@GregLeding Here's the review of the Aug. 20201 state of the science on ivermectin-covid: https://t.co/QanKN5VSwX Result: insufficient data--jury still out
RT @TheSGEM: @MDaware @JaimeAPRN No high-quality evidence to support its use. https://t.co/odXIDS5FaL
@MDaware @JaimeAPRN No high-quality evidence to support its use. https://t.co/odXIDS5FaL
@PierreKory I just came across this cochrane database review of ivermectin for covid. What is up with this review? Have you talked about this yet? https://t.co/e4bnqeS6NB
@IvmSlaysC0v1d @EverydayFinance @DrTomFrieden Madness! That is so wrong, invermectin does NOT treat Covud 19 and there is plenty of confirmation of that: here's one https://t.co/KarTLbpKQv And although viruses are microscopic parasites ivermectin does not
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@awfulhorrid @UrsulaV Better studies were designed and carried out, though not many of them. Cochrane's Review summarizes here: https://t.co/I5qIJuVrHY ... Ivermectin is as good as placebo. Placebo isn't bad! But there's nothing special about the de-wormer
@DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance." https://t.co/Uzcs0wUXmz https://t.co/eh0fdCDFQB
@IvmSlaysC0v1d @nickmmark You do realise that: The first 4 points of this tweet are irrelevant to the specific treatment of Covid-19 and your study claim is false. https://t.co/Idn6Ll1H5J
@TheFreds @Black1970Gary You had Covid, spent 4 days recovering on oxygen with the NHS and then took Ivermectin, which according to the meta analysis from Cochrane acts no better than a placebo. In medical terms, you experienced regression to the mean not
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
@teewee249 Here's the Cochrane review on it: https://t.co/VStRySX1lh Very very low-quality evidence & huge confidence intervals, but the point estimates are pretty solidly pro-Ivermectin.
@VaccineTruth2 What review is that? Because in studies it has been very clear ivermectin does nothing for Covid.
@shen_bott @TroncheBiais ...pour la qualité de leurs synthèses, comme par exemple Cochrane (cité par Raoult comme référence dans le domaine, au fait) Pour l'HCQ : https://t.co/jAkDx2nRZ9 Pour l'ivermectine : https://t.co/bV3QnId3Zd Et un résumé de un peu t
@MichaelAupaix @BastinPierre1 @HeyvaertLaurent @nicomedbxl @ONEnfance @CDCgov @lesoir Cette étude n'est pas randomisée, cela affecte sa qualité. Et en médecine on ne se fie pas à une seule étude, on rassemble les conclusions de plusieurs études. Ici une
@TX_TeaParty2_0 @WilliamJoy @wfaa Did you? Ivermectin doesn't work against Covid. https://t.co/pVKdwxwmrl
RT @DTB_BMJ: RT @juan_francomd: Caught in a Twitter argument over ivermectin? Trust the evidence. Here are three #FreeAccess articles you m…
@Natasha_Nin Lisez ces articles https://t.co/RqJedKyYtu
RT @T_Fiolet: https://t.co/Y8TnOsCxoy https://t.co/zFuJCB9LjO https://t.co/7n29BWeXG3 Cochrane : les preuves actuelles ne soutiennent pas…
@jo3Sant0s And Ivm for 2 https://t.co/Xu254IWQ63
@Millinillion3K3 @JenniferZenda @Belinda_McBride @TimFullerton The TL; DR summary of that study for people like myself.
@100trillionUSD @MinPres @hugodejonge Cochrane Institute - highest reputation in the world when it comes to scientific reviews - result: no evidence of efficacy of ivermectin against COVID .. https://t.co/qTeOlevbKQ
@itsjamesdhull @SoDakFarm @bluesky_42_ @blackswan651 @Covid19Critical @GidMK @cochranecollab '#Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19' https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J #OpenAcess 'We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preven
@peter_berghmans @vanranstmarc Neen het werkt niet. https://t.co/Vt7hmxezde
Vale a pena ler. @fabianoking https://t.co/XSRKvKsRIK
🧐
@JenniferZenda @Belinda_McBride @TimFullerton Mostly correct. It's not an anti-viral, but ivermectin does have some anti-viral action (at least in vitro). That of course does not prove it's useful in humans, either generally or for COVID-19 specifically.
@cor4office @dremilyportermd Als we naar de wetenschap kijken: Vaccin: 40.000 proefpersonen gerandomiseerd, dubbelblind, 95% effectief Ivermectine: https://t.co/FZ81nAL5Uu https://t.co/ZMYvWyXKDe
@SudRadio @gayets A priori ça marche moyen quand même votre truc https://t.co/ZstFnRHcyd
RT @nickmmark: - a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the…
RT @juan_francomd: Caught in a Twitter argument over ivermectin? Trust the evidence. Here are three #FreeAccess articles you must read 👇 https://t.co/5brpWsxcJC https://t.co/li0QjkMCM5 https://t.co/3bs2pHq7QU
@terhikoulumies @MuusaK @KariTikkinen Lääkkeitä ei testata noin vaan satunnaistetuilla kokeilla. Ivermektiinistä en pidättelisi henkeäni, trialeita menossa. "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infecti
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/wdOmNYbWOF
RT @LilRdVet2: @murrirl @thedailybeast Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain abo…
@murrirl @thedailybeast Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered h
@TeslaM3D @JLRIII @CBSNews Can't really rely on this Meta-Analysis since one of the larger studies used in this has been pulled from publication due to flaws within the study. A better review is the Cochrane Systematic Review. https://t.co/K8PMnQslVM
@LovesTheWords @EmilyGorcenski @SandleDavid @jimmy_dore @kenklippenstein And it is not just Medical Doctors that do research. So not sure what the flex is but a podcaster with a lot of low info reactionary followers that distrust any thing they deem mainst
@Charlescapsicum @antoinette_news @NSWHealth @NSWAmbulance Do NOT listen to this wacko… get vaccinated! Here’s a link to a proper systematic review of ivermectin. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
@PemicDan @MSHopkins4 @TheresaDianeUK1 …yet with all therapeutics it had to undergo larger scale placebo based testing. It failed horribly under these conditions. Which was disappointing but we moved on. We didn’t cling to a fantasy, and go around taking l
- a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” 7/ https://t.co/rDLkkGtPA4
@space_stations @Karen_Kong_ Dude all the research shows that if it has an effect is not a life saving one, is barely different to placebo as far as it has been discovered https://t.co/aflgSVQzPF
@space_stations @Karen_Kong_ https://t.co/aflgSVQzPF basis for studing it, not basis to believe it will work
@Bob_Ballinger This is horseshit, Bob. Anyone interested in a real meta-analysis can look here: https://t.co/QiiU9rwfaV Science.
