@real_seeking @TheChiefNerd “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME
@Dr_logicaI @thereal_truther Cochrane review of all the evidence "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" 🎯 https://t.co/TMjecYzmw4
@ProfTimNoakes What do you think of the 11 RCTs reviewed in the Cochrane systematic review of ivermectin in Covid-19 and their overall conclusion @ProfTimNoakes? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@fee_clochette91 @YvanLamy Ce n’est pas l’état des connaissances de la FDA mais l’état des connaissances scientifiques. https://t.co/O9iIaUOUrf
RT @WiscguyNE: @kasmith58 @clabaugh_mark @AntonioSabatoJr @thetoyman1 Apparently you haven’t looked. Here is a link. More listed at the bot…
@kasmith58 @clabaugh_mark @AntonioSabatoJr @thetoyman1 Apparently you haven’t looked. Here is a link. More listed at the bottom. https://t.co/Hp0aRiRIqS
@MarkSantaniello @The_JL_Podcast @MdBreathe @kroger Based off that response, something tells me you don’t understand a single word on that study that I sent. 🤥 Here’s another study that proves Ivermectin is completely ineffective at treating COVID 19. Rea
@MdBreathe @PierreKory What do you make of the cochrane review @MdBreathe? I’ve also asked Dr Kory and Dr Laurie but so far no reply https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@Evan_Branson @CosmosMom1 @MattBinder Speaking of data... https://t.co/l5gqagtbsz
@harvey_truth @dr_jon_l @PierreKory But no mention of other confounding variables (such as population density). We can only learn so much from ecological studies & the RCTs on ivermectin sadly haven’t been able to replicate the findings of the in vitro
@RuiLima85 @Mmacedo_tweets Blablablabla https://t.co/65LQdoegF3
@Lulu_b_lou @HRP1479 @JohnBoweActor @price_nicola @PierreKory @lawrie_dr @Covid19Critical As it goes I posed this exact question to Dr Kory just yesterday. Waiting for a reply
@Jack_Giovannini @giusbrindisi Forse non ti rendi conto che stai dicendo che l'ivermectina sarebbe efficace perché lo afferma uno che è contro i vaccini a mRNA? Grazie al ca@@o. Gli screenshot, le notizie di Epoch Times o le opinioni non servono a nulla. L
@m_ishetzat @RonaldKuilder 1. Het is een FDA advocaat die dit zegt, niet een arts 2. Het is toegestaan het middel voor te schrijven, maar het heeft geen werking tegen covid en wordt dus door FDA artsen ook niet geadviseerd. https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME We fo
For an evidence based perspective on ivermectin to treat COVID, see here: https://t.co/WcqzSJAZip https://t.co/LraBjFR2vg
@Lulu_b_lou @HRP1479 @JohnBoweActor @price_nicola @PierreKory @lawrie_dr This cochrane review? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@PierreKory Don’t fall for the lies of Pierre. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME
@PierreKory What do you make of the cochrane review on RCT of ivermectin for Covid-19 @PierreKory? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@P_McCulloughMD @US_FDA Sadly in RCT done looking at effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid-19, the promising results found in the retrospective cohort ICON study have not been able to be replicated https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@catturd2 That repeatedly in studies from around the world it isn’t effective in covid19? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@alexm0719 @tw_gato @TimRunsHisMouth From PubMed Read the "main results" for more. https://t.co/4XcmrC3YjH https://t.co/wWhJ5lg77S
@charliekirk11 Sorry, but I regret to inform you, Charlie Kirk, that YOU have blood on your hands: How many Americans senselessly died because you argued against the ONLY proven medicines against Covid (the vaccines)...? Ivermectin has NOT been shown an ef
@BretWeinstein A Cochrane meta-analysis of studies on ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19: "Overall, the reliable evidence available DOES NOT SUPPORT the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 (outside of well-designed rando
@HarryBlack303 Shouldn't be a problem, any doctor that prescribes off license for a therapeutic with zero proven benefit needs a wide berth https://t.co/E602adRg4V
@english_natal @Doctor_Cr @ABridgen If you want to read the actual evidence from trials I would suggest the Cochrane reviews
@slstrm_dsgn @ABridgen @wolsned Many medications have been trialled in Covid-19. Sadly most (including ivermectin and hydroxychoroquine) have been shown not to work.
