@catturd2 Well my educated guess is as follows... It inhibits invasion (or at the least allows for higher rates of red flags) via blind spots within the cell's semi- permeable membrane. That's the only thing that comes to my mind. https://t.co/BKv2VUm7vi
@is_hindsight @FoxNews "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 | Cochrane" https://t.co/oaTGmDwP0d
@is_hindsight @FoxNews Proper study "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 | Cochrane" https://t.co/oaTGmDwP0d
@treefrogvenom @LauraKronen @DarrenBurchill There’s currently no evidence to suggest it’s effective in treating Covid https://t.co/yrJpzXa2xi
@JustFinchALZ @Caitlinh24 @LauraKronen There’s currently no evidence to suggest it’s effective in treating Covid https://t.co/yrJpzXa2xi
@Scienceisacult @Caitlinh24 @LauraKronen Currently there’s no evidence to suggest it’s effective in treating Covid https://t.co/yrJpzXa2xi
@P_dknight @LauraKronen But currently there’s no evidence to suggest it’s effective in treating Covid so why does it matter? https://t.co/yrJpzXa2xi
@LauraKronen But it doesn’t https://t.co/yrJpzXa2xi
@AngryCardio @ScottAdamsSays @hoovarmin real skin in the game is whether or not any of the debaters have or would take it if sick. based on direct personal experience and the drug's 5 decades of proven non-toxicity if taken properly, I would suggest yes, b
@TexasRepublic71 @ke64728513 Sorry sweethearts Still no data supporting Ivermectin. https://t.co/HguIeXAJx8 Appreciate this is June 22. But nothing better published in last 6 months.
@mikegephart1 @luckytran Better link: https://t.co/4juDYyMcwy
@RWMaloneMD 2.) From Google Scholar: https://t.co/y2zJ38RHQs "Currently, evidence on ivermectin for prevention . . . treatment is conflicting . . . Ivermectin plus standard of care compared to standardof care plus placebo may have little or no effect on c
Read the article you’re sourcing as your gotcha evidence or you might look foolish like this snarky poster did.
@AndreaR9Md hey Dr. Andrea...Your days of respect are limited. You should practice being contrite & groveling in front of your mirror. You sold we, the people, out. You are laying down cover fire for evil. May the shut up devour you. https://t.co/Iq
@bwco hey Baloney With Cherry Ontop ...your days of respect are limited. Plan accordingly. https://t.co/IqZXrZnh9c
RT @UltiGuard: Cochrane considered the golden standard for meta-analysis reviews concluded there’s no robust evidence Ivermectin helps. S…
@FredHulls @johnrackham82 https://t.co/vIISWjNq8H. Studies did not show any effectiveness
@JuliaCerisi @GrumpyGrdHog @Educ_suspendu Site frauduleux pour gogos crédules! Sinon faut envoyer ça aux chinois: ils en auraient bien besoin et sont tellement cons qu'ils n'y ont pas pensé!https://t.co/Os83YfVA5i
@From_Marseille @Educ_suspendu Oui justement: et plutôt que "pas toujours" je dirais "jamais" ou, à la rigueur "quasiment jamais". Voir compilation études: https://t.co/y91CCXLWil
@LC95468112 @zoe_zaera @Educ_suspendu Reste couvert, tu vas prendre froid! https://t.co/y91CCXLWil
@dutankersa @CryptoSala @covid19vaccinen Här är en litteraturöversikt som särskiljer sjukhuspatienter från öppenvårdspatienter. https://t.co/QEfXiOjZGD
@dupontaignan Rien de flagrant dans toutes les études. https://t.co/sTgbym2b4R
@Samourai_Sushi @Sante_Gouv Pourquoi vous mentez tout le temps ? https://t.co/n0ZSe5VE6X
@pravednost @CiesekSandra Weil Corona kein Wurm oder keine Milbe ist!? https://t.co/4IgJimKMsy https://t.co/rbV9OiY6Os
@UOLNoticias O babaca mandando o povo tomar cloroquina e ivermecitina. E os passadores de pano achando que ele tava ajudando o povo. Que a verdade é bem simples ele sempre foi um merda. E quem defende não passa de massa de manobra. https://t.co/updWMks4NP
