For an evidence based perspective on ivermectin to treat COVID, see here: https://t.co/WcqzSJAZip https://t.co/LraBjFR2vg
@Lulu_b_lou @HRP1479 @JohnBoweActor @price_nicola @PierreKory @lawrie_dr This cochrane review? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@PierreKory Don’t fall for the lies of Pierre. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME
@PierreKory What do you make of the cochrane review on RCT of ivermectin for Covid-19 @PierreKory? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@P_McCulloughMD @US_FDA Sadly in RCT done looking at effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid-19, the promising results found in the retrospective cohort ICON study have not been able to be replicated https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@catturd2 That repeatedly in studies from around the world it isn’t effective in covid19? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@alexm0719 @tw_gato @TimRunsHisMouth From PubMed Read the "main results" for more. https://t.co/4XcmrC3YjH https://t.co/wWhJ5lg77S
@charliekirk11 Sorry, but I regret to inform you, Charlie Kirk, that YOU have blood on your hands: How many Americans senselessly died because you argued against the ONLY proven medicines against Covid (the vaccines)...? Ivermectin has NOT been shown an ef
@BretWeinstein A Cochrane meta-analysis of studies on ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19: "Overall, the reliable evidence available DOES NOT SUPPORT the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 (outside of well-designed rando
@HarryBlack303 Shouldn't be a problem, any doctor that prescribes off license for a therapeutic with zero proven benefit needs a wide berth https://t.co/E602adRg4V
@english_natal @Doctor_Cr @ABridgen If you want to read the actual evidence from trials I would suggest the Cochrane reviews
@slstrm_dsgn @ABridgen @wolsned Many medications have been trialled in Covid-19. Sadly most (including ivermectin and hydroxychoroquine) have been shown not to work.
@charliekirk11 For those who are interested in reading the actual (lack of) evidence for these 2 medications for Covid-19
RT @caz_sampson: @ABridgen Here is the (lack of) evidence for the effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7 And here is…
RT @caz_sampson: @ABridgen Here is the (lack of) evidence for the effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7 And here is…
@ABridgen Here is the (lack of) evidence for the effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7 And here is the same for hydroxychloroquine https://t.co/xtTKiYUdAw
@bubbajones4106 @BretWeinstein Looks fake to me. Here's the real one. https://t.co/AVYEjfDr5R
@catturd2 So many claims that ivermectin works with NO quality clinical trials. But yet when three large-scale clinical trials all proved the same outcome -- ivermectin has NO effect on Covid-19. https://t.co/rnPK3vC7gn
The medical community seems divided whether it makes Covid-19 better / worse or no change. Many low reliability studies. Read it for yourselves - and don't take Maria's tweet as absolute truth. https://t.co/3U715gpzBo
@AnnetteRockwe10 Well, we can go by this study reported on whatever biznews is, or by (checks notes) all the other ones combined. https://t.co/NZUqcnIReZ
@Resist_05 Bit depressing. Lots wrong with Covid but absolutely no solid evidence that ivermectin is an effective treatment. Cochrane showed masks don’t work and guess what, neither does ivermectin https://t.co/D2yz8xuW2e
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@ER_Korhola @PauliJuusela @SariEssayah Miksi ivermektiini olisi nyt kiinnostava asia? Miksi jaoit 2017 uutisen muka uutena osoituksena ivermektiinin tehosta ja "hyvistä puolista", vaikka uuttakin tietoa on tarjolla (esim. https://t.co/E5zFLIiJ5a)? Kysyn, k
RT @Kot_Behemot_NSA: Bonus. Gdyby ktoś przeoczył link w artykułach, to tutaj jest przegląd systematyczny badań iwermektyny vs Covid. Publik…
@julagaro @JulioRazona Por ejemplo https://t.co/3sHpdjrgET
@MikesSportsJam @Debunk_the_Funk Cochrane found a bunch of RTCs doing just that, but after weeding out those that didn't fulfil scientific criterial found ivermectin didn't work. https://t.co/UUkugg2qpL
@barcalnz @ColBurns1954 @ellymelly Therese Lawrie has not been involved in a Cochrane review. The Cochrane review of the efficacy of ivermectin in preventing or treating Covid 19 found little to no evidence supporting it's use. https://t.co/00FYuQLIEg
@BretWeinstein Bret Winstein: Epistemic Courage: Non-existent. Just says what his groupies want to hear. Like Jordan Peterson. Humility: About as non-existent as evidence that ivermectin treats COVID. See Cochrane: https://t.co/FBOAg2dheq Conclusion
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@Jandoorzee @traveling_brand Voordat covid 19 bestond was het in 2014 al geschikt bevonden ? https://t.co/QfAYrfynyX https://t.co/zGmYfXXD1E https://t.co/fMQMIQni0R
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@garbidz @SamiAntinniemi Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0 https://t.co/oXpgEuept5
@laski77 @garbidz @SamiAntinniemi Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0 https://t.co/oXpgEuept5