@charliekirk11 For those who are interested in reading the actual (lack of) evidence for these 2 medications for Covid-19
RT @caz_sampson: @ABridgen Here is the (lack of) evidence for the effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7 And here is…
RT @caz_sampson: @ABridgen Here is the (lack of) evidence for the effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7 And here is…
@ABridgen Here is the (lack of) evidence for the effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7 And here is the same for hydroxychloroquine https://t.co/xtTKiYUdAw
@bubbajones4106 @BretWeinstein Looks fake to me. Here's the real one. https://t.co/AVYEjfDr5R
@catturd2 So many claims that ivermectin works with NO quality clinical trials. But yet when three large-scale clinical trials all proved the same outcome -- ivermectin has NO effect on Covid-19. https://t.co/rnPK3vC7gn
The medical community seems divided whether it makes Covid-19 better / worse or no change. Many low reliability studies. Read it for yourselves - and don't take Maria's tweet as absolute truth. https://t.co/3U715gpzBo
@AnnetteRockwe10 Well, we can go by this study reported on whatever biznews is, or by (checks notes) all the other ones combined. https://t.co/NZUqcnIReZ
@Resist_05 Bit depressing. Lots wrong with Covid but absolutely no solid evidence that ivermectin is an effective treatment. Cochrane showed masks don’t work and guess what, neither does ivermectin https://t.co/D2yz8xuW2e
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@ER_Korhola @PauliJuusela @SariEssayah Miksi ivermektiini olisi nyt kiinnostava asia? Miksi jaoit 2017 uutisen muka uutena osoituksena ivermektiinin tehosta ja "hyvistä puolista", vaikka uuttakin tietoa on tarjolla (esim. https://t.co/E5zFLIiJ5a)? Kysyn, k
RT @Kot_Behemot_NSA: Bonus. Gdyby ktoś przeoczył link w artykułach, to tutaj jest przegląd systematyczny badań iwermektyny vs Covid. Publik…
@julagaro @JulioRazona Por ejemplo https://t.co/3sHpdjrgET
@MikesSportsJam @Debunk_the_Funk Cochrane found a bunch of RTCs doing just that, but after weeding out those that didn't fulfil scientific criterial found ivermectin didn't work. https://t.co/UUkugg2qpL
@barcalnz @ColBurns1954 @ellymelly Therese Lawrie has not been involved in a Cochrane review. The Cochrane review of the efficacy of ivermectin in preventing or treating Covid 19 found little to no evidence supporting it's use. https://t.co/00FYuQLIEg
@BretWeinstein Bret Winstein: Epistemic Courage: Non-existent. Just says what his groupies want to hear. Like Jordan Peterson. Humility: About as non-existent as evidence that ivermectin treats COVID. See Cochrane: https://t.co/FBOAg2dheq Conclusion
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@Jandoorzee @traveling_brand Voordat covid 19 bestond was het in 2014 al geschikt bevonden ? https://t.co/QfAYrfynyX https://t.co/zGmYfXXD1E https://t.co/fMQMIQni0R
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@garbidz @SamiAntinniemi Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0 https://t.co/oXpgEuept5
@laski77 @garbidz @SamiAntinniemi Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0 https://t.co/oXpgEuept5
@SamiAntinniemi @garbidz Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0 https://t.co/oXpgEuept5
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@ER_Korhola Jakamasi artikkeli on julkaistu vuonna 2017. Se ei ole uusi, eikä se sano Covidista mitään. Esimerkiksi tämä Cochrane-katsaus kävi läpi kaikki aiheesta tehdyt tutkimukset ja päätyi seuraavaan lopputulemaan. https://t.co/dyrLpC6doz https://t.co
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@clintonsolo8 @BanFauxNews @TheChiefNerd LMAO, no, it's not. Also, I'm not American. Also, here is an actual meta-analysis on ivermectin and covid-19 https://t.co/zGKKX6ei6j
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iverm, os dados só vão até 2021, mas o artigo é atualizado https://t.co/K4ejnauLGU
@Fordy8173 @FreeWCH Ivermectin is ineffective against SARS-CoV-2 based on double-blind randomized clinical trials with inert placebo. Natural medicine is pseudoscientific quackery and lacking data for efficacy. https://t.co/blI8Iorbiy
RT @nickmmark: If you want an actual meta-analysis, done by reputable experts, check out the updated one by Cochrane: https://t.co/1tjYMOdr…
If you want an actual meta-analysis, done by reputable experts, check out the updated one by Cochrane: https://t.co/1tjYMOdruF Spoiler alert: “For outpatients, there is currently low‐ to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for
@joebhoy1971 @richmcmullan @DeborahMeaden Here is some more studies that show it is useless. https://t.co/WhxbisxQx9 https://t.co/n6EwpgGzP4 I could continue quite easily. Ivermectin's main use is killing parasites in hearts of Animals, mostly cattle, w
@CKellyUAP C19early organisation is anonymous . They claim they are composed of PhD holders but will not disclose their names. Here is the research by JAMA regarding Ivermectin: https://t.co/xP1SudSgoj And Cochrane Library: https://t.co/K8u3H7N9eb Th
@RyanD_T @JohnMappin @KimDotcom "No trial investigated ivermectin to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection." "We also found 31 ongoing trials, and an additional 28 trials still requiring clarification from the authors or not yet published." https://t.co/gmhfYEwWR
@Leeleeliberty11 @IPatriot90 @lignebur72 @DrEliDavid why do you think it couldn't show value against covid-19 in actual controlled trials? It's a conspiracy again, isn't it. https://t.co/ZHtVldJEa5
@TonyHinton2016 Cochrane review does not agree https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@Artemizia_123 @JRSAZ69 Why promote something with no antiviral properties to counter a virus? https://t.co/x2Rbr2VRrM https://t.co/vwhbMIeY1s https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L
@SitSilver @Unheilpraktiker @Oliver25493862 @MS22029 @ThomasBe222 @plej_a @Heicapa1 @NarfGb @Shania20204 @NoDealNever @realism_climate @kessaku5 @Elke_Austenat @RWittenbrink @SHomburg @ZuckerZucker3 Zu IVM, nur um das nicht so stehen zu lassen. Weiter bei
@HAmesbauer @MarignoniMartin Ja verrückt Dinge zu empfehlen welche nicht wirken bzw bei Überdosierung tödlich sein können. Nach dem rechten Motto- flood the world with shit! https://t.co/yAcNruiKIk
@marc_g_wathelet @K_G_Andersen 🥱 Sad that you're still peddling garbage like ivmmeta. No wonder you're scientifically illiterate + paranoid on COVID-19-related topics. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/