@AlastairMcA30 @profnfenton @GidMK @AviBittMD Make that at least 5 meta-analyses that excluded Elgazzar, Niaee, Hashim, + Okumus, or have them at higher risk of bias. https://t.co/g51F78jpKx Hill 2022 (Hill 2021 was retracted): https://t.co/7BwmA975nY h
@Steele_Ink @truthseek33 * Nobel Peace Prize* It doesn’t work for covid. https://t.co/lnewk4R5Et
@GottignyMartine @HeleneSchild Si vous sous-entendez que l'ivermectine sert à soigner le covid vous faites fausse route source : https://t.co/S6FiOqM0MA, PS: la librairie cochrane est la référence en ce qui concerne les traitements pharmaceutiques.
@larschristens @SamolejJ @Bigsmiffy438 @profnfenton @DrSusanOliver1 @GidMK @K_Sheldrick 1) It was more than one study; it's *at least* Niaee et al. and Elgazzar et al. https://t.co/YGGejGTCGl 2) Removing those studies changes the conclusion. https://t.c
@TheSpaniard14 @SteveMazzie @kdkseven @danaturalleague @jenny2x4 It doesn’t work. https://t.co/lnewk4R5Et
@veroch06 @ptitprince75 @CazMariani @louisfouch3 @BanounHelene @EChabriere @MartinZ_uncut @GabinJean3 @CaudeHenrion allez, cessez vos mensonges svp https://t.co/yT3Y0gTXHz
RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト()伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…
@VanessaManif @Artknow2 @JMDemaison @ManonCantin49 Qu’elles se basent sur des études sérieuses, ensuite on en reparle. Cochrane est LA référence en matière de meta analyse. https://t.co/GYdldk680i
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @TripleAries328 @joshua_chupik @ClayTravis @JonathanSarfat1 In reality, ivermectin produces results co…
@TigerlillySusan @TripleAries328 @joshua_chupik @ClayTravis @JonathanSarfat1 In reality, ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvp
@PierreKory I'm just gonna drop this here and walk away https://t.co/zGKKX6ei6j
RT @Lau_uribefig: @memoweb01 @ivannieblas la FDA, la EMA, y la mayoría de los organismos reguladores en base a información como la revisión…
@liberty_fabian @ElAmarilloRazo1 A new Cochrane review was published last week that shows ivermectin has no effect for treating/preventing COVID. This may change in the future of course, but Destiny’s statement is not at all unreasonable given the current
@EggMarkus @SprichWahrheit @WahnSager @DeinertDoc @sabi_ri @JanThaler @a_nineties @tertiaerdelikt @MinyasLuvince @paulchen2021 @GesetzDesTages @stohr_klaus @Friedemann1 @JAMAInternalMed @JAMANetwork Empfehlung: Review des CIDG von Studien mit Ivermectin.
RT @balkraix: ningun beneficio https://t.co/s7lvi3yIBO Finalmente sobre la ivermectina me gustaría indicar que para cuando se hizo el vide…
ningun beneficio https://t.co/s7lvi3yIBO Finalmente sobre la ivermectina me gustaría indicar que para cuando se hizo el video, había dos revisiones publicadas indicando que esta no funcionaba: 1-https://t.co/cOzHQSkbXe 2-https://t.co/nK1QBukQCn https://t
@DeinertDoc @sabi_ri @JanThaler @a_nineties @EggMarkus @tertiaerdelikt @WahnSager @MinyasLuvince @paulchen2021 @GesetzDesTages @stohr_klaus @Friedemann1 Die Ausschließlichkeit bezieht sich auf die Blockade Glu-anhängiger Chlorid-Kanäle. Die von Ihnen zitie
RT @_kan22t: 新型コロナウイルス感染症 (COVID-19) の予防および治療に対するイベルメクチン https://t.co/ixFTudrJ5u
Ahora que se vuelve a hablar de la ivermectina para la prevención y el tratamiento de la covid-19, en relación con las nuevas variantes, es conveniente un vistazo a la última revisión Cochrane. Está claro que el tema continuará. https://t.co/qCTHL2mpdZ
@IvanColludes @DamnYankee3270 @JoJoFromJerz @CalltoActivism Yes, highlighting the growing problem in how some studies get published even with very flawed studies that later get chewed apart. Same idiocy happened with Autism. https://t.co/We1dVXsurd https:
@ASNilsannath @michel_viot Aucune étude fiable n’a démontré l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@ballardsigns @TravAlvord @I_Am_JohnCullen Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://t.co/M
@CDisco5 @GidMK @dr_barrett Your source is long-debunked disinformation. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/GvEC1v6HZ6
RT @Links_Medicus: Ivermectin for COVID-19 Cochrane review update: 11 trials and no evidence of benefit shown. – via @LSTMnews News releas…
Ivermectin for COVID-19 Cochrane review update: 11 trials and no evidence of benefit shown. – via @LSTMnews News release: https://t.co/ZASq1eA4KP Original article: https://t.co/ylot6eGiw5 Summary: https://t.co/BBccTLdoui
@TravAlvord @ballardsigns @I_Am_JohnCullen Yup. ivmmeta is just such ridiculous nonsense. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/6mruuqLpxF
@GattoRobin3 Utilisée oui, sans avoir vu son efficacité attestée à ce jour. Impossible via des témoignages & de faibles effectifs de dire ''ça fonctionne'', on le sait. C'est la vision de la Cochrane, du moins 🙂 Donc entre guérison spontanée et efficac
@blibberbl0b @EnzoG5169 @AllenRob00 @PeoplesParty_US What you're referencing is pseudoscience. Here's legitimate science. https://t.co/2rupV6riK6 https://t.co/UA2IdlZpzA https://t.co/FnIPgdymd8 https://t.co/uiNao6R8l3
@PhillyPharmaBoy @TrevorSutcliffe Of the three main authors of meta-analysis Andrew Hill has been remarkably neutral even though he was a proponent. He was willing to admit he was wrong. But ever since the Maria Popp's study came out the previous three hav
@TrevorSutcliffe You can trust this study. Cochrane bases its reputation on removing bias in studies: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/4p5VfRqfcd
@agnostosphere @ScienceAccount1 @ChrisBBacon3 @Followthescien3 Thanks for confirming what I originally said about you, low-follower troll accounts. You're unable to honestly admit you're wrong. 🙂 https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.
@hero4sonm2t2 @ZlZabcAmcfTRtCF @sunasaji イベルメクチンは流れとして、効きました(試験管内致死量)→効くらしいから治験しよう→駄目でした→「少人数の医師」効いたかも?→n増しして確認しよう→駄目でした。 以下医師から先を各国ループしてる感じ。 効かない優勢。 https://t.co/j9xhTn34Y4
And still ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. h/t @balkraix https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://t.co/MkqYVCgOJe https://
@martinzietek @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @GidMK You really need to learn not to believe ivmmeta's lies. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/cBbvpvn
@12moreboosters @thisisnothappen @tracyjayney64 @HomeHelpfulRN @reacharoundu @JohannaSzabo1 @Tomarakh @KB4L_00 @JoeSmit05465144 @Mummymobbsback1 @simone49922322 @NSWHealth Despite the fact that the whole review is unadulterated bollocks 🙄. Try reading a pr
@real_seeking @GrumpyOldDoc You almost always conveniently avoid linking the study in question, since that would undermine your attempts to willfully mislead people about it: https://t.co/8Q1RYf7CNc https://t.co/RhhRTSpb65 https://t.co/8BMkmXqfbV
@12moreboosters @tracyjayney64 @thisisnothappen @reacharoundu @JohannaSzabo1 @Tomarakh @KB4L_00 @JoeSmit05465144 @Mummymobbsback1 @simone49922322 @NSWHealth Try using a gold standard meta analysis like Cochrane which is based upon robust trials. That paper
@EvanMcFatridge Safe, yes, , but Popp et al “Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19” Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or pre
@Arta77639046 So we can assume ivermectin has no more clinical potential for cancer than it did when non-expert ivermectin fans (erroneously) said it had clinical potential for COVID-19. https://t.co/sZtrSo2TGK https://t.co/cBbvpvFhym [https://t.co/SjTl
@Man_Friday_Man @GidMK @MelissaSweetDr This seems to have an Expression of Concern. https://t.co/iDEVDjJt1v This Cochrane meta-analysis comes to a different conclusion https://t.co/7rJ1OtO983 What are your thoughts on this?
@howtoappl @Instablocked @real_seeking @wayne_uga @StoneJulian1112 @ArizonaRangr45 Mentioning Mexico does not change the fact that ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. h
@WilliamKittel5 @TheJniac @real_seeking @JeffreyStClair3 @leilacleigh Re: "So don't take Ivermectin. Here, go to town. https://t.co/RHdAdaDTbX" Your source is unreliable nonsense. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC h
@DuckDodgeParry @Dominos20076133 @boulware_dr Cool story, bro. Ivermectin still produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSol2US https://t.co/cBbvpvoewm [https://t.c
@real_seeking @TakeThatOG @IsaacsRevenge30 @walidgellad @GidMK Re: "Supposedly I'm unable to be convinced yet" Yeah, you are. Re: "when I show you something" 'World Council for Health' is not a credible scientific/medical organization, anymore than a ra
@real_seeking @TakeThatOG @IsaacsRevenge30 @walidgellad Re: "Observational studies by doctors say otherwise." https://t.co/CjT34R5W3q https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https://t.co/7BwmA975nY
@Phil74010610 @AshishKJha46 It was 60 yesterday... https://t.co/AGPgCrKd3V
@luther_snell @boulware_dr Re: "IVM started within 7 days? You've got to be kidding. All signals in the many studies already done" ivmmeta lied to you; there are not "many" high-quality studies showing ivermectin works. https://t.co/pkgoVnLuDq https://t
@dryadb43738 自己害死長輩而不自知,伊維菌素有沒有用還不太確定卻這麼相信,瑞德西韋有實驗支持卻不用 https://t.co/BiVNTB9Cr6
@real_seeking @villagerssn @Dalmane15 @PhillyPharmaBoy @spurzo71 @TakethatCt @OXHarryH1 @JohnRee58027351 @ryanbeed @DiegoHAWK6 @ptcjoneses @Purrrr31 @AreYouSure1985 @KStateTurk @Lunatic__Fringe @DrAcula987 @XRadarP sure its only because off that 🧐😅 https:/
@Dalmane15 @PhillyPharmaBoy @spurzo71 @real_seeking @TakethatCt @OXHarryH1 @JohnRee58027351 @ryanbeed @SaltaoVladimir @DiegoHAWK6 @ptcjoneses @Purrrr31 @AreYouSure1985 @KStateTurk @Lunatic__Fringe @DrAcula987 @XRadarP And this Cochran Library study. https:
@saraschatje @margabult Ja, helaas werkt het niet als we het toedienen aan grote groepen mensen om zo écht te zien of het werkt. https://t.co/EadVnMPBj3
@Dennistalksfact @trevor_qwerty @real_seeking @AnalysisPoliti @SAHPRA1 This should be the base from which you begin your meta-analysis. https://t.co/7xAemucUlq Add studies that satisfy the inclusion criteria. Otherwise you are just being distracted by the
@munwac @VerreSbastie @idrissaberkane Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @StoneUnlimited: @paulharwood4 @ascetic_dreams @K8J444 Actually Paul, not proven nor disproven the precise wording was "low to low certa…
@Zoupetteries @GetupStandup99 @Steve_Tiger1 Pour l’instant les études ultérieures sur l’homme n’ont démontré aucune efficacité. Faut arrêter de croire aux poudres de perlimpinpin. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@paulharwood4 @ascetic_dreams @K8J444 Actually Paul, not proven nor disproven the precise wording was "low to low certainty eviďence" and understandable considering the wide dosage/duration protocols employed, thus not proven completely ineffective 😉 http
@CBScott320 @StephanKesting @FurnessColin https://t.co/gsX9VVlyNg ...but don't worry, I think the horse-water-Jocko-piss-infusion will be on sale from Onnit at $75 a bottle pretty soon. You'd better get the monthly subscription if you want to use it as co
@Kolera_Kokido Toutes les études fiables ultérieures n’ont pas confirmé cette efficacité sur l’homme. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Tiff__Annie_ @theyareus2 @fearnley_k THIS is review. https://t.co/xkVr7aQxmY "peer review" is not a valid criterion for assessing epidemiological claims, u need META double review including epidemiologists. Doctors dont know * about statistics. Most canno
@Mr_Magoo5 @ArtysHouse @real_seeking @MTnutz @BlaylockMooky @NessunDormaEra @Truth_in_Number @blyrangez @alrightdave2 @cardseers Yup. Produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t
@mike10010100 @real_seeking @merchmont11 It's amazing how when expert publish reliable studies, ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.c
@Pifgasoil @Gobbo_fiero @Algargath @azazel1100 @LapiGreg @franceinfo Faut les lire maintenant. Des mois que personne n'utilise ce site. L'avis de la Cochrane est peut-être plus pertinent non ? https://t.co/PZHDWu2PWe https://t.co/St2eGoeed1
RT @swooshinc: @ryangerritsen @ComradeVero @KashPrime Because it doesn't work. If I prescribed a drug that is known not to work I would he…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
So this "MD" thinks that is ok for doctors that prescribe something that "does not work" to treat covid to get their license suspended but those experimenting on children by injecting them with useless substance are ok. Can someone explain the logic behind
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @thereds8: 82 studies 815 scientists 129,808 patients 27 countries https://t.co/qjbZANNztw https://t.co/jKxuSPIzBk
RT @thereds8: 82 studies 815 scientists 129,808 patients 27 countries https://t.co/qjbZANNztw
82 studies 815 scientists 129,808 patients 27 countries https://t.co/qjbZANNztw
You don't allow replies because you have no argument.
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in science. But I guess doctors don't pay attention to that kind of stuff. Not trained to think outside of the box.
@krakdkettle @real_seeking @GGIL1603 @haylopez25 They don't have any reliable evidence. They're just making stuff up. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐des
@HighwayBob @trskah @real_seeking @vicki_langer Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://