nothing more than a placebo? published 28 July 2021. multiple studies reviewed, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19. studies are underway that may produce clearer answers https
RT @EricTopol: New and rigorous review of Ivermectin by @CochraneLibrary @cochranecollab underscores the lack of evidence that it works htt…
RT @ZulmaCucunuba: ¿Podemos por favor cerrar el tema de ivermectina para covid-19? La ivermectina es un gran medicamento, de gran importa…
@leadfreeH2OinDC @guardian Published peer-reviewed medical literature says Ivermectin ineffective against Covid https://t.co/SZuRy1Cp7N Meanwhile poison control centers reporting 5 fold increase in Ivermectin poisoning cases
#COVID19 #COVID "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of #ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19." https://t.co/av4MCdhF6A
I encourage my trainees to approach every question with unbridled enthusiasm and a critical eye. Poor rationale, experimental design and holes in data/results must be identified to do better. Even more so in this era! So start with a reputable journal: htt
@issapunk @oufenix @zachzachzach @Morgan_Moriarty https://t.co/s3Ao2N8BzV I found this.
A review of actual studies done. Results are mixed that may be the major reason why work has stalled. https://t.co/vbmoWROHAc
@PierreKory @dancalegria Cochrane? https://t.co/DTf3vc2zwq
@herbstzeit2018 @BlakesWort @AerztekammerBW Wenn man nur ganz kurz recherchiert, findet man schnell heraus, dass viele Studien noch laufen bzw. kein positives Ergebnis geliefert haben. Aber dazu müsste man ja wieder mal mehr als die Überschriften lesen. h
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
@TOOEdit Why are you still pushing this trite? Is it just because it feels like it’s vaguely ‘anti-establishment?’ The available research makes it clear that IVM should not be used in the prevention/treatment of COVID. https://t.co/bTIJCPFYA9
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
@El_Duderino_788 @ArwaM @LeninsLinguine Actually there is a more recent meta-analysis https://t.co/VIViQA0w4p
@CourageTheprin1 @a_mum_lol When I last checked, excess deaths stats show 0.4% of South Africa’s population has already died of covid. Ivermectin is junk science. Studies done with proper analysis show no result https://t.co/Isi672clqJ
@hindouch75 @EmaJ_P @BrigitteMaz @DIVIZIO1 Lisez cet article scientifique, nettement plus documenté que des interviews de médecins que ni vous ni moi ne connaissons trouvé sur YouTube:, https://t.co/RqJedKhnBW
Full review: https://t.co/0j411ep1yl
@Tommy2Xs @FOX5Atlanta [Citation needed] Here's mine! https://t.co/7A0jSuThNw
@SomeGuy02245782 @onions712 @Covid19Critical @marybethpf @PierreKory Gladly. And again, redoing the math on another analysis is valid, considering the trial was retracted and new data available. https://t.co/bKkZmfiI7x https://t.co/FJJj1MrLTu https://t
@Naomi_D_Harvey @ClockworkCommu1 @netback @BogochIsaac https://t.co/5lZaA3KOoa I am not seeing many studies showing lack of benefit. In fact it's showing the opposite. https://t.co/MDTTeyIyQ3 <- best summary, low quality evidence shows potential, wait
@sineadggleeson @MrKonstantin5 @WJ23A @WestSydHealth If you want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for t
Kann mir jemand noch andere Studien nennen? https://t.co/vczDq30Tz6
RT @Vadeboncoeur_Al: Ivermectine? Voici ce qu'écrivait Cochrane le 28 juillet dernier: "Nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes sout…
@Slepton2525 @YKDesignLABS @9GCMnMkdh95PyHm @maruirin @MIKITO_777 何より、そんなに効果があるなら臨床試験で結果が出ないのがおかしい。 https://t.co/j9xhTn34Y4 全否定する気はありませんが、最低限、普通の用法用量では効果がないことは明らかかと。 ちなみにイベルメクチン初出の論文は試験管で、致死量使ってましたよね。
RT @Cosmic_Surfer: @GodandtheBear He's cherry-picking and ignoring that the very same site published a piece in July, 2021 saying: https:/…
@GodandtheBear He's cherry-picking and ignoring that the very same site published a piece in July, 2021 saying: https://t.co/8KuXvaYiRT https://t.co/apEzo8aoL8
@BillSpadea Millions have refused the vaccine because it wasn't FDA approved, yet we're upset that hospitals are not using a drug for an unapproved use? "The reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of CO
Con buona pace di Porro, Becchi e compagnia cantante #Ivermectina
RT @Vadeboncoeur_Al: Ivermectine? Voici ce qu'écrivait Cochrane le 28 juillet dernier: "Nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes sout…
Ivermectine? Voici ce qu'écrivait Cochrane le 28 juillet dernier: "Nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes soutenant l'utilisation de l'ivermectine dans le traitement ou la prévention de la COVID-19, mais la base de données probantes est limitée."
