@filipe_rafaeli @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Why are you still peddling that long-debunked disinformation website, instead of competently done meta-analyses? https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 ht
@trillionofcells @GidMK As I've said before, non-expert vaccine denialist, you are fundamentally clueless on evaluating sources + fall for obvious garbage. https://t.co/xBZStjAHAb https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 ht
@bielconn Respondendo a esse tweet: Li a pesquisa e preciso complementar que existem outras pesquisas (do mesmo site) que conflitam com os resultados: https://t.co/6ClZcoNXwZ Porém, a discussão é sobre VACINAS e não ivermectina. Existem milhares de estudos
@JimVPoll @AlexBerenson @CDCgov HCQ & IVM don’t work for COVID. https://t.co/lNt5IbnwaO https://t.co/c9Se3aRGOp
@BetwTheHeadline @kevinnbass Didn’t take critical care doctors any time at all to realise people were dying of covid19 Rob. Wrt Ivermectin, despite early promising results in vitro the randomised controlled trials have (sash) repeatedly failed to show a b
@gentigan @KonProg @ThomAsokopl Für Mitleser: Selbst Cochrane hält sich mit negativen Aussagen zu Ivermectin zurück, tendenziell FÜR Ivermectin: https://t.co/I3Mypfz4Gv
@CKellyUAP Why don’t you refer to Cochrane for your research Craig? https://t.co/wJhFtTye1a
@marc_g_wathelet @ImmunoGangsta @Debunk_the_Funk @BretWeinstein Again, not interested in you peddling a trash disinformation website like ivmmeta. Leave science to competent adults; it's not for conspiracists like you. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.
@DuvaleroyJ @CLeniata @Al12b1 @MartinZ_uncut Mais oublie Pfizer si c'est le problème. Tu as Moderna, Novavax, le Sanofi-Pasteur... Tu as le choix😉 Et non, HCQ, IVM ne fonctionnent pas sur la covid (sauf sur des sites créées pour l'occase par des pro-life c
@YutakaN24620234 @alo3677 @tKT2T2n81J4uCBJ c19ivmorgってイベルメクチン推奨のためのサイトのようですね。中立性は保たれているんでしょうか。 多くの中立性が確実な論文だとコロナには無効となっていますが。 https://t.co/SuEOxw1mtc
@CKellyUAP Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials. https://t.co/HiwMIsykBD
@LibrarianGirl77 @Zumi22376206 @David83823494 It's not a conspiracy. I think there are 13 major trials now around the globe that all showed it is completely useless for COVID. Even the trials run directly by the manufacturer of the drug. https://t.co/5z79
@VacSafety @stkirsch Ivermectin is anti-parasitic and not anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2. Systematic reviews confirmed that anti-parasitic drugs did not decrease hospitalization time. https://t.co/OdZ02hjzBq
@Zumi22376206 @LibrarianGirl77 @David83823494 Yes, it's great for parasitic infections. But demonstrably useless for COVID. It failed every large RCT. Cochrane filtered out the bogus ones and summarized the findings here: https://t.co/5z79dprkz9
@BobSesch @OwenBenjamin @doctor_oxford Are you suggesting they had worms? 'cos it is unlikely to work for COVID. https://t.co/UipVgVJIVt
@mknmkmjp172832 @HalucoJK1 @mikanramune117 @PoppinCoco 多分知ってます。メタ解析つきのやつかなと思います。 が、それが評価の低いものや後々データの粉飾がバレて撤回されたものが多く、やり直しされたのも知ってます。 https://t.co/j9xhTnlecc ↑データの信頼性高いものでやり直したものです。 イベルメクチンに効果があるならば良いことですけどね
@twinkbottom90 @TrainerExtreme @IdiazAyuso 2) las primeras autopsias a pesar de las prohibiciones, si no fuera por ellos seguirían matando con las intubaciones Aqui nadie está libre de culpa, de la OMS para abajo. Ni los comisarios de ventanas, los más cob
@Marjan_Podobnik Ta odgovor bi moral zadostovati. Potrebno jevzaupanje, da zdravniki pri izbiri sledimo smernicam. Za polemiko z avtorji usmeritev, ne več z mano - zdravnikom z licenco v Sloveniji - je najbolje, da preštudiraš še tole: https://t.co/xIME5c
@MdBreathe @EpochTimes @JanJekielek You need an updated Cochrane Revview https://t.co/nHnFknBMLp
@GrandSolarMini @RenzTom Yes, fact based. 12 failed large RCTs in a row is a clue. https://t.co/5z79dpqMJB
@MdBreathe @ShawnNeedham2 What do you (or “your side”) make of the cochrane review Dr Bowden? https://t.co/eUGwhvByKF
@DouglasFalcon @DrKellyVictory Yes, and every large RCT showed it was useless. All of them. Early fraud out of Egypt and bunch of small studies early duped folks. That's not the case anymore. At all. https://t.co/5z79dpqMJB https://t.co/2k6wJQzdcW
@SJR1717 @Lara1273 https://t.co/6ZQzoIa3TB no it really doesn't
@Ozcr123 El día que sepas leer ciencia y no « periodistas » hablamos. https://t.co/5RkFqFgRvk
RT @FriendsOfSciMed: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/KCb49UXCT1
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/KCb49UXCT1
@patricksavalle https://t.co/R2sPFMyrlS “Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital” https://t.co/fs5V2zYagK “Ivermectin compared with placebo or usual care 28 days after treatment, may make little or
@Grain_Cycles @davidfrum So far the science does not support its use for Covid. Get over it. https://t.co/uXiwDPq8EM
@SamDCapitalist @nicksortor https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ Ivermectin is not an effective treatment for Covid.
@nicksortor Ivermectin is unproven and not recommended. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ
@FedUpRetMarine @jxrbot @keith_dorschner @RepMTG @COVIDSelect Ivermectin is bullshit. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ
@keith_dorschner @RepMTG @COVIDSelect Ivermectin is bullshit. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ
@RepMTG @COVIDSelect Ivermectin is fucking bullshit for Covid. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ
@RobertRiver67 @koc134 @MakeMeWholeYou @healingfromlc The number of trials is irrelevant, it's the quality of the studies that counts—Cochrane reviews are the gold standard for appraising medical studies... ...and they found no evidence of benefit, &
@nexxypoo @NassMeryl Remarkable to still cling to it at this point, but if you ignore all the early bogus & tiny studies (remember, it all started due to Egyptian scammers), there are a dozen large trials. It failed all of them. https://t.co/5z79dprkz
@JGisSatoshi @sjs856 Plus, they include all the retracted ones! Cochrane goes through this. Really, 'C19' and similar are pages designed to dupe people w/confirmation bias and an inability to read thoughtfully. https://t.co/5z79dprkz9
@ereyes @SUgayos @Jaime_Culebras @sanidadgob @apetp_ @StopPseudo https://t.co/7zMy2PnDrf Te lo busqué en castellano, que ya sabemos que solo hablas ingles en la intimidad como Feijoo. 🤷
@ChrisManc9 @RMConservative Literally every large RCT. All of them. It's useless. https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 https://t.co/dQ4WXmoXvr Even the manufacturer https://t.co/c43rJB4l1I All tested together. Metformin showed promise. And it's cheap & widely
@CitoyenPoete @France5tv ... la réalité disparaîtra. Sur l'Ivermectine, Cochrane, source reconnue par Raoult https://t.co/A3thACxuLA
@JeffBernard1 @LeadingReport @naomirwolf You like Cochrane reviews or only those that support your view? https://t.co/hngtwAPow6
@drsimonegold Is this the same Cochrane Institute that says Ivermectin is useless in treatment and prevention of COVID-19? https://t.co/hngtwAPow6
@RickNas95547619 @DrJBhattacharya @RandPaul Correct. I was only explaining how RW media misinformation necessitated CDC and poison control centers to respond. If you want to see randomized clinical trials and meta studies on ivermectin see these studies
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @filipe_rafaeli @sudokuvariante @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Still wasting people's time with a disinformation site like…
@JKelleyK @MdBreathe @US_FDA These were the goal posts 🤷♀️
@subboy777 @dr_jon_l @PierreKory Is this the study? https://t.co/ykJP2l5Elu
@MdBreathe @US_FDA It does have a good side effect profile. Sadly despite promising early in vitro plus some observational data against Covid19, it has repeatedly failed to show benefit in RCTs. What are your thoughts on the cochrane review (and the 11 RCT
@Roger_Dyroy Cochrane konkluderer annerledes https://t.co/jRJmVgiNTd
@HannaSokajarvi Tämänkin jälkeen on tullut useampia rct-julkaisuja, ja niissä evidenssi ei puolla ivermektiiniä https://t.co/ze3IldGIZf
@stevocarter1 @Aimhigheruk1 @Phil_Burgundy @Johnincarlisle @vanstone_r71419 @YouTube Hey Stevo, in case you missed it. There are a dozen large trials out there. They included one. And completely lie about it. Look at the Cochrane summary. Ask yourself why
@Aimhigheruk1 @Phil_Burgundy @Johnincarlisle @vanstone_r71419 @YouTube Given you are an ivermectin fanatic, apparently you need help. ALL large RCTs were consistent. https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 https://t.co/V1444n8Wmd https://t.co/c43rJB4l1I https://t.co/2
@JohnJerkoff58 @EAustensen @Johnincarlisle @YouTube So to be clear, ivermectin is great for parasites, completely useless for COVID. Are we on the same page there at least? https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 https://t.co/oBTThRbQWe
@FrankPeeters4 Omdat er geen harde evidentie is - cfr Cochrane https://t.co/KfbhRKC7FQ Zelfde maatstaf waarom ik tegen verplichte mondmaskers was: geen evidentie.
@Johnincarlisle @YouTube What do you make of the cochrane review @Johnincarlisle? Maybe you could discuss the 11 studies and overall conclusions in a YouTube video? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@wideglide002 @EAustensen @Johnincarlisle @YouTube But it wasn't proven to work. It was hyped following multiple fraudulent preprints, which have since been retracted. And then it was proven *not* to work in several large, high-quality trials. https://t.co
@DrJBhattacharya @BrentTings52730 @neilh2o Stop playing on both side of the fence... you know iverm does shit versus covid https://t.co/65LQdoegF3
@ManuelDUPONT7 @Dr_Steph_GAYET @Randy64_fr Je ferais davantage confiance à cette revue : https://t.co/JqD8aAdb8Q
L’ivermectine dans la prévention et le traitement de la COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/JqD8aAdb8Q
@BretWeinstein Every single major clinical trial has shown it's completely useless for COVID. Not even a question at this point. All this based on a fraudulent study out of Egypt 😂 https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 High doses. Magic concoction treatments, early t
@elimarty_4 @ArthurTSJackson @sherrib48509 @NoLieWithBTC Here is Cochrane, they take all the studies done on Ivermectin, then they separate studies that were peer reviewed & take out studies that were retracted. & this is the result: https://t.co/
@alterdonauwels @GeraldGrosz Komisch, dass man davon bei den Zulassungsbehörden nicht ein Wort findet. Manche haben ja den Fehler gemacht und die Dosis für Pferde genommen, während sie die Dosis für Esel oder aber auch die Covid-Infektion oder die Impfung
@brent2501 @StanMar18422557 @wendibloomenth1 @globeandmail Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent used to treat parasitic infestation, inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro. ivermectin's antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe
@plej_a @Maga113377 @Gaby06870254 @Karl_Lauterbach Weil es nicht wirkt. https://t.co/dCA6Gu348m
@elhigadodmarita Consulta en base a que estudios se quiere juzgar a los que critican el uso de invermectina? Porque la revisión científica más seria de todos los estudios realizados en paciente mostraron que no había ventajas. Muchos mejoraron sin nada ent
RT @mrscorer: @BreezerGalway @eskimosikyung @Covid19Critical @SwaledaleMutton @LaymansScience @BerryTartlet Correct. IVM does work. There i…
@BreezerGalway @eskimosikyung @Covid19Critical @SwaledaleMutton @LaymansScience @BerryTartlet Correct. IVM does work. There is an issue. The dosage required will likely kill you first. Or if lucky your liver. https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L
@filipe_rafaeli @sudokuvariante @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Still wasting people's time with a disinformation site like ivmmeta. 🙄 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF http
@real_seeking @TheChiefNerd “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME
@Dr_logicaI @thereal_truther Cochrane review of all the evidence "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" 🎯 https://t.co/TMjecYzmw4
@ProfTimNoakes What do you think of the 11 RCTs reviewed in the Cochrane systematic review of ivermectin in Covid-19 and their overall conclusion @ProfTimNoakes? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@fee_clochette91 @YvanLamy Ce n’est pas l’état des connaissances de la FDA mais l’état des connaissances scientifiques. https://t.co/O9iIaUOUrf
RT @WiscguyNE: @kasmith58 @clabaugh_mark @AntonioSabatoJr @thetoyman1 Apparently you haven’t looked. Here is a link. More listed at the bot…
@kasmith58 @clabaugh_mark @AntonioSabatoJr @thetoyman1 Apparently you haven’t looked. Here is a link. More listed at the bottom. https://t.co/Hp0aRiRIqS
@MarkSantaniello @The_JL_Podcast @MdBreathe @kroger Based off that response, something tells me you don’t understand a single word on that study that I sent. 🤥 Here’s another study that proves Ivermectin is completely ineffective at treating COVID 19. Rea
@MdBreathe @PierreKory What do you make of the cochrane review @MdBreathe? I’ve also asked Dr Kory and Dr Laurie but so far no reply https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@Evan_Branson @CosmosMom1 @MattBinder Speaking of data... https://t.co/l5gqagtbsz
@harvey_truth @dr_jon_l @PierreKory But no mention of other confounding variables (such as population density). We can only learn so much from ecological studies & the RCTs on ivermectin sadly haven’t been able to replicate the findings of the in vitro