@lauri_paavola @kohudonitsi @TiinaKeskimki @SampoLms Mene nyt helvettiin pelle, Ivermektiinistä ei ole mitään hyötyä Koronan hoidossa, typerys. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1

New Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Ivermectin ‘Significantly’ Reduces COVID Infections, Hospitalization, and Mortality Rates https://t.co/1bllXdq3xG January 18, 2022

@InesvanBokhoven @slotball @DafiCrypt @cwitteveen1 @Alicia1984N @veen_els @ElvisMemphis70 @Meggy_Mae @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep @BagginsMolly @wimaalten Zie hieronder voor bewijs 2. https://t.co/PtqPG3C3j7

@pete988007766 @clownworld_bobo @Monstercoyliar @isa_picard @SkepticalMutant @CoralBlob @stevenmosher @mcfunny @tenebra99 @DCGreenZone1 @AlastairMcA30 @greenboat @ZaynJaffer @_mamadeb @Top_Muppetries @ncdave4life @melissa94307909 @swedishchf @carlsmythe @d

@pete988007766 @clownworld_bobo @DCGreenZone1 @isa_picard @Monstercoyliar @SkepticalMutant @CoralBlob @stevenmosher @mcfunny @tenebra99 @AlastairMcA30 @greenboat @ZaynJaffer @_mamadeb @Top_Muppetries @ncdave4life @melissa94307909 @swedishchf @carlsmythe @d

@clownworld_bobo @DCGreenZone1 @isa_picard @pete988007766 @Monstercoyliar @SkepticalMutant @CoralBlob @stevenmosher @mcfunny @tenebra99 @AlastairMcA30 @greenboat @ZaynJaffer @_mamadeb @Top_Muppetries @ncdave4life @melissa94307909 @swedishchf @carlsmythe @d

@GrumpyOldDoc The Bryant et al. ivermectin meta-analysis is basically dead at this point, especially since it's known to contain fraudulent + retracted research. https://t.co/sQNCRK7M8i https://t.co/t0M0VknI4n [https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69] https://t.co/CviHu

@slotball @DafiCrypt @InesvanBokhoven @cwitteveen1 @Alicia1984N @veen_els @ElvisMemphis70 @Meggy_Mae @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep @BagginsMolly @wimaalten Bewijs #2 is van eind juli 2021 en staat op https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6

@DominickStark2 @wgrzMichael @realrogerwilc0 Nice try. What happens when we look for more recent studies? In your words, "Here you go": https://t.co/qDuoGvQ66e

@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Your trick is pretty obvious: You got caught lying on whether the results are still significant. Since you can't admit your fabrication, you move the goalposts to a red herring on whether studies are

RT @VikCBC: @bethanylindsay Dr. Charles Hoffe told patients to buy veterinary ivermectin, college says. READ: @cochranecollab review of #i…

@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK @scienceaccount You Googled the term "immunologist" because you didn't know what it means, right? And you still don't know what it means, just like you don't know on herd immunity, ivermectin, infect

@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Re: "you cite a failed pandemic curve prediction" Is that your way of finally admitting you were wrong on that (to go along with the myriad of other nonsense you were wrong on)? Re: "potential benef

@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Your denialism is noted. 🙂 "the findings still meet statistical significance" https://t.co/TQvUVAspAp https://t.co/MoLGLLIJbc https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD

@dietcheese @PierreKory Haha @dietcheese I remember you. We did this dance twice before, so I only need to repost that thread that rebuts/debunks those IVM hit pieces: https://t.co/UIgtX1yojW

@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Re: "I wouldn’t waste your time with Atomsks, he’s a siloed partisan and is unable to view science objectively/admit wrong" ...says the non-expert ivermectin fan. You're so bad at evaluating scienc

@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK Re: "It’s common sense." Like your "common sense" on ivermectin (which turned out to be wrong)? https://t.co/SODuV7m5Ft Science isn't about the "common sense" views of ideologically-motivated non-ex

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @originalfarmski @thisisnothappen @markdodds11 @IainMulady @BreezerGalway @AlBowers1 @factode305 @SarahPi37977904 @Davi…

@originalfarmski @thisisnothappen @markdodds11 @IainMulady @BreezerGalway @AlBowers1 @factode305 @SarahPi37977904 @DavittJustin @1ohreally @GBNEWS @GVDBossche Not statistically significant; i.e. consistent with a drug that does not work. Stop trolling. h

RT @VikCBC: @bethanylindsay Dr. Charles Hoffe told patients to buy veterinary ivermectin, college says. READ: @cochranecollab review of #i…