https://t.co/UdkmcySxVQ Two different articles, same source. 2 different results?
@thedailybeast Here is another https://t.co/gmHbzMZDzH
@HansSwoloDolo @hofbats @SarahLJorgensen @GaryTuchmanCNN @AC360 There is no high quality evidence that Ivermectin is effective in treating or preventing COVID-19. https://t.co/R7SeRUjNYg
@deguate @MaruLuarca Le comparto esta otra. Además, si gusta, puedo compartir muchos más. https://t.co/B2gFEmD4xk
@medusaamoon @cooldancoolman It’s a scientific news article that quotes legitimate scientists who have reviewed the data and directly links to their analysis. Lol. The data is one click away. That’s called a citation or reference. Happy to help https://t.
1) The Cochrane Review: 👉 https://t.co/WFgZr0dCCY https://t.co/yyeZPkzE3z
@SpcialTK1 @philmoi @ChristianVolle @MathieuSlama https://t.co/IPlbKJtul3 On t'a déjà répondu, prend une🤣🤣🤣 tisane pour te calmer .
@MatjazSvab Gledam, da klinične študije pravijo, da nima smisla. Tole je en peer review teh študij. https://t.co/tIBva5d90l
RT @txemacoll: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratamiento…
Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención de la #COVID19 fuera de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados bien diseñados https://t.co/byfjFt8xVT via sanoysalvoblog
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención de la #COVID19 fuera de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados bien diseñados https://t.co/97Fn9mB8O1
@bufordmaddog @PeterHotez @CDCgov @CDCMMWR As do most studies. The evidence is really poor. Even the studies that find significant differences are often using secondary are outcomes that specifically chosen to make ivermectin look good. Hence we say quac
@_emmanuel___ @le_Parisien C est déjà fait : https://t.co/dlJ7uDUoCb
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
@nikoCSFB @blackintheempir Morphine has been for centuries, does that means we should use it for COVID? Have you check the state of research? here is a review paper from this year on the subject: https://t.co/uq8kFz9jOW
@jdueprocess @SpeaksAndHears @AaronBlake Science IS hard for Cochrane as well, I guess? https://t.co/dtU62l8hNA
@aleanto72 @borghi_claudio @GiuliaTamagnin1 Uno come questo ad esempio https://t.co/wGVo4ixo1u
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @Sefap_FAP: (Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP htt…
RT @Sefap_FAP: (Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP htt…
RT @robbo2885: @Fugstarnagar @zelo_street @GBNEWS @Ofcom Who cares what physicians think? unless they are specifically trained in virology…
@FrexitTV @wargonm Lisez juste les papier scientifiques. https://t.co/wpfCvJRYYj
@dshwa76 @Geminifty @TheHaguewood @AutumnDamnIt https://t.co/LLp1bwqLve Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @DaWittyWombat: @heathermcnarf @HadenWare @BenjaminPDixon Exactly, it says more large scale studies are need and has flaws as to why con…
RT @DaWittyWombat: @BenjaminPDixon The NIH has overwhelming states the ivermectin has no more effect than a placebo in large scale studies.…
@ralphscafe @JolyonMaugham @afneil @Ofcom Not according to Cochrane who found "Ivermectin compared to placebo or usual care may make little or no difference to improving outpatients' condition 14 days after treatment" though they concede that there have be
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
@fonytauci @CryanGrim @EbrilSir @kenklippenstein @jimmy_dore Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Review - Intervention Version published: 28 July 2021 {Not invitro - Summary of studies on Ivermectin} https://t.co/I22rIQISyI
@Revvy1337 @HawkeyeInDallas @socflyny @WesElyMD https://t.co/JTzMWtRcHS another meta analysis, so take it with a grain of salt (if you put garbage into a meta-analysis, you get garbage out), but the individual studies are fairly well-done, and total sample
@jimmykeating10 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@Gintit2k21 @TinderUppal @justfranklin @jpublik Source? “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infection, but the evidence base is limited.” https://t.co/xnsqB8zJRg
@Lewislama @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@dorathygreig47 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@MikeRokap @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@MikeRokap @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Damo__T @rochelle100mph @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment
@rochelle100mph @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@SpreckoStewart @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@CokeWayneCowbo1 @Revvy1337 @WesElyMD That's why it is still tested in clinical trials, whereas Remdesivir time is already over, as well as HCQ. https://t.co/P3jobLnaRM
@jimmyj_allday @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevent
@mattyoxide @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
RT @zzrwood: @Anthony74247166 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper syste…