RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

RT @CuendetV: 🔗 PDF de la lettre en 🇫🇷 https://t.co/2rTeBUQbSS 🔗 Source https://t.co/fIxaJR0sto 9/

RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

RT @Dover63A: Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines aprè…

https://t.co/alnqNwlWoa

Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines après la dose 2 ? Soit un délai de carence de 4 à 6 semaines où après la dose 1 on n'est pas compté comme vacciné ? https://t.co/DQPkZ

Quand la Cochrane étudie l' "efficacité" des vaccins anticovid en ne comptant les cas positifs qu'à partir de 2 semaines après la dose 2 ? Soit un délai de carence de 6 à 8 semaine où après la dose 1 on n'est pas compté comme vacciné ? https://t.co/DQPkZC

RT @ResilientsTv: Critique de la revue Cochrane consacrée aux vaccins Covid par Peter,Doshi @JosephFraiman & co: https://t.co/JL7EORwIgl h…

RT @ResilientsTv: Critique de la revue Cochrane consacrée aux vaccins Covid par Peter,Doshi @JosephFraiman & co: https://t.co/JL7EORwIgl h…

Critique de la revue Cochrane consacrée aux vaccins Covid par Peter,Doshi @JosephFraiman & co: https://t.co/JL7EORwIgl https://t.co/tHcLj4Rzw9

🔗 PDF de la lettre en 🇫🇷 https://t.co/2rTeBUQbSS 🔗 Source https://t.co/fIxaJR0sto 9/

@teavangelize @susie5 @Debunk_the_Funk @CFA_Yin @Jessnimm @kastle1 @ACCP @MDaware They're not going to honestly evaluate the evidence. The giveaway on that was evading after their bad faith question on Prasad was addressed. https://t.co/NatzR15kLg https:/

@kastle1 @susie5 @Debunk_the_Funk @CFA_Yin @teavangelize @Jessnimm @ACCP @MDaware This is a great example of the sort of non-expert vaccine denialist target audience that contrarians like Prasad attract. https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ ht

@LeBobophobe @Julbert_5G @Neo_Shyro @myriampalomba Une formule ? Ouais alors non ça ne fonctionne pas avec "une formule" https://t.co/zjfXdqRP8v

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Whitehorse1255 @TheDrJon @lasikeyecenter1 Harmful immune complexes were seen with SARS-CoV-2 infection, though, but no…

@Whitehorse1255 @TheDrJon @lasikeyecenter1 Harmful immune complexes were seen with SARS-CoV-2 infection, though, but not following vaccination. So SARS-CoV-2 vaccines working again. https://t.co/Gj4pCPLCox "Circulating multimeric immune complexes contri

@kusomitama @mph_for_doctors 試しに新型コロナワクチンの効果のコクランレビューに反論してみて下さいね。 https://t.co/BUOEK8tBxx

@BoussageonR @docdu16 @barriere_dr https://t.co/ifUpzvDYMd cherry picking? Parce que ceci dit le contraire

@DavidRotherton @NZFreeSpeech That's generally how medical standards regarding competence and best practice work with the Health and Disability Commissioner ruling based on the best peer-reviewed scientific evidence (meta-analyses and systematic reviews) w

@SHomburg https://t.co/vMvzLQaQyB

@JR4_Truth @thereal_truther @Standup__Man @katwrappah @USMortality @JeromeAdamsMD Your denialist opinion on the topic is as evidence-free + worthless as your denialist opinions on topics like ivermectin, herd immunity, etc. https://t.co/H5q138vgDu https:

@ImmunoGangsta @Jikkyleaks @Debunk_the_Funk @DopplerEffect93 @SaltaoVladimir @ENirenberg @weldeiry @DravenS17 @gorskon There are way more vaccine denialists, conspiracists, pseudoskeptics, etc. who trust Wakefield on vaccines than trust me, competent docto

RT @Streitschuster: @aysiati @bast_i @SHomburg Gut, dass #Cochrane auch ein Review zu den Impfstoffen veröffentlicht hat. Dann sind wir uns…

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jason_willz1 @TracyBethHoeg https://t.co/Ojx1gPeaQO Unsurprising to see a contrarian like Høeg resorting to the nirva…

@jason_willz1 @TracyBethHoeg https://t.co/Ojx1gPeaQO Unsurprising to see a contrarian like Høeg resorting to the nirvana fallacy, since it's an old vaccine denialist trope. 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/tiqKNHvyN6 https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/abzDsFm1Ab ht

@persephone28751 @gracefool @NZFreeSpeech LOL. I know what systematic reviews and meta-analyses are - often the very best scientific evidence we have. But in any case, no-one needs to take my word for it anyway, they can read the Dec 2022 Cochrane Library

