vaccinatio…
@AnthonyCalabr12 @JoeSilverman7 @MichaelTaricani If they say “suggests”, it’s suspect. “Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent used to treat parasitic infestations, inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro. The molecular hypothesis of ivermectin's antivir
Cochrane reviewed the evidence on Ivermectin in July. https://t.co/qhVL2mQ2Ib Please do not decide to forgo vaccination in hope that Ivermectin will save you if you catch it. It won't. And vaccination protects others as well. [Replies off, block button
@AbdenurFlavio "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69 The climbdown continues... https://t.co/PkSCu4MVvR h
RT @FleshMadeNew: What do you say to those who have “done their research” and found a meta-analysis of #ivermectin showing that it works as…
RT @FleshMadeNew: What do you say to those who have “done their research” and found a meta-analysis of #ivermectin showing that it works as…
What do you say to those who have “done their research” and found a meta-analysis of #ivermectin showing that it works as a #Covid cure? Just tell them that the recent Cochrane review is more trustworthy? https://t.co/s8ZdsvLvdc @pknoepfler @LeighGTurner h
Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. https://t.co/MwRIOj4Uqe
@1219ddenney @jsolomonReports Can you point us to one of these studies? because NIH reviewed 14 studies (total of 1678 patients) & concluded that "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@csen @CraigKellyMP 3rd of April 2020. Try reading something up to date. https://t.co/qRzmzNgEIS https://t.co/BDL38Hv9vu https://t.co/D43Wx4HOxu Last one is an update on Dr Wagstaff's study (hint no update yet)
@BluDogAnchorite @Diogenes20203 @NC_Optimist @CroCoach11 @Political_Goth @RBReich So you haven't done your own reading? Enough to know there's sufficient evidence of efficacy vs Covid to warrant further study? https://t.co/Q3CPRsjpJB
@BluDogAnchorite @Diogenes20203 @NC_Optimist @CroCoach11 @Political_Goth @RBReich Not my opinion. That's the data. It's under study now. https://t.co/Q3CPRsjpJB
@paulsounds @JMartinM1_30 @CaulfieldTim @DrJenGunter @LeslieYoung @ScienceUpFirst @StanKutcher @sarahcrgr @DrLindaMD @GidMK @jonathanstea @DrvanTilburg @SajjadFazel Also does not mean IVM works for COVID19. Those claiming efficacy have the burden of proof.
@designbyg @paulsounds @CaulfieldTim @DrJenGunter @LeslieYoung @ScienceUpFirst @StanKutcher @sarahcrgr @DrLindaMD @GidMK @jonathanstea @DrvanTilburg @SajjadFazel There is not high-quality evidence to support its use. The SRMA by @CochraneLibrary concludes
@Bkl175Ao @ABC Lol I'll call out your anecdotal evidence and raise you a meta-analysis. https://t.co/1Posj26cLp
@jenelled12 @OccupyDemocrats Here is a review of the studies done regarding invermectin for treating COVID. The drug is relatively safe if taken as directed and not the livestock version. There could be interactions just as with any other medication. htt
@jyanguas @Dr_Pilgrim @EugeniodOrs_ Que cosas los meta analisis y revisiones sistematicas hablan contra la ivermectina https://t.co/iVLtmncU0f https://t.co/LuH5GkU3kn Porque sera? Porque no sirven
@SmithRubble A news aggregator has already bootlegged her story compete with links. Here is the study https://t.co/wsCrKSSHEm and a more recent version https://t.co/WMgWZfieTJ
@yakobach @AgnesWold @southpasifictrd @a_olsson Skulle vilja se en storskalig RTC med Ivermectin innan jag chansade på det. Cochrane Institute kunde inte säga om det var verksamt eller ej https://t.co/taMULT4JYN
https://t.co/kPrKCCnR9d A systematic review of all the papers, "very low to low certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent covid. Few studies are considered high quality."
Other meta-analyses have been published (Bryant et al. 2021) and are again touted as proof IVM works (below), though a recent Cochrane review found only 4/17 studies from this MA meet pre-defined eligibility standards (https://t.co/puLXMaV8Du). https://t.c
The main issues with this MA I see are (1) very weak selection criteria and lots of low-quality studies, (2) huge amounts of heterogeneity in the studies. @GidMK has a thread here: https://t.co/puLXMaV8Du and writeup here: https://t.co/eqgC0wMVGt
@HUETJeanne1 @FinanceFr1 @brownpascal @TPMP @DIVIZIO1 J’ai pas les meme sources que vous: https://t.co/2qZfEouVQv
@Mark_Lisica @RocktheMawk @CaulfieldTim @DrJenGunter @LeslieYoung @ScienceUpFirst @StanKutcher @sarahcrgr @DrLindaMD @GidMK @jonathanstea @DrvanTilburg @SajjadFazel @US_FDA I interpreted this as a respectful dialog. I too have seen SRMA & RCTs claimin
@RandPaul here you big DOOFUS. There have been studies. I think people just think trump & his butt lickers are stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!https://t.co/9qTWLa9g1y.
YO @RandPaul About 30 days ago we got this: https://t.co/4p2Bkr3NPd
RT @DrRaniKhatib: @DrMarthaGulati I am still puzzled about what the conspiracy theorist think the reason for not approving Ivermectin other…
@walterpeters @AdvancedForged @ScottAdamsSays @AJA_Cortes Dude you don’t know what you’re talking about. That site is a great example of garbage in garbage out, many trash studies included. Here’s a link to an actual meta analysis https://t.co/zQdVsbIVRm
RT @mackinprof: https://t.co/zrJp29bp94 Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or p…
@DrMarthaGulati I am still puzzled about what the conspiracy theorist think the reason for not approving Ivermectin other than lack of efficacy. 🤔🤔 https://t.co/zAdVGktr1y
@ArnesshpA @getongab https://t.co/7V3MmgwSFt 9 studies already done so NO, its been studied, all studies not sure if increase in mortality from the patients given ivermectin over the placebo means the ivermectin killed them, but more people given the med d
@Mark_Lisica @CaulfieldTim @DrJenGunter @LeslieYoung @ScienceUpFirst @StanKutcher @sarahcrgr @DrLindaMD @GidMK @jonathanstea @DrvanTilburg @SajjadFazel I've done a deeper dive. It's part of my academic activity as a researcher a physician. Here is a SRMA b
Best available evidence to date re Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 | Cochrane Sum: Inconclusive. Do not recommend at this time. Risk of harm may outweigh benefit. & Certainly DO NOT use with out medical supervision https://t.co/MGn
@brenontheroad And a meta-analysis: "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quali
@CaulfieldTim @DrJenGunter @LeslieYoung @ScienceUpFirst @StanKutcher @sarahcrgr @DrLindaMD @GidMK @jonathanstea @DrvanTilburg @SajjadFazel The time to accept a claim is when their is sufficient evidence. This burden has not been met for #ivermectin. https:
From The Cochran Library for anyone who wants to read about Ivermectin use https://t.co/vMlGcTMgSM
@VincentDuguay_ @Vadeboncoeur_Al @TogetherTrial On ne connaît pas les doses à utiliser puisque chaque étude en a utilisé une différente ou quand ou # temps de n gros tout est flou à part un gros “Low-certainty”. Lisez ce résumé de cochrane. https://t.co/DF
@RobertW96538623 @legalobserver1 @thehill Nah, it’s the research. https://t.co/XP84RyW15m
@retchko6 @glenys_infexion @GidMK My mistake, wrong link https://t.co/A4abpUt27C
This meta-analysis (looking at 14 studies involving 1,678 participants) shows no benefit from ivermectin in the prevention or treatment of COVID. More studies are underway and, as always, we will follow the science. https://t.co/n8NnzqC5hE
@10P8TRIOT @JodieHMoss @AmyAThatcher No. This article looked at all the studies. It’s of no benefit. https://t.co/9LVb9Jeg9O
Rubbish.
RT @soluscogitari: @FPVaughanIII @CBC You might want to read this study as well. https://t.co/lzTgw6HlmV
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/1ztfwBW2lr