9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a published metaanalysis because his is more up to date and includes more studies. (follow him!) But official meta-analyses find the same: http
@Nothv13 @KD2NFC @Jenny_jones1978 @goddeketal @mpc_xetts @PeterHotez @DocDeezWhat @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 That’s what Cochrane is for https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
@JHC_53 @BruceYoung1963 @goddeketal @PeterHotez @joerogan No. Studies do not show that. They show the opposite. Cochrane is gold standard. https://t.co/tXtGYkPDY9
@debthecohost There's many studies documented on pubmed. Here's one https://t.co/3WSKemfbXc
@DannyC_DC1111 because the study is garbage No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy. https://t.co/cVYS5tTDea secret government propaganda site... or where all the US government research is vetted. try it out...
@KD2NFC @goddeketal @mpc_xetts @PeterHotez @DocDeezWhat There are numerous well powered RCTs that all show ivermectin does f*ck all. The Cochrane study showed that https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 7/V So ivermectin fans mislead when they complain about terms like "horse de-wormer", without acknowledging the *POISO…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 7/V So ivermectin fans mislead when they complain about terms like "horse de-wormer", without acknowledging the *POISO…
@dudu_wudu @VeganCardio @EckerleIsabella P.S. es konnte bei Ivermectin kein Nutzen und Wirksamkeit gegen COVID gefunden werden. https://t.co/GlmxvjlmSd
@Terence_009 @ztkelly @DrAseemMalhotra Hospitals all started using dexamethasone as soon as it was shown to work. It’s cheap, off patent, available in IV and oral forms and widely available even in LMIC (which rather dispels the profit concerns). As for iv
@LisaXX____ @gorepainmeat @NMoonitz @watershedchron @MattBinder You can't use a single study to claim that it works. It was found again and again that ivermectin had no effect. https://t.co/TaNY5TwAtF
@nickmmark @TheLancet So 'long COVID' results differing from their prior COVID-OUT study on preventing severe COVID-19. ivmmeta + the like will no doubt feed nonsense to their credulous conspiracist audience about this. 🙄 https://t.co/R11qt2Eriy https://
@ZaklinaczLosiow @tomaawroblewski Łoś w niedoczekaniu na Twoje "źródła" tutaj badanie pokazuje zupełnie coś innego. https://t.co/LOEVlrkCSK
@GRD_PL_2 @tomaawroblewski O te testy chodzi?? https://t.co/LOEVlrkCSK Testy pokazaly ze gówno daje.
@DIA01010101 @tomaawroblewski Masz już wiesz kto jest szurem. https://t.co/LOEVlrkCSK
RT @BRxAD: @elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes No. That's just a list of studies performed. Need to actually read the studies and critic…
RT @BRxAD: @elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes No. That's just a list of studies performed. Need to actually read the studies and critic…
@WakeUpSpeakOut @bfhermann @elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes Why? It's already known to be nonsense. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/s9TgIqIuLr
@matt7gh @RisatoNicola @SecchiLuigi We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. ⬇️ https://t.co/q2fiY02qWD
@human_raise @wietse_de_vries @timdouwsma https://t.co/pxB5pbGT1k Alsjeblieft.
