@OccupyMaga @l00ped3 @Halfway_kool @EggsWithRoses @ethanjsacks @elonmusk A rushed google search won't help you, bae. This is a preliminary report from two years ago suggesting more study. Subsequent studies found it to be lacking in evidence. https://t.co
RT @OXHarryH1: @TheMindshockPod @GSSalyer Summaries of the literature NOT funded by the drug's manufacturers. Large RCTs are the gold stand…
20:25 "Of course we have the Nobel prize winning Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine".... which time and again has been shown to be ineffective against SARS-CoV-2. See https://t.co/KVP4DQazos and https://t.co/d21ePWBKTY
@tracyjayney64 @turtleturtle000 @StopCoronaVir12 @BrentLeeSDCIC It’s a no from cochrane https://t.co/eUGwhvjpwx
@succube124 @DDupagne C'est pour ça qu'en médecine, il y a des institutions comme Cochrane qui font des revues des articles pour établir un consensus. Par exemple, pour l'ivermectine: https://t.co/BtzuZ1TWBo
@EMarascoMeyer @DeborahBlanco17 @verde4life @DrJamesOlsson there has been research and it has not been proven to be an effective cure. The medicine is not approved for that purpose either. Most studies were of poor quality https://t.co/vbAwSbE37C
@iambackagain21 @John1MD @JasonCoppingAB @ABDanielleSmith Highlight: “Cochrane meta-analysis (18) also found insufficient evidence to support the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.” https://t.co/1vHW0kAKR3
@MissJaneDiva @vgclements1 @JohnBoweActor *you're I'm not an expert, just a rusty old biochemist. But these people are: https://t.co/QG88pmcl6j Why do you think it's ethical to continue to waste resources and research a treatment that no reliable evidenc
@TheMindshockPod @GSSalyer Summaries of the literature NOT funded by the drug's manufacturers. Large RCTs are the gold standard. It fails them all. Not even an exception. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/omeXonqEAq
RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…
RT @MDaware: publication dates: I-TECH: February 18, 2022 EPIC: March 4, 2021 IVERCORCOVID: May 5, 2022 TOGETHER: 02 July 2021 Cochrane m…
@thepairodocs @LukaszukAB @ABDanielleSmith Completed studies were small and few were considered high quality. Reliable evidence does not support the use of Ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19…. But hey, it’ll for sure get rid of your worms
@Bob302111 @DrSusanOliver1 Your source is deceptive nonsense. https://t.co/YqxsHgCOMD https://t.co/sLyR0qyMZl https://t.co/9M8djQcme2 https://t.co/zb4TicYfsr https://t.co/ty49vkgTld https://t.co/hvyRPznoKh
@iambackagain21 @CaulfieldTim @atrembla @ABDanielleSmith Sorry, the folks who do meta-analyses for a living, call BS on this: "For outpatients, there is currently low‐ to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVI
@JosephLemire198 @provaxscience @m_a_cudel @DestroyEdits @sinnoby @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime @ATTABOYDELUXE Ton traitement ? Ou les traitements et soins reconnus et fondés dur ded données probantes. Tu sais ce que cela sign
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @sinnoby @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Oui mais pas l"ivermectine https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @PR93095542 @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Joseph et ses média. 🤭 Cochrane( pas Judith) tu connais? https://t.co/0gGovYDdnG
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime @FlavioCadegiani Ta science.... La mienne https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Beau média.....ta science Joseph? La mienne https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
But what about ivermectin? She’s ignoring all the evidence that says this doesn’t work and cheering on the stuff that disagrees, because, as usual, Danielle Smith doesn’t have the capacity to know what she doesn’t know. https://t.co/doEVM7Imhi
@JosephLemire198 @m_a_cudel @DestroyEdits @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Votre source ☝️😂😂😂😂 La mienne https://t.co/0gGovYDdnG
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Moi ...ma source😁 C'est pas moi qui le dit https://t.co/0gGovYDdnG
@JosephLemire198 @DestroyEdits @m_a_cudel @Lommaax @Adiladi46502486 @Lilirose135 @Joubadou @E_Duhaime Votre source??? La mienne😁 https://t.co/0gGovYVmBO
@girlnasty22 @progs4life Here is an old study: https://t.co/WhTxdjb4Ee
What are they? Paxlovid targets a viral protease but doesn't eliminate the virus. It helps as it allows the immune system to catch up. There's no convincing evidence for Ivermectin https://t.co/2WKlHVjPsY and https://t.co/lD96SjxtX2
@iambackagain21 @TuckerCarlson "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/tWx8bFGUnE
@stuartjs74 @dreamatrobs @rodgermoore @BrentLeeSDCIC Oh dear. You're going full cultist. Ivermectin has not been shown to work in any way for SARS2. There's a very good reason India stopped using it after testing it over many millions of people. https://
@bgiromini @Doc_0 @PierreKory Oh wow look at you shilling for Kory 🤣 There remains *NO* evidence ivermectin works in any way. You're literally describing to us how his confidence trick works - pretending the marks are 'special' and not just meat to squeez
@toddm92 @Inugamiz @JamieSale Or for meta analysis the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews which is considered the gold standard for meta analysis. https://t.co/HSqNoxNwIv
@spiropantazatos @Alex_on_A14 @bebeballena @thisisnothappen @DoctorLunge @BichonAtLaw @BerryTartlet @Davidla89114650 @DrHoenderkamp @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory Because they tested IVM alongside other drugs within the same protocol with no separation - seve
@EricSagaspe @Aumaja6583 @f_philippot Parce que ensuite il y a eu d'autres études, réalisées sans les erreurs de la première du Lancet, qui ont démontré que ça ne marchait toujours pas. https://t.co/5kR2MozJfC
RT @incompleteocean: The immune systems response. This has been debunked time and time again. https://t.co/lVJbrroxPu
@salitribule @EnanaBallon Pour quelqu’un qui se vante d’avoir fait 6 ans d’étude, t’as dû pas mal sécher https://t.co/xIhHRVBLT1
@iambackagain21 No it’s not. Also pub med allows any study to be uploaded. Many which have been debunked by others. Pub med also has studies debunking your claims. https://t.co/lVJbrr6oBm
@iambackagain21 Already debunked numerous times. It’s a antiparasitic. It does not have the properties to treat covid or prepare the immune system for covid. The source you provided had already been debunked. https://t.co/lVJbrr6oBm
The immune systems response. This has been debunked time and time again. https://t.co/lVJbrroxPu
Et non, c'est l'inverse: toute parole complotiste est taxée d'éveillée... enfin seulement par les complotistes. Sinon l'ivermectine n'a toujours pas fait la preuve de son efficacité. Source : https://t.co/SfBF4unGDb
@mentju4 @sense_strand @LaymansScience @Debunk_the_Funk @SwaledaleMutton @TomahawkVPhD You can keep pretending I'm whoever you want. Fact remains that ivermectin never worked for COVID-19, and you fell for an obvious disinformation website that misreprese
@MonolithicPeak @Mr_Magoo5 @Alex_on_A14 @Fishyfish666 @notMrFarmer @here4fredom @samanthamarika1 https://t.co/qtMjyILf40 Thanks for your out of date study. Here's one from June this year. Enjoy! 👍
@TomCaveman @MeaghanBm @CorinneWashik @TrueNorthCentre @dockaurG I've seen it listed as a potential treatment being tested, but it performed around the same as a placebo and/or the test was inconclusive. https://t.co/6jErCCGd3q https://t.co/MJxa6fnR5O htt
@NeurauterWerner @Monetarius @JamesMelville Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic. There is no safe dosage for humans that might be effective for treating SARS-COV-V2. It hasn't been shown to be effective at safe doses. https://t.co/u4uF7piUlk https://t.co/qgJ
@DrEliDavid Your assessment of Cochrane is serious or sarcasm? (Serious, meaning non-sarcastic, question) https://t.co/RafDqMkzmc
@FLAocta64 @Guilher97092622 @levi87BA @GCasaroes Da mesma maneira que tem esses estudos, existem MAIS estudos contrários https://t.co/a9mNcvHhSI
@KrzemoweEcho @k_pyrc Ona nie działa na COVID:) https://t.co/F9hIVmIBRQ
@ImaBirdNackNack @keetmuise I wondered if you were a troll. Advocating Ivermectin demonstrates that you are. There is no proof that Ivermectin is either safe or effective. See here: https://t.co/rf7avIDAyg and here https://t.co/2nrSG5RoTO
@Brett19995902 @EnragedApostate @obama_I_miss @WHCOS And most of those trials were garbage. Half a dozen were fraudulent and retracted. We now have a gold-standard Cochrane review showing no benefit followed by two large trials showing no benefit as well.
