@JoanieOC @PierreKory @healthnerd 1) It's not my fault non-expert conspiracists don't realize studies often have more than 1 author. 2) An edited video given to you by your fellow paranoid conspiracy theorists does not rebut published evidence. https://t
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Re: "What's wrong with these?" You're trolling in bad faith. No amount of evidence-based explanation will persuade ideologically-motivated denialists like you. You'll simply peddle trash source after trash source.
2020年に始めた北里大 @KitasatoUniv のイベルメクチン治験。遅延を重ねて2021年の10月にようやくデータ収集を終えたものの、解析でさらに遅延。「貧乏所帯」を言い訳にズルズル遅れて2021年度も終わりそう ウイルスも変異で特性がすっかり変わってしまい、もはやそのデータにどんな価値があるのか…
@richardemoe @AesBrah @loofymectin @drbeen_medical Your gibberish orders are noted. All you're doing is willfully ignore meta-analyses of RCTs because the larger pool of data makes your claims on sample size fail. You do this because you have a pre-deter
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "It’s still evidence." Already debunked. Re: "As far as I know" Then you're…
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle @drbeen_medical @_s1q3t3_ Re: "I’m starting to wonder if you have autism." Thanks for confirming your bad faith, @pondera_fm. 🙂 Despite your trolling, your attempted deception failed. You're going to need to find some
@VirginNostrils @CDisco5 @CachePast @GidMK Science isn't decided in a court of law. And personal anecdotes are not evidence a treatment works; published research is. No amount of evidence anyone cites will ever persuade you, given your conspiracist views.
@VirginNostrils @CDisco5 @CachePast @GidMK Your unevidenced anecdotes do not rebut published evidence + don't justify your conspiracy theories about the pharmaceutical industry https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https
@saskiaveluwe @CollakuGentian @muumi_tweets @mholkers @waukema @WHO @TwitterSafety Hoi @CollakuGentian, ken je https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6? Deze link werkt wel en je kunt het artikel ook als PDF downloaden.
@jengleruk @GidMK What makes this even sillier is that other researchers independently researched the same conclusion as Hill, + even the journal that published Lawrie's meta-analysis noted much the same thing. The paranoia about Hill is pathetic. https:
@Bartes73193791 @DoorbraakBe In de database van de Cochrane Library, dé medische referentie voor de betrouwbaarheid van de bestaande onderzoeken op statistische gebied en dus of ze voldoen aan de eisen gesteld in de Evidence Based Medicine: https://t.co/08
@CChaffoy @nicolasberrod Un couple d’amis de 80 ans également mais sans Ivermectine. Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@JohnyMcLane @Zeemeermin6 Je weet dat als iets op Google staat dit niet persé de waarheid is, hè. Ik zou deze even lezen als ik jou was https://t.co/B7NSzjZ36u
@markfmccarty @jason_willz1 @Integritys1 @PierreKory Re: "The authors redid the data with the questionable study removed - their conclusions still stand." No, they don't. https://t.co/sQNCRK7M8i https://t.co/t0M0VknI4n [https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC] https://
@lordbulb001 @PearMad @nickmmark What signal? Do you mean the signal of fraud and debunked publications at high risk of bias? https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https:
@ManuelaEberle1 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP Das weiß ich nicht, aber alle Reviews der vorhandenen Studien kommen zu dem Schluss, dass eine Aussage auf den bestehenden DaZen nicht gemacht werden kann. Vgl z.B. Cochrane: https://t.co/h7i1TgXYXy
@insins31544458 @dulac_dulac2 @michellecureur Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. Factuel. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Saint_William_ @Draakje58 @Brambothefirst @veen_els @hapelensrob @HuisartsWet @aliettejonkers @IGJnl Hoi @Draakje58, wappies leren op de wappieschool dat het verboden is om te accepteren dat Ivermectine niet werkt tegen corona. Ivermectine werkt dus niet
