@Roger_____That @AdamKinzinger https://t.co/mhqGBSSlrw try again. https://t.co/80wSzBB3ai

@r_y_a_n__t @GidMK Re: "Don't shoot the messenger loser." You mad, bro? 🤪 https://t.co/u7nwOqklSh https://t.co/gx6UH7IGFi https://t.co/quMTGXbgm5 https://t.co/tdroH57zzB https://t.co/Tbr69JobeO https://t.co/IgptlgyRAN https://t.co/FNFPC74b1L https://t

@emerqui @jcsouto https://t.co/fasIn6j2og

@83_mns @G_BRIFFAUD Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne confirme l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@LliaTay @G_BRIFFAUD Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@jr_dujardin @RolandLEVY8 @El_Dic_TatoR @marc_g_wathelet Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@AyyoubVincent @RolandLEVY8 @El_Dic_TatoR @marc_g_wathelet Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@DollyBig Pour l’instant, aucune étude ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@BrianEdwardMKE @gorskon 😁 "Ivermectin and fluvoxamine have solid data." https://t.co/mYZIve7pcz "Until evidence that is more robust is available, the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 cannot be justified." https://t.co/2vnDJym4ka https://t.co/Ow3xh30Srr

@BrianEdwardMKE @hypoautonomic @picphysicians 🤣 "Ivermectin and fluvoxamine have solid data." https://t.co/mYZIve7pcz "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed ra

@LisaXX____ @3DBeerGoggles @BonsensJoe @Mariannew1988 https://t.co/3WhmbRFRYe

@DavidPo18778311 @Billius27 https://t.co/ufeKSpD2bd https://t.co/1DeOJSEPi6 https://t.co/WEL1awd1Lv https://t.co/YC7hIOxzec https://t.co/9IPVobgTBT There's a few studies and some articles.

@SadiaBerboucha @raoult_didier Prenons votre dernière affirmation. L’ivermectine marche. Pour l’instant, aucune étude ne prouve l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@LouforFreedomL1 @anneliesfries @petervlemmix Dat is onzin Zie bijvoorbeeld deze meta-analyse: https://t.co/i28EK9xMHS

@r_y_a_n__t @tnicholsmd And the study does nothing to change the fact that ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https:

@FaitsetSources @laguiloute @papanours60 Si je peux me permettre : La dernière version de l'étude. Et en français (sans avoir besoin de la fonction de traduction de son navigateur) : https://t.co/qS8SgKOzwL La conclusion est en effet sans appel

In juli 2021 verscheen een systematic review van de betrouwbare ivermectinestudies in de Cochrane Library. Resultaat was dat evidentie voor een werking tegen Covid-19 nog steeds ontbrak. 46/ https://t.co/Lv8II1u98h https://t.co/BnDQkqsy2c

@Zoupetteries @BARRYJeanPaul1 @BFMTV Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@JaneSim66 @NJ30872107 @PaulTay21694369 Yes. Thats great. However, its her opinion. It is not scientific, significant evidence of efficacy. Because it doesnt exist. https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i

@VanessaTPRE @yellow_licorne @floroz3 @alext342 @AnneD89568338 L'ivermectine ne fonctionne pas contre le covid https://t.co/6ht1BqHDLD

@Bitcoinjimbo @DeathByBooko @MarkMcGowanMP here are the most recent IVM studies released in order from newest to oldest. 1 showed potential benefit. The other 2 showed none. The balance of evidence isnt there atm https://t.co/eFwDxv4CKN https://t.co/WruaMH

@carolin76237181 @SlhcSylvain @olivierveran Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@Stephane_Deluc @CreibHoo @pjd77420 @SylvainDRUELLE @ppr_75 Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

RT @tomo_hiko: @VoVxsGxHfxn1DFq @rNbOsNdJ3LlTAQP @t_mooon_ @dpFmUpp1dZ0f4xR @Cool_Code_ @Hyama88446075 @takavet1 @8UKdtNh0TmXW1pT @rikiya00…

@VoVxsGxHfxn1DFq @rNbOsNdJ3LlTAQP @t_mooon_ @dpFmUpp1dZ0f4xR @Cool_Code_ @Hyama88446075 @takavet1 @8UKdtNh0TmXW1pT @rikiya00box @sportsgs_inside 上記の情報は1年ほど前にまとめたものです。その後イベルメクチンについては多くのメタ解析が発表されましたが、捏造データなどの不正研究を含んだもの以外では有効性が示されませんでした。厳密に行われたメタ解析は多くの研究を統合して

@LYPNJz9y9zVCfnk @nonaka_shin 国内でまだ継続しているのは興和の治験ですね https://t.co/EUQlPAzuHz

@Blackksheep2 @LoloS79 @Patrick_JOJO @vivrelibre2012 @zoomabus Pour l’instant, aucune étude scientifique fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@marchettialine3 @John_Jeffraie @AlexisDeClercq1 @DrGomi https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト（）伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…

@ichudov @First10EM Cochrane, which is the gold standard: https://t.co/LUZRbU3w6A

