@Txema_Isabal https://t.co/a6ARpHe3ZB

RT @pills_ofscience: https://t.co/ELQv0hB6wz

@nntaleb https://t.co/oB02tPGnyc, the direct link

RT @pills_ofscience: https://t.co/ELQv0hB6wz

Good debunking guide here.

RT @nickmmark: Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a…

RT @nickmmark: Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a…

RT @pills_ofscience: https://t.co/ELQv0hB6wz

https://t.co/ELQv0hB6wz

@FiveTimesAugust @MajorGGowen Medical regulators have not approved ivermectin for COVID-19. https://t.co/bZzFlBntEM

RT @JamieHoagland: @rpwilliams2 @nntaleb @toadmeister this website presents a garbage metanalysis intented to fool people who don’t know wh…

@rpwilliams2 @nntaleb @toadmeister this website presents a garbage metanalysis intented to fool people who don’t know what they’re looking at. start here: https://t.co/2lr5F7Tgjt

RT @nickmmark: Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a…

@StotanEly @MrInfo888 @mjch_twit @TheTorontoSun @joerogan https://t.co/HSqNoxMYSX

@MrInfo888 @mjch_twit @TheTorontoSun Not for covid it isn't. My statement stands. https://t.co/HSqNoxMYSX

RT @nickmmark: Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a…

RT @nickmmark: Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a…

RT @nickmmark: Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a…

Ivermectin as COVID cure is the conspiracy theory that just won’t die, no matter how many RCTs disprove it. Sigh… Here’s a Cochrane review concluding ivermectin doesn’t treat COVID https://t.co/1tjYMOdruF And my guide to Debunking Ivermania https://t.co

@RepMTG For anyone interested in gold standard evidence, but is the latest review from @cochranecollab #ivermectin #cochranereview #systematicreview https://t.co/tw4tEQjq7S

@marianlquinn @FiveTimesAugust Can you post? Here's something https://t.co/w41djdAn8d

@md_something_ @angelaisms @Yair_Rosenberg If ivermectin is shown to be useful, every hospital in America will be all over it. https://t.co/4YqBhQJi3V "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prev

@iBasedRodrigo @Strikenstein @sharondolphin7 @dense_evi @thecoastguy Meta analysis. https://t.co/wJ7TK289LE

@kach022 @sturnertn @AlastairMcA30 @PWarrior68 @jakeshieldsajj There simply is no good evidence on the best quality trials done at this point to support its use. https://t.co/doEVM7Imhi

@RepMTG https://t.co/4YqBhQJi3V "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials."

@Strikenstein @iBasedRodrigo @sharondolphin7 @dense_evi @thecoastguy Apparently this meta analysis could only have been on one study. https://t.co/wJ7TK289LE

@nerdtechgasm https://t.co/eqlnaZCfCb

@RobinHood1367 @BigCheds @JesseKellyDC Except that's not true. As in false. https://t.co/4YqBhQJi3V "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed random

@TnAlistair @MNagin @PierreKory @jimmy_dore @AlexBerenson Links to reputable sources or it ain't nothing but a Twitter thing. https://t.co/4YqBhQJi3V "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven

@Greatusername10 @MommysaWitch @RepMTG https://t.co/a7oULhCfXW

RT @rAgingPachyderm: @Sundevil891 @SpringSteps @RepMTG @Twitter @facebook "...we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin…

@Sundevil891 @SpringSteps @RepMTG @Twitter @facebook "...we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19." https://t.co/8ZsYzgBdMH

@jakeshieldsajj https://t.co/I02PxVMYoE

@loveitorleaveus @dancingfun https://t.co/MdO16I3Mw0

@obsurfer84 Not really that complicated. Not fraudulent either: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@yourheroatlas @DrLizabeth @wittalyn_19 @The_JackHanson @Signoret59 @TheKeithBoynton @LyellBan @chasrmartin @johnlegend Cool - pick ONE compelling paper there. Any actual clinical trial that you found supports the use of the drug. Go ahead. Good news - pl

@obsurfer84 Weird how you attack the messenger when every independent health org says it's useless. And Kory is a fraud. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@gailgoodman11 @dusty_dweller https://t.co/lby323HyYz

@Ok81Gigi @AngryFleas @JimeeLiberty @provaxtexan @nuhope2022 @BreezerGalway @scottstocker4 @ShockTraumaRN @pawley_robert @SkepticalMutant @Anymous84861064 @AspAlaAsnAsnTyr @statsguyuk @CurfewX @doritmi @barryjohnreid21 @JKelleyK @ogilville1 @Pouldeau61 @To

@AngryCardio @808constituent Not all loaded with turds: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/omeXonqEAq

@808constituent @AngryCardio Neat - show me ONE compelling RCT from that page. C'mon - let's see it. Really! I'm sure it was super duper convincing to you. Here's three summaries of the real clinical trials: https://t.co/omeXonqEAq https://t.co/J9bODcYe

@JohnBoweActor Yes! Cochrane just did a great writeup for you John. I know you'll appreciate their findings. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@JohnBoweActor https://t.co/erjAiq9EVR

@Famester26 @SKUsa11 @SenateDems @HouseDemocrats @CNN https://t.co/q0Y8SFxMRW

@lagrassa1138 @NewsMuse1 @stephen91414874 @JohnBoweActor No. Anecdotes have no value. Water helped me recover after I had a respiratory failure. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@libsmakenosense @ccar0405 @AJFKDemocrat That’s based upon the Elgazzar study which is fraudulent hence why there’s an expression of concern. Bryant had publicly disowned the study & IVM. Cochrane is gold standard https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@GoRaiyan @JohnBoweActor The science says it doesn’t work. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@libsmakenosense @ccar0405 @AJFKDemocrat It doesn’t work. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@VechainArmy @TerryMugnier @fabiencergy @france_soir Une source fiable : https://t.co/TeY9M8gsSI

@thebigwave11 @Mivo68 @richardursomd Double blind randomized. Here they analyze all the major ones that aren't fraudulent: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@ALooterContinua @Mivo68 @richardursomd This may help: https://t.co/ufrpoOXCNm… https://t.co/ch72usknEp… https://t.co/1ibtoK0AJD… https://t.co/DBgRSGdJ2w… https://t.co/2uhsFrixOg https://t.co/emDjUi8Ird https://t.co/4D6voWE227 https://t.co/cersrNFGTi https

@rick43pen @FlavioCadegiani https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@Harper__Flynn @FlavioCadegiani Uh, no. It's a joke of a study. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@Go_BullDawgs @FlavioCadegiani Literally the worst executed research to date. Cochrane didn't even consider it in their review of literature. For good reason. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@Indiagirl99 @AJFKDemocrat Anecdote is not data, poppet. We know IVM doesn’t work. Science not stories. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@L33YOUK @JohnBoweActor Actual science. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@L33YOUK @tracyjayney64 @JohnBoweActor https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4

@krsmckenna @sfchronicle No, they would not. Every review of studies that removes the bogus ones shows it's useless. https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 There's literally no exception. https://t.co/omeXonqEAq And the largest trial to-date was just released: https:/

@JGisSatoshi @sbhank @drdrew That's simply false. It's how the FLCCC liars pull their BS but including all the bogus and retracted studies. Here are two excellent summaries of the literature to-date EXCLUDING the fake sh1t: https://t.co/omeXonqEAq And fr

@AdamKaraNO @mikestockmusic A couple more btw: Vaccines show the same efficacy everywhere around the globe based on age & rates: https://t.co/2H3LI1sf2F Ivermectin is useless https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 Really useless once you ditch the bogus FLCCC toute

@howienudet @Bamabeast256 @lisasalright @jbizzy6969 @VitalisSigna @KleeOntheRight @the_lorean @rksais1 @JoeyDrew10 @JamesLauder12 @ShellyRKirchoff @Mike44502881 @Krensharpaw @CarlBotha2 @TrumpLOST5 @JAlan21813286 @RogerRa09234150 @Flaffenbam @2_drac @Hunte

@appyman @AndyPan03390600 @MyPillsStore1 @petercfc2010 @GBNEWS No. It hasn’t. https://t.co/X34wdGYVxC

@danbots247 @Cliveja03988823 @BareReality @GBNEWS @EstherMcVey1 @PhilipDaviesUK No. It doesnt. https://t.co/SBNh4jiqHH

@danbots247 @Cliveja03988823 @BareReality @GBNEWS @EstherMcVey1 @PhilipDaviesUK Not nonsense. https://t.co/SBNh4jiqHH

@techwoods52 @ThevoiceAlexa @jonzy0322 https://t.co/diFrM9QZwq

@DrMarcoEF @doc_BLocke @nickmmark No, you just feel for obvious disinformation from ivmmeta, when you don't have even a basic understanding of the statistics needed in this topic. https://t.co/xBZStjSirJ https://t.co/sLyR0qyMZl https://t.co/9M8djQcme2 ht

@DeanyWinchy @DrNeilStone https://t.co/ufrpoOXCNm… https://t.co/ch72usknEp… https://t.co/1ibtoK0AJD… https://t.co/DBgRSGdJ2w… https://t.co/2uhsFrixOg https://t.co/emDjUi8Ird https://t.co/4D6voWE227 https://t.co/cersrNFGTi https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@JennyLStamm @AngryFleas @GeorgePapa19 No, it's not buried. No, there isn't a lot of evidence. At all. Summaries of the state of knowledge (Cochrane is the well regarded global health education non-profit): https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/J9bODcYeV6

@toddm92 @AlastairMcA30 Stop trolling. 🙄 https://t.co/xBZStjSirJ https://t.co/sLyR0qyMZl https://t.co/9M8djQcme2 https://t.co/zb4TicYfsr https://t.co/ty49vkgTld https://t.co/YGSCnMWmp4

@Treeps3 @Puppieskitts @TamiBone @judysimpson222 @StevenWilson777 @stephen1e4 @Anymous84861064 @BreezerGalway @HeyNurseKat @The_Ouroboros__ @DiamondJimLowe @AdamYoung329 @appyman @BRIANARNOPP @AmaryllisPot @Rolo_Tamasi @johnsgunn @JordanB4815 @SoiferErica

@Treeps3 @judysimpson222 @TamiBone @Puppieskitts @StevenWilson777 @stephen1e4 @Anymous84861064 @BreezerGalway @HeyNurseKat @The_Ouroboros__ @DiamondJimLowe @AdamYoung329 @appyman @BRIANARNOPP @AmaryllisPot @Rolo_Tamasi @johnsgunn @JordanB4815 @SoiferErica

@M1066R @pmcdunnough @BogochIsaac Meta studies often don't have independent funding. Try this one from the very well regarded Cochrane team: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@EstadoDono @JosianaZs 5- Começa a ler mais, quem sabe assim não acredite em qqr mentira que te contam. 😉 https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@asgraziano1 @JosianaZs 5- Agora segue um contra-argumento científico. Tenho mais vários se estiver realmente disposta a ler. 😘 https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@NoirRain2 @JosianaZs 3- Esse "maravilhoso estudo" postado por ela usou métodos, variáveis e grupo de intervenção errado. 4- E ainda foi publicado com um "erro de digitação" na Figura 2 e ela postando como se fosse grande informação. 5- Vamos a algo real

@BoldriniBonomo @JosianaZs 3- Esse "maravilhoso estudo" postado por ela usou métodos, variáveis e grupo de intervenção errado. 4- E ainda foi publicado com um "erro de digitação" na Figura 2 e ela postando como se fosse grande informação. 5- Vamos a info

@MadeLou57 @JosianaZs Esse "maravilhoso estudo" postado por ela usou métodos, variáveis e grupo de intervenção errado. E ainda foi publicado com um "erro de digitação" na Figura 2 e vc realmente acha que é um link com muita informação. 😂🤣😂 Piada? Toma info

@marioqm @petricor1970 https://t.co/VJvjCugnbD

@houseoflight_ @AlanSouzaPinto @Ringo3513 @sens8tionallyLC @border_canadian Again - instead of that chart (based on lies) find ONE double blind clinical trial - the cornerstone of modern medicine - that supports the drug. There are ten major ones this yea