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "What are your thoughts on https://t.co/Y3HO5iIt8O?" At this point, I've stopped taking seriously anyone who cites that trash website as if it's a credible source. It's been debunked so many times that there's no
@CharlieZxi1 I'll take that as your tacit admitting you can't meet the challenge. Campbell is a grifter who misrepresents evidence. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "It’s still evidence." Already debunked. Re: "As far as I know" Then you're incorrect. Meta-analyses of RCTs failed to show causation. So mentioning a poorly-done retrospective cohort study is irrelevant. https
@factode305 @msabouri @Alex_on_A14 @appyman @stephan19573 @BreesAnna @thesassymicrobe @Lizzy_Lang7 @SwaledaleMutton It goes on and on and on and... "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐1
@Alex_on_A14 @msabouri @factode305 @appyman @stephan19573 @BreesAnna @thesassymicrobe @Lizzy_Lang7 @SwaledaleMutton Re: "You have picked a fight you cant handle and you are retreating ..." Yup. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.c
@my_own_RESEARCH @msabouri @thisisnothappen @IainMulady @BreezerGalway @thatsnotmine125 @Project4210 @jo_regular @SwaledaleMutton @JohnBri74065189 @FunTimeFred1 @ArielKarlinsky Re: "From what I can tell every other study shows mortality efficacy with a P-v
@RolandDunbrack @msabouri @PienaarJm @AlexeyZiskin @MLevitt_NP2013 Re: "You’re just making stuff up." Of course he is. That's his habit. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/kJXigfdWPC https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKU
@pauldhaene @Brambothefirst @veen_els @hapelensrob @HuisartsWet @aliettejonkers @pauldhaene, flat-earthers weigeren te accepteren dat de Aarde een bol is en wappies weigeren te accepteren dat Ivermectine niet werkt tegen corona. Zie verder bron 2 op https:
@yodelodwho @GidMK Stop trolling. Your paranoid conspiracy theories aren't interesting to people who are scientifically literate. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub ht
RT @shiraishia_md: @surinobaasan 東京都医師会長がイベルメクチンを使えと言いました。科学的根拠も推奨もないのに、なぜでしょうね？私も不思議です。 様々な仮説や期待があることは承知していますが、現時点でベストの科学的根拠に照らしイベルメクチンはCo…
@richardemoe @AesBrah @loofymectin @drbeen_medical Seriously, you ivermectin fans need to stop already. This is getting tedious. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub http
@psonners @GidMK @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "That's what happens when you only look for evidence that supports your pre-established position" That's what you're doing on your ivermectin fandom, vaccine denialism, etc. https://t.co/8iZcU7M
RT @tomo_hiko: メタ解析を追加 完全に追い詰められてる状況ですねイベルメクチン Activ-6とcovidoutが有効性を示せなかった場合、国内治験の継続は倫理的に許容できるのでしょうか？🥲 https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl https://t…
RT @tomo_hiko: メタ解析を追加 完全に追い詰められてる状況ですねイベルメクチン Activ-6とcovidoutが有効性を示せなかった場合、国内治験の継続は倫理的に許容できるのでしょうか？🥲 https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl https://t…
@Roberts93998096 @fuqssake17 @DrSusanOliver1 They really don't show any effect https://t.co/71V5tugkBw
メタ解析を追加 完全に追い詰められてる状況ですねイベルメクチン Activ-6とcovidoutが有効性を示せなかった場合、国内治験の継続は倫理的に許容できるのでしょうか？🥲 https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl https://t.co/PwwoS6Zsqy https://t.co/elEt5PeVNt https://t.co/K40P3wbWy2 https://t.co/G1nsLIoDo1 https://t.co/a9a1o8vUur
RT @shiraishia_md: @surinobaasan 東京都医師会長がイベルメクチンを使えと言いました。科学的根拠も推奨もないのに、なぜでしょうね？私も不思議です。 様々な仮説や期待があることは承知していますが、現時点でベストの科学的根拠に照らしイベルメクチンはCo…
@surinobaasan 東京都医師会長がイベルメクチンを使えと言いました。科学的根拠も推奨もないのに、なぜでしょうね？私も不思議です。 様々な仮説や期待があることは承知していますが、現時点でベストの科学的根拠に照らしイベルメクチンはCovid-19の予防と治療の両方で有効とはいえません。 https://t.co/E7AZQDKw0F
@psonners @cleotibbitts @publicaddress Re: "How about 61 peer-reviewed studies...? This page contains links to each original study, plus a summary and discussion of each one" How many people have you tried to deceive using the disinformation site ivmmeta?