@usdetour @debradewonda @alfonslopeztena @nytimes You refer to a study from early 2020. We are in 2022. The scientific consensus on ivermectin vs covid 19 in 2022 is that it's not really efficient. Maybe this more recent study from the same website could h

@pascalthierry10 @Drmartyufml @ufmlcommunaute @afpfr Pour l’HCQ, il n’y a plus de débat, le consensus scientifique est clair : c’est totalement inefficace. Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022k

#Ivermectin กับ #covid19 https://t.co/15lVlqwznq https://t.co/UDXdXLPWwv #วงในซาลอน

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AndrewGillies9 @BreezerGalway @k_b_lvi @thismorning Ivermectin produces results consistent with an intervention that d…

@AndrewGillies9 @BreezerGalway @k_b_lvi @thismorning Ivermectin produces results consistent with an intervention that does not work, unlike SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK h

@roropapa4 @picco_s_ @PlasrR @Nain_Portekoi @ChrisCottonStat Nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes soutenant l'utilisation de l'ivermectine dans le traitement ou la prévention de la COVID-19, mais la base de données probantes est limitée. https://

@Jo_Milne @JujuliaGrace Found your misleading tweet. So your answer to proving remdesivir is lethal is again an unsubstantiated case. A claim that doctors youd never heard of before 2020 are being silenced. And a claim ivermectin is effective. https://t.

RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Instead of the garbage-in, garbage-out list of studies conspiracy theorists are passing around claiming that ivermecti…

@MrDiefenbach @sudokuvariante @AviBittMD @JAMANetwork They didn't actually read the paper, since ivermectin working on strongyloides is not the same thing as it working on SARS-CoV-2. These non-expert ivermectin fans can't be trusted to competenty evaluat

@PLarroque Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@dlc_products @deankingman @elonmusk @Independent @rustyrockets Since it seems I have to "spoon feed" the proper documentation to you, here you go. https://t.co/KDhjG4i6j1

@PascalFrog1 @COURTOI96984743 @Emmanuel_microb @PYJeholet Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@markfmccarty @AOlavarria @AesBrah @PierreKory 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 https://t.co/odlhb0PuFX https://t.co/GfepwsCQtw

@Allan43310392 @IvermectinSheep @CraigKellyMP Well then there's no point speculating. Fact is, it was retracted (usually that's because of bad data or flaws in the study). Try something reliable maybe? https://t.co/QOljmOiNrS

@alain_berre @Spinnaker13007 @Gioladouille1 “Le dossier” est clos depuis et sans appel: l’IV et l’HQ ne fonctionnent pas et n’ont jamais fonctionné. https://t.co/5SgfnMApZS https://t.co/L6G2zbCKz4

@LucySmi88574164 @h_irish37 https://t.co/7ijZNsG6jq

@SpcialTK1 @Andre002Nicolas @NaphtalineLeBon @05mars19461 @france_soir @aragon_jb @MartineWonner @CaudeHenrion @tatiann69922625 @RODAClaire @JuliaCerise https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@liza8491 @salspua @elliehoneybeez @DevlinCrose @katzycc @MISSION_is_life here's a Cochrane meta-analysis, which pools results from multiple trials in the literature. authors were a lot gentler in wording than I'd have been. the data is overwhelming. it sh

RT @CochraneLibrary: @Breanna34652334 @CochraneUK It's important to not only know what is effective but also to know what is ineffective.…

@Breanna34652334 @CochraneUK It's important to not only know what is effective but also to know what is ineffective. ➡️#Chloroquine or #hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of #COVID‐19 https://t.co/WKd9XZZGlz ➡️ #Ivermectin for preventing and

@Sabelot06414304 @CochraneUK Agreed! Our Ivermectin review (https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J) is a #LivingSystematicReview - as are many of our #COVID reviews. A updated version is currently being worked on. 🤓 https://t.co/ODzDDCMv9r

@roobar99 @vinchanska @CraigKellyMP https://t.co/QOljmOiNrS

@FIQwkiqTlIeVRDm @CraigKellyMP https://t.co/QOljmOiNrS

@YukikoPool 匿名グループが作ったメタ解析っぽく見えるウェブサイトですね。メタ解析の標準から完全に逸脱しているため、研究者、専門家からはまったく評価されていませんね。 メタ解析ではコクランが評価が高く、ゴールドスタンダードとみなされています ご参考になさってください https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl

RT @tomo_hiko: @YukikoPool @hanakihideaki 匿名グループが作ったメタ解析っぽく見えるウェブサイトですね。メタ解析の標準から完全に逸脱しているため、研究者、専門家からはまったく評価されていませんね。 メタ解析ではコクランが評価が高く、ゴー…

@YukikoPool @hanakihideaki 匿名グループが作ったメタ解析っぽく見えるウェブサイトですね。メタ解析の標準から完全に逸脱しているため、研究者、専門家からはまったく評価されていませんね。 メタ解析ではコクランが評価が高く、ゴールドスタンダードとみなされています ご参考になさってください https://t.co/NBP6Y1ibKl

@bob6429 @manu321_manu @Remi78500 @f_philippot https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO You're still not addressing the published evidence that was cited to you. https://t.co/0gRWR0xil8