@1galactus1 @MrAhmadKMalik @jessbowds78 Cochrane’s analysis on ivermectin in Covid19 https://t.co/eUGwhvByKF
@ryangerritsen @VanessaParnell Absolutely no scientific evidence of its effectiveness re covid 19 https://t.co/nKkNlYmPzt
@lghetti @appsantos38 @luquinhax011 @LaineFe82253009 @monark https://t.co/WEIfVkjMqr dá uma lida aí, freguês da Aparecidense Depois dá uma lida rápida sobre a fonte que você achou: https://t.co/kyow8zkcSR
@appsantos38 @luquinhax011 @LaineFe82253009 @monark Vamos achar uma fonte que presta: https://t.co/WEIfVkjMqr https://t.co/2oMawQm8uJ https://t.co/uOtAJOB3B7 Tudo isso só com uma pesquisa rápida no Google
@JRJHealey @UniverseWithin4 @DrSusanOliver1 Would you prescribe remdesivir as early treatment? The NIH seems to still be doing trials on ivermectin. https://t.co/fTlC32271N What would be the point of misleading people from a doctor's standpoint by prescrib
@buymedicine3 @McJaymck82 @JDMayger @StephenMcDonell Don't fall for it! https://t.co/MopTBU4BgH
@Mollie_Whuppie @LucasLeiann @obiwaugh @DrNeilStone We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. https://t.co/CXxllzlx4W
@KidCreole311 That's a misinformation site, softlad. https://t.co/QG88pmbNgL https://t.co/kHpyQUsoiC
@DStv57039749 @jakeshieldsajj @TomJumboGrumbo Try a little research , is it painful to be a low hanging fruit? 🙄 https://t.co/XBzpG9iZvm
@Texas__Bulldog @33Rule_Legend @Mary37298190 @VincePesce2 @nathaliejacoby1 @matevszlvcivs @BubbaSue222 "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection." https://t.co/dfz8frpo1g
@SteinLudvigsen @HansMagnusNils1 @Svindeljakt Cochrane om ivermektin: "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still limited
@vap0r1 @hross4943 @JaceStephens2 @jack Here's an analysis of multiple studies that says (spoiler) you're misinformed. https://t.co/xMRbqJEfVa
@bzblues1 @NutsMusks @HonestWaldo @nathaliejacoby1 Systematic review of the evidence (research gold standard) https://t.co/S6D7qoaSSr
@stcknthmdlewitu @DavidWolfe really? lol https://t.co/P12m4dytC8
@_Desi76_ @TerenceFerrett @BergssonErik @DrAseemMalhotra Ivermectin wasn’t ridiculed. We really wanted it to work - cheap, widely available (including in LMIC), good side effect profile etc. Sadly it hasn’t been shown to work in multiple trials. Here is mo
@cindybanks91 @Boiarski @PeterHotez You call someone a liar off off what?! India also implemented some of the strictest mask mandates in the world. Science is not a yes or no type of thing. It’s based off of research. Not headline. https://t.co/TfcPLdXe
@MayeuxFrederic @Crane2Piaf @MICHELVroniqu13 @Chamchamat Pas soigné, traité.. https://t.co/kek3gbEpnj
@bossert_l @leithian_prime @EdKrassen According to studies it isn't harmful. https://t.co/9NnkTN89aS
@LadyJustice4512 From the people that no kow to conduct metaanalyses. https://t.co/GhzPbBzRDJ
@JeanneOnyme @apresj20 Juin 2022 c'est assez récent pour vous? https://t.co/ltUFhvYA30 https://t.co/WbE3kA2DQO
@DannyStouffer @m_c_k_e_e @hodgetwins {no} https://t.co/IVAFLRfERR No effect. https://t.co/koxVs3zd8o No effect.
@ode2wine @shannonsinsc Here is one https://t.co/lYpt1LHEAh
@LordMagus1 @AnitaBlackmon69 @arube1 @Chicago1Ray https://t.co/UbEm8Vkv88 Drs should not have been blocked from trying or talking about a harmless medicine that might work when there were no treatments at all.
RT @45Kristina24: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/GmApLzjhqY I found this on Freespoke, a new searc…
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/GmApLzjhqY I found this on Freespoke, a new search engine that doesn't censor viewpoints and respects privacy. Check it out: https://t.co/ZXnruW4KOv
https://t.co/7xDRthGK2J We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still limited.