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
@IsaCoachYVida El enlace que comenta el tema de los ensayos (a 26 de mayo ahora): https://t.co/RQ1VWW0Vxn
RT @DeBieGuido: Hoe komt het dat medicijnen, zoals HCQ welke reeds meer dan 40 jaar worden voorgeschreven tegen malaria en reuma, en met su…
@larschristens @Medicinmanden Bryant et al og Hill et al er metanalyser som begge inkluderer et studie fra Elghazzer et al, et studie som var i preprint og trukket tilbage efterfølgende pga. stor kritik. Der er et Corchrane review af samme, men uden dett
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
@1devilnevercry @NicolaPorro @pbecchi @RWMaloneMD Sa cos'è una Cochrane? Laureato (in legge e non in medicina) su Google sarà lei. https://t.co/DGAtUqySFK
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
RT @nagaragawa79: @hanakihideaki @siminwakakuma Twitterでチョケてる暇があったら、コクランのレビュー(https://t.co/XyqAelfj7K)を覆せるくらい質の高い治験を行って、 #イベルメクチン の効果とやらをとっ…
@hanakihideaki @siminwakakuma Twitterでチョケてる暇があったら、コクランのレビュー(https://t.co/XyqAelfj7K)を覆せるくらい質の高い治験を行って、 #イベルメクチン の効果とやらをとっとと証明すればいいのではありませんか? 関西の「自称"コロナ患者を日本一多く診た医者"」と、言ってることが大差ないですよ、花木先生。
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
RT @Cartabellotta: @colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità…
@colvieux @Antonio_Caramia @GiulioNotturni @GiovaQuez @AurelianoStingi @MedBunker "Evidenze disponibili di buona qualità non supportano l'utilizzo della #Ivermectina per prevenzione o terapia della #COVID19, al di fuori di rigorose sperimentazioni cliniche
@NicolaPorro @pbecchi @NicolaPorro ma la vogliamo finire con questa pagliacciata dell’IVERMECTINA? Le invio una metanalisi sui lavori: la sottoponga cortesemente anche a @pbecchi e Zibordi. Almeno lei: basta disorientare le persone. https://t.co/eadaB1T2g
Hoe komt het dat medicijnen, zoals HCQ welke reeds meer dan 40 jaar worden voorgeschreven tegen malaria en reuma, en met succes, nu plots schadelijk zouden zijn indien ze worden voorgeschreven tegen COVID-19 ?
@AI2BO4 @Dr_Pilgrim @jyanguas @EugeniodOrs_ También me ha parecido raro que no se incluyera este metaestudio https://t.co/ZfuLADEYPy
@KirbSwiss @masonpelt In addition to Elgazzar, other meta-studies looked at and rejected Hashim 2020, Mahmud 2020 and Niaee 2020 for inclusion. See, e.g., https://t.co/6bqnSrKk11
@EM_RESUS While I am very skeptical of ivermectin, I'm surprised of conflicting metanalysis reports. What do you think? https://t.co/NPAsf6zebv Cochrane- https://t.co/Z55mWLzY2L
wonderful news #IvermectinWarriors! Just wonderful how well the Barbra Streisand effect is working to perfection... be sure not to tell those that are afraid of a EUA trial period Per Madcow/MSNBC a 24 fold/86,000 increase week to week in scripts TY Doc
Are you wondering about the possibility of "Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19"? Scientists are curious, too! But so far, the evidence does not support using #ivermectin (Popp et al., 2021): https://t.co/Cy8mUCQGCw
@CarlosDanger99 @MyElectricZen @CBCAlerts It doesn’t do squat. https://t.co/wmEB1rSw56
"Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/LN8XBdcuNy
@LouisBrandeis6 @JReinerMD And there is no hesitancy in the research on ivermectin. Here is a Cochrane review for you. https://t.co/f2NNci08UQ
@LTziolis @ProfPCDoherty @arkmedic If you want to see what real research looks like, see below… TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” https://t.co/VztBDKIjSd
@MartinPlourde8 @Pinedjem01 @JeanSebTurcotte Voici l'opinion la plus récente du plus gros groupe de recherche au monde à propos de ce médicament. https://t.co/2aPr4Nxy5L
@ryanlevier @nrgizerbunny @MedicPlastic @Ogichidaa_ As to the discrepancy in results, hence my "suspect effects" in my original post https://t.co/z3sJpp8PrX
@ryanlevier @nrgizerbunny @MedicPlastic @Ogichidaa_ Here's the full text article from the original publication https://t.co/BtNalqc0XI
@ryanlevier @nrgizerbunny @MedicPlastic @Ogichidaa_ The link I included was from a later date and included the results of more studies, both studies were metadata analysis studies https://t.co/MUwpGF3Y1T
@MichelleBlanc @CovidAnalysis Ce n’est oas tout d’accumuler des études. Il faut des méta-analyses bien faites comme celkes de Cochrane. https://t.co/GesXZL6SZg
@wakeupkiwi @IpscVictoria https://t.co/POYbaa3IR7 A meta analysis of 14 studies looking at IVM vs placebo. Not extensive sample size but indicates IVM isnt clearly beneficial in treating covid. The latest I've seen, admittedly dont research or engage wit
@wakeupkiwi @IpscVictoria https://t.co/POYbaa3IR7 14 studies comparing IBM to placebo, sample size of 1500
@Tremendous_Word @southsiderSAT @NoBSallowed1 @ImSpeaking13 Here's some research that shows the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 ....so your point???? https://t.co/6hNL3YPxud
@racechikee @Waldowordsworth @keese09 @Shayan86 There is no effect of IVM efficacy: https://t.co/AQge4x4sXb
@ChrisCillizza Wow, stop - that's simply NOT a fact. Do better! Your source: "..we are uncertain about the efficacy.. of ivermectin used to treat.. COVID‐19... Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates." https://t.co/i
RT @Caerage: A large review of the existing Ivermectin studies: no evidence for benefit in COVID19. "Overall, the reliable evidence availa…
There are some other reviews out there that include studies that are not randomized trials or have not been verified. I trust Cochrane, frankly. https://t.co/PUJhYWHCLJ
RT @Caerage: A large review of the existing Ivermectin studies: no evidence for benefit in COVID19. "Overall, the reliable evidence availa…
Just...stop. Find a litreview. I can't believe this is still a discussion. https://t.co/FDoPsJ5V7F
A large review of the existing Ivermectin studies: no evidence for benefit in COVID19. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." http
@courrierinter J’ai trouvé cet article pas mal et objectif https://t.co/dOwjnVp8bD
@lilougo @On3Fr3nch4T53P @kissingpigs @eric_patris @kelya2b Ce sont des bêtises. Quand on a un doute on regarde les meta-analyse de chez Cochrane (gold standard). Et pchiit l'ivermectine (et l'HCQ aussi au passage, meta cochrane du même accabit). https:/
@kristy_clueless Update: it looks like it has been tested in humans based upon the "in vitro" preliminary results. This article is highly technical. https://t.co/dGKUcJdmS5
@Dark_Realist @karma_galore @CaulfieldTim @sarahcrgr This review contains the overwhelmingly positive Elgazzar study that was retracted due to fraudulent data. Without that study the results would look very different. https://t.co/15NXC0sYWa
I dig the Cochrane involvement “Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality”
RT @chasbarter: What about the massive experiment in India where millions of people took Ivermectin with great results. Don’t these count?
❸ Ivermectine ➜ La dernière méta-analyse Cochrane (28/07/21) n’a pas trouvé de données probantes soutenant son utilisation dans le traitement ou la prévention de la COVID-19 : https://t.co/j1nclSyjNd. Son évaluation se poursuit dans 31 études en cours actu
@nrgizerbunny @MedicPlastic @Ogichidaa_ We should? What other medications of suspect effect should we be randomly be taking? https://t.co/MUwpGF3Y1T
@JesseBlackAllen @MooreintheAM Also read this https://t.co/SYoRzL0U5S