@DannyStouffer @m_c_k_e_e @hodgetwins {no} https://t.co/IVAFLRfERR No effect. https://t.co/koxVs3zd8o No effect.

@ode2wine @shannonsinsc Here is one https://t.co/lYpt1LHEAh

@MarkDStrauss https://t.co/UbEm8Vkv88

@LordMagus1 @AnitaBlackmon69 @arube1 @Chicago1Ray https://t.co/UbEm8Vkv88 Drs should not have been blocked from trying or talking about a harmless medicine that might work when there were no treatments at all.

RT @45Kristina24: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/GmApLzjhqY I found this on Freespoke, a new searc…

Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/GmApLzjhqY I found this on Freespoke, a new search engine that doesn't censor viewpoints and respects privacy. Check it out: https://t.co/ZXnruW4KOv

https://t.co/7xDRthGK2J We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still limited.

@TheCannaWiz @Sessler @joncoopertweets @elonmusk This is from a 2021. August 2021. Mines from Dec 1st. Your behind. But anyway. If we’re doing this. Here’s one from the same year as yours. https://t.co/LYUHupyEGB

@jettzetr @hodgetwins @elonmusk "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19" https://t.co/PTphvT8FuU

@CassieopeiaKat It Does Not Work. https://t.co/rCKS9RzS4o

@PierreKory Same with ivermectin – again, I'm not citing anything new to you, obviously, but you've decided to hang your hat on the other studies at high risk for bias: https://t.co/SZIdOXUEYp

@Amadori16626211 @PhillyPharmaBoy Apparently you don't even understand what 'truth' means or even what consists of evidence. (Clue for the rubes: it's not a clickbait video on Grindr, Rumbl or Substack) https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/2VoneqejXk

@Libbylibs101 @drsimonegold Ivermectin wasn’t ridiculed, just the trials done on it showed it didn’t work! We really wanted it to work - cheap, widely available (including in LMIC, doesn’t need to be refrigerated, good side effect profile). Sadly not to be

@BiliSeijo5 @GoodReplyz @nikau_6 @loulou2745 @idrissaberkane @wargonm Oui le vaccin de la dingue était réservé aux seuls personnes déjà infectés la France n’avait pas autorisé cette vaccination dans les TOM DOM https://t.co/fK1mOziSCp https://t.co/d1uivoHT

@stonkel_jordan @_pish @JenniferSey @elonmusk @gorskon https://t.co/WnDwpJLB9C

@Anniewuzhere @JamieSale Yeah... for parasitic infections. It is nothing more than a placebo for Covid. https://t.co/0KsCuWCkkh

@insins31544458 @muriel850 @publicsenat @OuzouliasP https://t.co/rcjiZeATYH

@BiologyAwesome @publicsenat @philippejuvin https://t.co/3odwTg4fmf

@NoMandatesOz @ChrisColButler @drbeen_medical @Johnincarlisle @dr_jon_l @DrEliDavid @DrAseemMalhotra @PierreKory @Covid19Critical @UniofOxford “Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of iver

@JeremyFOUBERT1 @Sky__SSBU @TroncheBiais Du coup .. Juin 2022 : https://t.co/8g1geWqxXt

@DonLiviel @Randy64_fr @myriampalomba @Beatrice_Rosen Par contre des études qui annoncent aucun effet, on en a plein : https://t.co/ZFttipmBQW

@goodgolly247 @CliveLindley @tooboopedoo23 @DrAseemMalhotra Yes. https://t.co/VzNiFN4N2Z and https://t.co/OuBJGR2eyo and here’s a Cochrane review from June 2022 which summarizes the current data https://t.co/2hf6KJt7rL

@SHBueche @JGaffneyUSN Your study fails to put ivermectin against any other therapeutic in current use- it only hypothesizes that ivermectin vs placebo.. that’s not a valid study for efficacy of ivermectin. https://t.co/QH3zGZ27aU