@SamiAntinniemi @garbidz Kuten voit lukea tutkimuksista, siita ei ole mitaan hyotya Koronan hoidossa. Ja miksi olisikaan, matolaakehan se on. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0 https://t.co/oXpgEuept5
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@ER_Korhola Jakamasi artikkeli on julkaistu vuonna 2017. Se ei ole uusi, eikä se sano Covidista mitään. Esimerkiksi tämä Cochrane-katsaus kävi läpi kaikki aiheesta tehdyt tutkimukset ja päätyi seuraavaan lopputulemaan. https://t.co/dyrLpC6doz https://t.co
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
@clintonsolo8 @BanFauxNews @TheChiefNerd LMAO, no, it's not. Also, I'm not American. Also, here is an actual meta-analysis on ivermectin and covid-19 https://t.co/zGKKX6ei6j
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
RT @bielconn: Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte,…
Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iverm, os dados só vão até 2021, mas o artigo é atualizado https://t.co/K4ejnauLGU
@Fordy8173 @FreeWCH Ivermectin is ineffective against SARS-CoV-2 based on double-blind randomized clinical trials with inert placebo. Natural medicine is pseudoscientific quackery and lacking data for efficacy. https://t.co/blI8Iorbiy
RT @nickmmark: If you want an actual meta-analysis, done by reputable experts, check out the updated one by Cochrane: https://t.co/1tjYMOdr…
If you want an actual meta-analysis, done by reputable experts, check out the updated one by Cochrane: https://t.co/1tjYMOdruF Spoiler alert: “For outpatients, there is currently low‐ to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for
@joebhoy1971 @richmcmullan @DeborahMeaden Here is some more studies that show it is useless. https://t.co/WhxbisxQx9 https://t.co/n6EwpgGzP4 I could continue quite easily. Ivermectin's main use is killing parasites in hearts of Animals, mostly cattle, w
@CKellyUAP C19early organisation is anonymous . They claim they are composed of PhD holders but will not disclose their names. Here is the research by JAMA regarding Ivermectin: https://t.co/xP1SudSgoj And Cochrane Library: https://t.co/K8u3H7N9eb Th
@RyanD_T @JohnMappin @KimDotcom "No trial investigated ivermectin to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection." "We also found 31 ongoing trials, and an additional 28 trials still requiring clarification from the authors or not yet published." https://t.co/gmhfYEwWR
@Leeleeliberty11 @IPatriot90 @lignebur72 @DrEliDavid why do you think it couldn't show value against covid-19 in actual controlled trials? It's a conspiracy again, isn't it. https://t.co/ZHtVldJEa5
@TonyHinton2016 Cochrane review does not agree https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@Artemizia_123 @JRSAZ69 Why promote something with no antiviral properties to counter a virus? https://t.co/x2Rbr2VRrM https://t.co/vwhbMIeY1s https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L
@SitSilver @Unheilpraktiker @Oliver25493862 @MS22029 @ThomasBe222 @plej_a @Heicapa1 @NarfGb @Shania20204 @NoDealNever @realism_climate @kessaku5 @Elke_Austenat @RWittenbrink @SHomburg @ZuckerZucker3 Zu IVM, nur um das nicht so stehen zu lassen. Weiter bei
@HAmesbauer @MarignoniMartin Ja verrückt Dinge zu empfehlen welche nicht wirken bzw bei Überdosierung tödlich sein können. Nach dem rechten Motto- flood the world with shit! https://t.co/yAcNruiKIk
@marc_g_wathelet @K_G_Andersen 🥱 Sad that you're still peddling garbage like ivmmeta. No wonder you're scientifically illiterate + paranoid on COVID-19-related topics. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/BPAcsezeQy
@profrobmartens @GidMK @SRaaijmakers @CovidAnalysis Same groups on unreliable contrarian websites that willfully misled credulous non-experts on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc. https://t.co/lInREyq25C https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC
@TheBeanEyesOpen I’ll just leave this here again. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@TheBeanEyesOpen No (sadly) neither has been shown to work. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@CKellyUAP @TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Let folks known when you have a source that isn't long-debunked non-peer-reviewed nonsense. https://t.co/wqlgpTFVHR https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/sCDn2zr2XI
@__anoop__ @CKellyUAP @TigerlillySusan @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Actually, it's not credible because it's non-peer-reviewed nonsense that's been repeatedly debunked and doesn't match published evidence. Not only are you biased, you're incredibly ba
@TiamatRoar @mentalyentil @LadyDoctorSays "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID‐19 infection" https://t.co/J9PIE7ux1P
@LimesAndMangos Ja, beschäftigen Sie sich mal mit dem Internet. Auf Cochrane geben Corona-Verharmloser doch sonst gerne so viel. https://t.co/xETDdOReik
@DocDeezWhat @mongoosenewyork @frank_zelenko Cochrane is how you do such analysis. Here’s there’s https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
@SmarterSig @jcatskill And on the basis of that you would be happy with a world wide roll out? So then how do you explain this? https://t.co/nW52bsFk94
@sigmashrink @RudieBdeV @DrDavidNL @jorgje @MarionKoopmans @mauricedehond Cochrane is negatief https://t.co/f9Bt1B2Pbu