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO https://t.co/si2kthEO9p

@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO You're dodging, as expected. Again: Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use iv

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Re: "by one sponsored study" You're still fabricating. Like Luca, you have no integrity. https://t.co/0gRWR0xil8

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Do you accept that this is true?: "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention

@Luca_Napoletano @W1nston984 @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO And you still refuse to admit to what the evidence-based consensus shows. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Re: "You pick one published document" Nope. You really are pathologically dishonest. 5 > 1 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO https://t.co/Ebmrv3yjVp

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO Again, none of your deluded ranting addresses the published evidence. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO None of your paranoid ranting addresses the published evidence cited to you. https://t.co/3gWCiztlw8

@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Your denialism is noted, pseudoskeptic. https://t.co/d4FGyKoq7k https://t.co/ZX0ASnNO2V https://t.co/zxKHO8xbqI

@W1nston984 @Luca_Napoletano @NotRight510710 @StephS57880241 @BiancaTheBrave @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @Merck @pfizer @cdc @WHO And it's one of @Luca_Napoletano's fellow non-expert ivermectin conspiracy theorists. 🙄 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8dj

@Artemizia_123 @EMWResearch @PierreKory @jpkiekens @P_McCulloughMD @richardursomd @Covid19Critical @treatearly @GeorgeFareed2 @ChildrensHD @AAPSonline @drbeen_medical @dockaurG @JamesTodaroMD @joerogan Here you go, the comprehensive analysis that proves I

@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark 🥱 Pseudoskeptic. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https://t.co/7BwmA975nY https://t.co/X9cb2CxJmF

@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Not my fault you're still willfully ignoring what better-designed studies show, since you want to troll with a worse study. Like I said, you're a pseudoskeptic troll committed to pretending ivermectin works. 🤷‍♂️ htt

@Luca_Napoletano @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle "Until evidence that is more robust is available, the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 cannot be justified." https://t.co/2vnDJym4ka ""Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in ot

@Luca_Napoletano @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "I don't think I'm more astute" No, you do. The consensus is clear. You dodge it. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outsi

@Luca_Napoletano @ChampCaI @nickmmark Stop being lazy, and go bother to learn the basics of evaluating medical studies, including better + worse study designs. It's not my fault if you lack the integrity to do that: https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/

@Luca_Napoletano @pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle Re: "I never said ivm worked", No, you did. Re: "I just said It's quite strange this association pops up continuously." It actually doesn't in the higher-quality studies you willfully ignore. Now, s

@r_y_a_n__t @jere7my @sailorrooscout @TerraChained Re: "What would you call one who is wrong about ivermectin, was embarrassingly wrong about the lab leak and wont update their beliefs, perhaps ever, no matter what the evidence?" @r_y_a_n__t https://t.co

@yvon_l @SeamanMuller @ElizabethDocc Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

RT @Psychiatry_MCU: イベルメクチンによるCOVID-19の予防および治療効果に関する、Cochrane Reviews. #イベルメクチン #COVID19 #CochraneReviews Ivermectin for preventing and t…

イベルメクチンによるCOVID-19の予防および治療効果に関する、Cochrane Reviews. #イベルメクチン #COVID19 #CochraneReviews Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/8iuMbQrC3P

@EdoajoEric Re: "Below from Juan Chamie. This is Belize. [...] Take a wild guess what Belize did mid-Dember." For posterity's sake: You should have never trusted Chamie, nor been in a disinformation group FLCCC for that long. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k htt

RT @KirWasHere1235: @citainsh @DerrickHood2 @ChuckCallesto https://t.co/PdPu4Eqlov

@citainsh @DerrickHood2 @ChuckCallesto https://t.co/PdPu4Eqlov

@citainsh @ChuckCallesto https://t.co/PdPu4Eqlov

@peabodypress @YvetteHenson @SikhForTruth https://t.co/PdPu4Eqlov They knew this. They suppressed this. So many people should have lived.

@Vivi8317 @RolandLescure @dupontaignan Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@maeleamanche @Robertlagriffo2 @Letoulouzingue Prends la peine de chercher… Traduction : je n’ai rien. J’ai trouvé ça ? J’ai bon ? https://t.co/hHJ0222PKR

@AntiLaissPasser @Palpatineto @QueInsu @Philouchi @cavousf5 @wargonm https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

RT @CoZza_86: What a joke. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/61XtLh71zi

@lordbulb001 @NLFD_org @RyanMarino https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/d6wH51t7Pm https://t.co/ujZwTAOkm4

@CachePast @c22784753 @GidMK It's an irrelevant conspiracy theory, since other researchers independently reached the same conclusion as well. This is just the same tedious paranoia that many science denialists often resort to, like HIV/AIDS deniers. http

@EdoajoEric @GidMK Re: "he re-analyzed data excluding 2 studies, one fraudulent the other with.... major concerns, and found NO benefit." Something other competent people independently did as well. Better the conspiracy theorists will make stuff up about

@CosminStanescu3 @severvoinescu https://t.co/sPAdnqjFYN

@CosminStanescu3 @severvoinescu https://t.co/sPAdnqjFYN

@bettynutely @BFMTV https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r