@VigilantFox @elonmusk @CommunityNotes @EpochTimes VigilantFox + Epoch Times are deceptive, as usual, not that Elon Musk honestly cares about facts. You don't just count studies. You assess them for *quality* https://t.co/cN6JYxqiq4 https://t.co/sLyR0qQ
@elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes No. That's just a list of studies performed. Need to actually read the studies and critically appraise the quality of evidence. 1. https://t.co/KSacgjrxZ1 2. https://t.co/jxrLBQZflp
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @HouleEvelyne @lonnibesancon Your link is as worthless as ivmmeta is on ivermectin. Unsurprising, since it's likely mad…
@HouleEvelyne @lonnibesancon Let me know when you can honestly address the criticism of the garbage source you posted on hydroxychloroquine, and the abundant evidence showing hydroxychloroquine doesn't work. Until then, bye, non-expert conspiracist. http
@HouleEvelyne @lonnibesancon Your link is as worthless as ivmmeta is on ivermectin. Unsurprising, since it's likely made by the same conspiracist crackpots. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 h
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho So, @MdBreathe, is there some reason you're liking a tweet that debunked your claims on ivermectin?…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho So, @MdBreathe, is there some reason you're liking a tweet that debunked your claims on ivermectin?…
@MdBreathe @19joho So, @MdBreathe, is there some reason you're liking a tweet that debunked your claims on ivermectin? And relying on deceptive nonsense like what ivmmeta fabricates about studies, is not going to help your position. https://t.co/wqlgpTFV
@WotsOnInfo @bbtwos @Auusi @goddeketal @hiltzikm There are also numerous studies showing it is ineffective. https://t.co/M1c09DtyA3 https://t.co/bkRjgWaA9W https://t.co/FekjMwBMkp
@InfiniteCyclus @lawrie_dr @OracleFilmsUK @WHO 1. Evidence quality *far* more important than quantity (10 poorly-designed trials don't trump 1 well-designed one) 2. Cochrane reviews are the gold standard of evidence appraisal, assessing reliability of tri
@ettourneur @verity_france Vous mentionnez des médecins, chercheurs dans votre famille. Donc vous savez un peu comment ça marche. Il y a bien des organismes auxquels vous faites confiance non? Par ex Cochrane, vanté par Raoult https://t.co/A3thACxuLA
@kharaguchi メタ解析も玉石混合。論文不正でとっくに取り下げられた論文を含めて「有意差あり」としてるところも多く注意が必要です 一番信用できるのは厚労省お墨付きのコクランレビューでしょう コクランによれば『イベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実と結論』とのこと https://t.co/dH26xYT8aR
@gwrit59 @Citysue6 @Likeshesays Actually, it didn't. It's for intestinal parasites covid-19 isn't an intestinal parasit, it's a virus. https://t.co/xp7xFEPWCf
@HelmutS45353688 @ReginaWitt24 @RA_MarkusHaintz Pferdeentwurmungsmittel also….Gehört und gleich weiterverbreitet..gell. Dass Ivermectin seit ca 1985 in der Humanmedizin eingesetzt wird haben Sie sicher nicht gewusst. Woher auch, Sie plappern ja bloss nach.
@ElefantImRaum2 @KathaSchulze @Bundeskanzler Tu ich nicht, https://t.co/rtrOGU2SDi und ich habe Vorurteile, weil ich an die Wirksamkeit eines Entwurmungsmittel zweifel?
@lavande25 @politicus2022 @raoult_didier @silvano_trotta @myriampalomba @BOROWSKIMIKE @CaudeHenrion Quand on commence à insulter, c'est qu'on n'a pas de vrais arguments. Vous devriez informer Cochrane de cette info capitale 😏 https://t.co/A3thACxuLA
@JanciToxDoc @BenFranklin1171 @LovemycountrySd @christophlane @PsychToday @19joho How about a gold standard meta - analysis https://t.co/X34wdGHSvC
@KaiserCut @SHomburg Zu ivermectin https://t.co/w1Mbpx3lhA
@Kizomba4Ever @schizoswoche @kutschera_u Sie stehen doch auch auf Cochrane. Oder etwa nur, wenn es Ihr Narrativ unterstützt😂 https://t.co/OXs36uhDW6
@TIzuriaga @plaforscience Ivermectina https://t.co/YX8qXIWSGh
@Szymon49366484 @pamiechomeblog @AnnaSiarkowska @PiotrWitczak_ @AgnieszkaSzust3 @RzeczPacjenta @SolidarnaPolska @marcinwarchol „The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement.” Nieste
@JavaRavel @lima_mailete @p_rousseff @jairbolsonaro Porque é muito difícil pra tu olhar um site como o Google olhar sites dos fabricantes de vacinas, ou por exemplo o site da Cochrane? https://t.co/Q27rX5hIba Mas aqui está mastiGADINHO pra vocês...
@RainerCMent1 @dale_wen Dass ivermectin einen Nutzen bei Corona-Infektionen hat, ist nicht belegt. https://t.co/X55x83ZkFX
@Adry773377 @p_rousseff @jairbolsonaro Além de ineficaz, o uso da Ivermectina para o tratamento da Covid-19 pode causar complicações para a saúde: https://t.co/Q27rX5hIba
#censored #EvidenceBased #Science #ScienceBased evidence. 0 views
@Monkie6669 @kroontwit @BsSlayah @CMC42 @AmberTunatya @CheapExWife @CrazyWines @Saints_75 @GrahamAllen_1 Every major clinical trial shows absolutely no effect https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
@HenryFordHealth @Abiomed When are you going to advocate for ivermectin Zinc and vitamin D? You know the thing... https://t.co/xDgBzB6DH8
@Bernard57502817 @sickofitall2222 @bickley200 @ClareCraigPath @Jikkyleaks @profnfenton @statsjamie @MineurMineure @Hawley_Richard @JamesMelville @Johnincarlisle @ONS Yes please don’t go down the early treatment rabbit hole. Here is Cochrane’s opinion of iv
That study used Ivermectin too late in the sickness; Early treatment was need and Faux Fauci said WAIT till you can breathe then go to the hospital for Ventilator treatment!