@misabelmelo1 @Bolsonaro7Cris Agora se vc acreditou nas falácias que leu, vai se informar melhor ao invés de pagar de moralista no tt. https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@MARCELOELOY9 @misabelmelo1 @JosianaZs Toma aqui a essência, mas não sei se consegue ler e entender. https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@rodolforosseto @misabelmelo1 @JosianaZs Argumentos tenho vários, mas não vou perder tempo com quem espalha falácias de propósito. Vc quer argumentos? Comece com esses. https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@misabelmelo1 @JosianaZs Mais fácil mesmo, pq é esse nível dela. E não estou aqui para mudar a cabecinha de gente que espalha falácias de propósito. Mas se vc quiser começar a ler estudos fique a vontade, também sei posta-los. https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@Rafinhagds Vamos começar. Eu começo daqui te mostrando não é eficaz e vc refuta com os seus grandes estudos científicos que supostamente comprovam. Vamos lá. https://t.co/6lJk7DLayf

@AllanicFabian @KnopfFrancois L'ivermectine n'a pas d'effet probant contre le COVID. https://t.co/eoSNEOo1W7 Et puis je croyais que le médicament qu'on avait depuis le début c'était l'hydroxycloroquine ?

@Ringo3513 @houseoflight_ @sens8tionallyLC @border_canadian I have the same job (scary). The "thousands of studies" is just nonsense. See these three independent reviews: https://t.co/omeXonqEAq https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 This doesn't even include the last

@houseoflight_ @Ringo3513 @sens8tionallyLC @border_canadian No, all ten large RCTs in 2022 show the same thing. It's not a narrative. It's double blind clinical trials. Happy to share all of them with you. Only grifters selling it at this point. https://t

@insins31544458 @ivanrioufol En tout cas aucune étude ne démontre son efficacité…. https://t.co/4MTzPrr9by. Au bout d’un moment …

@barratt_ash @presDonldSkroob @beeljo @IdeahAgency @TomFitton Here, for your reading pleasure, is an unbiased review with critical appraisal of included studies: https://t.co/iK8grfsM3C

@CDisco5 Tess Lawrie is a grifting shyster, preying on the gullible and vulnerable. No evidence ivermectin is effective. https://t.co/QG88pmbNgL

@roxslater @LeannePergel @thesalariedGP @Crypto_Nyte @EmergMedDr @DrHoenderkamp Yeah, ivermectin is not a recognised or proven treatment for Covid 19. https://t.co/7Fxd8EDRwu

@maddoxrules @thebradfordfile Please stop lying, stupid people might believe you and that would be sad. https://t.co/rO3cjBo22Y

RT @S96405539: 【補足】参考までに、“イベルメクチンの新型コロナウイルス感染症に対する安全性/有効性”に関して現時点で得られる最良のエビデンスの一つは、コクランレビューでしょう。 医師であれば、このエビデンスを踏まえた上で患者さんへ治療法や予防法を提案する必要が…

@JohnnyBravo8532 @IdeahAgency @TomFitton Read the systematic review from Cochrane. It critically appraises the evidence from studies of Ivermectin and Covid. There is not good evidence to support it and it is dangerous to try to convince others that it an

@Jbrdm1 @JonathanRueb If you're a non-expert who claims what ivmmeta says is compelling, yet almost all the informed experts say otherwise, then it's probably because the experts know stuff that you don't. Ivermectin doesn't work; ivmmeta is nonsense. ht

@DavidCu87627414 @JohnBoweActor @NewstalkFM @nurseforethics @Iobey10 @MRobertsQLD @SaraHaboubi1 @SeivwrightTrudy @AndersonAfDMdEP @GBNEWS @CristianTerhes Do you know what a Cochrane Review is? You should find out and read one. https://t.co/RF2zAhnX48

@Jbrdm1 @GidMK ivmmeta is a long-debunked disinformation website, akin to vaccine denialist blogs that falsely claimed to have studies showing MMR vaccination caused autism. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://

@FreeMIN24465256 @Laurentpiot1 @kekiliacecile38 @insins31544458 @Luc60730 @DIVIZIO1 https://t.co/F1W3zt1sbG

@FreeMIN24465256 @Laurentpiot1 @insins31544458 @Luc60730 @kekiliacecile38 @DIVIZIO1 bah non, aucune étude n'a réussi a prouvé un gain mortalité traitement covid en hospi et le bilan est negatif en prevention https://t.co/F1W3zt1sbG

@FiliaVeritas @HEW12345678 @veen_els Maar hier dan een meta analyse van cochrane https://t.co/pxB5pbGT1k Ziet er ook niet al te best uit wel?