@nicolechaison @mojo12469 @cmorrissey59 @DanRather There are results from more trials on ivermectin coming out in 2022..https://t.co/eBf1nwktuU
@Dom76934834 @TheFreds No. I dont read reports. I read clinical trials. https://t.co/g3GrdTOaXQ https://t.co/WrbMTQ8IWB https://t.co/2OMONLMW6l
@mocamononfoco @oantikristopher @matheuscomth89 @guildutra @WaldoFFC1902 @LulaOficial @JanjaLula Fonte: Ministério da Saúde. Sem NENHUM respaldo científico. Eu teria vergonha de soltar um print desses. Dá uma lida nessa pesquisa aqui, publicada pela Cochra
@crpkchan @LindsayPinkerto @lindahmullen @Interior_Health Relies on retracted and bogus studies. It doesn't work. ALL the large RCTs had the same conclusion. https://t.co/fKmolWVEZV
@crpkchan @LindsayPinkerto @lindahmullen @Interior_Health Twelve RCTs this year. All large. All show no benefit. Those older papers relied on so many bogus and retracted studies. And were written by IVT funded authors! Infinitely better analysis at these:
@TilburyCody @gwkrause1968 @dericklehmann @JamieSale Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. I tend to block those I view as being incapable of rational or respectful dialogue. https://t.co/227rDZXbZp
@GiuseppeCasey @Licdenf Jouer avec ces affirmations pour la mort d'un enfant, ce n'est pas la honte qui vous étouffe. Comment faut-il vous expliquer que ni l'un ni l'autre ne sont efficaces contre le Covid et qu'ils peuvent du coup même être dangereux comm
@Liveitup331 @Kazimir1021 @DepressedTMLFan @DecentFiJC @SevanGrim @oneunderscore__ The NIH is conducting a phase 3 trial with IVM, but we don’t even need it, because every major trial to date has shown no effect re: COVID. But you bozos will cling to the h
RT @MartinMendoza27: @Chertorivski A ver baboso! yo te doy estadísticas (las obtuve en 5 min) TU SOLO DAS TACOS DE LENGUA MAL HECHOS 👇 no e…
@Chertorivski A ver baboso! yo te doy estadísticas (las obtuve en 5 min) TU SOLO DAS TACOS DE LENGUA MAL HECHOS 👇 no entiendes los efectos de una PANDEMIA, además NO SE HA DEMOSTRADO EFICACIA ALGUNA DE LA IVERMECTINA vs COVID (😆imbécil). https://t.co/66g
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
@Andros1freedom @JohnBoweActor @TheRubicon7 It’s not one side of the fence. Those are facts supported by multiple clinical trials. We KNOW ivermectin doesn’t work. https://t.co/X34wdGYVxC
@sineadggleeson @naturaltosmile @JohnBoweActor 26 years of nursing. Including 13 in critical care. Throughout the pandemic. Don't you dare. Passionate about something I don't have any experience of? https://t.co/HQBbIKwZ9e
@naturaltosmile @JohnBoweActor Not. For. The. Treatment. Of. Covid. https://t.co/HQBbIKP8nm NO EVIDENCE AT ALL.
@nx2nao @tommytommy0924 @hanakihideaki その研究で信頼できるデータをまとめてメタ解析をして、結果有意差があるのかないのか、っていうのはすでにやっています。 今のデータでは効くとは言えないのが結論です。 効かないという結果だけを信用してるわけではないです。 すでに総合的に判断されてる。 https://t.co/GzhOewsTIj
@jhstrx90 @filbodge @TheFreds INvermechtin hasn’t been proven to work.Anywhere..it’s a good idea to do decent recent research.why would an anti-parasitic work on a virus?that’s like saying anti biopics work on a virus Try again https://t.co/r5WL9GGPeU ht
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
@hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn9XYマレーシアのハイリスク者対象https://t.co/aPHZ4Tj8YXのRCTでもnegativeであったことを踏まえて申しております。
@MaggieW82391432 @Elle_Ham06 Science would like a word https://t.co/w3oxQ2730j https://t.co/T2kiXQwk5Q
@MedSciPatriot @SMooreesq @RenoDrew @kdlaw @AliNeitzelMD @CAgovernor @Evan_Low @DrPanMD @CMAdocs @NLFD_org @TheFSMB I know what is being tested and I know that people have been ingesting ivermectin despite it not being approved as a treatment for COVID-19
@Kay09387221 @mjtimber2 ivmmeta / c19ivermectin are garbage websites peddling disinformation. Not that you honestly care about facts. https://t.co/YqxsHgUY0L https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd
@RepGosar We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection! https://t.co/mJQ7Dgn4Ea
@Krypto_Kash @Andyging @Lewis_Brackpool Oh? Where? Not this one that says the opposite. https://t.co/KaVVLelcvN
@MRobertsQLD Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. https://t.co/RxkBolI9PB
@insins31544458 @FrancoiDucrocq De l'ivermectine ? Qu'aucune étude scientifique sérieuse n'a montré son efficacité pour soigner le Covid. https://t.co/5kR2Mozbq4
@RepGosar @joekent16jan19 Like many drugs ivermectin works in conjunction with other drugs (zinc, vitmans C & D, HCQ) to lessen symptoms early in C-19 infection, not just by itself. Here are two papers https://t.co/yXNvU56JO1, https://t.co/KhPlB4MjOd
RT @BartenEM: Maar ALS het zou werken, dan is het nog steeds goedkoper dan een IC-opname. Klopt. Maar dat doet het niet. Net als op talloze…
@brothy07 @pauljheywood @mrjamesob @GaryLineker Ivermectin? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣https://t.co/UEPWG7GPH1
@RhetoricalGirl0 @DonnieV23 @DCGreenZone @JasonPerryNTD @news_ntd I read the scientific papers. Maybe you should try it. Now present evidence or bore off. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4
@AnonJ68 @Alton11421134 @DonnieV23 @Cycle4Exercise @JasonPerryNTD @news_ntd We KNOW it doesn’t work. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4
@AnonJ68 @DonnieV23 @Cycle4Exercise @JasonPerryNTD @news_ntd I don’t look at the MSM for science. I read the scientific papers themselves. There are zero robust trials showing any efficacy for covid. We know it does not work. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4