@AndreBensson @Chadwanger3 @Tino_Kunze @estenfeld1 @tagesschau Die Studien, die eine positive Wirkung belegen, kannst du gerne den Autoren der Metastudie des Cochrane-Instituts melden. Die fanden keinen Beleg für Wirksamkeit in Verbindung mit Covid. http
@AlexBerenson If Cochran can't make a call due to a lack of quality data, you are really entering pseudoscience arena that you claim to hate. https://t.co/bjFPOdRmUC
@adlpie @cafelockedout It’s been proven by doctors and research scientists that immavecten doesn’t work…full stop…ok if you are a horse with worms. Good update here https://t.co/IW25lQR9qe
@CKellyUAP OMG Tess was debunked years ago. She is a shill for IVM Follow the money, ya plonker. https://t.co/3IsLZlBswO
イベルメクチンの有用性を未だに主張する方がおられるのなら、是非以下のレビューに御反論ください。 https://t.co/SuEOxw1mtc
@naomi_nakano703 書き方というより内容そのものです。 イベルメクチンが有効だとされる科学的根拠はあるのでしょうか。 https://t.co/SuEOxw1mtc あるのならば挙げ、上記のレビューに対して反論ください。
@insins31544458 @dupontaignan Tweet de 2021, pas d'étude retrouvée dans Cochrane donc Bullshit Voici ce que dit Cochrane https://t.co/1G14ZTWMrU
@Invermectin1 @Alice_Weidel Zu Invermectin: https://t.co/EPPw2nqdal
RT @JerryTa50216668: @goddeketal @P_McCulloughMD @jimmy_dore @SabinehazanMD @KanekoaTheGreat @PierreKory Ivermectin was ineffective in COVI…
@goddeketal @P_McCulloughMD @jimmy_dore @SabinehazanMD @KanekoaTheGreat @PierreKory Ivermectin was ineffective in COVID-19 patients and did not reduce hospitalization time compared to placebo. Cheap and generic drugs were not suppressed: dexamethasone cort
@MartinDaubney You're so far out of your depth it's painful. https://t.co/33ekCq1nZ8
@AndyBandy1954 @dupontaignan @LyonCocoon Vous l'avez toujours dit?! Mais sur quelle base?! Au doigt mouillé ? Pas besoin de faire de la recherche alors 😜 https://t.co/A3thACxuLA
@lepoussin87 @dupontaignan Il raconte effectivement n'importe quoi. Il a fait pareil pour l'HCQ, il se moque de la vérité, il fait du populisme https://t.co/A3thACxuLA
@marc_g_wathelet @FloreSol2 @MareaMalga @nicomedbxl @EricMuraille @mariusgilbert Après je ne sais pas, mais une capture d'écran d'une source moyennement fiable à moins tendance à me convaincre ceci par exemple. https://t.co/A3XweLLEjb
@ABridgen That’s was two years ago and didn’t proceed. You must try harder 1/10. Ivermectin didn’t work then and doesn’t work now. BUT you are now saying the pandemic was a scam😂😂 https://t.co/JmY7ItG9Sr
@tKT2T2n81J4uCBJ @alo3677 @ivermectin_sub @hikaru1032 https://t.co/LXC8hVTbtF https://t.co/xWAqd69ZfP 早川先生もこれだよね。 イベルメクチンは効果が疑わしく重篤な副作用がある為に治療、予防に使用することを支持しない。
RT @DrJackieStone: @SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/8e8uO2RMJp This was the nail in their coffin for me. They join the Lancet, NEJM and JAMA…
@SeivwrightTrudy https://t.co/8e8uO2RMJp This was the nail in their coffin for me. They join the Lancet, NEJM and JAMA. Can't trust them. Whether incompetent, fraudulent or both - their conclusion was incorrect. Doctors believed them and lives were l