@duggaltweets @BrettYoud @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19
@Dcatz77 @BrettYoud @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or pr
@sbal5344 @BrettYoud @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or p
@JudyMor67515655 @BrettYoud @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-
@lesnshawn1 @BrettYoud @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or
@RVarmaMD @BrettYoud @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or p
@insight39818958 @LinaB21694369 @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating CO
@LinaB21694369 @drsimonegold So people that said Ivermectin worked and actually put people’s life in danger should be held accountable too. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection”
@ElonMuskaccioli @CathyAbacus @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVI
@AzazelG559 @rooot101 @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or
@skintnick @drsimonegold Exactly… “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection” https://t.co/wefwbD7UKA
@BidenHolocaust @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preven
@NancyBa55821405 @RickS9115 @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-
@Real64779934 @mike_muffler @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-
@drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2
@flnurse18 @mike_muffler @drsimonegold So then we can all agree that Ivermectin was NEVER a treatment (or prevention) for covid & saying it was put people’s life in danger. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19
RT @wb8000: @IanCopeland5 "We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standa…
RT @wb8000: @IanCopeland5 "We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standa…
RT @wb8000: @IanCopeland5 "We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standa…
@IanCopeland5 "We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standard of care. The evidence does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19." https://t.co/t5AbSfveI4
@JLimHospMD Of course they would. This was published in July of 21: https://t.co/mNdLnljWVz
@t_endian @DrAseemMalhotra No, they didn’t https://t.co/LDt3VqTqgs
@megajig420 Your claims have zero supportive evidence. Systematic review of the literature finds NO evidence of ivermectin use in treatment or or prevention of COVID. https://t.co/DBGAJDhGXa
@GrGuenter Das kommt alles von den MaßNahMen. Ich sage nur: flatten the curve! Kein Wunder dass die Erde abflacht. Dies beweist diese Methan anal lyse von Dr. Gickler. "Flatulence of police horses flattened by ivermectin." https://t.co/pg2YXq8Ya1
@creyna55 @NikkiPr62640078 They are experts only for "educators". Low certainty, low quality and bias trials with no conclusion on well known anti viral drug- official US govt opinion: https://t.co/T7ftUhXDgT
@DCKicker3 https://t.co/XUT7MGDhIJ But you haven’t. And ivermectin causes swelling, nausea, diarrhea, rash and a host of other fun side effects
@CKellyUAP @Phil69695598 Cool. Whatcha got from a page that doesn’t have the letters IVM in the url? How about trying something impartial like https://t.co/0AS77Q3Jju
@Katie_Spence_ @TigerlillySusan @handmadekathy @NicoleSirotek https://t.co/1ku08ID5Qx, ivmmeta, etc. are disinformation websites. https://t.co/YqxsHgUY0L https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd http
@backtolife_2023 Same could be said about Trump and the reason Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were ever considered despite being proven to be completely ineffective for COVID treatment. Why are politicians involved in any medical decisions? https://t.c
@CDisco5 @DrSusanOliver1 And then the recent cochrane review, famous for their independence say 'we found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection' https://t.co/ocbtKYr8O7
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/rOn1ffjYaj
@meme2075 @geoffmboyd @white_bite @nb_covid_info Popp et. al.'s meta-analysis was the final nail in the coffin for ivermectin. https://t.co/vejGA7t7sW
@Diana_1776 @hm_montes @KeriTombazian @seanonolennon You mean SARS-CoV-2? My recollection, it was ruled out for both inpatient and outpatient standard of care for lack of evidence (or risk of harm) as of late 2020/early 2021. This pubmed article is typical
@LeMarcheRetreat @patbhamilton @DrAseemMalhotra That's an outlier...this review looks at several different studies and comes to a very different conclusion. https://t.co/YdxNPexh4d
@Mars_2807 @Ppiraeus53 Nee, dat maak ik er niet van. https://t.co/q2CFl61iDr
@goddeketal @Twitter Disinformation websites run by anonymous people, so no idea if they're actually competent scientists. https://t.co/YqxsHgUY0L https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd https://t.c
@ABridgen Not a reputable source. Deliberate disinformation here’s the truth: https://t.co/yLp2HIpN0X
@Dr_Steph_GAYET L'ivermectine et l'HCQ ne soignent pas le covid. https://t.co/DMCNujl4T9 https://t.co/9ACHcn2IPW
@ABridgen Try Cochrane reviews, studies of studies, with the stats done better. It's for gut parasites, a bit last generation https://t.co/403lH3ICIC
between correlation and causation, understand observation biases,and practice medicine to the best evidence. There is no good evidence to support using ivermectin in COVID https://t.co/WnDwpJM8Za
@buning1980 @carlosalazraqui @jimmy_dore @bobcesca_go @HalSparks “They” aren’t hiding anything. It’s useless fir anything besides parasites. https://t.co/e7VTF39swq