@TheCannaWiz @Sessler @joncoopertweets @elonmusk This is from a 2021. August 2021. Mines from Dec 1st. Your behind. But anyway. If we’re doing this. Here’s one from the same year as yours. https://t.co/LYUHupyEGB
@jettzetr @hodgetwins @elonmusk "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19" https://t.co/PTphvT8FuU
@CassieopeiaKat It Does Not Work. https://t.co/rCKS9RzS4o
@PierreKory Same with ivermectin – again, I'm not citing anything new to you, obviously, but you've decided to hang your hat on the other studies at high risk for bias: https://t.co/SZIdOXUEYp
@Amadori16626211 @PhillyPharmaBoy Apparently you don't even understand what 'truth' means or even what consists of evidence. (Clue for the rubes: it's not a clickbait video on Grindr, Rumbl or Substack) https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/2VoneqejXk
@Libbylibs101 @drsimonegold Ivermectin wasn’t ridiculed, just the trials done on it showed it didn’t work! We really wanted it to work - cheap, widely available (including in LMIC, doesn’t need to be refrigerated, good side effect profile). Sadly not to be
@BiliSeijo5 @GoodReplyz @nikau_6 @loulou2745 @idrissaberkane @wargonm Oui le vaccin de la dingue était réservé aux seuls personnes déjà infectés la France n’avait pas autorisé cette vaccination dans les TOM DOM https://t.co/fK1mOziSCp https://t.co/d1uivoHT
@Anniewuzhere @JamieSale Yeah... for parasitic infections. It is nothing more than a placebo for Covid. https://t.co/0KsCuWCkkh
@NoMandatesOz @ChrisColButler @drbeen_medical @Johnincarlisle @dr_jon_l @DrEliDavid @DrAseemMalhotra @PierreKory @Covid19Critical @UniofOxford “Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of iver
@JeremyFOUBERT1 @Sky__SSBU @TroncheBiais Du coup .. Juin 2022 : https://t.co/8g1geWqxXt
@DonLiviel @Randy64_fr @myriampalomba @Beatrice_Rosen Par contre des études qui annoncent aucun effet, on en a plein : https://t.co/ZFttipmBQW
@goodgolly247 @CliveLindley @tooboopedoo23 @DrAseemMalhotra Yes. https://t.co/VzNiFN4N2Z and https://t.co/OuBJGR2eyo and here’s a Cochrane review from June 2022 which summarizes the current data https://t.co/2hf6KJt7rL
@SHBueche @JGaffneyUSN Your study fails to put ivermectin against any other therapeutic in current use- it only hypothesizes that ivermectin vs placebo.. that’s not a valid study for efficacy of ivermectin. https://t.co/QH3zGZ27aU
@kirkwylde @rookierw @DrSusanOliver1 Wrong, "quality" definitely has well established, pre-determined meanings when it comes to all levels of studies. So it's just one more lousy excuse to not accept "high quality" meta-analyses such as the Cochrane Review
RT @samiahurst: @MiloslavBilik @marc_g_wathelet L'ivermectine n'est pas efficace seulement contre la gale, mais aussi contre d'autres paras…
@MiloslavBilik @marc_g_wathelet L'ivermectine n'est pas efficace seulement contre la gale, mais aussi contre d'autres parasites. C'est un médicament très utile Contre le COVID19, en revanche, il semble actuellement qu'elle ne marche pas. C'est vraiment do
@fleurdotone @pktoutceci_ @xazalbert @MVPolitique @idrissaberkane Sur l'Ivermectine ? Voilà déjà 2 croyances très répandues battues en brèche. Vous pouvez donc identifier ceux qui les défendent comme des sources peu fiables https://t.co/a3oT5O1nyF
@The4ourthBranch @um_felipe @TaurenDruids @TomFitton For posterity: The non-expert paranoid conspiracist was peddling non-peer-reviewed cr*p for ideological reasons. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4
@The4ourthBranch @BioTurboNick I'm saying you're a gullible pseudoskeptic + conspiracist who peddles whatever narrative you find ideologically convenient (ex: ivm, lab leak conspiracism) https://t.co/xBZStjBfpJ https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQ
@nowwhatsthat @StatisticsBC @AB_MD_WarRoom NIH: you will die. Also NOPE https://t.co/qhOMLzvULE Most damning: Cochrane study: NOPE https://t.co/AN6FViuyS5 So 99% of world scientists and health orgs said nope. There is no other side. Just flat earthers
@Noncoerciverea1 @BretWeinstein So Cochrane is wrong? Serious question. https://t.co/YRdD68i0jO
RT @JennyPickles1: @LykDj @smartwookiee @mschade72 @Ghostwalkes @RobAussie1 They just keep on coming … June 2022 … “We found no evidence to…
@LykDj @smartwookiee @mschade72 @Ghostwalkes @RobAussie1 They just keep on coming … June 2022 … “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/PMgHdjepHQ
@Lektronk @DAR1797 @DiedSuddenly_ No, it has not had any success anywhere. Not in India. Not in Africa. There have been about 10 major clinical trials for the drug. It failed all of them. Without exception. Some good meta summaries (ditching the bogus bad
@brsavage11 @heidithewiz @DrJenGunter @bethanyshondark Thanks. Unfortunately none of these are citations. You might as well quote Dr. Seuss. Here's from Cochrane, the gold standard review of trials, as of June 2021. https://t.co/Bd9P9IQzc2
@ovjocm @srut42 @CetiAlphaFumf @realRobPlumber @GidMK For posterity: ivmmeta was a disinformation website meant to fool the credulous, on par with an HIV/AIDS denialist blog. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https:
@RogerCl33051189 @sinceronaperfil @KatieDaviscourt oh look, another one https://t.co/JDpXy2DBrn
@eneldiluvio @Massy_444 @AlexBirrell3 @TheoFleury14 I'm sure the dozens of studies just all did it wrong! I just don't think you are willing to accept being wrong. I'm not digging through every study, but it's hard to argue study after study failing to s
@LM_Ginger_Kitty @NovElection2024 What a moron.. Clinical trials have shown that ivermectin did fuck all.. https://t.co/alVWgExUck 2. The vaccine wasn’t untested, it wasn’t fully FDA approved. 3. What deadly effects..?!? Lemme rephrase.. What a fuckin
@dslack_haf @TheoFleury14 https://t.co/17JWLgUdsx Still does noting for Covid