@Raymond93426525 @BlackCat002742 @botliberalisme @AmeliaDacine @_______liberty @MartineWonner @Laissonslespre1 @verity_france @alainhoupert @MullerBronnL @ansm @ars_grand_est @olivierveran Quels juges ? HC ne fonctionne pas...quant à lIVM, rien de probant
@WittgensteinsR @MerlotVine @njmidm @ErikCosters @FHeijblom @HTillaert @HaHaGentherapie @muumi_tweets @rutten_dr @Dieren_Doc @TraderTemmie @HerrEngelbert @DCSZ14 @henk382 @Karla_Delfoix @Marc_Veld @statistiekcbs Daarnaast verscheen in de tussentijd een Coc
@TnCoNews1 It. Doesn’t. Work. From 2021: https://t.co/n8RuiVx4zL
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 11/P The exclusion wasn't a result of bias from @GidMK. It came from evaluating the study on its merits, as other expe…
@ClaytonHiland @Dean35801990 @Thomasp183 @GovMikeHuckabee Even in 2021, when you guys were creaming your tighty whities over IVM, before the big studies came in…an analysis of 14 studies said…..Meh, not conclusive. https://t.co/I3lluNzKHm
@robolobs @dbgolfnut @DrJamesOlsson Re: "the studies point the other way" No, they don't. Ivermectin produced results consistent with a drug that doesn't work. https://t.co/3qKD0og9Vv https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKU
@solarcx69 @ypandele @a_chevillot_HD @heidi_news Visiblement vous n’avez pas compris les études… https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Dawn52532028 @MrBl4ckSyst3m @jshaer @the_picketfence @elonmusk I don't know what "having proof for ivermectin being approved" means, but I can assure you that there is no proof that Ivermectin can be used to counter COVID. And no, the election wasn't stol
@JLesgards @OJBoyau @raoult_didier Un peu de lecture : https://t.co/GRevTzLy70
@realjlhoward @JamesBradleyCA Not quite there, "Churchill": https://t.co/s4NWMMxdOC https://t.co/Kp3byBRcSV
@TigerlillySusan @syd_ayers @LizzieSuspended @landjax @Squirrel12777 @JonathanSarfat1 Yeah, ivermectin produced results consistent with a drug that doesn't work. That's why it isn't recommended. https://t.co/3qKD0og9Vv https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.c
@AbgemeldetBeein @Psicoalfanista @chiriboga_cris @thenadie0 @mara_dani1 @pamlight_ @Krisxd12 @AleFredric @ccanalesss Pero esque una señal de que realmente se usa esa metodologia es mediante por ejemplo comentarios , en el abstract de almenos la calidad gen
@debwesteinde @lizabeth4566 @PatsKarvelas You don’t understand how to systematically evaluate research do you? Just because something has been published doesn’t mean it provides support for a treatment. Read this - gold standard stuff https://t.co/OlzTOiEw
11/P The exclusion wasn't a result of bias from @GidMK. It came from evaluating the study on its merits, as other experts have done. Harper does not know how to do this because he's a pseudoskeptic lacking competency. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.
Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19.
@Cryptograph82 @Zackpit1999 @KathleenKrzyno1 @PurpleP52620105 heres another one for ya sport. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials."
@msabouri @sschinke @GYamey @NKinNewEng @djt6978 @factode305 @inden_l @greg_travis @thereal_truther @yeahnaa333 @SwaledaleMutton @JesseVentura86 @RachelAlter007 @timmmyrobin @RyanMarino Sad that you're still trying to deflect from your distortions on iverm
@sschinke @factode305 @msabouri @GYamey @NKinNewEng @djt6978 @inden_l @greg_travis @thereal_truther @yeahnaa333 @SwaledaleMutton @JesseVentura86 @RachelAlter007 @timmmyrobin @RyanMarino Re: "He also likes to pretend that people only disagree with him on Co
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht Re: "ivmmeta even created" Stop relyin…
@SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht Re: "ivmmeta even created" Stop relying on that that non-peer-reviewed disinformation website, and actually read the peer-reviewed literature. https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https:/
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht But sure, keep pretending a crackpot so…
@SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht But sure, keep pretending a crackpot source like ivmmeta is reliable, while published papers from experts that do competent risk-of-bias assessments aren't. 🙄 https://t.co/sZt
@Ken65326824 @JeanPierreG9 Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@PureRatPlgueBld @BreezerGalway @JoseGonzalesZa1 @BerryTartlet @LaymansScience IVM has been tested extensively. And shown no efficacy at all. Which is why it is not used clinically. https://t.co/AQge4x4sXb