@gracefool @persephone28751 @NZFreeSpeech No, that's not what I claimed. I provided all the references to the peer-reviewed articles including the meta-analyses and systematic reviews *that I cited*. More have been done since 2021 such as the 2022 Cochrane

@L2Feather @normanpie @VWNW @robinmonotti Sorry, but I'm not interested in evidence-free asinine conspiracy theories from paranoid non-experts. mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines worked, and the mRNA technology justifiably won a Nobel prize. Deal with it. 🤷‍♂️ htt

@normanpie @TigerlillySusan @robinmonotti Cool story, bro https://t.co/QBlLyZhlgB https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/7DGeCfqehi

@ancientastrokn3 @MadsOlesenDK @geoffmprice @ScottAdamsSays @CaulfieldTim It's no surprise non-expert vaccine denialists pat each other on the back. https://t.co/2VpGsRdxjC https://t.co/LsORVktsFE https://t.co/YBsQHUbxB0

@ancientastrokn3 @geoffmprice @MadsOlesenDK @ScottAdamsSays @CaulfieldTim Your incompetence is obvious https://t.co/2VpGsRdxjC https://t.co/Yu5Df4Q9if https://t.co/Pzxeib2Lpz

@mc_furball @theAliceRoberts @robinmonotti Stop trolling. https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/hxQwa30ZYT

@ancientastrokn3 @geoffmprice @MadsOlesenDK @ScottAdamsSays @CaulfieldTim Again: Fact remains that RFK Jr. cherry-picked with no understanding of the broader literature or the relative quality of the studies in question. I get that why this is beyond your

@BERNARD45433768 @GuillaumeBarucq Vraiment. https://t.co/UwqB6KSfnH

@Thorvi1977 @Streitschuster Unsinn… https://t.co/LxNDlAi3DS https://t.co/utjyCyhTbw https://t.co/fgXEUJEDRm https://t.co/OIajlr5XZ9 https://t.co/AdbF2w5Sw0 https://t.co/G0T5ST5mXQ https://t.co/xfF4RQuvba https://t.co/qYKN44WQ2P https://t.co/9zfh3d

Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines https://t.co/X8srYevzuw @cochranecollab #vaccines

@dougcarlson1984 @StewMama71 @whstancil Stop trolling. https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc

@zeitonline Dann wird sie wohl auch noch mehr Millionen Menschen das Leben gekostet haben, weil ja die Gesamtsterblichkeit in allen Länder mit der Impfung anstieg ... oder hier https://t.co/JYerYA17P2

@LlieLA1 @Carene1984 @AJMougin Oui. Lis ça et donne moi ton avis: https://t.co/Nyk6nLXfJ1 Tu as google traduction pour le lire. Je veux ton apres avoir pris une bone heure pour le lire.

RT @ray5ar: @raisonance1 @Carene1984 @AJMougin Lis ça (tu peux le traduire avec google traduction): https://t.co/Nyk6nLXfJ1 Après lecture…

@raisonance1 @Carene1984 @AJMougin Lis ça (tu peux le traduire avec google traduction): https://t.co/Nyk6nLXfJ1 Après lecture dis moi ce qui ne vas pas? Allez. Tu peux prendre plusieurs heures pour le lire on a le temps.

@GiggaMAGA @lasikeyecenter1 @EllisGerry14 @genemapper24 @DrMolon_Labe @TOPDOGE007 @TheChiefNerd https://t.co/ZCYTMSfQQp(30%20μg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25. https://t.co/cTRE4rijKj https://t.co/sUwtzDR3Dn https://t.co/sH1qM3

@JrgnBrgmnsch @Sander_Lab @elonmusk Safe✔️ https://t.co/MDFRu3vhZW

@Isabelsmother2 @TigerlillySusan @han_francis @JonathanSarfat1 @DrSusanOliver1 Stop trolling https://t.co/wS8SVaABJj https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/rYZ99HimVl

コクランとか久しぶりに見てるわ https://t.co/6MaXC3ZRYq

@kampfbiber123 @Jordnt4 @csgoruna @Michael__1967 @AfD_Thueringen Hier Argumente: https://t.co/LxNDlAi3DS https://t.co/utjyCyhTbw https://t.co/fgXEUJEDRm https://t.co/OIajlr5XZ9 https://t.co/AdbF2w5Sw0 https://t.co/G0T5ST5mXQ https://t.co/xfF4RQuvba

RT @DominiekC: @Luketheduke1960 @AnnaArendt123 @RudieBdeV @DirkvanLinth @Het_Leidse_Volk En aangezien @AnnaArendt123 blijkbaar graag met Co…

