RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
So this "MD" thinks that is ok for doctors that prescribe something that "does not work" to treat covid to get their license suspended but those experimenting on children by injecting them with useless substance are ok. Can someone explain the logic behind
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @thereds8: 82 studies 815 scientists 129,808 patients 27 countries https://t.co/qjbZANNztw https://t.co/jKxuSPIzBk
RT @thereds8: 82 studies 815 scientists 129,808 patients 27 countries https://t.co/qjbZANNztw
82 studies 815 scientists 129,808 patients 27 countries https://t.co/qjbZANNztw
You don't allow replies because you have no argument.
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
RT @ComradeVero: Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in s…
Tell that to India and Japan who prescribed IVM. And look up something called "conflict of interest." It's kinda rife in science. But I guess doctors don't pay attention to that kind of stuff. Not trained to think outside of the box.
@krakdkettle @real_seeking @GGIL1603 @haylopez25 They don't have any reliable evidence. They're just making stuff up. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐des
@HighwayBob @trskah @real_seeking @vicki_langer Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://
@VirginNostrils @SHurrell1 @APFactCheck @AP https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO Here a proper paper - there is not a single robust trial which says that IVM works.
@anon_english @Steelcryo @SHurrell1 @APFactCheck @AP Great. A meme. IVM doesn’t work https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO
@DuneskeLindsay @GGIL1603 @haylopez25 "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/GG3s2o9Xxc
イベルメクチンがCOVIDに効くなんてエビデンスもないとコクランには書かれている。イベルメクチン推し陰謀論者とマスク推し反陰謀論者、実は似た者同士なのかもしれない。 https://t.co/kvaCM4BUkA
@ryanbeed @real_seeking @Dalmane15 @PhillyPharmaBoy @TakethatCt @OXHarryH1 @JohnRee58027351 @SaltaoVladimir @DiegoHAWK6 @ptcjoneses @Purrrr31 @AreYouSure1985 @KStateTurk @Lunatic__Fringe @DrAcula987 @XRadarP Yup. Ivermectin produces results consistent wit
@real_seeking @Dalmane15 @ptcjoneses @AreYouSure1985 @TakethatCt @ryanbeed @Purrrr31 @JohnRee58027351 @OXHarryH1 @KStateTurk @Lunatic__Fringe @DrAcula987 @XRadarP Sure sure cochrane also on the payroll ? https://t.co/3bq0CHxrtj
@Dalmane15 @ptcjoneses LoL it doesn't work ... The end https://t.co/3bq0CHxrtj
@fugginskid @Detrieman @GidMK Re: "the carvallo study isn't included." Niaee et al. was included, even though randomization clearly failed for that study. You were already shown what happens when fraudulent + lower-quality studies are excluded. https://
@real_seeking @TnAlistair @avghyperborean @EricMetcalf13 @Samuel_Gregson @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "As I have said many times, explain to me how Ivermectin even had a chance to be successful" You move the goalposts after your talking p
@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @EricMetcalf13 @Samuel_Gregson @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "Wrt meta, it is very difficult to cherry pick studies for the meta to be neg. That is why most are positive." More lies. Doing a competent risk-of-b
RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…
@frans1960nl https://t.co/H3c8x2DXzw Wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar werking Ivermectine bij Covid19. Het werkt niet.
@TnAlistair @Samuel_Gregson @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "Is Ed Mills a non-expert?" The TOGETHER study co-authored by experts was cited to you. Re: "There are more meta-analyses published on ivrm that found stat sign eff
@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @Samuel_Gregson @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Without fraudulent + low-quality studies, non-expert ivermectin fans have nothing "reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or preve
@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @Samuel_Gregson @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Your usual evidence-free paranoid gibberish is noted, pseudoskeptic. https://t.co/sZtrSo2TGK https://t.co/ZX0ASnNO2V https://t.co/mBvqcsZUES
@lucaszenichi @Zuritageo @OsmarTerra Já publicaram vários artigos sobre o uso. Os raros com algum efeito positivo tem sido retratados. Estudos bem desenhados apontam pra ineficácia deste medicamento. Por exemplo, ano passado foi publicado na @CochraneLibra
RT @KlaasvanDijk5: @MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nergens heb ik beweerd of gesteld of gesuggereerd dat dez…
RT @KlaasvanDijk5: @MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nogmaals, oud nieuws uit oktober 2020. Zie verder https:/…
@Juliana27876571 @anacoe26 @drpaulofaria22 @oscasosraros @GFiuza_Oficial @cristinagraeml @AlessandroLoio2 @EmiliaSerra5 @draugustonasser Voce finge que esta fazendo um trabalho de pesquisa, mas fica aqui batendo palma e dando suporte a tratamentos nao comp
@MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nergens heb ik beweerd of gesteld of gesuggereerd dat deze artsen patiënten hebben verzonnen of dat ze aan het rommelen zijn geweest met de data. Dat is niet zo. Later onderzoek heeft uitgeweze
@MetinGungul @EricRosil @EsthervanFenema @IGJnl @I_PoisonIvy_I Nogmaals, oud nieuws uit oktober 2020. Zie verder https://t.co/5CGeAKkxF6. Nogmaals, Ivermectine en HCQ werken niet tegen corona.