@josbourgault c19early/c19ivermectin are collections of retracted studies, preprints, opinion articles with no methodology falsely claiming ivermectin works for covid, while ignoring all of the randomized controlled trials proving it doesn't https://t.co/

@MzMistyRose @DavisonVideo @kathryniveyy Indeed it is https://t.co/snw1Gc7t2V https://t.co/2fJDWFtrgk

@kirkwylde @rookierw @DrSusanOliver1 Wrong, "quality" definitely has well established, pre-determined meanings when it comes to all levels of studies. So it's just one more lousy excuse to not accept "high quality" meta-analyses such as the Cochrane Review

@ogilville1 @nuhope2022 @kevinoler @provaxtexan @doritmi @scottstocker4 @JimeeLiberty @ZeetubesII @SariellaForever @doom37455413 @TonyBaduy @JonathanHannah @TheRoyalRant @Pouldeau61 @KellyGoodmanPhD @Frenchg11623069 @IdunsDaughter @Jaytee116James @Skeptica

@JUJU4_0 @walch_jasmina @Wahlen_AT Es ist auch nicht so absurd, wie Sie es hinstellen, Juju: "Laborstudien zeigen, dass Ivermectin die Vermehrung des COVID-19-Virus (SARS-CoV-2) hemmen kann. Für eine solche Wirkung beim Menschen wären allerdings hohe Dose

RT @samiahurst: @MiloslavBilik @marc_g_wathelet L'ivermectine n'est pas efficace seulement contre la gale, mais aussi contre d'autres paras…

@MiloslavBilik @marc_g_wathelet L'ivermectine n'est pas efficace seulement contre la gale, mais aussi contre d'autres parasites. C'est un médicament très utile Contre le COVID19, en revanche, il semble actuellement qu'elle ne marche pas. C'est vraiment do

@BitMekon @SaulGoodIsBack @Opportunitweet @CDCDirector https://t.co/RkOaNHlYGQ

@Matias21605354 @PirtaHotulainen @SamiAntinniemi https://t.co/EdAMvaZO1l

@fleurdotone @pktoutceci_ @xazalbert @MVPolitique @idrissaberkane Sur l'Ivermectine ? Voilà déjà 2 croyances très répandues battues en brèche. Vous pouvez donc identifier ceux qui les défendent comme des sources peu fiables https://t.co/a3oT5O1nyF

@The4ourthBranch @um_felipe @TaurenDruids @TomFitton For posterity: The non-expert paranoid conspiracist was peddling non-peer-reviewed cr*p for ideological reasons. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4

@The4ourthBranch @BioTurboNick I'm saying you're a gullible pseudoskeptic + conspiracist who peddles whatever narrative you find ideologically convenient (ex: ivm, lab leak conspiracism) https://t.co/xBZStjBfpJ https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQ

@nowwhatsthat @StatisticsBC @AB_MD_WarRoom NIH: you will die. Also NOPE https://t.co/qhOMLzvULE Most damning: Cochrane study: NOPE https://t.co/AN6FViuyS5 So 99% of world scientists and health orgs said nope. There is no other side. Just flat earthers

@Noncoerciverea1 @BretWeinstein So Cochrane is wrong? Serious question. https://t.co/YRdD68i0jO

RT @JennyPickles1: @LykDj @smartwookiee @mschade72 @Ghostwalkes @RobAussie1 They just keep on coming … June 2022 … “We found no evidence to…

@LykDj @smartwookiee @mschade72 @Ghostwalkes @RobAussie1 They just keep on coming … June 2022 … “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/PMgHdjepHQ

@Lektronk @DAR1797 @DiedSuddenly_ No, it has not had any success anywhere. Not in India. Not in Africa. There have been about 10 major clinical trials for the drug. It failed all of them. Without exception. Some good meta summaries (ditching the bogus bad

@Troijanhevonen @SamiAntinniemi @MikaelNiku @Karponara @19JKS83 https://t.co/ze3IldGb9H https://t.co/blD4jDD7AW