@bethanylindsay Dr. Charles Hoffe told patients to buy veterinary ivermectin, college says. READ: @cochranecollab review of #ivermectin They are the gold standard for review of best evidence. https://t.co/qnCwGxLw0c #cdnhealth

@paps_zen @SkunkWorks___ @DocCacahuete @LCP @MartineWonner @olivierveran Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne soutient l’utilisation de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@ScienceAccount1 @pafournier @MartyBritts @dmatic_33 @MartyMakary Using your nonsense for entertainment, + as an object lesson to others later. Nothing I say is for your benefit, given your dishonesty. It's not my fault you're wrong on topic after topic,

@ScienceAccount1 @JHowardBrainMD @DrJBhattacharya @Michigan_Noah Re: "Yet your track-record of predictions is... not great, @ScienceAccount1. 😑" Speaking of which... https://t.co/udijhWtz3f https://t.co/zoPTJ8Wr0q https://t.co/gSXq85eEgR

@ScienceAccount1 @luckyfrak @rial0325 @AdorableDashie @jondutoit Re: "the Ivermectin studies look promising. That’s my next pandemic prediction, that Ivermectin will be the next lab leak theory exposed." 🤣 Your predictions are so bad. https://t.co/N7iZn

@ScienceAccount1 @stephaniemlee @kenbensinger Re: "the findings still meet statistical significance" So you screwed up on ivermectin as well. How telling https://t.co/MoLGLLIJbc https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/k3pXiFGZ69 https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD ht

@ioainpc11 Ironically, the article in question debunks the source used for the 70+ studies claim. So you didn't read the source you quote-mined, @ioainpc11, despite acting like you did. https://t.co/lWRdR5Ey4p https://t.co/rcZKlz9rBW

@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers Re: "read every article and study you've sent along" No. For example, when you gave your usual "inconclusive" distortion, you missed the part where it said the source you + FLCCC use for your '70+ studi

@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers Some of your other tricks: 1) Go on about "inconclusive" because you refuse to learn about rejecting the null hypothesis: https://t.co/TcW7kf5GTv 2) Continually evading the fact that experts showed you w

@ioainpc11 Again: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC Contrast with what a dishonest denialist said: https://t.co

@ioainpc11 Re: "maybe doesn't help much or it definitely helps a lot" 🤦‍♂️ "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC h

@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers I've dealt with denialists long enough to know when they're deflecting to tone trolling to avoid acknowledging their position was wrong. 🙂 You were wrong, @ioainpc11. Whining about people being "unhealthy

@ioainpc11 @L_A_C_E_S @jejune2016 @william_summers "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/QVSic

@ioainpc11 @Davidfa35698009 @ariehkovler Amazing how the non-expert ivermectin conspiracists are still citing long-debunked tripe from FLCCC and ivmmeta, as if that nonsense is credible. https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 https://t.co/odlhb0PuFX https://t.co/sLyR0q

@TommyGligoor @geelenconsult https://t.co/BRgABMj5NP

@Crypt0_Normie @Randinho @naveedciao @Beard_Vet 3/ https://t.co/tl3sVPAeEi https://t.co/PvmPWlZ89e https://t.co/eT1gwduw8R https://t.co/zbxADPtOFW https://t.co/iIefvnX5jy https://t.co/UCqNc59Kkv https://t.co/gGoWQGRwqh

@trozzman79 @yungfraggle @starsleandown @APFactCheck 3/ Recommendations from relevant organizations can be summarized as: Evidence of efficacy for ivermectin is inconclusive. It should not be used outside of clinical trials. https://t.co/QNEv4JmwYZ http

@DirkVan72068758 @ceescpv @Ger80351189 @attjekuiken Die landen waar het zogenaamd zou werken wordt u verteld door extreem rechtse groeperingen. Kunt u mij een sluitende wetenschappelijke studie uit bijvoorbeeld Japan geven? https://t.co/e3uHDkBznv

@yoshkapundrick @Sharky_vs_Evil @GidMK Interesting. Still seems like the evidence is against it working. Given the high quality research showing it not working and all. https://t.co/YTWfVt4gPU That said, less inflammation is always good.

@villemin_thomas @canbetheonlyone @UPR_Asselineau @raoult_didier Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@BiliSeijo3 @CongasMaracas @dvdgchrd @azertyijkl123 Non c'est un site créé par des personnes qui ont des intérêts dans l'ivermectine (FLCCC etc) Si vous voulez une liste, utilisez pubmed https://t.co/PUlNr6BGbW Et sinon lisez des bonnes meta https://t.co/

@joeygilbertinc They’ve been hiding this for 2 years, so nothing is surprising anymore 🤷‍♀️ https://t.co/p2wuR6zcTr

@Herellesp si, https://t.co/cOzHQSkbXe Cochrane dice cosas similares a lo que te he comentado, pero es mas , Cochrane hace una critica mas detallada y discute sus hallazgos analizando otras revisiones y critica tmb a https://t.co/jd8afXpWeq https://t.co

@dirtwork69 No studies do yet. https://t.co/lrTmIZaJGX

@VielHelene @MohamedDtici @crypta_lite @anna098143 @idrissaberkane Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@nnxk_music @Serpentaire13 @Midilibre Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@WeiZhangAtmos @drg1985 It has no efficacy. https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO

@CacheaCarol @Bolsonariana12 @heeybu_ @uillianrj91 @Capyvara @tesoureiros @ACurrentAffair9 @DrMukeshH https://t.co/c7UVgjkrM6 Tá aqui o artigo. E tia, bloquearam seu post por fake news.

@Bolsonariana12 @heeybu_ @CacheaCarol @uillianrj91 @Capyvara @tesoureiros @ACurrentAffair9 @DrMukeshH https://t.co/c7UVgjkrM6 Authors' conclusions Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of

@greenboat @_mamadeb @Alaskacryptogi1 @FrankDElia7 @JonInTn1 @AGoldsmithEsq @AspAlaAsnAsnTyr @quigley_jesse @DCGreenZone1 @doritmi @swedishchf @Mchael21592783M @TakethatCt @g_ballew @carlsmythe @TonyBaduy @WendyOrent @volpiranyas @Top_Muppetries @wendy_Lyn

@profnfenton MEHHHHHHHHH https://t.co/65LQdoegF3

@salvadorcharly @DrIanWeissman versus covid mostly none, all big studies were retracted because they sucked hard , also cochrane says its doesnt work versus covid so... https://t.co/65LQdoegF3

LOL Cochrane is voluntary, unpaid, and un-peer-reviewed postings. This is not how facts are determined. Try again.

@Jeffrey95835823 @ProgresivePatrt The stats within the studies themselves Stats are the very basis of how these studies work and how we measure how confident we can be in a result For example in the screenshot below (1), you'll see a lot of the aforementi

@sparklingtides @natsrambles @LeilaniDowding Lol there is https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO

@AnnickBolo @MORENE33715772 @JESSIESUMMER @nc_vert Les traitements… Il n’y a plus aucun espoir que l’HCQ soit un traitement efficace et, pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@Jeffrey95835823 @ProgresivePatrt Here: https://t.co/yKzDrZ05qu Cochrane are generally regarded highly within medical academia (second link, or: https://t.co/mJFxEGRYsC )

@AlbertUgh @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino The evidence doesn’t support his claim. https://t.co/qdD08Cfdnf What is your position on IVM for covid19?

@EchoSuzy @Scientista_Data @bedcatalysis @karana19 @Rbor700 @Jherta @angeleyes_b1 @Remco_TP @meneerbaguette @veen_els @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep @HaHaGentherapie Hoi Suzy, ik heb 4 bronnen voor mijn stelling "Ivermectine werkt nie

RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト（）伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…

RT @AtomsksSanakan: Might try another poll at some point... https://t.co/x0vAskg1O7 https://t.co/BlaXLUVp3l https://t.co/cZipkQVKmM

@EchoSuzy @karana19 @Rbor700 @Scientista_Data @Jherta @angeleyes_b1 @Remco_TP @meneerbaguette @veen_els @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep @HaHaGentherapie En deze nieuwe studie is een bevestiging van een eerder overzicht op https://t.co/

@Scientista_Data @EchoSuzy @karana19 @Jherta @angeleyes_b1 @Remco_TP @meneerbaguette @veen_els @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep @HaHaGentherapie @Rbor700 hoi @Scientista_Data, de nieuwe studie in JAMA bevestigt de conclusie in https://

@Moonwalker33333 @Emmanuel_microb https://t.co/3aHT8SPOtI ça date de juillet 21, et rien de solide depuis n'a penché en faveur de l'IVM

@KyleJon75738070 @Conmebul @ccmsax84 @AnaCabrera Sure, criticize the source, not the content. But since you insisted: "Overall, the reliable evidence available DOES NOT support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-des

@Mala_Naicker @nickmmark @CebmOxford @First10EM @EMManchester @richardbody @BMJ_EBM Then you have a high-quality SRMA by @cochranecollab which included only RCTs. Their conclusions are the evidence does not support the use of IVM outside of a well-designed

@jeff_skrentner @PierreKory @EMManchester @richardbody @BMJ_EBM My assessment is evidence does not support the use of IVM in the treatment of #COVID19. This aligns closely with the @cochranecollab SRMA conclusions. https://t.co/qdD08Cfdnf #EBM

@KasEist @angeleyes_b1 @PeninDiaz @veen_els @Dimence @jornverbeek @pjvanerp @IGJnl @DimenceGroep Hoi Angel, de consensus over Ivermectine in eind juli 2021 staat op https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6

@Nockit1 @andylumm @MatthewNewell67 @TonyBaduy @DeckardJodi @chimera414 @JonathanHannah @sammy44231 @zeetubes @ScepticalAussie @ogilville1 @SkepticalMutant @GeoffSchuler @pawley_robert @Monstercoyliar @Alex_on_A14 @JimeeLiberty @volpiranyas @provaxtexan @I

@CVolkmannMD @PloederlM Not this Cochrane review, but I’m sure it had stricter inclusion criteria than the others. https://t.co/ietKhMV71V

@dietcheese @THeNBLeNDr @rodrigolouvisse @masimaux @PierreKory Haha @dietcheese, I remember you now. We did this dance before, so I only need to repost that thread that rebuts/debunks those IVM hit pieces: https://t.co/UIgtX1xQuo

@AnaCabrera https://t.co/FgPW9ooGn1

@Catheri33242090 @BrigitteJaumott @Fraslin On n’a pas tranché sur l’ivermectine : https://t.co/MfHHq3Z0VL

@theadamsullivan @garrr_scallywag @P_McCulloughMD Cochrane and the final Hill. Don’t understand why it doesn’t send notifications for your comments. 🤔 https://t.co/xWdeXcmFRw https://t.co/sLoT2dVSmB

@CarolineVonhoff @fransveldman @__K_C_B__ @DeLo1973 Ivermectine: https://t.co/HZxXNVV8LX HCQ: https://t.co/RZNKcjzrrP En de vaccins zijn niet experimenteel, ze werken prima en zijn veilig. https://t.co/uZtwsXjPad Veilig betekend niet dat er niet in z

@bigirish411 @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@Sandra30051143 @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@koalifiedgrace @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@KoolSofa @SeivwrightTrudy @CinndyEE https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@Adela_L_B @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@PJ_Lowry @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@cantbesitting @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@peter_cappel @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@kenmacpherson @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@SteveCutlerLive @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/6HvSdtPIsw

@ERamugondo Yeah I'll trust the Cochrane analysis, the science never lies https://t.co/i7ZHOwVg64

@FLOsleepyknight @Olivierfente https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@mholkers @HARRY_44 @Morpheusz5 @UMCUtrecht @ArtsenC @pjvanerp @Cath77777 @hbj0168 @Doc_Box @DanielTuijnman @DCSZ14 @HARRY_44 stelt: "De conclusie vh review vindt geen steun i/d aangevoerde studies." Alleen hardcore 'science denialists' en lieden met een

@Rimiquen_DSM @C33Sylvie @luffy_mh @colibri63641 Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable sur l’homme n’a validé les résultats de l’étude de l’institut Pasteur. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@Morpheusz5 @HARRY_44 @UMCUtrecht @ArtsenC @pjvanerp @Cath77777 @hbj0168 @Doc_Box @DanielTuijnman @mholkers @DCSZ14 @HARRY_44 ("maar “wetenschappelijke richtlijnen” zijn niet hetzelfde als wetenschap, maar eerder een hulpmiddel"), Ivermectine werkt niet

@mommsbrugger @sorryabernein @rob_ert6 Ansonsten verweise ich auf Cochrane. https://t.co/Cknuh5hfKB https://t.co/0TO2yCGMee

@factcheckdotorg https://t.co/Gsq2p8sLXC

@eldebs94 @Magrolino28 @YvonFrederic1 @MFabichon @JuliaCerisi @YvesPDB https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@LALICORNE13 @Frdouce1 @colibri63641 @ChantalCadot2 https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@thibson @XavierLG2 @Linolin29384804 @f_philippot https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@mazi87m @86Yennefer @GiKolbe @protestmedykow @Piotr_Schramm Tym pytaniem zdradzasz taka naiwnosc ze rece opadaja. Zeby wypowiedziec sie na temat tego tt trzeba by wielu dni by sprawdzic zrodla, wartosc wzietych pod uwage prac i analizowac. Cochrane znam

@Loulali8 Le gag des antivax… https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

RT @JeremyFarrar: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library @cochranecollab https://t.co/hq7b36t…

@Ken36143959 @Dunk_Pacino @Citizen817 @dangjones https://t.co/sM28vARdGt Look in the mirror for the Dumbass.

@Ken36143959 @Dunk_Pacino @Citizen817 @dangjones "Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. " https://t.co/sM28vARdGt Opps. N U T T E R