@crpkchan @LindsayPinkerto @lindahmullen @Interior_Health Relies on retracted and bogus studies. It doesn't work. ALL the large RCTs had the same conclusion. https://t.co/fKmolWVEZV
@crpkchan @LindsayPinkerto @lindahmullen @Interior_Health Twelve RCTs this year. All large. All show no benefit. Those older papers relied on so many bogus and retracted studies. And were written by IVT funded authors! Infinitely better analysis at these:
@TilburyCody @gwkrause1968 @dericklehmann @JamieSale Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. I tend to block those I view as being incapable of rational or respectful dialogue. https://t.co/227rDZXbZp
@GiuseppeCasey @Licdenf Jouer avec ces affirmations pour la mort d'un enfant, ce n'est pas la honte qui vous étouffe. Comment faut-il vous expliquer que ni l'un ni l'autre ne sont efficaces contre le Covid et qu'ils peuvent du coup même être dangereux comm
@Liveitup331 @Kazimir1021 @DepressedTMLFan @DecentFiJC @SevanGrim @oneunderscore__ The NIH is conducting a phase 3 trial with IVM, but we don’t even need it, because every major trial to date has shown no effect re: COVID. But you bozos will cling to the h
RT @MartinMendoza27: @Chertorivski A ver baboso! yo te doy estadísticas (las obtuve en 5 min) TU SOLO DAS TACOS DE LENGUA MAL HECHOS 👇 no e…
@Chertorivski A ver baboso! yo te doy estadísticas (las obtuve en 5 min) TU SOLO DAS TACOS DE LENGUA MAL HECHOS 👇 no entiendes los efectos de una PANDEMIA, además NO SE HA DEMOSTRADO EFICACIA ALGUNA DE LA IVERMECTINA vs COVID (😆imbécil). https://t.co/66g
@SoulReaperFPS @jeanjacoboski1 @Isa_mendoonca @giacominiiii Artigo CIENTÍFICO publicado em 2022 desmento essa mentira que você publicou! https://t.co/VM5d2l93Ox Se ele tivesse prezado pela vida das pessoas E estimulasse o uso de máscaras ao menos 400mil
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
@Andros1freedom @JohnBoweActor @TheRubicon7 It’s not one side of the fence. Those are facts supported by multiple clinical trials. We KNOW ivermectin doesn’t work. https://t.co/X34wdGYVxC
@sineadggleeson @naturaltosmile @JohnBoweActor 26 years of nursing. Including 13 in critical care. Throughout the pandemic. Don't you dare. Passionate about something I don't have any experience of? https://t.co/HQBbIKwZ9e
@naturaltosmile @JohnBoweActor Not. For. The. Treatment. Of. Covid. https://t.co/HQBbIKP8nm NO EVIDENCE AT ALL.
@nx2nao @tommytommy0924 @hanakihideaki その研究で信頼できるデータをまとめてメタ解析をして、結果有意差があるのかないのか、っていうのはすでにやっています。 今のデータでは効くとは言えないのが結論です。 効かないという結果だけを信用してるわけではないです。 すでに総合的に判断されてる。 https://t.co/GzhOewsTIj
@jhstrx90 @filbodge @TheFreds INvermechtin hasn’t been proven to work.Anywhere..it’s a good idea to do decent recent research.why would an anti-parasitic work on a virus?that’s like saying anti biopics work on a virus Try again https://t.co/r5WL9GGPeU ht
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
RT @bar1star: @hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn…
@hanakihideaki 日本の結果がすべてとは言っておりません。 むしろ2021年7月時点のコクランレビューで実臨床使用を支持していないhttps://t.co/oeUaqFO3Ru中、直近でもブラジルやhttps://t.co/6blhZOn9XYマレーシアのハイリスク者対象https://t.co/aPHZ4Tj8YXのRCTでもnegativeであったことを踏まえて申しております。
@MaggieW82391432 @Elle_Ham06 Science would like a word https://t.co/w3oxQ2730j https://t.co/T2kiXQwk5Q
@MedSciPatriot @SMooreesq @RenoDrew @kdlaw @AliNeitzelMD @CAgovernor @Evan_Low @DrPanMD @CMAdocs @NLFD_org @TheFSMB I know what is being tested and I know that people have been ingesting ivermectin despite it not being approved as a treatment for COVID-19
@Kay09387221 @mjtimber2 ivmmeta / c19ivermectin are garbage websites peddling disinformation. Not that you honestly care about facts. https://t.co/YqxsHgUY0L https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd
@RepGosar We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection! https://t.co/mJQ7Dgn4Ea
@Krypto_Kash @Andyging @Lewis_Brackpool Oh? Where? Not this one that says the opposite. https://t.co/KaVVLelcvN
@MRobertsQLD Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. https://t.co/RxkBolI9PB
@insins31544458 @FrancoiDucrocq De l'ivermectine ? Qu'aucune étude scientifique sérieuse n'a montré son efficacité pour soigner le Covid. https://t.co/5kR2Mozbq4
@RepGosar @joekent16jan19 Like many drugs ivermectin works in conjunction with other drugs (zinc, vitmans C & D, HCQ) to lessen symptoms early in C-19 infection, not just by itself. Here are two papers https://t.co/yXNvU56JO1, https://t.co/KhPlB4MjOd
RT @BartenEM: Maar ALS het zou werken, dan is het nog steeds goedkoper dan een IC-opname. Klopt. Maar dat doet het niet. Net als op talloze…
@brothy07 @pauljheywood @mrjamesob @GaryLineker Ivermectin? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣https://t.co/UEPWG7GPH1
@RhetoricalGirl0 @DonnieV23 @DCGreenZone @JasonPerryNTD @news_ntd I read the scientific papers. Maybe you should try it. Now present evidence or bore off. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4
@AnonJ68 @Alton11421134 @DonnieV23 @Cycle4Exercise @JasonPerryNTD @news_ntd We KNOW it doesn’t work. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4
@AnonJ68 @DonnieV23 @Cycle4Exercise @JasonPerryNTD @news_ntd I don’t look at the MSM for science. I read the scientific papers themselves. There are zero robust trials showing any efficacy for covid. We know it does not work. https://t.co/X34wdGHkG4
@REVMikeMenkes @hollyshansen Oh cool, all the bogus studies conveniently consolidated for us by an organization supported by the drug's manufacturer! Neat! Perhaps come to terms with falsehoods and turn to some objective sources: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9
@jipseeblue @reacharoundu @catherine___c Oh dear me. You can’t be serious. Have you actually read this document? I’d expect better from uni students. Have a read of this: https://t.co/Fd2VYh7XP7
@mentju4 @past_is_future @gorskon You didn't address the question, again illustrating you're bad at debate. So: Why'd you fall for ivmmeta so easily? It's nonsense. https://t.co/MfJa7Zfcc0 https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M
@mentju4 @past_is_future @gorskon Why'd you fall for ivmmeta so easily? It's a trash website, as is obvious now and was obvious a year ago. https://t.co/5xdMtFmynA https://t.co/9pwYYA1e7D https://t.co/no9Heorpwc https://t.co/UG87GnpVur
@JohnLazd @patmanp1 @skell_thomas @stv_fx @MaxDelvallee https://t.co/kyRk6oX3qF https://t.co/iFYcZnsqM3 Personnellement toutes les méta analyse que je peut lire montre que les résultats ne sont jamais significative pour l'ivermectine. La seule probante es
@NoMandatesOz @tnicholsmd @unhealthytruth Start here I would suggest: https://t.co/omeXonINOy https://t.co/5z79dprkz9
@Service2power1 @PSUFAN07 @DonaldJTrumpJr https://t.co/U0b410kTqP these others say it doesnt do squat, as do the others that peer reviewed the paper.
@BarnettforAZ @AP Why? She's not a horse in need of deworming! https://t.co/xnLeJaMAoq
@jeffreyatucker What about actual studies? https://t.co/QbwWT5FuWM
@caz_sampson @tedthepyrenean @ClareCraigPath @P_McCulloughMD The title says indicates otherwise! https://t.co/FDGYkWVuJ8
@tedthepyrenean @Oldketchup @ClareCraigPath We all really wanted it to work. IVM is cheap, widely available (including in LMIC) and has a good side effect profile. Sadly now multiple studies have failed to show it is effective. Here is most recent Cochrane
@SassyWitfield Or here (you know - presenting facts - your kryptonite): https://t.co/5z79dprkz9
Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID-19? #hllnyorku https://t.co/zcGSOPgDTb
@AHarrisonHome https://t.co/nXRhEgC6dj This is the one I mentioned in one of my other replies. There are many others.
@Remithatbeast @mel_brenner @JustinTrudeau No, I stand with scientists that sued the FDA for expedited release of Covid-19 clinical trial data. I believe transparency is important esp in matters of Public Health. And for anyone who cares about what has bee
@Bartek19953 @kowajan65 @SebRoss4 https://t.co/LXQHCOKC95 O patrz, badania rok później. Przeczytaj wnioski.
@iambackagain21 @jonatho84952843 @njonesspelly @RehabilitatedB3 @Nat_the_twat_ @LeilaniDowding @ickonic Tested on >40,000 people. https://t.co/R3F0ePuw0x Ivermectins efficacy data suggests it isnt effective. https://t.co/SBNh4jhSS9
@HELLMNOP @HxLL_Monk @DocDeezWhat @ChadRickard First paragraph!! https://t.co/uicawtwyar
@CongasMaracas @DCratie @Nathan27400 @ChrisCottonStat @cavousf5 - l'article cite "la Collaboration Cochrane publiée en juillet 2021" https://t.co/peu7rBr6iU lui faisant affirmer qu'il y'a une absence d'effets positif pour l'Invermectine, c'est faux, ses co
@mentju4 @TheEthanIverson @gorskon @Baric_Lab @PeterDaszak Bye again, gullible, paranoid, + disingenuous troll. I'm sure you'll continue to peddle your ill-informed conspiracist nonsense on topics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, lab leak, etc., while
@mentju4 @TheEthanIverson @gorskon @Baric_Lab @PeterDaszak It's like trying to correct a gullible brick wall that lacks the integrity + intellect needed to honestly engage evidence. Such a lost cause. 🙄 https://t.co/5vDW1OlPXC https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt ht
@thebadstats @mentju4 @su3su2u1 @PierreKory Especially bad for the non-experts who were gullible enough to fall for trash like ivmmeta, even after numerous experts warned them. https://t.co/MfJa7ZfK1y https://t.co/YqxsHgUY0L https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https
RT @BartenEM: Maar ALS het zou werken, dan is het nog steeds goedkoper dan een IC-opname. Klopt. Maar dat doet het niet. Net als op talloze…
Maar ALS het zou werken, dan is het nog steeds goedkoper dan een IC-opname. Klopt. Maar dat doet het niet. Net als op talloze andere eindpunten. Nog één keer dan, voor de allerlaatste keer: ivermectine heeft geen rol in de behandeling van C19 👇 8/8 http
@Hannah74E @notMrFarmer @InCytometry @JamesNite9 @thecoastguy More lies. Neither of those compounds work to reduce the severity of a Covid-19 infection. And there are no 'nano particles' https://t.co/43YEFUEBa2 https://t.co/xomDXXuoV3
@TomParedis @crevits @torhout Nope. En hier is het bewijs. Geen YouTube filmpje met wat valse claims. https://t.co/8pxxXrSbxe
RT @hindmost_: @BadMedicalTakes <Narrator> In reality the available evidence is that Ivermectin has no beneficial effects for people with C…
@BadMedicalTakes <Narrator> In reality the available evidence is that Ivermectin has no beneficial effects for people with Covid 19 </Narrator> https://t.co/UpkHClv0tu https://t.co/h3gNS0puXV
@YourAntiChri5t @Imwalkinere @PhillipElder8 @drsimonegold You're profoundly idiotic if you do not believe nor understand the term off-label. This study says it can not be excluded nor confirmed. Hence it needs more research. Which is more recent than yo
@dataOverFear1 @MattHancock Thereve been several "proper" trials. There are more ongoing. No evidence of efficacy. https://t.co/SBNh4jhSS9 First you claim its effective. Then you claim its being used. Now youre backtracking quickly.
@team_toucan01 https://t.co/OyEOmQMiLa Systematische review van Cochrane
@fabiostrusi @ColinBoos Excuses, dit was de review van 2021. Hier de update van 2022. https://t.co/OyEOmQMiLa
@fabiostrusi @ColinBoos Ik heb hier een prachtige systematische review waarin alle beschikbare onderzoeken over de werkzaamheid geanalyseerd zijn. Conclusie; er is geen bewijs gevonden dat Ivermectine werkt tegen covid. Kun jij onderbouwen waarom het vol
@psonners @Marqrk1 @GidMK There's a reason you don't link folks to the source of your image; stop trying to deceive people with trash from ivmmeta. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/xBZStjAHAb https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t
@solid2gas @kramer_maira @madsnippetss @LeslynLewis 🤣🤣Sorry the New England Journal of Medicine. One of the most prestigious medical journals around is not good enough for you? Well how about The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Considered the gol
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…
@RogezVeronique C’est peut être parce que vous prescrivez un traitement dont l’efficacité laisse à désirer … https://t.co/BJlAXAqgya qui sait ?
@PierreMarionnet Euh … that’s all folks ca signifie quoi au juste ?? https://t.co/BJlAXAqgya
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…
@GamingTruths @ElleC64127408 @EdEdgeMusic No, I'm talking about the Doctors who submitted research articles to the National Institute of Health showing the benefits of it & seeking additional trials to see if it can help. See the link for additional re
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…
RT @MaxPowerRocks: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed Authors conclusion “Overall, the reliable evidence available d…