@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @EricMetcalf13 @Samuel_Gregson @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "Wrt meta, it is very difficult to cherry pick studies for the meta to be neg. That is why most are positive." More lies. Doing a competent risk-of-b
RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…
@frans1960nl https://t.co/H3c8x2DXzw Wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar werking Ivermectine bij Covid19. Het werkt niet.
@TnAlistair @Samuel_Gregson @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "Is Ed Mills a non-expert?" The TOGETHER study co-authored by experts was cited to you. Re: "There are more meta-analyses published on ivrm that found stat sign eff
@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @Samuel_Gregson @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Without fraudulent + low-quality studies, non-expert ivermectin fans have nothing "reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or preve
@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @Samuel_Gregson @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Your usual evidence-free paranoid gibberish is noted, pseudoskeptic. https://t.co/sZtrSo2TGK https://t.co/ZX0ASnNO2V https://t.co/mBvqcsZUES
@lucaszenichi @Zuritageo @OsmarTerra Já publicaram vários artigos sobre o uso. Os raros com algum efeito positivo tem sido retratados. Estudos bem desenhados apontam pra ineficácia deste medicamento. Por exemplo, ano passado foi publicado na @CochraneLibra
RT @KlaasvanDijk5: @MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nergens heb ik beweerd of gesteld of gesuggereerd dat dez…
RT @KlaasvanDijk5: @MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nogmaals, oud nieuws uit oktober 2020. Zie verder https:/…
@Juliana27876571 @anacoe26 @drpaulofaria22 @oscasosraros @GFiuza_Oficial @cristinagraeml @AlessandroLoio2 @EmiliaSerra5 @draugustonasser Voce finge que esta fazendo um trabalho de pesquisa, mas fica aqui batendo palma e dando suporte a tratamentos nao comp
@MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nergens heb ik beweerd of gesteld of gesuggereerd dat deze artsen patiënten hebben verzonnen of dat ze aan het rommelen zijn geweest met de data. Dat is niet zo. Later onderzoek heeft uitgeweze
@MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nogmaals, oud nieuws uit oktober 2020. Zie verder https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6. Nogmaals, Ivermectine en HCQ werken niet tegen corona.
@Mancarl13 @Poulin2012 Non, pour les crédules. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@LeferPierre @lavignep007 @Calnos1 L'ivermectine a donné des preuves de traitement ? Nouveau, ça. https://t.co/3HeZXdjqS2
@JAngelyssa Encore faudrait il que ce soit un traitement efficace. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@insins31544458 @Digicath @Gocentrique @ella03787321 @JackyLEFEVRE2 Même s’il n’y a pas la liste, vous avez un aperçu du problème ici : https://t.co/HG4iaGBDfP
@Timcast Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Review - Intervention Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/0B2K6NsFUl https://t.co/n1HPaTnN08
@Lemefisto2a @SudRadio @andrebercoff @raoult_didier L’ivermectine tout aussi inefficace. Quels sont les pays qui l’utilisent ? https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @JohannaSzabo1: @SuperDaveUnit @TimeToWakeup62 @rogue_WOM @cerothstein "The reliable evidence available does not support the use of iver…
@Fred15541646 @RomainDoyer Les études ultérieures sur l’homme n’ont, pour l’instant, pas démontré l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @CochraneJapan: 多くの方にご興味を持っていただいておりますが、エビデンスの確実性が非常に低いというのは、「効果が無い」ということではありません。「効果があるかどうか確実なことは言えない」という解釈が正しいです。効果があるかないかをはっきりさせるために、より…
@SoulRebel73 @danvandertuin Geen links naar onderzoeken. Bovendien nepnieuws. Als je dit echt gelooft, dan zeg je het zelf al: geloof. Als wetenschapper kijk je naar data, en de data liegt niet tot dusver: HCQ, maar ook IVM dragen niks bij. https://t.co
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention…
@C_Kavanagh @su3su2u1 @agnostosphere @PersistntSplntr Fair enough. But they mess up on basics, like what a "confounder" is and what the purpose of a control group is. Also funny to see @agnostosphere claim fraud when they peddled retracted tripe on ivmmet
@HHillelon @nath28564 @AlineCitoyenneB @Digicath Aucune étude ultérieure sur l’homme n’a démontré l’efficacité de l’ivermectine dans le cadre du Covid. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@heimskringla25 @Timcast It isn't that insane, since it is still either in the realm of uncertainty, since "The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality." https://t.co/MbWEoACJrx The next line, in my novice opinion, depends on ethics
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention…
@jasnotron And you continue to dishonestly evade what the evidence shows. So you're lying when you claim ivermectin works. https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https://t.co/7BwmA975nY https://t.c
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Press pieces from 3 months ago don't rebut the published cited to you from after that. You're showing your dishonesty, confirming that you lies. https://t.co/Za0UswDgSh
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Nope. That's in vitro, which is trumped by clinical, in vivo results. You're dodging the evidence at this point, as per your lie. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Merck's position is simple: They see ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2. So they avoid bad publicity from backing it on that https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t
