@KistNirvan @crovaxsentry @demsmight @justinsp07 @joerogan Yes, initial studies on ivermectin in Jan/Feb 2021 were promising. Better-controlled studies found the effects were overstated in the early studies. Meta-analysis shows no reliable evidence of effe
@turbofolkenjoyr @NewDayForNJ @ReutersWorld @rose78_joanne Yeah, that's a great question. Here are a few sources from medical journals (not random webpages or things that are not peer-reviewed). https://t.co/Lvmz2Vb41J
@BrumDog3 @somersetbagpuss @Mick_Lindores @VaxControlGroup If you are qualified to assess scientific evidence you will already know how value this. https://t.co/LGghn0vO5F If you’re not, then you’re not.
@eellppgg @Alejandra891201 @giordanopg Eso es en la teoría, en la práctica, no hay evidencia que respalde el uso de Ivermectina en COVID-19. https://t.co/sFEbBBeMET
RT @CochraneLibrary: #Ivermectin: @cochranecollab's most talked about review. ➡️Read the review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J ➡️Interview with…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #Ivermectin: @cochranecollab's most talked about review. ➡️Read the review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J ➡️Interview with…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #Ivermectin: @cochranecollab's most talked about review. ➡️Read the review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J ➡️Interview with…
#Ivermectin: @cochranecollab's most talked about review. ➡️Read the review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J ➡️Interview with authors as they explore why: https://t.co/7wFMKU4Qm8 https://t.co/dRYuW40msb
@ComanChe553101 @joerogan Here is an analysis of ivermectin studies with randomization and controls. https://t.co/dtIP5nFNOr
@remonwangxt https://t.co/jrOPiWNjCR 查到一篇相关，但作者写没有发现证据伊维菌素可治疗新冠，证据依据有限，这篇样本多但是有效样本少，其他的都是可能性也没结论，文中提到大剂量的问题没有得到批准，日本这个？
@ariehkovler Correct. https://t.co/738PMRZtbg
@JuiceFreely They are looking at it. But the evidence is not there at the present time. Studies so far are small, poorly designed and in several cases including the largest, have already been withdrawn due to being fraudulent. https://t.co/6SQ5bsMJhB
@FoooBarBazz @Phacops9999 @Tim_Roehn Diese Autoren haben 14 randomisierte und abgeschlossene Studien zu Covid-19 und Ivermectin untersucht und keine Evidenz für einen Nutzen gefunden. Weitere 31 Studien laufen noch und würden das Ergebnis gegebenenfalls mo
@dorienrose Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit gevonde
@AblemanAdam @ariehkovler Clear benefit? Where are these trials? Here is the actual Cochrane review (gold standard meta analysis) which finds no evidence of benefit. https://t.co/2bpIVMuMUM
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @GidMK @tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy It'd be like if numerous space agencies…
@GidMK @tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy It'd be like if numerous space agencies from across the globe said Earth is not flat, but one instead trusted a flat Earth blog that says an Earth scientist on Twitter is biase
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy @GidMK Re: "I might add that this site seems v…
@tlewis3348 Regarding https://t.co/8l3ZkSTUJ9:
@tlewis3348 Re: "I'm clearly not a med Dr, so maybe I'm missing something here, but the analysis at https://t.co/9sRCNTMFot seems extremely solid." The analysis is misleading, and likely willfully so. Medical experts do not take it seriously. https://t.c
@tlewis3348 @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @LisaMar73085074 @anonyguy @GidMK Re: "I might add that this site seems very excellent: https://t.co/9sRCNTMFot (sister site to https://t.co/mheQ8N20KM)." I've spent years reading medical research. The people
RT @bait51: https://t.co/qoMUgOIWfH Check this out for the latest including support for Ivermectin and it's history and present use re Cov…
https://t.co/qoMUgOIWfH Check this out for the latest including support for Ivermectin and it's history and present use re Covid! This article from the National Institutes of Health.
