@EinfachLiebe1 @privacylord @OWalkure Aber Ivermectin habe ich keine verlässlichen Studien gefunden, die über einen Placeboeffekt hinausgehen. https://t.co/CeM0VmtKjJ
@fityheav @KevinNimmock The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews the gold standard of meta analysis studies, also found no evidence that Ivermectin works as an anti viral. https://t.co/HSqNoxNwIv
@Robshop64 @CaulfieldTim @clinicaltrialON Would you like work by the experts? https://t.co/QGpBYOiTAQ Or comparison of risks in science-based vs ideology-based responses? https://t.co/Skb3jbOtlj
@yanmartel89 @JamieSale Lol. That paper is currently being investigated because of an expression of concern over the data in a number of the studies used. The Cochrane Collaboration, considered the gold standard in systematic reviews disagrees. https://
@abarcpet @brclothwrites Ummmm… here’s a link too… https://t.co/PurnUMpqlP. This is just one of many studies that disagrees with you. https://t.co/BoBxzPO7uD
@MrGlass61145253 @EvacTony @Dominiquetaegon He tarnished his reputation even further by using vaccine conspiracy theories to promote using invermectin to treat covid as an alternative to vaccines. After clinical trials it has shown no benefit to covid suf
@Pugsley420 @therod1978 @Scott24599866 @Wil_McBrideX @MsBlaireWhite Not sure what good it will do given what you've passed as evidence. The Cochrane Collaboration is recognised for it's high standards https://t.co/wJ7TK289LE
@Sue93518895 @BilsonhBilson @MickJ62295702 @iambackagain21 @OzraeliAvi No, Sue, I'm just not interested in your narrative. I've already looked into ivermectin and concluded that randomised control trials do NOT support its use. It is not a substitute for a
RT @AllyJonsson: There are 31 ongoing trials for Ivermectin to treat Covid. So far the evidence is that it does NOT prevent deaths or worse…
Yes, I'm trolling a... but please don't ask me to write you an Rx for ivermectin. A: I'm an anesthesiologist B: There is little to no evidence of ivermectin's efficacy in preventing or improving outcomes of Covid-19. https://t.co/Bb68JC90Hh
@iambackagain21 @BilsonhBilson @Sue93518895 @OzraeliAvi A better source of credible information, a 2022 review from the Cochrane Institute. "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" htt
@Sue93518895 @BilsonhBilson @OzraeliAvi The esteemed and independent Cochrane Institute has concluded in its review; "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" https://t.co/7bLgr8fFMs
There are 31 ongoing trials for Ivermectin to treat Covid. So far the evidence is that it does NOT prevent deaths or worsening symptoms from covid. https://t.co/C8xe5eNY1e
@momentpresent21 @richardhetu Vous avez les contrats? Ivermectine ne fonctionne pas: https://t.co/BtzuZ2bxZY Hydroxychloroquine ne fonctionne pas: https://t.co/CWlkiEIWPO
@sevlacc @andrefrankl @ElenaoAline @augustodeAB Opa é ora pesquisar, faço questão então mas vc tem que ler tudinho senhor estudioso https://t.co/3jWnZQNaI6
@Songbir40253612 @Dan85220270 @JennyTa22393082 🍳🧠🤡 The whole world is in the pocket of Big Pharma 🤦♂️🤦♂️ It doesn't work. https://t.co/KzmLIHE4FZ
@LucileFievet @Oliviersanstom Donc un antiviral est universel ? Exceptionnel de dire ça. Sinon, quelles études ? Les sociétés savantes sont unanimes. Aucun effet face au Sars-Cov-2. https://t.co/rCRLwzbHyc
@insins31544458 @MadaJoal J'en dis tout simplement ça👇 https://t.co/0gGovYUOMg
@insins31544458 @FrancisBScience Ça ne marche pas. https://t.co/0gGovYUOMg
@turpinator929 @FranJac1991 @PhillyPharmaBoy @AlastairMcA30 @jakeshieldsajj They point out how said methodology leads to garbage findings, and showed their finds in an their meta-analysis. Not my fault you fell for a garbage source like ivmmeta. Maybe you
@asu22paraguay @FakieNosegrob00 @samanthamarika1 Why not both? You don't know for both. Why do you insist on something that you have not a clue? https://t.co/JNrrP9hDFj https://t.co/o7wKwkGzKa
@emonkey79 @megbasham Or this. https://t.co/i1Dz3SgSoN
@wjn3tweets @GVendacopy @willis128 @AnFeGil @dbass72 @DBoxhorn @jimmy_dore From the latest Cochrane review: "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection." https://t.co/ZtFcWDmOhV
@OccupyMaga @l00ped3 @Halfway_kool @EggsWithRoses @ethanjsacks @elonmusk A rushed google search won't help you, bae. This is a preliminary report from two years ago suggesting more study. Subsequent studies found it to be lacking in evidence. https://t.co
RT @OXHarryH1: @TheMindshockPod @GSSalyer Summaries of the literature NOT funded by the drug's manufacturers. Large RCTs are the gold stand…
20:25 "Of course we have the Nobel prize winning Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine".... which time and again has been shown to be ineffective against SARS-CoV-2. See https://t.co/KVP4DQazos and https://t.co/d21ePWBKTY
@tracyjayney64 @turtleturtle000 @StopCoronaVir12 @BrentLeeSDCIC It’s a no from cochrane https://t.co/eUGwhvjpwx
@succube124 @DDupagne C'est pour ça qu'en médecine, il y a des institutions comme Cochrane qui font des revues des articles pour établir un consensus. Par exemple, pour l'ivermectine: https://t.co/BtzuZ1TWBo
@EMarascoMeyer @DeborahBlanco17 @verde4life @DrJamesOlsson there has been research and it has not been proven to be an effective cure. The medicine is not approved for that purpose either. Most studies were of poor quality https://t.co/vbAwSbE37C
@iambackagain21 @John1MD @JasonCoppingAB @ABDanielleSmith Highlight: “Cochrane meta-analysis (18) also found insufficient evidence to support the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.” https://t.co/1vHW0kAKR3
@MissJaneDiva @vgclements1 @JohnBoweActor *you're I'm not an expert, just a rusty old biochemist. But these people are: https://t.co/QG88pmcl6j Why do you think it's ethical to continue to waste resources and research a treatment that no reliable evidenc
@TheMindshockPod @GSSalyer Summaries of the literature NOT funded by the drug's manufacturers. Large RCTs are the gold standard. It fails them all. Not even an exception. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/omeXonqEAq
@thepairodocs @LukaszukAB @ABDanielleSmith Completed studies were small and few were considered high quality. Reliable evidence does not support the use of Ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19…. But hey, it’ll for sure get rid of your worms
@Bob302111 @DrSusanOliver1 Your source is deceptive nonsense. https://t.co/YqxsHgCOMD https://t.co/sLyR0qyMZl https://t.co/9M8djQcme2 https://t.co/zb4TicYfsr https://t.co/ty49vkgTld https://t.co/hvyRPznoKh
@iambackagain21 @CaulfieldTim @atrembla @ABDanielleSmith Sorry, the folks who do meta-analyses for a living, call BS on this: "For outpatients, there is currently low‐ to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVI
@JosephLemire198 @provaxscience @m_a_cudel @DestroyEdits @sinnoby @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime @ATTABOYDELUXE Ton traitement ? Ou les traitements et soins reconnus et fondés dur ded données probantes. Tu sais ce que cela sign
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @sinnoby @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Oui mais pas l"ivermectine https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @PR93095542 @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Joseph et ses média. 🤭 Cochrane( pas Judith) tu connais? https://t.co/0gGovYDdnG
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime @FlavioCadegiani Ta science.... La mienne https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Beau média.....ta science Joseph? La mienne https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
But what about ivermectin? She’s ignoring all the evidence that says this doesn’t work and cheering on the stuff that disagrees, because, as usual, Danielle Smith doesn’t have the capacity to know what she doesn’t know. https://t.co/doEVM7Imhi
@JosephLemire198 @m_a_cudel @DestroyEdits @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Votre source ☝️😂😂😂😂 La mienne https://t.co/0gGovYDdnG
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Moi ...ma source😁 C'est pas moi qui le dit https://t.co/0gGovYDdnG
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Votre source??? La mienne😁 https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
@girlnasty22 @progs4life Here is an old study: https://t.co/WhTxdjb4Ee
What are they? Paxlovid targets a viral protease but doesn't eliminate the virus. It helps as it allows the immune system to catch up. There's no convincing evidence for Ivermectin https://t.co/2WKlHVjPsY and https://t.co/lD96SjxtX2
@iambackagain21 @TuckerCarlson "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/tWx8bFGUnE
@stuartjs74 @dreamatrobs @rodgermoore @BrentLeeSDCIC Oh dear. You're going full cultist. Ivermectin has not been shown to work in any way for SARS2. There's a very good reason India stopped using it after testing it over many millions of people. https://
@bgiromini @Doc_0 @PierreKory Oh wow look at you shilling for Kory 🤣 There remains *NO* evidence ivermectin works in any way. You're literally describing to us how his confidence trick works - pretending the marks are 'special' and not just meat to squeez
@toddm92 @Inugamiz @JamieSale Or for meta analysis the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews which is considered the gold standard for meta analysis. https://t.co/HSqNoxNwIv
@spiropantazatos @Alex_on_A14 @bebeballena @thisisnothappen @DoctorLunge @BichonAtLaw @BerryTartlet @Davidla89114650 @DrHoenderkamp @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory Because they tested IVM alongside other drugs within the same protocol with no separation - seve
@EricSagaspe @Aumaja6583 @f_philippot Parce que ensuite il y a eu d'autres études, réalisées sans les erreurs de la première du Lancet, qui ont démontré que ça ne marchait toujours pas. https://t.co/5kR2MozJfC
RT @incompleteocean: The immune systems response. This has been debunked time and time again. https://t.co/lVJbrroxPu
@salitribule @EnanaBallon Pour quelqu’un qui se vante d’avoir fait 6 ans d’étude, t’as dû pas mal sécher https://t.co/xIhHRVBLT1
@iambackagain21 No it’s not. Also pub med allows any study to be uploaded. Many which have been debunked by others. Pub med also has studies debunking your claims. https://t.co/lVJbrr6oBm
@iambackagain21 Already debunked numerous times. It’s a antiparasitic. It does not have the properties to treat covid or prepare the immune system for covid. The source you provided had already been debunked. https://t.co/lVJbrr6oBm
The immune systems response. This has been debunked time and time again. https://t.co/lVJbrroxPu
Et non, c'est l'inverse: toute parole complotiste est taxée d'éveillée... enfin seulement par les complotistes. Sinon l'ivermectine n'a toujours pas fait la preuve de son efficacité. Source : https://t.co/SfBF4unGDb
@mentju4 @sense_strand @LaymansScience @Debunk_the_Funk @SwaledaleMutton @TomahawkVPhD You can keep pretending I'm whoever you want. Fact remains that ivermectin never worked for COVID-19, and you fell for an obvious disinformation website that misreprese
@MonolithicPeak @Mr_Magoo5 @Alex_on_A14 @Fishyfish666 @notMrFarmer @here4fredom @samanthamarika1 https://t.co/qtMjyILf40 Thanks for your out of date study. Here's one from June this year. Enjoy! 👍
@TomCaveman @MeaghanBm @CorinneWashik @TrueNorthCentre @dockaurG I've seen it listed as a potential treatment being tested, but it performed around the same as a placebo and/or the test was inconclusive. https://t.co/6jErCCGd3q https://t.co/MJxa6fnR5O htt
@NeurauterWerner @Monetarius @JamesMelville Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic. There is no safe dosage for humans that might be effective for treating SARS-COV-V2. It hasn't been shown to be effective at safe doses. https://t.co/u4uF7piUlk https://t.co/qgJ
@DrEliDavid Your assessment of Cochrane is serious or sarcasm? (Serious, meaning non-sarcastic, question) https://t.co/RafDqMkzmc
@FLAocta64 @Guilher97092622 @levi87BA @GCasaroes Da mesma maneira que tem esses estudos, existem MAIS estudos contrários https://t.co/a9mNcvHhSI
@KrzemoweEcho @k_pyrc Ona nie działa na COVID:) https://t.co/F9hIVmIBRQ
@ImaBirdNackNack @keetmuise I wondered if you were a troll. Advocating Ivermectin demonstrates that you are. There is no proof that Ivermectin is either safe or effective. See here: https://t.co/rf7avIDAyg and here https://t.co/2nrSG5RoTO
@Brett19995902 @EnragedApostate @obama_I_miss @WHCOS And most of those trials were garbage. Half a dozen were fraudulent and retracted. We now have a gold-standard Cochrane review showing no benefit followed by two large trials showing no benefit as well.
@nicolechaison @mojo12469 @cmorrissey59 @DanRather There are results from more trials on ivermectin coming out in 2022..https://t.co/eBf1nwktuU
@Dom76934834 @TheFreds No. I dont read reports. I read clinical trials. https://t.co/g3GrdTOaXQ https://t.co/WrbMTQ8IWB https://t.co/2OMONLMW6l
@mocamononfoco @oantikristopher @matheuscomth89 @guildutra @WaldoFFC1902 @LulaOficial @JanjaLula Fonte: Ministério da Saúde. Sem NENHUM respaldo científico. Eu teria vergonha de soltar um print desses. Dá uma lida nessa pesquisa aqui, publicada pela Cochra
@crpkchan @LindsayPinkerto @lindahmullen @Interior_Health Relies on retracted and bogus studies. It doesn't work. ALL the large RCTs had the same conclusion. https://t.co/fKmolWVEZV
@crpkchan @LindsayPinkerto @lindahmullen @Interior_Health Twelve RCTs this year. All large. All show no benefit. Those older papers relied on so many bogus and retracted studies. And were written by IVT funded authors! Infinitely better analysis at these:
@TilburyCody @gwkrause1968 @dericklehmann @JamieSale Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. I tend to block those I view as being incapable of rational or respectful dialogue. https://t.co/227rDZXbZp