https://t.co/zrJp29bp94 Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials. #evidence vs 💩
@jyanguas @Dr_Pilgrim @EugeniodOrs_ No es un poco sospechoso que tu fuente sea justamente una web sobre la ivermectina y el cov19 creada ad hoc para dar propaganda al movimiento? Por otro lado, de esos 31 estudios aún ninguno ha concluido y los otros 14 a
@FPVaughanIII @CBC You might want to read this study as well. https://t.co/lzTgw6HlmV
@jyanguas @Dr_Pilgrim @EugeniodOrs_ La efectividad de las vacunas incluso para la delta aun no cae por debajo de 60, deja de mentir. La ivermectina tiene 0% efectividad y ya revisiones sistemáticas y metanalisis lo confirman. 👇 https://t.co/bL8Yc114UK U
@JaggerMickOZ It's true that the average of published studies shows a positive effect but the degree of uncertainty is large with a confidence interval spanning zero with a wide range of possible values https://t.co/5Eqgsx1B2j
@Andre77INS @keo_hj @ChampoDr @DDupagne Et très possible de dire que l'IVM ne fonctionne pas, surtout après le retrait de la plus grosse étude pour fraude. Mais même avant cela https://t.co/REsJ6BcxoH
@pauli_laakso Ei kukaan, ei laakarit ole idiootteja. siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronaa vastaan kuten voit lukea tasta. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@guka4 @CiesekSandra @nytimes #PLURV Ivermectin ist kein geeignetes Medikament zur Therapie von Covid-19 https://t.co/AG189iVVW3
@pinolillo1 @hecid @Nurse_same @melanocit0 Extracto (en inglés) en: https://t.co/6JjmBBZszY
@pinolillo1 @hecid @Nurse_same @melanocit0 Fuente: Popp, M., Stegemann, M., Metzendorf, M. I., Gould, S., Kranke, P., Meybohm, P., Skoetz, N., & Weibel, S. (2021). Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19. The Cochrane database of systematic rev
@JackLan74995854 @CraigKellyMP Interesting correlation but doesn't show causation. https://t.co/mK7zdpAykT https://t.co/JAOAqot0Kx So take something that isn't proven to be effective yet and has (very rare) side effects or get a proven vaccination hmmmm
@cophiladamtc @Cdrik09383178 @ChihuahuaOly @LRigole @cab2626 Il y a aujourd'hui 31 études dans le monde mais pas aujourd'hui de médicament susceptible d'avoir une AMM. "Nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes soutenant l'utilisation de l'ivermectine d
@oneunderscore__ @mathsnetty https://t.co/VUYP4laMHp is the current truth as of publication date July 2021. Follow the evidence instead of social media influencers IMHO.
@carlososuna86 @clairlemon I think there have been several recent meta analyses that show Ivermectin has low efficacy. https://t.co/KFYRpMRDlR
RT @CochraneJapan: イベルメクチンの効果を見たコクランレビューが出版されました。現段階のエビデンスからは、COVID-19患者の入院・外来治療、およびハイリスク曝露後の感染予防に使用されるイベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実と結論付けられました。…
@CoachWithLucas @BenjaminPDixon @jimmy_dore As a scientist, I agree that it isn’t crazy to study and the hypothesis behind why it would have worked was scientifically sound. However, the meta analysis from large scale placebo studies shows it does no more
@brenontheroad The Cochrane reviews say nope. https://t.co/gvZFWGSUE2 https://t.co/iUNayW6bRS
@SenRonJohnson @NIH @CDCgov @US_FDA ▶️Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials. https://t.co/hVESJ1VLhr
@X_THEOMEGAMAN_X @EugeniodOrs_ Pues de momento como que no 👇 Revisión Cochrane https://t.co/8jpEG6oHhj
@minimalcasanova @AgnesWold @broder_fluffie Om Ivermectin var så bra skulle det finnas tydliga signaler på det https://t.co/taMULT4JYN
@karl_haynes @CJTheran @ggreenwald >cites the retracted elgazzar paper Lol nice try. And the author of that meta-analysis (Pierre Kory) is also part of the FLCCC and has a conflict of interest. His paper is an outlier among studies and meta-analyses abo
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
@sinterklaas1211 @ArbiterOfTweets Het werkt niet. https://t.co/Vt7hmxezde
@Waltlaw69 First: Why does it appear that you purposely misrepresented Implications for Practice as definitive conclusion? https://t.co/DxZl8YkejL
@Mizhakwad14 @Evelyn21082108 @RWMaloneMD I never said, nor implied, I know more than the doctors or scientists. I talk about a spectrum of treatments with efficacy. I don't know what you mean by 'actual science' but I do perform it. I weigh the following t
@trip6 @hapelensrob @IGJnl Sure: te weinig / geen bewijs na meta-analyse (vrij belangrijk in EBM) https://t.co/ug7Ci1FXV8 Interessant artikel rondom de schade, maar ook een voorbeeld van fraude van auteurs om IVM in een positief daglicht te krijgen voor
@Waltlaw69 @OklahomaCovid “We don’t know whether ivermectin leads to more of fewer deaths compared with no drug… No participants died 28 days after the drug. THE STUDY REPORTED RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF COVID-19 SYMPTOMS (…) and unwanted events…” From st
@Singe_Volant @hereintheearth @JeanBottari Bonne lecture https://t.co/kWJaGOPUFu
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
@lstphane73 @Locuste_ Pour le coup, ça ne me semble pas possible d'écarter ajd les deux options : https://t.co/vrIZJFONJU https://t.co/CXZZLgAT9t
症例 ヒドロキシクロロキンを投与した新型コロナウイルス肺炎患者 30 例の検討 社会福祉法人 仁生社 江戸川病院 伊勢川拓也 古市 基彦 加藤正二郎 https://t.co/7S35zSapC5
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
@NOmasCNE @casylemag @Bater_84 @jledezmah26 @DrWilfredoBello Estudio pilioto con N 45???? Ok Que me dices de este con N250 (negativo) https://t.co/zfmV83BVS8 O este metanalisis tb negativo? https://t.co/iVLtmncU0f O esta revisión sistematica (también
@mobilehardwired @wenzel94 @muskfund @660NEWS https://t.co/5MmeHUTu9w https://t.co/6lhklEN6rB https://t.co/nHbVhesBIc All show Null effect. Fraud: https://t.co/LVHC0AJZ0V And likely many more trials fraud or so poorly done to not mean anything. “Do
@HahnThomsen @AgnesWold I vilka länder används ivermectin och visar bra resultat? Länken är från december 2020, https://t.co/diIgz5JKUN är en sammställning från juli 2021.
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
La conspiranoia mata. El fanatismo mata. La ignorancia mata. Los aprovechadores de lo anterior matan. Y te terminan matando a vos, terraplanista antivacunas, q creés q te están abriendo los ojos para ver los negocios de los laboratorios. No podés ser mas p
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evidencia suficiente xa la utilización de ivermectina en la prevención ni en el tratamiento d la infección por #SARSCOV2) y no te vacunas? h
@very_grem @GovCircusTent @iollmann @marquelawyers I’m a Librarian … unless your have access to refereed scientific info, you can ‘research’ as much as you like, but pushing Ivermectin is dangerous https://t.co/8wautTRUTY
@gira_michel @truthmatters241 @paul_norel @ElianeCarrier @Escal177R C’est un traitement pour les animaux vous qui avez peur de manque de recul quand ça vous arrange … https://t.co/z4OQsJyqCt
@miraaksoys @RolandXSweden "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 • via @PubMedOnli
@tootslatoots @RMConservative Rather than sending me an article in relation to HIV from pubmed why not send me one from pubmed about COVID-19 which literally states “No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy.” https://t.co/HOmdBl
@TeaPainUSA @RandPaul, obviously not related to the eyes, and many years away from medicine cause you to forget basic stuff https://t.co/4SwI83KRRd
@MarlenyCastro @marcoventurardz @PastorMNunez Interesante opinión, muéstranos algunos estudios ya que si no hay estudios es muy irresponsable recomendarlo. Aquí hay uno que dice que consumirlo no ayuda mucho. https://t.co/DlNKHzcq1T
@MakisMD @AntibioticDoc Credible organizations disagree. https://t.co/wmEB1rSw56
@weisselbergers Guys, @Mabbs5 is a bot, no credentials gets his info from Parley or similar sites. Ignore him because the one with absence of connections higher than the limbic system is him. Ivermectin is not useful to treat covid19, end of story https://
@GregoriTonon @Spooper19 @hellojenjo @t_law2728 @littlewhitty Doctors have a duty to prescribe medicines for indications where they are safe and effective. Current studies show limited to no efficacy. Why would they prescribe? https://t.co/QLxNws5PE2
@Mabbs5 And please post your credentials besides propaganda poster child https://t.co/4SwI83KRRd
@aucklandir @mrbrownsauce @colin_crookston @NHSEngland @MidwivesRCM @RCObsGyn Might as well use the Gummy Bear protocol. 🙄 https://t.co/wmEB1rSw56
A Cochrane review is basically the gold standard of systemic reviews of existing studies. Bottom line: don’t take horse pills.