@MaxDWolf @marc_g_wathelet @patobrenner @GidMK He's relying on the disinformation website ivmmeta, which has so many problems it's telling that paranoid + gullible non-expert fans still peddle its trash 🤦♂️ https://t.co/xBZStjAHAb https://t.co/sLyR0qQon
@patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention that does not work, unlike dexamethasone, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTl
@mousepolice1 @Tomarakh @Ozijury @tao_d_Pooh @TGAgovau Analysis of all the studies published so far Quote "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomi
@Raymond93426525 @BlackCat002742 @botliberalisme @AmeliaDacine @_______liberty @MartineWonner @Laissonslespre1 @verity_france @alainhoupert @MullerBronnL @ansm @ars_grand_est @olivierveran Quels juges ? HC ne fonctionne pas...quant à lIVM, rien de probant
@WittgensteinsR @MerlotVine @njmidm @ErikCosters @FHeijblom @HTillaert @HaHaGentherapie @muumi_tweets @rutten_dr @Dieren_Doc @TraderTemmie @HerrEngelbert @DCSZ14 @henk382 @Karla_Delfoix @Marc_Veld @statistiekcbs Daarnaast verscheen in de tussentijd een Coc
@TnCoNews1 It. Doesn’t. Work. From 2021: https://t.co/n8RuiVx4zL
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 11/P The exclusion wasn't a result of bias from @GidMK. It came from evaluating the study on its merits, as other expe…
@ClaytonHiland @Dean35801990 @Thomasp183 @GovMikeHuckabee Even in 2021, when you guys were creaming your tighty whities over IVM, before the big studies came in…an analysis of 14 studies said…..Meh, not conclusive. https://t.co/I3lluNzKHm
@robolobs @dbgolfnut @DrJamesOlsson Re: "the studies point the other way" No, they don't. Ivermectin produced results consistent with a drug that doesn't work. https://t.co/3qKD0og9Vv https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKU
@solarcx69 @ypandele @a_chevillot_HD @heidi_news Visiblement vous n’avez pas compris les études… https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Dawn52532028 @MrBl4ckSyst3m @jshaer @the_picketfence @elonmusk I don't know what "having proof for ivermectin being approved" means, but I can assure you that there is no proof that Ivermectin can be used to counter COVID. And no, the election wasn't stol
@realjlhoward @JamesBradleyCA Not quite there, "Churchill": https://t.co/s4NWMMxdOC https://t.co/Kp3byBRcSV
@TigerlillySusan @syd_ayers @LizzieSuspended @landjax @Squirrel12777 @JonathanSarfat1 Yeah, ivermectin produced results consistent with a drug that doesn't work. That's why it isn't recommended. https://t.co/3qKD0og9Vv https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.c
@AbgemeldetBeein @Psicoalfanista @chiriboga_cris @thenadie0 @mara_dani1 @pamlight_ @Krisxd12 @AleFredric @ccanalesss Pero esque una señal de que realmente se usa esa metodologia es mediante por ejemplo comentarios , en el abstract de almenos la calidad gen
11/P The exclusion wasn't a result of bias from @GidMK. It came from evaluating the study on its merits, as other experts have done. Harper does not know how to do this because he's a pseudoskeptic lacking competency. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.
Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19.
@Cryptograph82 @Zackpit1999 @KathleenKrzyno1 @PurpleP52620105 heres another one for ya sport. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials."
@msabouri @sschinke @GYamey @NKinNewEng @djt6978 @factode305 @inden_l @greg_travis @thereal_truther @yeahnaa333 @SwaledaleMutton @JesseVentura86 @RachelAlter007 @timmmyrobin @RyanMarino Sad that you're still trying to deflect from your distortions on iverm
@sschinke @factode305 @msabouri @GYamey @NKinNewEng @djt6978 @inden_l @greg_travis @thereal_truther @yeahnaa333 @SwaledaleMutton @JesseVentura86 @RachelAlter007 @timmmyrobin @RyanMarino Re: "He also likes to pretend that people only disagree with him on Co
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht Re: "ivmmeta even created" Stop relyin…
@SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht Re: "ivmmeta even created" Stop relying on that that non-peer-reviewed disinformation website, and actually read the peer-reviewed literature. https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https:/
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht But sure, keep pretending a crackpot so…
@SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht But sure, keep pretending a crackpot source like ivmmeta is reliable, while published papers from experts that do competent risk-of-bias assessments aren't. 🙄 https://t.co/sZt
@Ken65326824 @JeanPierreG9 Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@PureRatPlgueBld @BreezerGalway @JoseGonzalesZa1 @BerryTartlet @LaymansScience IVM has been tested extensively. And shown no efficacy at all. Which is why it is not used clinically. https://t.co/AQge4x4sXb
And just to be clear, while @sciencevs doesn't mention it, the @cochranecollab came to the same conclusion about #ivermectine: https://t.co/G7iLFZDZkI They mentioned the later TOGETHER trial: https://t.co/zonemm1KV7 2/5
@Jeffrail1 @dre_sunshine Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@noteworthypoint @OXHarryH1 @brodjustice @RowdyKate2 @Roper_Lab @Ro10Reed @judysimpson222 @helen_wingrave @madeulookcouk @ECUBrodySOM So you are better then this guy's ? https://t.co/3bq0CHxrtj BCS they say they are junk (the big ones , the tiny don't even
@Existence2100 @Covid19Critical @phillyharper @alexandrosM They're the ones publishing meta-analyses you don't read. 😉 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/C
@MarcTomtom @MarieHlneFabre1 @Dover63A @raoult_didier Oh non, pas Gibertie. Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r