@Luketheduke1960 @AnnaArendt123 @RudieBdeV @DirkvanLinth @Het_Leidse_Volk En aangezien @AnnaArendt123 blijkbaar graag met Cochrane referenties zwaait, zou ze deze al gelezen hebben ? Vaccins wérken en er zijn niet meer SAEs dan bij placebo 😜 Ze kan meteen

@JulienBourgeai8 @fournier65 @barriere_dr « Compared to placebo, most vaccines reduce, or likely reduce, the proportion of participants with confirmed symptomatic COVID‐19, and for some, there is high‐certainty evidence that they reduce severe or critical

@AlonzoLyons @JRNave @TakethatCt @Catheri49917567 @crabb_vicki @_SeeingDbl_ @TinFoilAwards @khoombu @groin_hammer @1_TMF_ @krebiozen @WendyOrent @RadioColor @FUDyou2 @CyclopsSeesAll @mcfunny @TonyBaduy @doritmi @ScienceMonkey0 @Just4TheCause @zendogbreath

@PVPAST @SinbSinbad @Screenguy69 That RCT (and many others) all feature in the Cochrane meta-analysis that I linked to earlier. You might want to be careful about taking Sinbad's claims at face value and read it yourself: https://t.co/cP0DKmC2Mi

@PVPAST @newzealand @Screenguy69 Anecdotes (i.e. personal stories) even if true are low quality evidence. And there are significant volumes of credible high quality scientific evidence that refutes the claims you are making here: https://t.co/cP0DKmC2Mi

@PVPAST @newzealand @Screenguy69 Quoting from the Cochrane meta-analysis on vaccine safety and efficacy. “there is high‐certainty evidence that they reduce severe or critical disease. There is probably little or no difference between most vaccines and plac

@NateWeymouth @iXeno @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd Your pretense of having credentials is not impressive to those who have them, nor those who know the published evidence well enough to spot your non-expert vaccine denialism. "doesn’t pr

@NateWeymouth @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd @iXeno Re: "I think for myself" That is the same thing non-expert science denialists (especially pseudoskeptics) often say, whether they be flat Earthers, HIV/AIDS denialists, vaccine denialist

@NateWeymouth @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd For instance, the tweet below is a textbook instance of non-expert vaccine denialism that is immune to rational consideration of evidence. https://t.co/UVAAEHvWrI https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https

@Overfakenews @gorskon @Debunk_the_Funk @weldeiry @ImmunoGangsta @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @P_J_Buckhaults Some people watch grown men kick a ball into a net. I play video games. If whining about people's hobbies is the best you got, then you should probably

@NateWeymouth @thereal_truther @Will31415926531 @TheChiefNerd You're a willfully ignorant + disingenuous charlatan, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. You don't deserve to be taken seriously. https://t.co/zC1iRbHXof https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://

In più tutti gli studi fatti a riguardo dimostrano un profilo rischio beneficio fortemente a favore del vaccino. https://t.co/ah4PSwl2wo Anche su questo è ovviamente presente un'analisi sistematica della Cochrane Library https://t.co/diat2vvSc9 https://t.c

@bigger_bread @hage8675309 @KenPodrasky @YourBro91760395 @in_the_sky34221 @notabrokenthing @BeccaRocks7399 @EternalLifePlan @BryanKemper Since pubmed is a reliable source, I guess you agree that the COVID vaccine was vital in fighting Covid? https://t.co/D

@Booguis1 @RenkaBlanche https://t.co/H2xz7prLl7

@MemeWally @RenkaBlanche Une meta analyse de RCT datant de 2022. Apres tu vas pas avoir tous les 6 mois des RCT nouvelles sur ces vaccins. Faut pas deconner. https://t.co/5WFClxURcw

@K0DK0DK0D @jhan2qt @19joho @GidMK @drbogash Re: "The reason so much skepticism has been created about CV vaccine" ...is because ideologically-motivated non-expert vaccine denialists like you fabricate about it, just as occurred previously for garbage cla

@JakeKolnik @JudeMcKew @lensiseethrough https://t.co/fTEyeJA8qd

@FreeMIN24465256 @matthieugarby @randomuser98752 @arikouts @MonerpMon347390 @raoult_didier Au choix : https://t.co/f0PalrVIKx (meta-review pour enfants et adolescents) https://t.co/C5Cgt3UjyV (Cochrae review - un peu datée) https://t.co/efpsIEcPEP (récent

@LaguerieMathias @Super_Fishman @2_expat L.O.L. "Je sais pas donc ça n'existe pas.". https://t.co/j9g5ShW1OI

@D1I7O @Tipuncho @SupernovaT423 @LoLoLamu Ah si il y a plein d'arguments https://t.co/eaFMmqnEJj

@MajaSeelen @HansLandman @KwekkieLentebol Nee, ik doel op gerenommeerde wetenschappers van gerenommeerde instituten die op gerenommeerde sites publiceren en wat door andere gerenommeerde wetenschappers wordt gereviewed, zoals dit artikel: https://t.co/9wIj

Who can poke the most holes in this condom analogy?