@Mancarl13 @Poulin2012 Non, pour les crédules. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@LeferPierre @lavignep007 @Calnos1 L'ivermectine a donné des preuves de traitement ? Nouveau, ça. https://t.co/3HeZXdjqS2
@JAngelyssa Encore faudrait il que ce soit un traitement efficace. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@HitmanAK907 @space_monk42 @EddiePipes1979 Please read, Vern. Same people. Same study. https://t.co/aKdEmJz8Lq https://t.co/IhSWnRmq1p
@HitmanAK907 @space_monk42 @EddiePipes1979 Refuted by the same site, Vern. https://t.co/aKdEmJz8Lq https://t.co/vNY6I3TQGe
@HitmanAK907 @space_monk42 @EddiePipes1979 This isn’t a study, Vern. Same site. https://t.co/aKdEmJQbNq
@insins31544458 @Digicath @Gocentrique @ella03787321 @JackyLEFEVRE2 Même s’il n’y a pas la liste, vous avez un aperçu du problème ici : https://t.co/HG4iaGBDfP
@Timcast Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Review - Intervention Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/0B2K6NsFUl https://t.co/n1HPaTnN08
@Lemefisto2a @SudRadio @andrebercoff @raoult_didier L’ivermectine tout aussi inefficace. Quels sont les pays qui l’utilisent ? https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @JohannaSzabo1: @SuperDaveUnit @TimeToWakeup62 @rogue_WOM @cerothstein "The reliable evidence available does not support the use of iver…
@Fred15541646 @RomainDoyer Les études ultérieures sur l’homme n’ont, pour l’instant, pas démontré l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @CochraneJapan: 多くの方にご興味を持っていただいておりますが、エビデンスの確実性が非常に低いというのは、「効果が無い」ということではありません。「効果があるかどうか確実なことは言えない」という解釈が正しいです。効果があるかないかをはっきりさせるために、より…
@SoulRebel73 @danvandertuin Geen links naar onderzoeken. Bovendien nepnieuws. Als je dit echt gelooft, dan zeg je het zelf al: geloof. Als wetenschapper kijk je naar data, en de data liegt niet tot dusver: HCQ, maar ook IVM dragen niks bij. https://t.co
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention…
@C_Kavanagh @su3su2u1 @agnostosphere @PersistntSplntr Fair enough. But they mess up on basics, like what a "confounder" is and what the purpose of a control group is. Also funny to see @agnostosphere claim fraud when they peddled retracted tripe on ivmmet
@HHillelon @nath28564 @AlineCitoyenneB @Digicath Aucune étude ultérieure sur l’homme n’a démontré l’efficacité de l’ivermectine dans le cadre du Covid. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@heimskringla25 @Timcast It isn't that insane, since it is still either in the realm of uncertainty, since "The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality." https://t.co/MbWEoACJrx The next line, in my novice opinion, depends on ethics
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention…
@jasnotron And you continue to dishonestly evade what the evidence shows. So you're lying when you claim ivermectin works. https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https://t.co/7BwmA975nY https://t.c
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Press pieces from 3 months ago don't rebut the published cited to you from after that. You're showing your dishonesty, confirming that you lies. https://t.co/Za0UswDgSh
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Nope. That's in vitro, which is trumped by clinical, in vivo results. You're dodging the evidence at this point, as per your lie. https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Merck's position is simple: They see ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2. So they avoid bad publicity from backing it on that https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t
@MaxDWolf @marc_g_wathelet @patobrenner @GidMK He's relying on the disinformation website ivmmeta, which has so many problems it's telling that paranoid + gullible non-expert fans still peddle its trash 🤦♂️ https://t.co/xBZStjAHAb https://t.co/sLyR0qQon
@patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention that does not work, unlike dexamethasone, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTl
@mousepolice1 @Tomarakh @Ozijury @tao_d_Pooh @TGAgovau Analysis of all the studies published so far Quote "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomi