@rig_s13 @ClaudeSteve6 @lety75014 Tout les autres disent que les effets st inexistant voir dangereux (11 essaies) https://t.co/4VW3EZ2HsY
@applegat14 @RogueTr51010193 @NSWHealth @OdyseeTeam Also for some non biased info collected for your benefit. It’s in plain English and scientific. This is a collection of all trials going and on going and is updated regularly. https://t.co/WbsYKgwVZZ
@SuryaFaridaa @MinnesotaDFL Even Cochrane now: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9
RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…
RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…
RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…
RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…
My family are laughing at you. Different age groups and comorbidities. All received the same fda approved Ivermectin with other fda approved medicines. Symptoms didn't get worse and no hospitalization Stay away from covid cult doctors like you
ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” https://t.co/tt9VAz6A7q
@fcktyranny2 @alienmotives At least 12 quality, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled studies -- 9 since the beginning of this year -- indicate ivermectin is devoid of meaningful activity against COVID. Here are just two of many meta-analyses of RCTs
@DD59170 @HomoSap60422481 @qo_ideme6 En effet mieux vaut s'informer des des revues scientifiques. Lesquelles, par exemple ? La Cochrane n'est pas de cet avis. https://t.co/PZHDWu2PWe
RT @DrSergioRalon: @molinaret Cochrane presenta la mejor evidencia basada en en meta análisis. Pueden pasar a leer Se los dejo en españo…
@molinaret Cochrane presenta la mejor evidencia basada en en meta análisis. Pueden pasar a leer Se los dejo en español. https://t.co/Kw6GPY7qhZ
@rn_abrahamsen @Silje_Schevig @CiViX Det har vært forsket på ivemektin siden tidlig i 2020, men ingen studier av kvalitet viser noe resultat av preparatet mot Covid-19. https://t.co/ynqeV9ZxFB
@highbrow_nobrow @TheWarMonitor https://t.co/41Hesfguyd study’s still ongoing as results have varied widely. Trust the science, right?
@BrandonMJ514 @SamRoberge08 @ArponBasu Reality: of trials that had any scientific integrity and weren’t just made up, no evidence for any benefit. https://t.co/3ovNYzKcLE
@currie27 @MGeschwind @ArponBasu It is great for your crusted scabies! But there is zero evidence it does anything for COVID. https://t.co/3ovNYzKcLE
@molsjames @JReinerMD @PeterHotez @EricTopol @JonathanSarfat1 @TigerlillySusan In this conversation the data shows ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https:/
@nickmmark @BillyCarruther3 @mark_melbin @SkyNewsAust @Leo_Puglisi6 @jimmy_dore @mtaibbi @ggreenwald @joerogan @maddow For Dore's gullible fans: Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamet
@uPdy5n4VyG60EMv @S5sX2LyITzsu7tk Cochrane Reviewの結論は We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/MObhidYnU2
@GRosethefirst @allangmiller1 @microbiomeandme @sebpowell @apsmunro 2 results weren't actually RCTs. In any event, these people did it much better than I could ever do. Disclaimer: I'm a very out-of practice biochemist, and don't work in the field. Doesn't
@Leviathan_100 @mulletron60 @The_Ouroboros__ @Therappinghand @Yarabibi123 @NicolaSims1966 @TheFreds Tess Lawrie 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Shame her meta was based on fraudulent data. Let’s try something unbiased https:
@LionDuNet https://t.co/FJMBWqHZHv Très efficace en effet ! T'as raté médecine et c'est ta façon de corriger le tir ? C'est minable, assume juste que tu es lissencéphale et incapable de mener un raisonnement accessible à un chimpanzé 😬
@ConstantRebel55 @molsjames @JReinerMD @PeterHotez @EricTopol Yup. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/S
@Mr_NoTyrants @RupertPupkin895 @PhillyPharmaBoy @real_seeking @DocDeezWhat @max____headroom @InRainbows182 @curmudgeon_red @SomeSis1 @Resistenzanow @cryptofailsafe @pelleggi2 @Trumpbangskids there are many studies, at best conflicting, the top link conclud
@CedricSacced @LapiGreg @BigSuis @worldfflyer @MMeBlackSheep Donc je t'en prie, envoie cette étude. Je n'ai pas lu ça étrangement... https://t.co/PZHDWu2PWe
@insins31544458 @JeanLo17459216 @clement_helart @HoSinopeus @ChrisCottonStat ? Mais vous balancez un blog pourri sans preuve qui demande de l'argent pour des fausses victimes... On vous demande de la rigueur, des études. Aucune aujourd'hui ne montre quoi q
@tmoneybrown @dafwoyz @nickmmark @jimmy_dore Cochrane is the gold standard for medicine. Here's what they have to say. https://t.co/NEE4DGiHyf
@realnikohouse @nickmmark @jimmy_dore How is it debunked? https://t.co/NEE4DGiHyf
@covideuskal Yo no me creería todo lo que se escribe por ahí. No entraré en detalles pero, hasta donde yo sé, no hay evidencia científica de que la ivermectina tenga ningún efecto en el tratamiento de pacientes COVID. https://t.co/odvSaUHTVg
@RobertFritzenk1 @TaoOfCats @real_seeking @NPR Try a credible source. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.c
@JosephLemire198 @nadineridorossi @RenaudClaudia @steeeve27 Y'a d'autres études qui disent le contraire aussi mais tu as déjà démontré ta difficulté à comprendre un article scientifique alors je t'envoie un petit lien facile à comprendre. https://t.co/m7Ft
@USMCC3maw @Hashgraphian @jmray60 I'm quite aware. I've done research on the matter. The fact is that MOST people who got Covid didn't die whether they took Ivermectin or not. Stories are shit compared to actual scientific data. https://t.co/AN5eBF8pzE
@bestbadideas @ctvwinnipeg The Lancet? Same Lancet that had to retract a bogus hydroxychloroquine article? They're part of the problem. But this isn't about Ivermectin. It's about freedom of physician/patient relationship. https://t.co/wqyXR4gHWl
@catlyn777 @RussianDisinf0 @WSJ I hate Trump too dude, but even a broken clock is right twice day. Ivermectin was clearly at least somewhat effective at treating Covid https://t.co/NfLbxGAqJM
@NeilochGaming @TheRadicalProle @RageMichelle @Walgreens Oh look, Ivermectin helped ease symptoms. What now? 🙄 https://t.co/E8LOlBzlJH
@CulinaryOasis79 @real_seeking @SJ_18757 @SEH20203 @MollyBoHa @juliastmi Press pieces aren't evidence, troll. 🙂 Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t
@real_seeking @mrudolph22 @ImplicitNorm @RpsAgainstTrump False. The data shows ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [ht
@Ruggs4Liberty @billy915 @SallyMayweather Well here's the actual paper on the subject and the 41 studies they did. They seem to have reached a different conclusion https://t.co/Sx7PBFeOTd
@Cetotherium @PettDanFTW @flockofwords @sharanvkaur Here's the education you lack, Dan — https://t.co/o9SdPJs7L2 https://t.co/0lol0HGuGG
@pete_artist @AnnastaciaMP @TheEkka @qldhealth @YvetteDAth because neither of those work unless you have scabies or Plasmodium vivax (as far as i know P. falciparum is mostly resistant?) or Lupus … a lot of things really, but not COVID https://t.co/1tmHI
@mtntallpaul @JoshW65280673 @BingoMontoya @BlueLinePhilly @MurrayChadwick2 @Briansa79884138 @lukebroadwater @alanfeuer Scabies, head lice, etc. are not SARS-CoV-2. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlik
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @real_seeking @FillmoreWhite @opedaily @plenalibertad2 @Coyotl2021 @more_unicorns_g The burden of evidence is on you si…
@real_seeking @FillmoreWhite @opedaily @plenalibertad2 @Coyotl2021 @more_unicorns_g The burden of evidence is on you since ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXViJwLU
@AprilHunter @Cccsjb @RWNJ_ Interesting. It's one study but it does draw different conclusions. This one from the related studies links was not so optimistic. https://t.co/Tn4zBv1d60
@HonestAttemptCT @NPR Yes, off-label uses do exist for drugs! However you should re-evaluate the "quality" of your "studies" https://t.co/rP1bCnkCYL "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 in
@katharina_munz @TimEng2003 Hierzu mal ne Metastudie zur Horizonterweiterung falls dir das ein Begriff ist: https://t.co/r8h5KRGbeq falls dir das zu kompliziert ist oder du sonst noch nie ein Paper gelesen hast empfehle ich dir den so genannten „Abstract“
@insins31544458 @Bacchuche @moky52 ton article n'est pas une étude. Je veux voir l'étude ! Par contre a la meme période j'ai ça : https://t.co/NnZfN3ErE9 "Ivermectin compared to placebo or usual care may make little or no difference to improving patients'
@PurificatoZ @CarineCarion @mbompard Une revue sur l'ivermectine : https://t.co/NnZfN3ErE9 "Ivermectin compared to placebo or usual care may make little or no difference to improving patients' condition"
@mentat_the @PRGuy17 @AjaxXanthe @andojc @aussiedub Why don't you read the best evidence to date? https://t.co/IIgYq7i2pH
@LizMuniz1972 @rahmdphd @celticgem1776 @DukeLeBout @Max166702 @JoeBiden Find an actual treatment clinical trial. C'mon, you can do it! Just so you know, this was basically the only paper on which those idiots based their whole protocol. And it's shitty.
@thistle1176 @2020EASP @rice0494 @Papaschase2 @Scribulatora @TheGentYYC Here’s a couple just to get you started. It is still uncertain if IM will prove useful. But most studies show no benefit at this time. https://t.co/4mXr0MhuXW. https://t.co/KyetS8WFI0
@papanours60 Étude datée de 2020, pourquoi la publier aujourd'hui ? Les données à jour, dans des environnements mieux contrôlés n'ont pas montré d'effet probant de l'ivermectine contre le Covid-19 : https://t.co/sjcduBa0a7 https://t.co/bOmm8EAYrw
@FPlaie @IgorDEDIC1 @papanours60 Aucune étude fiable n’a démontré l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Densepistrophei @Frances27916780 @mad_ama_dore @DartNose @ProfCampagna Veramente tutti gli studi hanno dimostrato l'inutilità sia dell'ivermectina che della vitamina D. https://t.co/Kcy2k8n0ll
RT @drkalai61: COVID-19 guidelines citing Malaysia’s I-TECH findings @ICR_NIH @KKMPutrajaya #COCHRANE: Is #ivermectin effective for COVID-…
RT @drkalai61: COVID-19 guidelines citing Malaysia’s I-TECH findings @ICR_NIH @KKMPutrajaya #COCHRANE: Is #ivermectin effective for COVID-…
RT @drkalai61: COVID-19 guidelines citing Malaysia’s I-TECH findings @ICR_NIH @KKMPutrajaya #COCHRANE: Is #ivermectin effective for COVID-…
RT @drkalai61: COVID-19 guidelines citing Malaysia’s I-TECH findings @ICR_NIH @KKMPutrajaya #COCHRANE: Is #ivermectin effective for COVID-…
COVID-19 guidelines citing Malaysia’s I-TECH findings @ICR_NIH @KKMPutrajaya #COCHRANE: Is #ivermectin effective for COVID-19? Found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating #COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection https://t.co/mN0frH
@real_seeking @WhySoCeasarian @dancingfun @lookveld1970 Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu]
RT @AlastairMcA30: @BretWeinstein @thebadstats Trials have been done, Bret. Meta-analysis from Cochrane (and others) also done. No evidence…
Here are links to give to any chud that is still on the horse paste meta of mid-late 2021 when abortion medication (misoprostol and mifepristone) enter the discussion. Making the latter 2 available OTC should be done because they work, unlike IVM. It's not
RT @AlastairMcA30: @BretWeinstein @thebadstats Trials have been done, Bret. Meta-analysis from Cochrane (and others) also done. No evidence…
RT @AlastairMcA30: @BretWeinstein @thebadstats Trials have been done, Bret. Meta-analysis from Cochrane (and others) also done. No evidence…
@BenignBrodwicz @JessMissingLink Wrong, your Ivermectin site is not peer-reviewed. Ivermectin (not IVM) failed meta-analysis of legitimate clinical trials for COVID-19 patients. See Cochrane Review's updated paper: https://t.co/blI8Io924q
@BretWeinstein @thebadstats Trials have been done, Bret. Meta-analysis from Cochrane (and others) also done. No evidence of benefit. Time to be intellectually honest and admit it. https://t.co/VCvnK2Hp0w https://t.co/kuH1EL50MH https://t.co/JFzgH02BZa
次は「外来加療患者では有効なんだ!😡」ってきそうだし2021のSystematic Reviews貼っとくか 'the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.' https://t.co/Lrb6n1FUr1
@AlastairMcA30 @profnfenton @GidMK @AviBittMD Make that at least 5 meta-analyses that excluded Elgazzar, Niaee, Hashim, + Okumus, or have them at higher risk of bias. https://t.co/g51F78jpKx Hill 2022 (Hill 2021 was retracted): https://t.co/7BwmA975nY h
@Steele_Ink @truthseek33 * Nobel Peace Prize* It doesn’t work for covid. https://t.co/lnewk4R5Et
@GottignyMartine @HeleneSchild Si vous sous-entendez que l'ivermectine sert à soigner le covid vous faites fausse route source : https://t.co/S6FiOqM0MA, PS: la librairie cochrane est la référence en ce qui concerne les traitements pharmaceutiques.
@larschristens @SamolejJ @Bigsmiffy438 @profnfenton @DrSusanOliver1 @GidMK @K_Sheldrick 1) It was more than one study; it's *at least* Niaee et al. and Elgazzar et al. https://t.co/YGGejGTCGl 2) Removing those studies changes the conclusion. https://t.c
@TheSpaniard14 @SteveMazzie @kdkseven @danaturalleague @jenny2x4 It doesn’t work. https://t.co/lnewk4R5Et
@veroch06 @ptitprince75 @CazMariani @louisfouch3 @BanounHelene @EChabriere @MartinZ_uncut @GabinJean3 @CaudeHenrion allez, cessez vos mensonges svp https://t.co/yT3Y0gTXHz
RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト()伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…
@VanessaManif @Artknow2 @JMDemaison @ManonCantin49 Qu’elles se basent sur des études sérieuses, ensuite on en reparle. Cochrane est LA référence en matière de meta analyse. https://t.co/GYdldk680i
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @TripleAries328 @joshua_chupik @ClayTravis @JonathanSarfat1 In reality, ivermectin produces results co…