@NYC2Changsha @carlosalazraqui @jimmy_dore @bobcesca_go @HalSparks The experts did and found it useless https://t.co/e7VTF39swq
@simoncynicsays @IanCopeland5 It’s anecdotal. You’re pretty awful at snark, poppet. Not a single robust trial showed any efficacy for IVM. Evidence not anecdote. https://t.co/X34wdGHSvC
@ironcryptic This is a good META study. It shows that taking 1kg of sugar is just as effective as taking horse de-wormer https://t.co/u3Z8PmVeyU
@HoowlingWolf @DropaGoldenSun @healthbyjames I'm guessing you didn't bother to actually look up ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine results either. Here you go, illiterate one. https://t.co/T7TKOzk86m https://t.co/TEr0DVLCVi https://t.co/0bHiuY79Ob https://
@BobLeithiserPhD @IanCopeland5 That's not meta-analysis. It's a collection of retracted, weak, misrepresented and in vitro studies on an anonymous glossy, well-funded website. No peer-review, no formal protocols. It's anti-vax propaganda https://t.co/IgW8
@insins31544458 @Dr_Steph_GAYET https://t.co/xK09iVeGHb Un peu plus récent. Et ça vient de @cochranecollab qui est cité dans votre site comme référent mais je trouve cela étrange. Peut être peuvent ils valider
@RepMTG No one cares. Regarding those answers, you will owe millions of us apologies, for believing your stupidity over actual MDs. https://t.co/WmZnkTgCyJ
@justkevking @lyndastraffin The following state ivermectin is not shown to be effective: https://t.co/oQY2Ti6YSa https://t.co/8XCZJwMT6I https://t.co/7cOSdGqfSJ
@libertygandalf Might it be because it has the same effect on COVID as sugar pills (placebo)? https://t.co/u3Z8PmVeyU
@balls_pepper @JohnBoweActor Some more reading https://t.co/QG88pmbNgL
@hopkinslindsay @tabby_caz @Hammancheez Yes, but that doesn't mean Ivermectin works against COVID. And EVERY study shows it doesn't https://t.co/3MTKerz1kw https://t.co/PsXDvVScQ0 https://t.co/fETiGVAuVs
@JohnRuddick2 There was proof that it didn’t work. See https://t.co/1FUbmG8NUX
@11survivorr @aquamoon_05 @yamikawadays https://t.co/UHhUhTgwiA 試験管の中で抗ウィルス効果がある物質はとてもたくさんありますが（緑茶のカテキンですらそうですし）、実用化される薬は本当に一握りです。
@11survivorr @aquamoon_05 @yamikawadays https://t.co/GzhOewbQGj コクランのリンクはこちら。 『イベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実』 イベルメクチンに効果があるとしたければ、これをひっくり返すくらいの信頼度と規模が大きい論文が複数出ない限り、まあ無理だろうと思います。
RT @rosavita: @MichMcGrath59 @jamesamcgee @gregfoley2002 @FatEmperor I'm sorry but ivermectin isn't effective for treating SARS-CoV-2 infec…
@MichMcGrath59 @jamesamcgee @gregfoley2002 @FatEmperor I'm sorry but ivermectin isn't effective for treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. https://t.co/YcoJzHWkHM
@Rawdog1000000 @teslacoilduh @Partisangirl @McpeakRichie @btysonmd Ivermectin does work https://t.co/ACecguMofk
@FHabersberger @Leelah1 Sie sind sich sicher, dass IVM nicht wirkt, obwohl selbst diese Metastudie den outcome als "uncertain" beschreibt? https://t.co/0APEshm8Gq https://t.co/MZihm6KvRt
RT @45Kristina24: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/GmApLzjhqY I found this on Freespoke, a new searc…
@BostonReckless @OldStudentnow @benj_politics @NickAdamsinUSA “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.” From a paper that reviewed 4
@sharky36912 @CHUDROUS @jackiread also check some sources before you speak bc you're wrong lol -https://t.co/H7lZyEXL8R - https://t.co/eEvZjIX3Fd - https://t.co/ThfZRjL4hI - https://t.co/hdIEYW3U39 -https://t.co/o0eTx87M8K
@BillyBu38155902 @Johnincarlisle They’ve done both. It doesn’t work as treatment or prophylaxis. (A Cochrane meta-analysis is the highest form of evidence available) https://t.co/kuH1ELna0P
@JackSlaterPT @Tmafkab @Anymous84861064 @Mr_Magoo5 @Richbink @SpiderThors @LaymansScience @BreezerGalway @TigerlillySusan @JCresearch01 @jneill @PrinterVictor Here you go, the cochrane review: https://t.co/AQge4x50MJ
@lesaintvaccin2 @Renkatroussier2 Donc toujours pas de lien vers une revue scientifique qui démontrerait l'efficacité des antibiotiques ? Et à la place tu m'envoies un truc bidon sur l'Ivermectine ? Tu serais pas un peu perdu dans ta tête toi ? https://t.co
@Marcus_Trueman @TheChiefNerd There is little or no evidence that ivermectin was effective. It would arguably be better to give people a sugar pill. https://t.co/j163e9qblZ
@MTrumpforthewin @FionaXXs @RWMaloneMD Oh wait, I see why. Because you don't want me to look at the conclusion. Source: https://t.co/0OQsFJLUPf Look at that, your source found NOTHING. But man, better squelch that nothing right? https://t.co/LCmj7QRjU
@Horsepaste99 @JohnTal6 @PeterSweden7 Ivermectin literally does not work for COVID. It’s been studied to death. 14 studies, from around the world are summarized here: https://t.co/MNOA9wlwnh
@VickieM40917932 @bnewt1212 @toughtalkty @terrannerd @MrJamie25 Ok but ivermectin still doesn’t work for covid. Yes, truly. https://t.co/MNOA9wlwnh
@Jussi7 @sepesankkeri @heliramax Ei sitä nyt aina voi vedota siihen että annostus tai ajankohta oli pielessä, jos ei tule tulokseksi mitä toivoisi. Tämän datan perusteella en pidättelisi henkeäni, että ivm osoittautuisi vielä avoinna olevissa/raportoimatt
@k11aittchakcht @PacificNW77 @DC_Draino @CDCgov Here are a few on a quick search. Hope this helps. https://t.co/A5dvdZDFkO https://t.co/1NHSIwNCli https://t.co/dmNMo4FwYy https://t.co/gi2PUiYn8x https://t.co/NIbxQRZRGH https://t.co/p18zxhLvj9 https: