RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
Apparently you're right. I lean right and that link won't let me see anything.
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@JMAURY41 @ObsConspiQc Je ne me considère pas comme l'un de ces "cons". Les résultats des études sont encore beaucoup trop partiels pour tirer des conclusions. Ça ressemble beaucoup à l'histoire de l'hydroxychloroquine. Le médicament micracle qui n'en étai
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
I’m getting errors timing out or a dead link. https://t.co/Zmf5ZeUOyv
Apparently I’m still not allowed to see it, the site says it’s down right now.
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
Meta studies are the good standard.
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
RT @ScottAdamsSays: If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
If you lean right, I'll bet you've never seen this Ivermectin study. https://t.co/aie70Ddrg3
@over_it23 @cammunchcar @kenklippenstein Irrelevant, dawg. Those are the people that developed the drug. I'll take their word over you; as you are nothing. https://t.co/kolgxG05kv
@PresBren @bnballin12 @SpittinVenoms @ISellFreeMoney @kenklippenstein That's the maker of the drug, dumbfuck. But here, unlike you, I came prepared: https://t.co/kolgxG05kv https://t.co/mXT9BlUwyj https://t.co/WpDyVk5q3q https://t.co/PfnfJLn3bU https://t.c
@_CaptainMagnet @MatkovichTony @waynerohde @breezemom27 @HuffPost They're being dismissed by govt for bias. Not sure if it's a legitimate assessment, most promising study they are dismissing because no one died either with it or the placebo. No one died. I
@JSMazarr An anecdotal story on a private website isn’t evidence. Below is a meta-analysis of “ivermectin vs. no treatment” studies; and it seems nobody has done an “ivermectin vs. standard of care” comparison.. https://t.co/qqer23Qy1k
@HenkJZoer @c_breul idd, zo wordt een wetenschappelijke tekst geschreven. We houden opties open, als er nieuwe data is, passen wij ons aan. Er is geen data die het effect van IVM laat zien, niets. Maar er lopen nog een aantal trials. Nieuws is niet goed...
@HenkJZoer @c_breul Oh... ik begrijp data niet, interessant! Kom er eens mee, dan laat ik ik je zien wat data is. Maar hier meer professionals die weten over data en goed ondezoek https://t.co/DTf3vc2zwq
@CaliMarineVet A meta-analysis is only as good as the underlying studies, you have to be very careful about inclusion criteria. Flawed statistical methods have led to retractions of ivermectin studies https://t.co/Kvo60HF95Z Here’s a better meta analysis
@HenkJZoer @c_breul En opnieuw https://t.co/DTf3vc2zwq
@HenkJZoer @c_breul En dezelfde groep wederom. Kies nu eens een articel, gepubliceerd, peer reviewed, niet retracted die je zeer goed vind en waarna je denkt het een goed idee is om een dewroming middel te nemen? https://t.co/DTf3vc2zwq
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@levi_alterman @NicolaPorro @pbecchi https://t.co/WXpjWYfu5d Qualche collega ha delle perplessità
@chadpencil @SpydyrrHeath @Chinchillazllla @PPetrarco You clearly need a better google. https://t.co/wGdVuV1UoH
RT @DrBubbs: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19..."…
"Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19..." https://t.co/zxT4KRUIjJ #Ivermectin #Covid19 #CochraneReview
@HenkJZoer @c_breul Vertel, welk artikel, niet een pre-print, geen trial de resultaten waarvan niet gepubliceerd zijn wil je bespreken. Pick er 1. Dit zijn de trials met enige degenlijke setup: https://t.co/DTf3vc2zwq
@outreforet @PaulLow32841476 Here is a properly conducted analysis of the available research showing no evidence of benefit: https://t.co/E2DVmpbcYR
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
@Browser25271932 @michaelbd @aaronsibarium @petespiliakos What evidence of efficacy? It’s practically non-existent. https://t.co/Ad3x8fIwXm
@Lrn2History @randomspank @abcnews Here is the gold standard for you for the entire world for all researchers. https://t.co/mM97ayUoHQ
@RossaMullin Table with no source, link etc is as reliable as my dog tapping his paw twice & claiming he can count up 2 Go back to school so you can tell diff. between reputable & bullshit https://t.co/YBpt6FrOwN https://t.co/fVRmyQkSvV https
@PierreKory hey pierre - are u familiar with this negative to IVM Cochrane paper ? do you guys have a page on this somewhere ? https://t.co/oXTRbcjvxK
@tristandancunha @olcan_shaw @Oisin_McGovern @ronronzo https://t.co/gdvEe0wzOO "We found *NO EVIDENCE* to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infection, but the evidence base is limited."