@brsavage11 @heidithewiz @DrJenGunter @bethanyshondark Thanks. Unfortunately none of these are citations. You might as well quote Dr. Seuss. Here's from Cochrane, the gold standard review of trials, as of June 2021. https://t.co/Bd9P9IQzc2

@ovjocm @srut42 @CetiAlphaFumf @realRobPlumber @GidMK For posterity: ivmmeta was a disinformation website meant to fool the credulous, on par with an HIV/AIDS denialist blog. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https:

@RogerCl33051189 @sinceronaperfil @KatieDaviscourt oh look, another one https://t.co/JDpXy2DBrn

@THeNBLeNDr @ianfmusgrave @TheJikky @freegazanias @SpeaksInTruth @overcatbe @MaryanneDemasi @CDCDirector @akheriaty @DrNancyOlivieri @JohnBoweActor @Texas_Kate @MartyMakary @DrJBhattacharya @drcole12 @TheFreds @Dominiquetaegon @woodymatters I'm sorry but I

@THeNBLeNDr @ianfmusgrave @TheJikky @freegazanias @SpeaksInTruth @overcatbe @MaryanneDemasi @CDCDirector @akheriaty @DrNancyOlivieri @JohnBoweActor @Texas_Kate @MartyMakary @DrJBhattacharya @drcole12 @TheFreds @Dominiquetaegon @woodymatters You might like

@eneldiluvio @Massy_444 @AlexBirrell3 @TheoFleury14 I'm sure the dozens of studies just all did it wrong! I just don't think you are willing to accept being wrong. I'm not digging through every study, but it's hard to argue study after study failing to s

@LM_Ginger_Kitty @NovElection2024 What a moron.. Clinical trials have shown that ivermectin did fuck all.. https://t.co/alVWgExUck 2. The vaccine wasn’t untested, it wasn’t fully FDA approved. 3. What deadly effects..?!? Lemme rephrase.. What a fuckin

@freegazanias @ianfmusgrave @SpeaksInTruth @overcatbe @TheJikky @MaryanneDemasi @CDCDirector @akheriaty @DrNancyOlivieri @JohnBoweActor @Texas_Kate @MartyMakary @DrJBhattacharya @drcole12 @TheFreds @Dominiquetaegon @woodymatters Then there is this "We fou

@overcatbe @ianfmusgrave @freegazanias @SpeaksInTruth @TheJikky @MaryanneDemasi @CDCDirector @akheriaty @DrNancyOlivieri @JohnBoweActor @Texas_Kate @MartyMakary @DrJBhattacharya @drcole12 @TheFreds @Dominiquetaegon @woodymatters Ah I'm blocked for pointing

@dslack_haf @TheoFleury14 https://t.co/17JWLgUdsx Still does noting for Covid

@sailendra76 @dslack_haf @TheoFleury14 https://t.co/17JWLgUdsx Ok, Parasitic worms if you want to be precise. Still does nothing for COVID.

@kylenabecker They will lose. Ivermectin doesn’t work. Studies prove it. https://t.co/rCKS9RzS4o

@denniskaiser4 Bullshit. https://t.co/rCKS9RzS4o

@Razor2413 @Neloangelo314 No, it doesn’t work. https://t.co/rCKS9RzkeQ

@RenzTom No. Current studies show absolutely no evidence Ivermectin works. Even studies by the maker, Merck. https://t.co/rCKS9RzkeQ

@USA__one @akheriaty @AaronSiriSG HCQ was "vilified" simply because it doesn't work. Here are two large reviews discussing all the evidence: https://t.co/ZtFcWDEXw3 And: https://t.co/2tOwT5Oa5f

@ChristopheSage @AlaryPatrick @DavidB2703 @myriampalomba @idrissaberkane Ne vous laissez pas avoir par ceux qui veulent vous manipuler. Si on vous dit qu'un traitement marche, vérifiez. Par exemple sur Cochrane mais je peux vous montrer comment aller voir

@MJPadula @Dobberdude @MartyMakary You're a bit gullible if you believe his claims. That being said: IVT: All the large RTs showed it was useless https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 D: even the authors say it's association, not causation Zinc: Useless https://t.co/

@Antonio41107975 @DWYMissSteal @Humble_Analysis You can actually read about the collection of conclusive trials here: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 And even the bogus ones are discussed

@Antonio41107975 @DWYMissSteal @Humble_Analysis That's full of falsified studies. Find ONE large RCT that shows it works there. I bet you have a favorite! All real trials show it doesn't work. . A summary https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 A summary https://t.co/

@PatrioticPizzas Randomized clinical trials repeatedly found that ivermectin does not benefit COVID-19 patients. Study with more than 1,300 people infected with the coronavirus, ruled out ivermectin as a useful treatment. https://t.co/sbBLNVRWf5 https://t.

@Eric_Schmitt Let me help a bit! mRNA Vaccines work https://t.co/2H3LI1aEb7 Ivermectin is useless for COVID https://t.co/5z79dpqMJB https://t.co/VayqJrb6Qv Fauci did not profit from mRNA vaccines: https://t.co/sgPe8HaC73 Pregnancy? https://t.co/f3V1YO6

@elberethstar @IRINEU79837274 @RobertodosAnjos @vanessnnavarro Tem mais, especialista! https://t.co/aI00Y2pOor

@DrHoenderkamp https://t.co/uNDZMgi74K https://t.co/k7Vy28Kekp

@JebSprague @WR4NYGov According to the PubMed paper cited, the leading tweet contains nothing accurate. The Mayo Clinic has good info on effective therapies: https://t.co/jO4rU2N7Nn The below PubMed paper shows the ineffectiveness of Ivermectin. http

@Pietertwits @Porcupine666 @harryhol https://t.co/pxB5pbGT1k Jup, meta analyses van cochrane kletsen uit hun nek.

@KimBroadsword @Chicago1Ray https://t.co/CdtZMURZiz Here’s a better study. The one you posted is a meta-analysis of 6 trials, with one being mortality data from Peru (not known for a bastion of clinical studies.)

@Ramily66970099 @SebStub @idrissaberkane https://t.co/lkuAKU9zRx

@chrismartenson @EpochTimes https://t.co/znQ3Sax9Ev

@chrismartenson @EpochTimes https://t.co/XCOUg0zxHV

@KuchaMusora Нет так не понятно все с ним https://t.co/WUVyXYTxb9

RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…

@PaulMaxit Mais qu'est-ce que tu racontes? https://t.co/U8MSN8lMJx L'industrie pharmaceutique n'empêche pas la recherche medicale ... ca coute de l'argent à l'état quand sa population est malade et meurs, personne ne veut ça ...

@SleepySaff @CanadianAthies1 @herosjourney11 @buchanan17 @PrisonPlanet Yes. I think he did a search and assumed anything he found supported Ivermectin. OTOH, Ivsearch for results posted by the lead researcher, Echeverri. He found Ivermectin at best made

@samphireisland @JR4_Truth @All_Knowing_Bio @mentalmal1 @aSinister @Spencerfletch0 @glinch72 @WReynolds20 @variegated2 @PaprikaLady @BernaB_2013 @automatrix66_KC @MicWelshman @Veritatem2021 @GordonDHG_clim8 @B_Bolshevik100 @Climate_Takes @ejwwest @Roark_Ar

@Jeannemarie1309 @LockedFab @raoult_didier VOUS? 🙄 vous adorez accuser les autres, hein? Alors il y a un complot de big pharma pour cacher l'HCQ, la vitamine D, l'Ivermectine... ven dites donc. Voyons ça ensemble. Les études sont publiques https://t.co/a3o

@JR4_Truth @All_Knowing_Bio @mentalmal1 @aSinister @Spencerfletch0 @glinch72 @WReynolds20 @variegated2 @PaprikaLady @BernaB_2013 @automatrix66_KC @MicWelshman @Veritatem2021 @GordonDHG_clim8 @B_Bolshevik100 @Climate_Takes @ejwwest @Roark_Architect @Climate

@JR4_Truth @jonathanstea @GidMK Why are you wasting folks' time with unsourced images, likely from the non-peer-reviewed disinformation blog ivmmeta? https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://

@RichardNeedlem3 @jonathanstea @GidMK https://t.co/wLv15MvJL9

@Shnauser1 @lynn_ohnheiser @BretWeinstein No, you're just wrong. I believe only two meta-studies represent the large RCTs from '22. Both conclude it's useless (as do ALL the large trials individually). You don't have to self medicate to make your politica

@AJ32800278 @jonathanstea Whether or not Ivermectin is effective against covid is an empirical question, which has been thoroughly studied. It doesn't work. I can say that with some confidence, because that's what the best science says. https://t.co/GJq9vK

@shubakka75 @FlatBrainCorp @ESTELLEURBAIN1 @barriere_dr Dans ce cas, allez au bout de la démarche et constatez les effets sur patients : https://t.co/Ffvvkak3yg

@JR4_Truth @ggreenwald ^^^ Non-peer-reviewed disinformation blog. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/BVQ9FRIATd

@JR4_Truth @aSinister @Spencerfletch0 @glinch72 @WReynolds20 @variegated2 @mentalmal1 @PaprikaLady @BernaB_2013 @automatrix66_KC @MicWelshman @Veritatem2021 @GordonDHG_clim8 @B_Bolshevik100 @Climate_Takes @ejwwest @Roark_Architect @ClimateSkeptic4 @Robert7

@jt3431 @Tex2_A https://t.co/zkW7RiBFjI

@stock_shan "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." Found a copy of this on antifa group chat. I'm sure all 14 studies were funded by

@insins31544458 @JOANMITCH2013 @tristanwaleckx @nathsapena Moi je me fie à la référence : https://t.co/n0ZSe6dNl5

RT @youwantawar: 41 different Ivermectin study results, assessment: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ive…

41 different Ivermectin study results, assessment: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/96vDwmOKth

@StephenM Remind Twitter again what you studied at University? It sure wasn't anything that focused on science... https://t.co/aXKlY2cahv

@geffjoldbloom @DonaldJTrumpJr No problem, it's written right here. Additionally, look at the date and read the article i posted if you dare. Most of those early study results were FALSIFIED regardless. https://t.co/Akby8rxeXo https://t.co/iRp9BkMghH

@geffjoldbloom @DonaldJTrumpJr https://t.co/Akby8rPobw No problem, it's written right here. Additionally, look at the date and read the article i posted if you dare. Most of those early study results were FALSIFIED regardless. https://t.co/2nNu3G0ANL

Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/4g0qtAVH7H

@StrohJulian @lexxxilovexo @philoshua @willsommer You're peddling a disinformation website. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd https://t.co/9zrenbXLYC

@groin_hammer @tristanrajaz @PierreKory Amazing anyone still cites ivmmeta like it's a credible source. It's a disinformation website. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF

@MonolithicPeak @SJ_23US @trueOntario @BubbleVapor @Alonso4MVP @cougarr84 @colinb099 @ChrisWNunn https://t.co/APGH6mxMUU

@MonolithicPeak @SJ_23US @trueOntario @BubbleVapor @Alonso4MVP @cougarr84 @colinb099 @ChrisWNunn They're probably the same ones discussed here That's something worthwhile for yiu to check https://t.co/3a3dgOp3eI

RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…

@DomaineValescia @mattletiss7 🤣🤣🤣 Still trying to push for an antiparasitic drug against a virus. Even after a number of studies proved that it doesn't work. https://t.co/tnOnTDTOvp