@cleotibbitts @psonners @publicaddress They're trying to deceive you by citing a long-debunked article that contains fraudulent + retracted research, was authored by members of an ivermectin advocacy group, has an "expression of concern" on it, etc. https
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @psonners @GidMK @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 🙄 "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support t…
@psonners @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 Read. The. Published. Literature. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK http
@psonners @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 @GidMK You said ivmmeta does not include retracted it work. Well, it does, so you were wrong. Just admit it, instead of trying to change the topic to save face. Try being honest, instead of a non-expert id
@psonners @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Completely wrong, like Dr. Zamora" Sorry, but you don't merit being taken seriously if you're still citing long-debunked nonsense like ivmmeta as if it's a credible source. https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 htt
@psonners @GidMK @Waltlaw69 @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 🙄 "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKU
@BradCohn @r_y_a_n__t @ilyakayli If you're credulous enough to rely on a disingenuous non-expert like Alexandros, then you're beyond help. And you were wrong when you said ivmmeta does not peddle retracted research. What Lawrie says is irrelevant now. ht
Re: "Campbell approvingly cites a meta-analysis containing fraudulent + retracted research (ex: Elgazzar). https://t.co/VrfPY0N56L Then ignores a collaborator when they point it out." Getting worse + worse for Campbell's source. https://t.co/IvYMmTlFHu
@psonners @jasonl417 @JoseGonzalesZa1 This **non-peer-reviewed** meta-analysis has been shown to be problematic, to say the least, by @GidMK . Never mind the retracted & fraudulent studies. Also see Cochrane Library systematic review of RCTs. https://
@thereal_truther @Juicifer19 @jason_willz1 @AmerAcadPeds @FloridaAAP @DuckDuckGo Re: "It's over dude. It's failed. Move on. I won't debate things that aren't subjective." Yup. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https
@iguy_f @DurhamRich @KimIversenShow That said, I'm certainly open to further studies if people desire. The scan of available studies I was able to find so far did not look promising, but I'd take any tool in the toolkit if it can be shown to work. https:/
@KimIversenShow @L0_0ney I am very interested in every possible option for combating COVID 19; unfortunately, Ivermectin has been studied rather extensively at this point and been shown to have little to no impact as either preventative or treatment. http
@BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectivi
@LogicalKnot @AesBrah @GidMK @drpablocorral @AOlavarria @PierreKory Re: "I want to point folks to the RCT trials, can you provide me some links?" https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k
@1kick1hat1snare @AesBrah @AdamALang @PierreKory Re: "Would you say experience in clinical practice is also a good guide for clinical practice?" "Experience in clinical practice" does not trump RCTs. That's not how medical research works. https://t.co/sZ
@Elduper1 @CharlesPoiret @FLAHAULT Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Tim_Hayward_ @AesBrah @GidMK Re: "is there any risk of the general public seriously misunderstanding" Many members of the public grasp that correlation =/= causation, and to defer to experts on scientific topics they lack expertise in. You should try th
@BorgerPieter @pjvanerp @JoseGonzalesZa1 Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wor
RT @AtomsksSanakan: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 o…
@ai_clayton @Jccalmond2 @rw_christian @jason_willz1 @NoVaxPassInUk That's not how medicine works. Practitioners don't just do whatever a patient requests, when the request contradicts evidence on what treatments work. Medicine is guided by evidence. Iver
@PeterKonings7 @Ar_Chroi @CHRISTO92770326 @ClimateAudit @soncharm People lie, though, or else make mistakes, such as claiming that Cochrane views ivermectin as proven, when the truth is the exact opposite: https://t.co/r3iuCFxuyX
@Paul__Fritz @jappert_chris @CPC_HQ His PhD is in nursing education - a Doctor but not in the field of infectious diseases or epidemiology. Also - nothing credible there. Here is something from a credible source stating there are no studies proving effica
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
@AlbertUgh @AtomsksSanakan @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Read & consider: - Critically appraise the SRMA on IVM - What tool will you
@AlbertUgh @TheSGEM @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @GidMK @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Why are you still peddling a long-debunked article that contains fraudulent + retracted
@AlbertUgh @GidMK @TheSGEM @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Re: "Conclusion Ivermectin use was associated with decreased mortality in patients with
@NeiuCHDepWsD59t 唔使驚，藥房有冇伊維菌素買？最有效的藥。 https://t.co/UNc4RlB4Ms
@Jccalmond2 @jason_willz1 @NoVaxPassInUk @ai_clayton Re: "And I suppose that you know more about meta analysis than Dr Tess Lawrie" The one containing fraudulent research, with an "expression of concern" attached to it, debunked in the journal it was publ
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/WGWLlKieCL
@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Stop trolling. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k
RT @AlastairMcA30: @ai_clayton There is no compelling evidence that ivermectin treats Covid-19. That is the state of the science. It is the…
@ai_clayton There is no compelling evidence that ivermectin treats Covid-19. That is the state of the science. It is the truth. If you don’t like it, that’s your business, I’m afraid. (Since this review, 2 more large RCTs showing no benefit. See above). h
@JLesgards J’attends vos études. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@jjchamie Don't you ever get tired of trying to deceive people, Chamie? https://t.co/NAkx7DGkrv https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/ykwWY1k3ma
@RMConservative You're a disinformer. https://t.co/NAkx7DGkrv https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/kbGOFhDFEn
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
@PretresseAlexia @Xof3 @2022_alf @lereveildatlas Plutôt qu’1 article, je vs joints l’étude sur les 31 études sur l’ivermectine, vs remarquerez qu’il n’y a aucune conclusion affirmant ou infirmant son efficacité. Tout est à l’arrêt depuis mars 2021. Cocasse
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
@greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell me the name of the author of) the randomized clinical trials?" https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK
@RomainNotRemain @WilliamROsler1 @veski777 @Tom60Chat @EncoreZino @Mediavenir Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne soutient l’utilisation de l’ivermectine dans le traitement ou la prévention de la COVID-19. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@lauri_paavola @n1kul1 @milladeema Ivermektiinistä ei vain ole mitään hyötyä Koronan hoidossa. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@Primal_Wound @mizdefiant Y’all realize you can’t just stop at one study because you like it, right? “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomize
@FFeys @instagram The @CochraneLibrary systematic review on #Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of #COVID19 https://t.co/jdRm2rbv81 More about it here: https://t.co/VmyYFY5GTM
@PekkaPaananen4 @OttoPoikolainen @HuuhtanenPanu Anna kun mä arvaan, "lääkekuuria"? Ivermektiiniä? 😀 Ei ole mitään näyttöä että siitä on mitään hyötyä, Lue nuo tutkimukset. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
RT @boticariors: 💥Riguroso (as usual) análisis de la evidencia disponible sobre #Ivermectin en #Covid_19 por @cochranecollab Resumen: nad…
RT @boticariors: 💥Riguroso (as usual) análisis de la evidencia disponible sobre #Ivermectin en #Covid_19 por @cochranecollab Resumen: nad…
@BorgerPieter @lapisexcoelis @veen_els @pjvanerp @ReusVisser @bpoc2020 @HaHaGentherapie De stand van zaken in eind juli 2021 staat op https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6. Ivermectine werkt niet tegen corona. Pieter Borger kraamt onzin uit.
RT @boticariors: 💥Riguroso (as usual) análisis de la evidencia disponible sobre #Ivermectin en #Covid_19 por @cochranecollab Resumen: nad…