@JorgeEReyes1 @Fela76007749 La mejor revisión de estudios completados y en curso sobre ivermectina, es la reciente revisión hecha por los científicos independientes y sin ánimo de lucro de la Colaboración Conchrane. https://t.co/eUYSptxMcV https://t.co/cX
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
@MMA_lens @jakeshieldsajj Oh yeah? Link me to the accredited, peer reviewed studies. And please make sure they are 100% legit. Here's mine— 14 studies, over 1,600 people and no proof whatsoever that ivermectin does anything for COVID-19 https://t.co/wBjj
@purviparwani Had similar discussions about Ivermectin. I usually ask why would we not approve the use of a cheap drug if it was efficacious? I never get a logical meaningful answer! https://t.co/EskL9iy7UZ
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
@TheQuartering Doesn't work you ignorant muppet. NO reputable studies show either efficacy or safety. Stop posting lies and misinformation 😡😡😡 https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
@vickipoulter1 @TonyHWindsor Not if you do meta-analysis correctly https://t.co/Isi672clqJ
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
@connorino @pinchofginger @KenTremendous Try this one. Flip down to the bottom & it gives you the run down. https://t.co/eXAR8ngC27
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
RT @JulieLeask: Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. T…
Ivermectin in the news. It's a drug to treat parasites. It doesn't have sufficient evidence to treat or prevent COVID-19. This is helpful and high quality information. https://t.co/9lrVqoFQGM
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
@vallen67 @DrTomFrieden Yet many people around the world are taking appropriate doses and never going to the hospital in the first place. https://t.co/3lEE6TynGQ
@DoubleDDebby @DrTomFrieden Yet, millions of people are taking it successfully around the world. https://t.co/3lEE6TynGQ
RT @A_Ra_Berlin: Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли ч…
Ивермектин трендит в твиттере. Спрос на препарат взлетел в США🚀 Удивительно: те же люди, что против вакцин (ведь мало ли что от них будет), готовы принимать антипаразитное средсто без доказанной эффективности вопреки рекомендациям https://t.co/YZoDfsp0eL h
@ElvisSinosic Ughhh not more of this. Yes, there is a human use for ivermectin. It's used against parasitic worms just like horses and occasionally head lice. Please, please, please do a bit more research into the accredited studies done on this drug.
@The_OtherET @bethanyshondark You’re assuming he’s being treated with human-grade Ivermectin, which is not FDA-approved for this use. That means Rogan is taking the dosage used for farm animals. There are no double-blind, peer-reviewed studies showing Iver
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
@FrankModeo Parce que ceci. https://t.co/2aPr4Nxy5L
@justintrapp @Lowkingpl 14 studies over 1,600 patients, no proof whatsoever that ivermectin treats COVID-19. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed
@nanimononaranu @JustMeGLC @QTRResearch @jilliancyork @WajahatAli https://t.co/6Yv4Hg6yBa I can do that too. Nobody should be using this for covid because it is not proven to work and is proven to be harmful if used haphazardly, which is what is happening
@tempete777 @quocdngu @VeilletteAndre @NGrandvaux @isa_picard Tout le monde en parle, voyons. Mais pas pour les bonnes raisons. https://t.co/2aPr4Nxy5L
@Freemarkethuman @SeanRohead @Ivan_Davila_21 @MsKimmyThompson @Forbes Finally, here is the link to the Cochrane analysis: https://t.co/ABycWFkbiq
@whereispankaj @GKudin @joshuaharris20 @marcorubio Fourteen different studies found no measurable effect: https://t.co/uxTpk4B0QZ The only thing it helps is if you happen to have parasites.
"Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality." https://t.co/AOXVUTMtJG
@heckyessica @NPR you're not a real journalist https://t.co/Dax6E1tXPF
RT @JohannaSzabo1: @dream_tansy @Uaskt @chikaching The highly esteemed and independent Cochrane Institute have reported their findings afte…
@Darkrinsolarorb @dvdheiden @sketts1 @AndyMacMillan14 @redundantuk Thats great. Try this: https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i
@RNicholsLV @jbbrisco You're right, I personally don't. But the thousands of scientists that have been studying this for awhile do. https://t.co/EchnYb3bkV https://t.co/7Zt0Kfn0ZC
Here’s a link to the systematic review: https://t.co/rPpHQnKVbj Here’s a more scathing takedown in less dry language: https://t.co/3JUwQUiby7 2/20
@WillAdamslsd @E7Drew @US_FDA I’ve yet to see a study that showed ivermectin is effective for covid. So it’s not well known, because it’s false. https://t.co/37wVfqPbyC
@RWMaloneMD @kingsam919 You seen this one Robert? Been any rebuttals yet?? Looks like they ruled out a number of studies, bias? https://t.co/UL5qX9ja4S
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@sialnez @RoseTay20882782 @Sandy85762869 @jmkcob @jizzwhistle @NumbersMuncher From this study: The molecular hypothesis of ivermectin's antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) r
@MaximusVesuvius @TamponsForTrump @scott3614 @kenklippenstein Here’s a better study https://t.co/IB5wNdAYKP
@SomeGuy02245782 @onions712 @Covid19Critical @marybethpf @PierreKory https://t.co/bKkZmfiI7x Try again. Or search it yourself. “Cochrane review ivermectin” If the math of the forest plot crosses one you do realize then it shows no effect on the outcomes
@BlackMrWilson @richmurphy1232 @Fiorella_im I'm sure every other study like this one is wrong but your random one is correct. https://t.co/h1tt4q5MVB
@US_FDA 2 opposing studies. Im now confused. https://t.co/V84oV6Y9Sf vs. https://t.co/derKrZ6SIw
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
@richmurphy1232 @Fiorella_im https://t.co/h1tt4q5MVB it's not suitable for covid and there is a giant grift going on by dodgy influencers and doctors