I love Cochrane! https://t.co/KCb49UFtET https://t.co/yzGpgwO2Wx
@PilarKa4 @KuchaMusora @sd0107 Хватит дурить людям мозги с Ивермектином. Его эффективность не доказана. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed random
@etfortitudo @KJCByrne @RWMaloneMD Yes> Dated 7/28/2021 from the Cochrane library https://t.co/D0Mvo3cOkh https://t.co/wE737tcYKs
@OklahomaCovid, this may not persuade true believers, but for the curious, you may want share this current science on Ivermectin for COVID-19. Cochrane meta-analysis, which is on-going with over 30 studies in the pipeline, suggests it not be used. https:
@beliefstructure @jojohill1974 @meatyuncle @brenontheroad No it does not-at least at this point with the studies and information out there https://t.co/F1tbO8aynG
When you are a healthcare professional yet you still don’t realise you are caught up in Covid conspiracy theories and behaving like an ass! https://t.co/ZJutKuVfjP
@Awen67898863 @hendrick2018 @anoticingsenpa1 @PierreKory @US_FDA I can do better than an open mind. I have data: https://t.co/t8udFWoP8x https://t.co/P4QhmnIwso
@drjkahn @RWMaloneMD @maddow @MSNBC @FDA_Drug_Info @US_FDA But actual clinical studies? Not so much.https://t.co/2TeJHhjZFN
@nikommen @SusieBdds @brenontheroad No, this tweet is accurate. Here is the Cochrane review of the evidence, which is the gold standard for clinical studies: https://t.co/E2DVmpbcYR
@grahamwalker @DrJenGunter This @cochranecollab SRMA gives some background on the topic of IVM for #COVID19 https://t.co/odXIDS5FaL
@karl_haynes @CJTheran @ggreenwald What the fuck are you talking about? Even if Ivermectin were as effective as crackpots claim, there isn't near enough quality data to make that determination. Anyone vaccine hesitant who's willing to use Ivermectin at t
RT @Portland_Beer: Because I know my patients will ask me about it. 41 Ivermectin studies & author’s conclusions: Overall, the reliable ev…
@eicul @mskalick @Axl33k Toxicky neni, jako antiparasitikum se pouziva, jedine co je vyvracene je ucinek na covid 19 napr. https://t.co/crQoiYuvFG
Because I know my patients will ask me about it. 41 Ivermectin studies & author’s conclusions: Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized tri
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@deguate @MaruLuarca Ya te mande un estudio de estudios y ni así, con usted es gastar polvora en zanates, pero aquí te va de nuevo... https://t.co/B2gFEmD4xk
14 studies: https://t.co/q4rudfZ6EP
@RWMaloneMD @maddow @MSNBC @FDA_Drug_Info @US_FDA Cochrane meta-analysis: So far, the evidence does not support its use for prevention or treatment of COVID. https://t.co/8INxTxBzDN Nor were benefits shown in the TOGETHER trials. https://t.co/N7M4IrZ3aU
@vickaelmer @teresalmazan @byemiek1 Te repito que me baso en la evidencia de los ensayos clínicos realizados hasta la fecha: "No se encontró evidencia para apoyar el uso de la ivermectina para tratar o prevenir la infección por covid-19..." https://t.co/4