And just to be clear, while @sciencevs doesn't mention it, the @cochranecollab came to the same conclusion about #ivermectine: https://t.co/G7iLFZDZkI They mentioned the later TOGETHER trial: https://t.co/zonemm1KV7 2/5
@Jeffrail1 @dre_sunshine Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@noteworthypoint @OXHarryH1 @brodjustice @RowdyKate2 @Roper_Lab @Ro10Reed @judysimpson222 @helen_wingrave @madeulookcouk @ECUBrodySOM So you are better then this guy's ? https://t.co/3bq0CHxrtj BCS they say they are junk (the big ones , the tiny don't even
@Existence2100 @Covid19Critical @phillyharper @alexandrosM They're the ones publishing meta-analyses you don't read. 😉 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/C
@MarcTomtom @MarieHlneFabre1 @Dover63A @raoult_didier Oh non, pas Gibertie. Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@hirt_benjamin Le cancer peut-être. Le Covid non. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@FredHarveyMD @PaulGBrandon @WearYourEfnMask @Ken34205423 https://t.co/rGZJBP6Yon Here is a systematic review, summarizing the available evidence (July 2021). There is LOW to VERY LOW evidence for invermectins use. If you can counter this with GOOD evidenc
@RowdyKate2 @Ro10Reed @brodjustice @Roper_Lab @judysimpson222 @OXHarryH1 @helen_wingrave @madeulookcouk @ECUBrodySOM https://t.co/KfJlfjcCi8 "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of CO
@Rasputi79730477 @KtikerV Im ersten Anlauf hatte Posten nicht geklappt, also nochmal. Zum Thema Cochrane im eigenen Feed wieder gefunden. https://t.co/99RL9BcJBg
@Ro10Reed @brodjustice @RowdyKate2 @Roper_Lab @judysimpson222 @OXHarryH1 @helen_wingrave @madeulookcouk @ECUBrodySOM https://t.co/3bq0CHxrtj ate this guy also payed by big pharma? I bet for you all are minus the ones you believe , it's called selective bia
@RowdyKate2 @Roper_Lab @Ro10Reed @judysimpson222 @OXHarryH1 @brodjustice @helen_wingrave @madeulookcouk @ECUBrodySOM Ffs saying that nowadays about ivermectin really shows how dumb you are ... Big studies have shown it doesn't work, the studies that said i
@Jon___F @bmj_latest @GYamey @GidMK @SarahWieten @mariamedina_A Re: "evidence suggests it has benefitted" Nope. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrS
@bobmarkel @BethGoldens @thebradfordfile It's a TOPICAL medicine prescribed to treat scabies, head lice, scabies, river blindness (onchocerciasis), strongyloidiasis, trichuriasis, ascariasis and lymphatic filariasis. It has been proven in a peer reviewed
這則消息不知真是正確否？？使用伊維菌素 (Ivermectin) 預防以及治療COVID-19 https://t.co/4BJFLHboVO
@NH_Braveheart @FreeStateNH Well here’s my case study with a link. https://t.co/jQV4qEorsI
@Hyama88446075 コクランレビューでは「Data collection and analysis」で系統的にバイアス評価したことが書かれてますが、https://t.co/JzOcJwYs5d には系統的レビューは行わず全ての研究を投入したと書かれてますね。これでは不正があった研究が混ざってしまいますね。 https://t.co/0Guy1hNmN2
@tcohoe @Hwill77 @flindall_steve Cochrane review (7/2021)of ivermectin trials. Most trials were not high quality, about a third had notable bias, and there was no clear evidence to indicate its use in COVID. https://t.co/p5ynaLD7Xv
@shannanstreet @CEStephens @US_FDA Do you have evidence of this? There exists evidence that says the exact opposite of your declaration. Like this from National Institute of Health. https://t.co/QnOAgD1qPW
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Chris_Brit10 @markdodds11 @EastYorksTony @dj1au @PaulLomax @sajidjavid @BreezerGalway Re: "Dr Tess Lawrie someone you…
@ErikKohl @Dohan111 @ingridvermeule6 @AntiWap @ErikGeenen @DrDavidNL @DirkDirkw @OmerVandevelde @WoutvanAert Beste @Dohan111, verder is de nieuwe studie een bevestiging van de hoofdconclusie van een Cochrane review uit eind juli 2021. 4/. https://t.co/5
@davidwetton @FraiseAdam @Anymous84861064 @GidMK Re: "come to a scientific evidence-based research conclusion together." That's like saying one needs to come to agreement with an HIV/AIDS denialist on the cause of AIDS. One does not need to agree with den
@Chris_Brit10 @markdodds11 @EastYorksTony @dj1au @PaulLomax @sajidjavid @BreezerGalway Re: "Dr Tess Lawrie someone you can so easily ignore or brush aside?" Yes, since she relies on fraudulent + retracted research, along with being a vaccine denialist and
@PiecesWar @StatisticsBC @StVitusDance @DARAMITZ22 @reallySirChope @ickonic No. Because it isnt proven effective. https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i
@ChamsAli111 @kroger @MdBreathe https://t.co/V0L5Zdjbab even if other authors disagree, it's clear there is mixed evidence at best for benefit vs harm results and pts best interest would be to not use something that has no conclusive evidence for use.
@DerkdeVriesz @VaxxDoc @Aal_68 @AndereKrant Beste @Aal_68, flat-earthers weigeren te accepteren dat de Aarde een bol is en wetenschapsontkenners weigeren te accepteren dat Ivermectine niet werkt tegen corona. Zie onderstaande draad van @Marc_Veld. Zo duide
@Aal_68 @VaxxDoc @AndereKrant Cochrane; de gouden standaard van wetenschappelijke bevindingen, 2021, met de beste onderzoeken die er toen waren: Geen effect. https://t.co/0XJOo45RTS
@kisipi_pls @pakkorokotus @janus_putkonen @OssiTiihonen @TurtiainenAno @Kimmo_Kautio @HeikkiUutiset @myytinkertojat @Juha_Korh2 @HuuhtanenPanu @TiinaKeskimki @MarinSanna Lisaa nauloja Ivermektiini arkkuun. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@Sisapolitiikka @OttoPoikolainen @pakkorokotus @TiinaKeskimki @janus_putkonen @OssiTiihonen @TurtiainenAno @Kimmo_Kautio @HeikkiUutiset @myytinkertojat @Juha_Korh2 @HuuhtanenPanu @MarinSanna Ainoa ongelma on siinä ettei Ivermektiinistä ole mitään apua Koro
@Alpha91160 @barzek @Homagade @Nain_Portekoi @verity_france @Marc_Doyer @JeanGABIN3 Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@KentHartsell @JimDelos02 @Alicefromaus No, there is not one study that showed benefit. You need to start looking at actual data rather than the IVM propaganda sites: https://t.co/AQge4x4sXb
@Menan67 @mtehlo @olivierveran Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@ValrieJ11 @Alpha_2473 @CC051132 @MartineWonner Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@DrDavidNL @ErikGeenen @AntiWap @ingridvermeule6 @DirkDirkw @OmerVandevelde @WoutvanAert Hoi @ErikGeenen, en dan is er natuurlijk nog de Cochrane review uit eind juli 2021 over de werking van Ivermectine tegen corona. De nieuwe studie uit eind maart 2022 b
@DrDavidNL @AntiWap @ingridvermeule6 @ErikGeenen @DirkDirkw @OmerVandevelde @WoutvanAert En uiteraard is er ook nog een Cochrane review uit eind juli 2021 waaruit naar voren komt dat IVM niet werkt tegen corona. @ingridvermeule6 is echter een wetenschapson
@Geraldine13cent @CuveLe @EChabriere Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@BenoitBoullay @DirdeConscience Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@StrongmanNBest @newsmax Here's the Cochrane meta-analysis https://t.co/fIYgk1ycUp 2)
@ScienceAccount1 @jasbulbasaur @gwsuperfan Re: "LIKE I said, my tweet from 09/2021 was factually accurate regarding the meta-analysis in question." Nope. For example, Cochrane's meta-analyses were out before your tweet, excluded the fraudulent work, and f
@ScienceAccount1 @jasbulbasaur @gwsuperfan Re: "That statement on Ivermectin was factually accurate at the time of writing, 09/04/2021." No, it wasn't. For example, TOGETHER's results were out before then. But your denialism is noted, though. https://t.c
@Chaostao1 @trucmuc28502451 @BlagJack @GabyLouLouLou @DeeploInsoumis @delphinebatho Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@NathalieCamy @zorah_lille @DidierMaisto @JLMelenchon Pour l’instant, aucune étude fiable ne démontre l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @r_y_a_n__t @tnicholsmd And the study does nothing to change the fact that ivermectin produces results consistent with…
@insins31544458 @ninji427 @ZuLe79583523 @GuillaumeBarucq Oui, mais ça reste des études biaisées. Quand on fait le tri et qu'on ne garde que les études sérieuses (RCT, risque de biais très faible, etc), ça donne ça : https://t.co/3ai6gSbBjW Aucune preuve
@Fleur_Ru11 @dirkdewap @Johannes3005 @61Bokito Het Werkt alleen tegen parasieten; NIETY tegen een virus Als je beweerd van wel; laat de data zien https://t.co/0XJOo45RTS
@Fleur_Ru11 @dirkdewap @Johannes3005 @61Bokito het werkte nooit niet, dus datum maakt niet uit; data wel. https://t.co/0XJOo45RTS
@SchwuasKlab @Johannes3005 @61Bokito Oh dus niet gelezen.... och gut: kan je dat niet? En je weet ook al niet wat Cochrane is... Oh dear. https://t.co/0XJOo45RTS
@homosapiens300 @Friegida @61Bokito Onzin; puur fraude https://t.co/0XJOo45RTS