@Jgee3943 @JustJH14 @alexandrosM I was about to write "you've got to be kidding," but I'm sure you believe your propaganda, and there's no talking you out of it. You'll ignore this, but you're repeating pure garbage. Here's Cochrane on IVM: https://t.co/j
@jelucas14 @EricBillyFR C'est quoi les ref de l'étude? J'ai juste trouve la dernière méta-analyse. Pas franchement enthousiasmant:https://t.co/rkVO02wjxK
@bordner_maryann @ketaminelover @AndyGrewal Also our national library of medicine: https://t.co/ICG68sp0Cu
@orwell2022 @Marc_Veld @tommy0gun @bringsmileback3 @koagelink @LaceyX1989 @SebastienDeVos @meladoro378 @fl_bart @ChrisAalberts @vanranstmarc @P_McCulloughMD https://t.co/XiNW8YxKeh Not an expert, but I assume Marc would agree that this pretty much tells i
@Nightof_sorrow @Elmotrix @Bobgx2 Science is not that easy young man https://t.co/XVgcv1stB5
@savannahgraycee @naturalllyi @DrSPrendiville @AllMattNYT The very best that can be said about the use of ivermectin to treat COVID19 infection is there is not enough evidence yet. “[T]he reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for
@Angry__cat_ @nelarolan Con qué? Con capturas de pantalla? Esta es la evidencia científica "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials" ht
@Christoffer1968 I see your point. My only concern is if people expect Ivermectin works and it doesn’t, then people will not receive a high quality treatment. https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw
@JeffreyRumney @wba434 @prowlmedia @calvinrobinson @doctor_oxford The current state of evidence of ivermectin as treatment for COVID: https://t.co/rru1nYyc8D
@JohnVin07786901 @AliAdair22 @joncoopertweets If ivermectin had been proven to treat Covid (it hasn’t) you still wouldn’t have a point…other than that a Nobel prize was awarded. https://t.co/QUGa2fbitn
@MalicGruban @SteveJones3465 @KnutCrosswords @daveh171 @NostrilsHairy @JuliaHB1 @LozzaFox @sajidjavid That relies on multiple studies which have been shown to be highly problematic & debunked. There is a large reliance on Elgazzar to bolster results -
@mouldcapital @LozzaFox Key message from Cochrane database, linked to evidence nhs uk/NICE site -low evidence of efficacy of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 with only a few poor quality studies available, as opposed to very high evidence base and higher quali
@robindahood3187 @Dam_outsider @abirballan @Twitter @NIH @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory @DrJBhattacharya @MartinKulldorff @ScottWAtlas I guess you call this a corporate newspaper? Once again, no reliable studies have proven ivermectin stops Covid deaths. ht
@blacksesame @NSWHealth When they have been proven in reputable, well designed trials. https://t.co/7bLgr8xP0A
@debh_carbone @Jorge_Esteves @andreawerner_ https://t.co/Iw0C4eHqrD é tão difícil assim entender???
@Hiyahills @Av8trix1 @LozzaFox "Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet" - its flawed https://t.co/cmMosvqd6x Meanwhile https://t.co/zE5SRCbN9P Taking a drug for parasitic worms undergoing trials, rather than a vaccine tha
@YogaLifeLine think your assertion on this issue may be questionable. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/JtEkcSxEoE
RT @AdamRutherford: @DamienShort I'm afraid this is simply incorrect. Cochrane is the gold standard for high quality meta-analysis of medi…
@hyd3ro1 I'll wait here for your link to a legitimate double blind study on ivermectin showing that it actually effective in treating covid. Meanwhile, for your reading pleasure... https://t.co/PCMAYyilxr
@DamienShort I'm afraid this is simply incorrect. Cochrane is the gold standard for high quality meta-analysis of medical interventions and finds no such evidence https://t.co/JutmNgmBW9
@MarieAnnUK Is this what he's taking ? https://t.co/5OzZ3eb4ly
@JackBMontgomery @LozzaFox @TrialPrinciple @OxfordMedSci there's "no real clinical justification" - really? good quality meta-analysis suggests it's unlikely work. it's being used in trials until that point. https://t.co/tUbOl4YX1v
@alisterrussell @AlecPiercy @Eddystone506 He hasn't got any. https://t.co/vPyeXeJpOz
@PatriotForeve11 @RedJohnBounds @Eddystone506 Facts: ivermectin doesn't even work. Might as well take paracetamol... https://t.co/vPyeXeJpOz
@SeivwrightTrudy Sorry.