@StillShakinIt @EpiEllie Vaccines “prevent” illness in the same way condoms do: they don’t work all the time (nothing does), but they work much better than doing nothing. One of many reviews: https://t.co/mqmq5P6D6X

@ILGUARDIANOZ @ScaltritiLab Non basta questo per dire che si, i vaccini sono sicuri? https://t.co/diat2vvSc9

@MariuszJagora @Pawe19745344 https://t.co/4qEn6e28N5 https://t.co/jtBCNsKBbQ https://t.co/8C44RMEbrB ( tu masz coś o dzieciach) https://t.co/nBhAmd3nY8)%20in

RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

@jrseihgstein @CyberCoffeIT @GValeau @carlito50089599 @Oliviersanstom @MartinZ_uncut Toujours selon cochrane, sur les vaccins. https://t.co/rtIrwufihM

RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

RT @fhljpt: COVID-19ワクチンを有効とする 2021年11月時点（約2年前）でのコクランレビューです データ解析によるエビデンスはリアルワールドより常に遅れます

RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

COVID-19ワクチンを有効とする 2021年11月時点（約2年前）でのコクランレビューです データ解析によるエビデンスはリアルワールドより常に遅れます

RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

これが真🙄

COVID-19を予防するためのワクチンの効果とリスクは何か？ https://t.co/nCviXVntsZ

@Elizabe28992182 @DoctoraPrego @miltommy56 No, los han engañado. 100% estudios adhoc afirman seguridad muy alta, similar otros fármacos Ej estudios masivos -Lancet, 280 millones adultos https://t.co/ezyAB0fR40 -JAMA, 11 mill NIÑOS https://t.co/1buJuaSx

@elenazorro76 @piliani_zaolo @m_ccini @Doctor_Gio_2 @LaBombetta76 @giusbrindisi @robygt77 https://t.co/RAp1ATlDxG Tra gli eventi neurologici descritti NON c'è la disautonomia https://t.co/0A8jDQQppe https://t.co/0UATnW3GOA

@peter_tornquist @CarlMattis1 @svtnyheter En av många redovisningar: https://t.co/QKZK1wVFMc

@MatthewWielicki I think it still is the gold standard and for COVID. They just messed up the one study. Here is their statement: https://t.co/KbnFBbB69c Here are two others. https://t.co/WinAiLpWDe https://t.co/Gk7qYBXIpG

@alexjonesSatire @zeusireog 1. No vaccine can stop 100% of any disease. 2. The vaccinated were catching COVID at a lower rate, and suffering milder symptoms. https://t.co/GIViRCWcbb

@zerohedge https://t.co/3snFtsZ8SF

@franckpati77853 @salitribule Super 👍🏻 vous êtes au courant que dans l’expérimentation de cette thérapie génique à échelle mondiale il y avait des placebos ? 😬 https://t.co/cFiIebSK8o https://t.co/9eR5c0WSsx

@RobertM72103719 @FakeDoctorReal1 @Volksverpetzer Na klar doch, kommt auch noch was mit Substanz oder kannst du nur Copy-and-Paste? Peinlicher kann es für Dich schon garnicht mehr werden.🤦‍♂️ Hier ist was für Dich...👇 https://t.co/FvrtOpgXUa https://t.co/m

RT @TheBenSchmark: @kevinnbass @OttawaHospital Thanks Kevin. Can you please also widely share what Cochrane, the most respected evidence an…

@kevinnbass @OttawaHospital Thanks Kevin. Can you please also widely share what Cochrane, the most respected evidence analysis organization in the world found about Covid-19 vaccines? 🙏 https://t.co/hq5qY70ZWo https://t.co/W74NPbS9Nh

@lionelscania @thandor123 @rtlinfo https://t.co/yBuaPQr5M2 https://t.co/fhJLbrBqjT https://t.co/Fuh97xvc8C

@Pablosquest @ICNARC You asked 'why *are* people not warned', not why we they not warned... ...we now have a much clearer idea of the risk:benefit ratio of the vaccines [ref: https://t.co/WYjDrL3Vw9] https://t.co/HDqkzMCOMD

@jason_willz1 @contrarian4data @jsm2334 There was, of course, reduction in risk of infection, despite desperate attempts by vaccine denialists to pretend otherwise by committing the nirvana fallacy. https://t.co/lCLE7vH7AH https://t.co/tiqKNHvyN6 https://