RT @rogerkb2012: @Eddystone506 I thought this was a wind-up till I looked it up! 'During the COVID-19 pandemic, ivermectin was researched…
@Eddystone506 I thought this was a wind-up till I looked it up! 'During the COVID-19 pandemic, ivermectin was researched for possible utility in preventing and treating COVID-19, but no good evidence of benefit was found.' That from Wikipedia but evidenc
@POE_backup @KLubarn12 @EnderDev_ Save your money. https://t.co/738PMRZtbg
@SeivwrightTrudy Ever hear of Cochrane, doc? Citing one study is misleading. Duh. https://t.co/738PMRZtbg
@praxsusg @hyxx_or @PrLantern @BigSuis @arikouts Bah, non, alexander il sait pas... Par contre cochrane, tu connais ? https://t.co/mv4OO6MJHb
@hyxx_or @PrLantern @praxsusg @BigSuis @arikouts Donc 1 étude critiquée vs une méta : https://t.co/mv4OO6MJHb
@wenlembo @Marc_Veld @talithamuusse @Doc_Box hoi @wenlembo ("Hun oproep: behandel mensen vroeg met veilige medicatie en red levens! En stop met het demoniseren van die veilige medicijnen."), Ivermectine werkt niet tegen corona. Bron: https://t.co/5CGeAKkx
@wenlembo @Marc_Veld @talithamuusse @Doc_Box hoi @wenlembo ("Zijn die artsen dan gek volgens jou?"), ja indien ze weigeren de conclusie te aanvaarden dat Ivermectine niet werkt tegen corona. Bron: https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6
@wenlembo @Marc_Veld @talithamuusse @Doc_Box hoi @wenlembo, de Aarde is een bol en Ivermectine werkt niet tegen corona. Bron: https://t.co/PEjVwqwAXM Je bent dus vrij om te roepen dat de Aarde plat is of dat Ivermectine wel helpt tegen corona. Beide zijn
@Remulus15 @pamiechomeblog @KozminskiUni @Covid19Critical @PierreKory @PaulMarik Ale gdzie ktoś kwestionuje, że iwermentyna to odrobaczacz dla koni (dla ludzi skądinąd też)? Na dziś badania (a było ich ponad 30 i trwa kolejne 20) nie potwierdzają skuteczno
@HellLiving666 @goozzi81 Podałem Panu przystępne źródło, jeśli umie Pan czytać teksty naukowe, proszę uprzejmie https://t.co/XdLTMGgc1f
@don2deliver @fryingmoths @neverendingluv8 @cons_owned U’re a Youtube-Degree- specialist? Steroids are SoC! HCQ is proven to be ineffective, IVM’s effectiveness is still doughtful! https://t.co/yOhVTqEWu8 The (partly) useful mCA Sotrovimab costs $2200 pe
@JohanArlovski @sparkybob11 @PierreKory A book?? Are you kidding me? You must live in the 19th century. Only fools think an anti-parasitic MIGHT be effective for viruses. Missed basic zoology I see. Let me help you, assuming you can read. https://t.co/Vwi
Por otro lado, la PMDA, jamás hace trucos sucios (no es como en occidente), sin un Ensayo Clínico y con tanta evidencia en contra de la #eficacia de #ivermectine , no alentarían el uso de la misma. Aquí un metaanálisis, que te contradice completamente: ht
@Tania_Tha_Hun @jonnybgood1 @drsanjaygupta @joerogan Your right, it's not hard ffs: https://t.co/b4XoaKkY1s
@Celtics_PRam @TomFitton @GOP "Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are consi
RT @BBWave2020: @urphucher @Ethan_Sawyer_ @WorldBeCray Get a f&$king vaccine …. https://t.co/nlhhyNLbik https://t.co/XvstC6CsNZ
@luisnube @millin8150 "Las pruebas realizadas en laboratorio demuestran que la ivermectina puede ralentizar la reproducción del virus de la covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2), pero tales efectos necesitarían dosis importantes en los seres humanos" https://t.co/jvQLi8um
@pythonmaniac @mholkers @DanielTuijnman @UMCUtrecht @ArtsenC @pjvanerp @Cath77777 @hbj0168 @Doc_Box @DCSZ14 Jelle schreef over de werking van Ivermectine tegen corona: "...dit is nog niet onderzocht. Het is jammer dat ze dat niet doen." 1. Jelle liegt da
@respectfreewill @Keef3Keef @gregfischer69 @RollingStone Show the peer reviewed studies. I have mine. https://t.co/bVtI4R4lez
@DanielTuijnman @mholkers @pythonmaniac @UMCUtrecht @ArtsenC @pjvanerp @Cath77777 @hbj0168 @Doc_Box @DCSZ14 https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6 De 2de bron is deze review. Uiteraard kunnen nieuwe ontwikkelingen ervoor zorgen dat ik mijn standpunt bijstel. Standaard l
@debowensIcare @urphucher @ellenspencer03 @BBWave2020 @Ethan_Sawyer_ @WorldBeCray ROFL...why take a horse dewormer when it doesn't seem to work? See, we did our research too. https://t.co/MH3k3Nhh4B https://t.co/ReibnkWpmW
RT @BBWave2020: @urphucher @Ethan_Sawyer_ @WorldBeCray Get a f&$king vaccine …. https://t.co/nlhhyNLbik https://t.co/XvstC6CsNZ
RT @BBWave2020: @urphucher @Ethan_Sawyer_ @WorldBeCray Get a f&$king vaccine …. https://t.co/nlhhyNLbik https://t.co/XvstC6CsNZ
@jaaarock @lexharvs @TorontoStar Did you read the full text of the study? No. Neither did I as the link is dead to the Indian journal where it was. Fact is, actual meta study experts have looked into this: https://t.co/3y9efBWNOw and found it does nothing
@pythonmaniac @UMCUtrecht @ArtsenC @pjvanerp @Cath77777 @hbj0168 @Doc_Box @DanielTuijnman @mholkers @DCSZ14 hoi Jelle ("Kijk, voorschrijven van ivectermine ben ik geen voorstander van, niet zonder onderzoek. Maar ik vind wel dat het onderzocht moet worden.